A Collaborative Longitudinal Design for Supporting Writing Pedagogies of STEM Faculty

References

• Anderson, P., Gonyea, R. M., Anson, C., & Paine, C. (2015). The contributions of writing to learning and development: Results from a large-scale multi-institutional study. Research in the Teaching of English, 50(2), 199–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anson, C. M. (2002). The WAC casebook: Scenes for faculty reflection and program Development. (C. M. Anson, Ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anson, C. M., & Dannels, D. (2009). Profiling programs: Formative uses of departmental consultations in the assessment of communication across the curriculum. Across the Disciplines, 6. Retrieved from https://wac.colostate.edu/atd/assessment/anson_dannels.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Beaufort, A. (2007). College writing and beyond: A new framework for university writing instruction. Logan: Utah State University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctt4cgnk0
   Google Scholar
• Belcher, D. D. (2006). English for specific purposes: Teaching to perceived needs and imagined futures in worlds of work, study, and everyday life. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 133–156. doi:10.2307/40264514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitzer, L. F. (1968). The rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1(1), 1–14. doi:10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2
   Google Scholar
• Bizzell, P. (1992). College composition: Initiation into the academic discourse community. In Academic discourse and critical consciousness (pp. 105–128). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctt7zwb7k
   Google Scholar
• Bocchi, J. S. (1991). Forming constructs of audience: Convention, conflict, and conversation. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 5(2), 151–172. doi:10.1177/1050651991005002002
   Google Scholar
• Bohr, D. J., & Rhoades, G. (2014). The WAC glossary project: Facilitating conversations between composition and WID faculty in a unified writing curriculum. Across the Disciplines, 11(11), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Clarence, S., Albertus, L., & Mwambene, L. (2014). Building an evolving method and materials for teaching legal writing in large classes. Higher Education, 67(6), 839–851. doi:10.1007/s10734-013-9707-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad, S., Kitch, W. A., Pfeiffer, T. J., Smith, T. R., & Tocco, J. V. (2015). Students writing for professional practice: A model for collaboration among faculty, practitioners, and writing specialists. Proceedings of the 2015 American Society for Engineering Education Conference, 1–19. doi:10.18260/p.24769
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, S., Pfeiffer, T. J., & Szymoniak, T. (2012). Preparing students for writing in civil engineering practice. Proceedings of the 2012 American Society for Engineering Education Conference (pp. 1–18). Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/21817
   Google Scholar
• Devitt, A. (1993). Generalizing about genre: New conceptions of an old concept. College Composition and Communication, 44(4), 573–586. doi:10.2307/358391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druschke, C. G., Reynolds, N., Morton-Aiken, J., Lofgren, I., Karraker, N. E., McWilliams, S. R., & Ingrid, E. (2018). Better science through rhetoric: A new model and pilot program for training graduate student science writers. Technical Communication Quarterly, 27(2), 175–190. doi:10.1080/10572252.2018.1425735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finelli, C. J., Daly, S. R., & Richardson, K. M. (2014). Bridging the research-to-practice gap: Designing an institutional change plan using local evidence. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 331–361. doi:10.1002/jee.20042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraiberg, S. (2013). Re-assembling technical communication: Mapping out a framework for studying multilingual-multimodal practices in the context of globalization. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22(1), 10–27. doi:10.1080/10572252.2013.735635
   Google Scholar
• Gay, R. (2010). Subverting the subject position: Toward a new discourse about students as writers and engineering students as technical communicators (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/etds/84
   Google Scholar
• Grice, R. (2017). Experience architecture: Drawing principles from life. In L. Potts & M. J. Salvo (Eds.), Rhetoric and experience architecture (pp. 41–56). Anderson, South Carolina: Parlor Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J. (1989). The idea of community in the study of writing. College Composition and Communication, 40(1), 11–22. doi:10.2307/358177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, J. C. (1996). Crossing boundaries: Knowledge, disciplinarities and interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville, Virginia: University Press of Virginia.
   Google Scholar
• Marron, M. G., & Thompson, J. E. (1998). Determining audience for a health sciences writing course. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 28(1), 119–125. doi:10.2190/HPW5-Y4M3-U4PB-7HND
   Google Scholar
• Mathison, M. A. (2019). Sojourning in disciplinary cultures: A case study of teaching writing in engineering. (M. A. Mathison, Ed.). Logan: Utah State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Melonçon, L., & St. Amant, K. (2018). Empirical research in technical and professional communication: A 5-year examination of research methods and a call for research sustainability. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication. doi:10.1177/0047281618764611
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(2), 151–167. doi:10.1080/00335638409383686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirel, B. (1992). Analyzing audiences for software manuals: A survey of instructional needs for “real world tasks.”. Technical Communication Quarterly, 1(1), 13–38. doi:10.1080/10572259209359489
   Google Scholar
• Ochsner, R., & Fowler, J. (2004). Playing devil’s advocate: Evaluating the literature of the WAC/WID movement. Review of Educational Research, 74(2), 117–140. doi:10.3102/00346543074002117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odell, L., Goswami, D., & Herrington, A. J. (1983). The discourse-based interview: A procedure for exploring tacit knowledge of writers in non-academic settings. In P. Mosenthal, L. Tamor, & S. Walmsley (Eds.), Research on writing: Principles and methods (pp. 220–236). New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, J. E. (1992). Audience and rhetoric: An archaeological composition of the discourse community. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Potts, L., & Salvo, M. J. (2017). Introduction. In Rhetoric and experience architecture (pp. 3–16). Anderson, South Carolina: Parlor Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, P. (1998). Writing/disciplinarity: A sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy (1st ed.). Mahwah, New Jersey: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, P. (2004). Tracing process: How texts come into being. In C. Bazerman & P. Prior (Eds.), What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices (pp. 167–200). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. doi:10.4324/9781410609526
   Google Scholar
• Prior, P., & Bilbro, R. (2012). Academic enculturation: Developing literate practices and disciplinary identities. In M. Castelló & C. Donahue (Eds.), University writing: Selves and texts in academic societies (pp. 19–31). doi:10.1163/9781780523873_001
   Google Scholar
• Reave, L. (2004). Technical communication instruction in engineering schools: A survey of top-ranked U.S. and Canadian programs. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 18(4), 452–490. doi:10.1177/1050651904267068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, G., & Miller, C. R. (2018). Classification and its discontents: Making peace with blurred boundaries, open categories, and diffuse disciplines. In R. Malenczyk, S. Miller-Cochran, E. Wardle, & K. B. Yancey (Eds.), Composition, rhetoric, and disciplinarity (pp. 87–110). Logan: Utah State UP.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, D. R. (1997). Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication, 14, 504–554. doi:10.1177/0741088397014004004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serafini, E. J., Lake, J. B., & Long, M. H. (2015). Needs analysis for specialized learner populations: Essential methodological improvements. English for Specific Purposes, 40(October), 11–26. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2015.05.002
   Google Scholar
• Smagorinsky, P. (2008). The method section as conceptual epicenter in social science research reports. Written Communication, 25(3), 389–411. doi:10.1177/0741088308317815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., & Prior, P. (2019). A flat CHAT perspective on transliteracies development. Learning, Culture, and Social Interaction, 11. (online first). doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2004). Four ways to investigate assemblages of texts: Genre sets, systems, repertoires, and ecologies. ACM SIGDOC 2004 Conference Proceedings. NewYork, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1026533.1026560
   Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2015). Toward a typology of activities: Understanding internal contradictions in multiperspectival activities. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 29, 3–35. doi:10.1177/1050651914548277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trellinger, N. M., Jesiek, B. K., Troy, C., Boyd, J., & Essig, R. R. (2016). Engineering faculty on writing: What they think and what they want. Proceedings of the 2016 American Society for Engineering Education Conference (pp. 1–16). Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/26645
   Google Scholar
• Warnock, S. (2009). Methods and results of business college. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 23(1), 83–107. doi:10.1177/2F1050651908324383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warnock, S., Rouse, N., Finnin, C., Linnehan, F., & Dryer, D. (2017). Measuring quality, Evaluating curricular change. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 31(2), 135–167. doi:10.1177/1050651916682286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte, S. (1992). Context, text, intertext: Toward a constructivist semiotic of writing. Written Communication, 9, 237–308. doi:10.1177/0741088392009002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoritomo, J. Y., Turnipseed, N., Cooper, S. L., Elliott, C. M., Gallagher, J. R., Popovics, J. S., … Zilles, J. L. (2018). Examining engineering writing instruction at a large research university through the lens of writing studies. Proceedings of the 2018 American Society for Engineering Education Conference and Exposition (pp. 1–22), Salt Lake City, UT.
   Google Scholar
• Yoritomo, J. Y., Turnipseed, N., Villotti, M. J., Tate, A., Searsmith, K., Perdekamp, M. G., … Zilles, J. L. (2019). A tale of two rubrics: Realigning genre instruction through improved response rubrics in a writing-intensive physics course. Proceedings of the 2019 American Society for Engineering Education Conference and Exposition (pp. 1–20). Tampa, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Zemliansky, P., & Berry, L. (2017). A writing-across-the-curriculum faculty development program: An experience report. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 60(3), 306–316. doi:10.1109/TPC.2017.2702041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar