Examining Methectic Technical Communication in an Urban Planning Comic Book

References

• Alexander, K. (2013). The usability of print and online video instructions. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22(3), 237–259. doi:10.1080/10572252.2013.775628
   Google Scholar
• Alexandrakis, A. (2002). Neoplatonic influences on Eastern iconography. In A. Alexandrakis & N. J. Moutafakis (Eds.), Neoplatonism and Western aesthetics (pp. 75–88). Albany: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Auffarth, C. (2010). The materiality of god’s image: The Olympian Zeus and ancient Christology. In J. N. Bemmer & A. Erskine (Eds.), The gods of ancient Greece: Identities and transformations (pp. 465–480). Edinburgh, Scottland: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Azouz, S. (2015). Amiri Baraka’s participatory and ceremonial theater: From mimesis to methexis. Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism, 29(2), 25–41. doi:10.1353/dtc.2015.0002
   Google Scholar
• Bacha, J. A. (2012). Taxonomies, folksonomies, and semantics: Establishing functional meaning in navigational structures. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 42(3), 249–263. doi:10.2190/TW.42.3.d
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, E. (2015). Materiality, language, and the production of knowledge: Art, subjectivity and indigenous ontology. Cultural Studies Review, 21(2), 101–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batson, M. (2017). SMAPL: A living document. Saint Paul, MN: Frogtown. Retrieved from https://issuu.com/mycdazzle/docs/smapl_issuu
   Google Scholar
• Benston, K. W. (2000). Performing Blackness: Enactments of African American modernism. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Blythe, S., Grabill, J. T., & Riley, K. (2008). Action research and wicked environmental problems: Exploring appropriate roles for researchers in professional communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 22(3), 272–298. doi:10.1177/1050651908315973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourelle, T. (2014). Adapting service-learning into the online technical communication classroom: A framework and model. Technical Communication Quarterly, 23(4), 247–264. doi:10.1080/10572252.2014.941782
   Google Scholar
• Boykin, J. (2019). Filling the gutters: Graphic biographies disrupting dominant narratives of the civil rights movement. Journal of Multimodal Rhetorics, 3(1), 68–85.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, C. (2018). Rhetoric as a posthuman practice. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brunette, M. J., Evia, C., & Thorkelson, N. (2009a). Cheo en ‘Seguridad en las Escaleras’. Lowell, MA: UMASS Lowell and Virginia Tech Pilot Project.
   Google Scholar
• Brunette, M. J., Evia, C., & Thorkelson, N. (2009b). Cheo y Sus Consejeros en ‘Seguridad en los Techos’. Lowell, MA: UMASS Lowell and Virginia Tech Pilot Project.
   Google Scholar
• Buckland, M. (2017a). Document theory. In B. Hjørland & C. Gnoli (Eds.), ISKO encyclopedia of knowledge organization. Retrieved from http://www.isko.org/cyclo/document
   Google Scholar
• Buckland, M. (2017b). Information and society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Card, D. J. (2019). Off-target impacts: Tracing public participation in policy making for agricultural biotechnology. Journal of Business and Technical Communication. doi:10.1177/1050651919874114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinkenbeard, M. J. (2020). A posthuman approach to agency, disability, and technology in social interactions. Technical Communication Quarterly, 29(2), 115–135. doi:10.1080/10572252.2019.1646319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, M. M. (2011). Rhetorical agency as emergent and enacted. College Composition and Communication, 62(3), 573–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilger, B. (2006). Extreme usability and technical communication. In J. B. Scott, B. Longo, & K. V. Wills (Eds.), Critical power tools: Technical communication and cultural studies (pp. 47–69). Albany: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evia, C., & Patriarca, A. (2012). Beyond compliance: Participatory translation of safety communication for Latino construction workers. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(3), 340–367. doi:10.1177/1050651912439697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faris, M. J. (2019). Sex-education comics: Feminist and queer approaches to alternative sex education. Journal of Multimodal Rhetorics, 3(1), 86–114.
   Google Scholar
• Foreman, I. (2011). Uncanny soundscapes: Towards an inoperative acoustic community. Organised Sound, 16(3), 254–271. doi:10.1017/S1355771811000276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frohmann, B. (2004). Documentation redux: Prolegomenon to (another) philosophy of information. Library Trends, 52(3), 387–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabill, J. (2007). Writing community change: Designing technologies for citizen action. New York, NY: Hampton.
   Google Scholar
• Grabill, J. (2010). On being useful: Rhetoric and the work of engagement. In J. M. Ackerman & D. J. Coogan (Eds.), The public work of rhetoric: Citizen-scholars and civic engagement (pp. 193–209). Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grabill, J. T., & Simmons, W. M. (1998). Toward a critical rhetoric of risk communication: Producing citizens and the role of technical communicators. Technical Communication Quarterly, 7(4), 415–441. doi:10.1080/10572259809364640
   Google Scholar
• Halberstam, J., & Livingston, I. (1995). Introduction. In J. Halberstam & I. Livingston (Eds.), Posthuman bodies (pp. 1–19). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hart-Davidson, W. (2013). What are the work patterns of technical communication? In J. Jonson-Eiola & S. A. Selber (Eds.), Solving problems in technical communication (pp. 50–74). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, J. (2009). (Re)appraising the performance of technical communicators from a posthumanist perspective. Technical Communication Quarterly, 19(1), 11–30. doi:10.1080/10572250903372975
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, D. (2007a). Marveling at ‘The Man Called Nova’: Comics as sponsors of multimodal literacy. College Composition and Communication, 59(2), 180–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, D. (2007b). More than words: Comics as a means of teaching multiple literacies. English Journal, 96(3), 19–25. doi:10.2307/30047289
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, D. (2013). Graphic encounters: Comics and the sponsorship of multimodal literacy. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. A., & Johnson, N. R. (2018). Can objects be moral agents? Posthuman praxis in public transportation. In K. R. Moore & D. P. Richards (Eds.), Posthuman praxis in technical communication (pp. 121–140). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. R. (1998). User-centered technology: A rhetorical theory for computers and other mundane artifacts. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kallinikos, J. (1995). The architecture of the invisible: Technology as representation. Organization: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Organization, Theory and Society, 2(1), 117–140. doi:10.1177/135050849521006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashtan, A. (2018). Between pen and pixel: Comics, materiality and the book of the future. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, S. B., & Miller, C. R. (1996). The low-level radioactive waste siting controversy in North Carolina: Toward a rhetorical model of risk communication. In C. G. Herndl & S. C. Brown (Eds.), Green culture: Environmental rhetoric in contemporary America (pp. 111–140). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, L., Young, A., Neimeyer, R., Baker, J., & Barfield, R. (2008). Keeping users at the center: Developing a multimedia interface for informed consent. Technical Communication Quarterly, 17(3), 335–357. doi:10.1080/10572250802100451
   Google Scholar
• Kimme Hea, A. C., & Wendler Shah, R. (2016). Silent partners: Developing a critical understanding of community partners in technical communication service-learning pedagogies. Technical Communication Quarterly, 25(1), 48–66. doi:10.1080/10572252.2016.1113727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch, G., & Ritchie, J. (1995). Beyond the personal: Theorizing a politics of location in composition research. College Composition and Communication, 46(1), 7–29. doi:10.2307/358867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolodziejski, L. R. (2014). Harms of hedging in scientific discourse: Andrew Wakefield and the origins of the autism vaccine controversy. Technical Communication Quarterly, 23(3), 165–183. doi:10.1080/10572252.2013.816487
   Google Scholar
• Leon, K., & Sura, T. (2013). “We don’t need any more brochures”: Rethinking deliverables in service-learning curricula. Writing Program Administration, 36(2), 59–75.
   Google Scholar
• Longo, B., & Fountain, K. (2013). What can history teach us about technical communication? In J. Jonson-Eiola & S. A. Selber (Eds.), Solving problems in technical communication (pp. 165–186). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mara, A. (2006). Using charettes to perform civic engagement in technical communication classrooms and workplaces. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15(2), 215–236. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1502_5
   Google Scholar
• Mara, A., & Hawk, B. (2010). Posthuman rhetorics and technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 19(1), 1–10. doi:10.1080/10572250903373031
   Google Scholar
• Margaret, B. G., & Lindeman, N. (2005). The rhetoric and politics of science in the case of the Missouri river system. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 19(4), 422–448. doi:10.1177/1050651905278311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mautner, T. (2005). Dictionary of philosophy (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• McCloud, S. (1994). Understanding comics. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
   Google Scholar
• Middleton, M., Hess, A., Endres, D., & Senda-Cook, S. (2015). Participatory critical rhetoric: Theoretical and methodological foundations for studying rhetoric in situ. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. R. (2007). What can automation tell us about agency? Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 37(2), 137–157. doi:10.1080/02773940601021197
   Google Scholar
• Moore, K., & Elliott, T. (2016). From participatory design to a listening infrastructure: A case of urban planning and participation. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 30(1), 59–84. doi:10.1177/1050651915602294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nancy, J. L. (2007). Listening. ( (C. Mandell, trans.)). New York, NY: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neighborhood and Comprehensive Planning Committee. (2019, August 29). Frogtown neighborhood plan (the SMAPL). The City of Saint Paul. Saint Paul, MN.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, F. E. (1967). Greek philosophical terms: A historical lexicon. New York, NY: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plato. (1892a). Parmenides. In B. Jowett (Ed. & Trans.), The dialogues of Plato (Vol. 5, pp. 1–106). Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plato. (1892b). Phaedo. In B. Jowett (Ed. & Trans.), The dialogues of Plato (Vol. 2, pp. 157–266). Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Propen, A. (2007). Visual communication and the map: How maps as visual objects convey meaning in specific contexts. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16(2), 233–254. doi:10.1080/10572250709336561
   Google Scholar
• Remes, P. (2014). Neoplatonism. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, E., & Walton, R. (2018). Factors to actors: Implications of posthumanism for social justice work. In K. R. Moore & D. P. Richards (Eds.), Posthuman praxis in technical communication (pp. 91–117). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rupersburg, N. (15 September 2017). A small area plan with big ambitions: Frogtown’s illustrated SMAPL is a document of tactical urbanism. Creative Exchange. Retrieved from https://springboardexchange.org/small-area-plan-big-ambitions-frogtowns-illustrated-smapl-document-tactical-urbanism/
   Google Scholar
• Ryerson, R. (2019). Disidentification, disorientation, and disruption: Queer multimodal rhetoric in queer comics. Journal of Multimodal Rhetorics, 3(1), 49–67.
   Google Scholar
• Salvo, M. (2001). Ethics of engagement: User-centered design and rhetorical methodology. Technical Communication Quarterly, 10(3), 273–290. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1003_3
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, G. (2018). Applying usability and user experience within academic contexts: Why progress remains slow. Technical Communication Quarterly, 27(4), 362–371. doi:10.1080/10572252.2018.1521637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scanlon, M. J. (2015). The work of comics collaborations: Considerations of multimodal composition for writing scholarship and pedagogy. Composition Studies, 43(1), 105–130.
   Google Scholar
• Schibille, N. (2016). Hagia Sophia and the Byzantine aesthetic experience. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. B. (2008). The practice of usability: Teaching user engagement through service-learning. Technical Communication Quarterly, 17(4), 381–412. doi:10.1080/10572250802324929
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, M. W. (2007). Participation and power: Civic discourse in environmental policy decisions. Albany: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. C. (2011). Polis and personification in classical Athenian art. Boston, MA: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2005). The methodology of participatory design. Technical Communication, 52(2), 163–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2011). Losing by expanding: Corralling the runaway object. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 25(4), 449–486. doi:10.1177/1050651911411040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, P. (1989). Beyond a narrow conception of usability testing. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 32(4), 256–264. doi:10.1109/47.44537
   Google Scholar
• Sun, H. (2006). The triumph of users: Achieving cultural usability goals with user localization. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15(4), 457–481. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1504_3
   Google Scholar
• Swacha, K. Y. (2018). “Bridging the gap between food pantries and the kitchen table”: Teaching embodied literacy in the technical communication classroom. Technical Communication Quarterly, 27(3), 261–282. doi:10.1080/10572252.2018.1476589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swarts, J. (2010). Recycled writing: Assembling actor networks from reusable content. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 24(2), 127–163. doi:10.1177/1050651909353307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddell, C. (1996). Saving the great lakes: Public participation in environmental policy. In C. G. Herndl & S. C. Brown (Eds.), Green culture: Environmental rhetoric in contemporary America (pp. 141–165). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, R. (2013). Stakeholder flux: Participation in technology-based international development projects. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 27(4), 409–435. doi:10.1177/1050651913490940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton, R., Zraly, M., & Mugengana, J. P. (2015). Values and validity: Navigating messiness in a community-based research project in Rwanda. Technical Communication Quarterly, 24(1), 45–69. doi:10.1080/10572252.2015.975962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, M. (1985). Monuments & maidens: The allegory of the female form. New York, NY: Atheneum.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, H. (2015). The other kind of funnies: Comics in technical communication. Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar