Emotion and the Economy of Genre in a Design Presentation

References

• Applegarth, R. (2014). Rhetoric in American anthropology: Gender, genre, and science. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Artemeva, N. (2005). A time to speak, a time to act: A rhetorical genre analysis of a novice engineer’s calculated risk taking. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 19(4), 389–421. doi:10.1177/1050651905278309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artemeva, N. (2008). Toward a unified social theory of genre learning. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 22(2), 160–185. doi:10.1177/1050651907311925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artemeva, N. (2009). Stories of becoming: A study of novice engineers learning genres of their profession. In C. Bazerman, A. Bonini, & D. de Carvalho Figueiredo (Eds.), Genre in a changing world (pp. 158–178). Fort Collins, CO: WAC Clearinghouse.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, M., & Smith, G. (2011). Ethnomethodology and the visual: Practices of looking, visualization, and embodied action. In E. Margolis & L. Pauwels (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of visual research methods (pp. 392–413). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bawarshi, A. (2003). Genre and the invention of the writer: Reconsidering the place of invention in composition. Logan: Utah State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bawarshi, A. S., & Reiff, M. J. (2010). Genre: An introduction to history, theory, research, and pedagogy. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C. (1994). Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 67–86). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Berkenkotter, C. (2001). Genre systems at work DSM-IV and rhetorical recontextualization in psychotherapy paperwork. Written Communication, 18(3), 326–349. doi:10.1177/0741088301018003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dannels, D. (2000). Learning to be professional: Technical classroom discourse, practice, and professional identity construction. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 14(1), 5–37. doi:10.1177/105065190001400101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dannels, D. (2002). Communication across the curriculum and in the disciplines: Speaking in engineering. Communication Education, 51(3), 254–268. doi:10.1080/03634520216513
   Google Scholar
• Dannels, D. (2003). Teaching and learning design presentations in engineering: Contradictions between academic and workplace activity systems. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 17(2), 139–169. doi: 10.1177/1050651902250946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dannels, D. (2009). Features of success in engineering design presentations: A call for relational genre knowledge. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 23(4), 399–427. doi:10.1177/1050651909338790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dieter, G. E., & Schmidt, L. C. (2013). Engineering design (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Driscoll, D. L., & Powell, R. (2016). States, traits, and dispositions: The impact of emotion on writing development and writing transfer across college courses and beyond. Composition Form, 34. Retrieved from http://compositionforum.com/issue/34/
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eubanks, P. (1998). Genre and technical translation: Social, textual, and educational exigence. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 12(1), 50–70. doi:10.1177/1050651998012001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, A. (2008). Pushing the envelope: Expanding the model of RGS theory. In N. Artemeva & A. Freedman (Eds.), Rhetorical genre studies and beyond (pp. 121–142). Winnipeg, MB: Inkshed Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, A., & Medway, P. (1994). Locating genre studies: Antecedents and prospects. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 1–20). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, G., & Lee, A. (2002). Assembling a genre subject. In R. Coe, L. Lingard, & T. Teslenko (Eds.), The rhetoric and ideology of genre (pp. 207–224). Cresswell, NJ Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtyka, F. (2015). Settling in to genre: The social action of emotion in shaping genres. Composition Forum, 31. Retrieved from http://compositionforum.com/issue/31/
   Google Scholar
• Longo, B. (2000). Spurious coin: A history of science, management, and technical writing. Albany: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mallette, J. C. (2017). Writing and women’s retention in engineering. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 31(4), 417–442. doi:10.1177/1050651917713253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. (1994). Genre as social action. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 20–37). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, D. (1979). America by design: Science, technology, and the rise of corporate capitalism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paré, A. (2002). Genre and identity: Individuals, institutions, and ideology. In R. Coe, L. Lingard, & T. Teslenko (Eds.), The rhetoric and ideology of genre (pp. 57–71). Cresswell, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Randazzo, C. (2015). Hearing silence: Toward a mixed-method Approach for studying genres’ exclusionary potential. Composition Forum, 31. Retrieved from http://compositionforum.com/issue/31/
   Google Scholar
• Russell, D. (1997). Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication, 14(4), 504–554. doi:10.1177/0741088397014004004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schryer, C., Lingard, L., & Spafford, M. (2007). Regularized practices: Genres, improvisation, and identity formation in health-care professions. In M. Zachary & C. Thralls (Eds.), Communicative practices in workplaces and the professions: Cultural perspectives on the regulation of discourse and organizations (pp. 21–44). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Schryer, C. F., & Spoel, P. (2005). Genre theory, health-care discourse, and professional identity formation. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 19(3), 249–278. doi:10.1177/1050651905275625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidman, I. (2013). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, B. (2008). The profession of engineering in America. In C. Pursell (Ed.), A companion to american technology (pp. 363–384). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Smagorinsky, P. (2008). The method section as conceptual epicenter in constructing social science research reports. Written Communication, 25(3), 389–411. doi:10.1177/0741088308317815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommers, N., & Saltz, L. (2004). The novice as expert: Writing the freshman year. College Composition and Communication, 56(1), 124–149. doi:10.2307/4140684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2012). Genre and generic labor. In C. Bazerman, C. Dean, J. Early, K. Lunsford, S. Null, P. Rogers, & A. Stansell (Eds.), International advances in writing research: Cultures, places, measures, perspectives on writing (pp. 487–505). Fort Collins, CO: WAC Clearinghouse.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, R., O’Connor, K., Garrison, L., Jocuns, A., & Amos, D. M. (2008). Becoming an engineer: Toward a three dimensional view of engineering learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 355–368. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00984.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tardy, C. (2009). Building genre knowledge. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winsor, D. (2003). Writing power: Communication in an engineering center. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winsor, D. A. (1990). Engineering writing/writing engineering. College Composition and Communication, 41(1), 58–70. doi:10.2307/357883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar