Navigating Messy Research Methods and Mentoring Practices at a Bilingual Research Site on the Mexico-U.S. Border

References

• Agboka, G. Y. (2014). Decolonial methodologies: Social justice perspectives in intercultural technical communication research. Journal Technical Writing and Communication, 44(3), 297–327. doi:10.2190/TW.44.3.e
   Google Scholar
• Agboka, G. Y. (2018). Indigenous contexts, new questions: Integrating human rights perspectives in technical communication. In A. M. Haas & M. F. Eble (Eds.), Key theoretical frameworks: Teaching technical communication in the twenty-first century (pp. 114–137). Louisville, CO: Utah State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blakeslee, A. M. (2009). The technical communication research landscape. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 23(2), 129–173. doi:10.1177/1050651908328880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büscher, M., Urry, J., & Witchger, K. (Eds.). (2010). Mobile methods. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, A. F. (2017, September 5). The US, Canada, and Mexico are renegotiating NAFTA — Here’s what each country wants. Vox. Retrieved from https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/9/5/16156924/nafta-negotiations
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. (2009). Drug war zone: Frontline dispatches from the streets of El Paso and Juárez. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Canagarajah, S. (2012). Autoethnography in the study of multilingual writers. In L. Nickoson & M. P. Sheridan (Eds.), Writing studies research in practice: Methods and methodologies (pp. 113–124). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cargile Cook, K. (2002). Layered literacies: A theoretical frame for technical communication pedagogy. Technical Communication Quarterly, 11(1), 5–29. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1101_1
   Google Scholar
• Cushman, E. (1999). The public intellectual, service learning, and activist research. College English, 61(3), 328–336. doi:10.2307/379072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doheny-Farina, S. (2004). Writing in an emerging organization: An ethnographic study. In J. Johnson-Eilola & S. A. Selber (Eds.), Central works in technical communication (pp. 325–340). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durá, L. (2016). What’s wrong here? What’s right here? Introducing the positive deviance approach to community-based work. Connexions L International Professional Communication Journal, 4(1), 57–89. doi:10.21310/cnx.4.1.16dur
   Google Scholar
• Durá, L., Felt, L. J., & Singhal, A. (2014). What counts? For whom? Cultural beacons and unexpected areas of programmatic impact. Evaluation and Program Planning, 44, 98–109. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durá, L., Perez, L., & Magdalena, C. (2019). Positive deviance as design thinking: Challenging notions of stasis in technical and professional communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication: JBTC; Thousand Oaks, 33(4), 376–399. doi:http://dx.doi.org.lib-e2.lib.ttu.edu/10.1177/1050651919854057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durá, L., & Singhal, A. (2009). Utilizing a positive deviance approach to reduce girls’ trafficking in Indonesia asset-based communicative acts that make a difference. Journal of Creative Communications, 4(1), 1–17. doi:10.1177/097325861000400101
   Google Scholar
• Durá, L., Singhal, A., & Elias, E. (2013). Minga Perú’s strategy for social change in the Peruvian Amazon: A rhetorical model for participatory, intercultural practice to advance human rights. Rhetoric, Professional Communication, and Globalization, 4(1), 33–54.
   Google Scholar
• Eaton, A., Rothman, L., Smith, J., Woody, R., Warren, C., Moore, J., … Spinks, R. (2008). Mentoring undergraduates in the research process: Perspectives from the mentor and mentee. In M. F. Eble & L. L. Gaillet (Eds.), Stories of mentoring: Theory and Praxis (pp. 159–177). West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eble, M. F., & Gaillet, L. L. (Eds.). (2008). Stories of mentoring: Theory and Praxis. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhart, M., & Jurow, A. S. (2011). Teaching qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 699–714). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Endres, D., Hess, A., Senda-Cook, S., & Middleton, M. K. (2016). In situ rhetoric: Intersections between qualitative inquiry, fieldwork, and rhetoric. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16(6), 511–524. doi:10.1177/1532708616655820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzales, L. (2018a). Translation as technology: From linguistic “deficit” to rhetorical strength. In C. Medina & O. Pimentel (Eds.), Racial shorthand: Coded discrimination contested in social media. Computers and Composition Digital Press, Boulder, CO. Retrieved from https://ccdigitalpress.org/book/shorthand/chapter_gonzales.html
   Google Scholar
• Gonzales, L. (2018b). Sites of translation: What multilinguals can teach us about digital writing and rhetoric. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gorjidooz, J., & Vasigh, B. (2009). The maquiladora industry: Recent downturn and future prospects. International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER), 8(3), 47-58.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, A. M. (2012). Race, rhetoric, and technology: A case study of decolonial technical communication theory, methodology, and pedagogy. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(3), 277–310. doi:10.1177/1050651912439539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, A. M. (2013). Subject matter expert meets technical communicator: Stories of Mestiza consciousness in the automotive industry. In H. Yu & G. Savage (Eds.), Negotiating cultural encounters: Narrating intercultural engineering and technical communication, 227-245. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-IEEE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, A. M., & Eble, M. F., (Eds.). (2018). Key theoretical frameworks: Teaching technical communication in the twenty-first century. Louisville, CO: Utah State University Press. Retrieved from https://upcolorado.com/utah-state-university-press/item/3425-key-theoretical-frameworks
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Eilola, J., & Selber, S. A. (Eds.). (2004). Central works in technical communication. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N. N., & Walton, R. (2018). Using narratives to foster critical thinking about diversity and social justice. In A. Haas & M. F. Eble (Eds.), Key theoretical frameworks: Teaching technical communication in the twenty-first century, 241-267. Louisville, CO: Utah State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, E. J. (2019). Rhetorical strategies for professional development: Investment mentoring in classrooms and workplaces. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kimme Hea, A. C., & Shah, R. W. (2016). Silent partners: Developing a critical understanding of community partners in technical communication service-learning pedagogies. Technical Communication Quarterly, 25(1), 48–66. doi:10.1080/10572252.2016.1113727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koerber, A., & McMichael, L. (2008). Qualitative sampling methods: A primer for technical communicators. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 22(4), 454–473. doi:10.1177/1050651908320362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern ( C. Porter, Trans.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leontev, A. A. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality ( M. J. Hall, Trans.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, A. C., & Tomlin, B. W. (2000). The making of NAFTA: How the deal was done. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Medina, C., & Pimentel, O., (Eds.). (2018). Racial shorthand: Coded discrimination contested in social media. Logan: Computers and Composition Digital Press/Utah State University Press. Retrieved from http://ccdigitalpress.org/shorthand
   Google Scholar
• Melonçon, L., & St.Amant, K. (2019). Empirical research in technical and professional communication: A 5-year examination of research methods and a call for research sustainability. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 49(2), 128–155. doi:10.1177/0047281618764611
   Google Scholar
• Minacori, P., & Veisblat, L. (2010). Translation and technical communication: Chicken or egg. Meta: Translators’ Journal, 55(4), 752–768. doi:10.7202/045689ar
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, K. R. (2018). Black feminist epistemology as a framework for community-based teaching. In A. Haas & M. F. Eble (Eds.), Key theoretical frameworks: Teaching technical communication in the twenty-first century (pp. 185–211). Louisville, CO: Utah State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford Learning Institute. (2018). Research supervision: New supervisors. Retrieved from http://supervision.learning.ox.ac.uk/supervisors
   Google Scholar
• Pihlaja, B. (2020). Inventing others in digital written communication: Intercultural encounters on the U.S.-Mexico Border. Written Communication, 37(2), 245–280. doi:10.1177/0741088319899908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, J. E., Sullivan, P., Blythe, S., Grabill, J. T., & Miles, L. (2000). Institutional critique: A rhetorical methodology for change. College Composition and Communication, 51(4), 610–642. doi:10.2307/358914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinones, S. (2016, June). Once the world’s most dangerous city, Juárez returns to life. Retrieved April 15, 2017, from http://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2016/06/juarez-mexico-border-city-drug-cartels-murder-revival/
   Google Scholar
• Rose, E. J., & Walton, R. (2018). Factors to actors: Implications of posthumanism for social justice work. In K. Moore & D. P. Richards (Eds.), Posthuman praxis in technical communication (pp. 91–117). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rubinstein-Ávila, E. (2013). Accounting for–and owning up to–the messiness in cross-cultural/linguistic qualitative research: Toward methodological reflexivity in South America’s Internet cafés. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(8), 1041–1061. doi:10.1080/09518398.2012.736642
   Google Scholar
• Rude, C. D. (2009). Mapping the research questions in technical communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 23(2), 174. doi:10.1177/1050651908329562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Los Angeles; London, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Semple, K. (2016, December 13). Mexico grapples with a surge in violence. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/world/americas/mexico-drug-war-violence-donald-trump-wall.html
   Google Scholar
• Spilka, R. (2009). Practitioner research instruction: A neglected curricular area in technical communication undergraduate programs. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 23(2), 216–237. doi:10.1177/1050651908328882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2013). Topsight: A guide to studying, diagnosing, and fixing information flow in organizations. Scotts Valley, CA: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
   Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2018). Topsight 2.0: A guide to studying, diagnosing, and fixing information flow in organizations. Austin, TX: Urso Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, P., & Porter, J. E. (1997). Opening spaces: Writing technologies and critical research practices. Greenwich, CT: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Swarts, J. (2016). Composing networks: Writing practices on mobile devices. Written Communication, 33(4), 385–417. doi:10.1177/0741088316666807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thralls, C., & Blyler, N. R. (1993). The social perspective and pedagogy in technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 2(3), 249. doi:10.1080/10572259309364540
   Google Scholar
• Tuhiwai Smith, L. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (2 ed.). London:Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, R., Zraly, M., & Mugengana, J. P. (2015). Values and validity: Navigating messiness in a community-based research project in Rwanda. Technical Communication Quarterly, 24(1), 45–69. doi:10.1080/10572252.2015.975962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, G. (2001). Technical communication and late capitalism: Considering a postmodern technical communication pedagogy. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15(1), 72–99. doi:10.1177/105065190101500104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. (2008). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Nova Scotia: Fernwood Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar