A Communicational Disconnect: Establishing Superordinate Identities in Climate Communication Through Transgenerational Responsibility

References

• Andina, T. (2020). Climate issue: The principle of transgenerational responsibility. Rivista di estetica, 75(75), 17–32. doi:10.4000/estetica.7201
   Google Scholar
• Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. M. (2014). Sozialpsychologie (8th ed.). Hallbergmoos: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Batalha, L., & Reynolds, K. J. (2012). Aspiring to mitigate climate change: Superordinate identity in global climate negotiations. Political Psychology, 33(5), 743–760. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00896.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, K. (1969). A rhetoric of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cagle, L. E., & Tillery, D. (2015). Climate change research across disciplines: The value and uses of multidisciplinary research reviews for technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 24(2), 147–163. doi:10.1080/10572252.2015.1001296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloud, D. (2016). Communicating climate change to religious and conservative audiences: The case of Katharine Hayhoe and Andrew Farley. Reflections, 16(1), 57–74.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, R. (2022). The ‘boomer remover’: Intergenerational discounting, the coronavirus and climate change. The Sociological Review, 70(1), 74–91. doi:10.1177/00380261211049023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, H. R. (2020). A rhetorical perspective on youth environmental activism. Journal of Science Communication, 19(6), C07.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielding, K. S., & Hornsey, M. J. (2016). A social identity analysis of climate change and environmental attitudes and behaviors: Insights and opportunities. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsche, I., Barth, M., Jugert, P., Masson, T., & Reese, G. (2018). A social identity model of pro-environmental action (SIMPEA). Psychological Review, 125(2), 245–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamann, K., Baumann, A., & Löschinger, D. (2016). Psychologie im Umweltschutz: Handbuch zur Förderung nachhaltigen Handelns. München: oekom Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, P. S., & Nisbet, E. C. (2012). Boomerang effects in science communication: How motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. Communication Research, 39(6), 701–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, A. J. (2011). Talking past each other? Cultural framing of skeptical and convinced logics in the climate change debate. Organization & Environment, 24(1), 3–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., Bain, P. G., & Fielding, K. S. (2016). Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nature Climate Change, 6, 622–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kershaw, C., Rast, D. E., III, Hogg, M. A., & Knippenberg, D. (2021). Battling ingroup bias with effective intergroup leadership. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(3), 765–785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Rosenthal, S., Kotcher, J., Ballew, M., Bergquist, P. … Wang, X. (2020). Politics and global warming [report]. New Haven: Yale University and George Mason University. Yale Program on Climate Change Communication.
   Google Scholar
• Mackay, C. M. L., Schmitt, M. T., Lutz, A. E., & Mendel, J. (2021). Recent developments in the social identity approach to the psychology of climate change. Current Opinion in Psychology, 42, 95–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markowitz, E., Hodge, C., Harp, G., St John, C., Marx, S. M., Speiser, M. , andPerkowitz, R. (2014). Connecting on climate: A guide to effective climate change communication. New York and Washington, D.C: Center for Environmental Research Decisions and ecoAmerica.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. R. (1992). Kairos in the rhetoric of science. In S. P. Witte, N. Nakadate, & R. D. Cherry (Eds.), A rhetoric of doing: Essays on written discourse in honor of James L. Kinneavy (pp. 310–327). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostapchuk, J., Harper, S., Cunsolo Willox, A., Edge, V. L., & Community Government, R. I. (2015). Exploring elders’ and seniors’ perceptions of how climate change is impacting health and well-being in rigolet, nunatsiavut/ᕿᒥᕐᕈᓂᖅ ᐃᓐᓇᐃᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐃᓄᑐᖃᐃᑦ ᐃᓱᒪᔾᔪᓯᖏᓐᓂᒃ ᕆᒍᓚᑦ, ᓄᓇᑦᓯᐊᕗᒻᒥ ᓯᓚᐅᑉ ᐊᓯᔾᔨᐸᓪᓕᐊᓂᖓᓂᒃ ᐊᑦᑐᐃᓂᖃᖅᑎᓪᓗᒍ ᐃᓗᓯᕐᒥᒃ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᖃᓄᐃᓐᖏᓂᖏᓐᓂᒃ. International Journal of Indigenous Health, 9(2), 6–24.
   Google Scholar
• Pace, J., & Gabel, C. (2018). Using photovoice to understand barriers and enablers to Southern Labrador Inuit intergenerational interaction. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 16(4), 351–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, S., & France, A. (2021). Problematizing a popular panacea: A critical examination of the (continued) use of ‘social generations’ in youth sociology. The Sociological Review, 69(4), 775–791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackey, D. J. (2018). An environmental justice paradigm for technical communication. In A. M. Haas & M. F. Eble (Eds.), Key theoretical frameworks: Teaching technical communication in the twenty-first century (pp. 138–160). Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sansoulet, J., Therrien, M., Delgove, J., Pouxviel, G., Desriac, J., Sardet, N., & Vanderlinden, J. P. (2020). An update on Inuit perceptions of their changing environment, Qikiqtaaluk (Baffin Island, Nunavut). Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 8(1), 025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal, J. Z. (2020). Ageism and rhetoric. In A. Bleakley (Ed.), Routledge handbook of the medical humanities (pp. 163–175). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, G., & Falconer, M. (2021). Genre, uptake, and the recontextualization of climate change science by ‘denialist’ cultural communities. In S. Auken & C. Sunesen (Eds.), Genre in the climate debate (pp. 85–107). Warsaw, Berlin: De Gruyter Open Poland.
   Google Scholar
• Stapleton, S. R. (2019). A case for climate justice education: American youth connecting to intragenerational climate injustice in Bangladesh. Environmental Education Research, 25(5), 732–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh, S. M., Chapman, D. A., & Lickel, B. (2021). The role of psychological research in understanding and responding to links between climate change and conflict. Current Opinion in Psychology, 42, 43–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanis, M., & Postmes, T. (2005). A social identity approach to trust: Interpersonal perception, group membership and trusting behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(3), 413–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viscogliosi, C., Asselin, H., Trottier, L., D’Amours, M., & Levasseur, M. (2022). Association between intergenerational solidarity involving elders and mental health of indigenous people living off reserve. BioMed Central Public Health, 22(1), 512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenzel, M., Waldzus, S., & Steffens, M. C. (2016). Ingroup projection as a challenge of diversity: Consensus about and complexity of superordinate categories. In C. G. Sibley & F. K. Barlow (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice (1st ed., pp. 65–89). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitmarsh, L., & Corner, A. (2017). Tools for a new climate conversation: A mixed-methods study of language for public engagement across the political spectrum. Global Environmental Change, 42, 122–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar