Embracing a Metic Lens for Community-based Participatory Research in Technical Communication

References

• Agboka, G. Y. (2013). Participatory localization: A social justice approach to navigating unenfranchised/disenfranchised cultural sites. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22(1), 28–49. doi:10.1080/10572252.2013.730966
   Google Scholar
• Bell, S. E. (2013). Our roots run deep as ironweed: Appalachian women and the fight for environmental justice. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blythe, S., Grabill, J. T., & Riley, K. (2008). Action research and wicked environmental problems: Exploring appropriate roles for researchers in professional communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 22(3), 272–298. doi:10.1177/1050651908315973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, J. L. (2018). Slow circulation: The ethics of speed and rhetorical persistence. Rhetorical Society Quarterly, 48(5), 479–498. doi:10.1080/02773945.2018.1455987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brulle, R. J. (2010). From environmental campaigns to advancing the public dialog: Environmental communication for civic engagement. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 82–98. doi:10.1080/17524030903522397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cushman, E. (1996). The Rhetorician as an Agent of Social Change. College Composition and Communication, 47(1), 7–28. doi:10.2307/358271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detienne, M., & Vernant, J. (1991). Cunning intelligence in Greek culture and society. J. Lloyd, trans. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1978).
   Google Scholar
• Dolmage, J. (2009). Metis, Metîs, Mestiza, Medusa: Rhetorical bodies across rhetorical traditions. Rhetoric Review, 28(1), 1–28. doi:10.1080/07350190802540690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolmage, J. (2013). Disability rhetoric. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Downey, L., & Anyaegbunam, C. (2010). Your lives through your eyes: Rural Appalachian youth identify community needs and assets through the use of photovoice. Journal of Appalachian Studies, 16(2), 42–60. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.lib.purdue.edu/stable/41446841
   Google Scholar
• Dush, L. (2017). Nonprofit collections of digital personal experience narratives: An exploratory study. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 31(2), 188–221. doi:10.1177/1050651916682287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edenfield, A. C. (2019). Research in cooperatives: Developing a politically conscious research methodology. Technical Communication Quarterly, 28(4), 376–390. doi:10.1080/10572252.2019.1621388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedukovich, C. (2009). Strange imports: Working-class Appalachian women in the composition classroom. Journal of Appalachian Studies, 15(1/2), 140–154. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.lib.purdue.edu/stable/41446824
   Google Scholar
• Grabill, J. T. (2007). Writing community change: Designing technologies for citizen action. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Gruenspecht, H. (2019). The U.S. coal sector: Recent and continuing changes. Cross-Brookings initiative on energy and climate. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-u-s-coal-sector/
   Google Scholar
• Hall, B. L. (1981). Participatory research, popular knowledge and power: A personal reflection. Convergence, 14(3), 6–19.
   Google Scholar
• Haswell, R. H. (2005). NCTE/CCCC’s recent war on scholarship. Written Communication, 22(2), 198–223. doi:10.1177/0741088305275367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawhee, D. (2005). Bodily arts: Rhetoric and athletics in ancient Greece. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N. N. (2016a). Found things: Genre, narrative, and identification in a networked activist organization. Technical Communication Quarterly, 25(4), 298–318. doi:10.1080/10572252.2016.1228790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, N. N. (2016b). The technical communicator as advocate: Integrating a social justice approach in technical communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(3), 342–361. doi:10.1177/0047281616639472
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N. N., & Walton, R. (2018). Using narratives to foster critical thinking about diversity and social justice. In M. Eble & A. Haas (Eds.), Integrating theoretical frameworks for teaching technical communication (pp. 241–267). Louisville: University Press of Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Lykes, M., & Hershberg, R. (2012). Participatory action research and feminisms: Social inequalities and transformative praxis. In S. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), Handbook of feminist research: Theory and practice (pp. 331–367). New York, NY: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• McNely, B., Spinuzzi, C., & Teston, C. (2015). Contemporary research methodologies in technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 24(1), 1–13. doi:10.1080/10572252.2015.975958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, K. R. (2017). The technical communicator as participant, facilitator, and designer in public engagement projects. Technical Communication, 64(3), 237–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pflugfelder, E. H. (2018). The role of metis in revising automotive recall letters. In D. P. Richards & K. R. Moore (Eds.), Posthuman praxis in technical communication (pp. 199–216). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pope-Ruark, R. (2014). A case for metic intelligence in technical and professional communication programs. Technical Communication Quarterly, 23(4), 323–341. doi:10.1080/10572252.2014.942469
   Google Scholar
• Richards, D. P., & Moore, K. R. (2018). Introduction. In D. P. Richards & K. R. Moore (Eds.), Posthuman praxis in technical communication (pp. 1–20). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, E. (2016). Design as advocacy: Using a human-centered approach to investigate the needs of vulnerable populations. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(4), 427–445. doi:10.1177/0047281616653494
   Google Scholar
• Salvo, M. J. (2018). Writing postindustrial places: Technoculture amid the cornfields. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, G. J. (2004). Tricksters, fools, and sophists: Technical communication as postmodern rhetoric. In T. Kynell-Hunt & G. J. Savage (Eds.), Power and legitimacy in technical communication: Volume II (pp. 167–194). Amityville, New York, USA: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (2008). The practice of usability: Teaching user engagement through service-learning. Technical Communication Quarterly, 17(4), 381–412. doi:10.1080/10572250802324929
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, W. M., & Amidon, T. (2019, October 4–6). Negotiating research stance: An ecology of tensions in the design and practice of community-engaged research. In SIGDOC ’19: The 37th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication Proceedings (pp. 11). ACM: Portland, OR. doi:10.1145/3328020.3353955
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, T. (2014). The rhetoric of Appalachian identity. Jefferson, NC: McFarland Books.
   Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2003). Tracing genres through organizations: A sociocultural approach to information design (Vol. 1). Boston, Massachusetts, USA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, P. (2017). Participating with pictures: Promises and challenges of using images as a technique in technical communication research. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 47(1), 86–108. doi:10.1177/0047281616641930
   Google Scholar
• Walters, S. (2014). Rhetorical touch disability, identification, haptics. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, R., Moore, K. R., & Jones, N. N. (2019). Technical communication after the social justice turn [Kindle version]. Retrieved from amazon.com
   Google Scholar
• Walton, R., Zraly, M., & Mugengana, J. P. (2015). Values and validity: Navigating messiness in a community-based research project in Rwanda. Technical Communication Quarterly, 24(1), 45–69. doi:10.1080/10572252.2015.975962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C., & Burris, M. A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behavior, 24(3), 369–387. doi:10.1177/109019819702400309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb-Sunderhaus, S. (2016). “Keep the Appalachian, drop the redneck”: Tellable student narratives of Appalachian identity. College English, 79(1), 11–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar