Visualizing of the structure of subject trends in Persian articles published during 2008–2012 in information organization domain

References

• Baeza-Yates, Ricardo & Ribeiro-Neto, Berthier (1999). Modern information retrieval. New York: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benavides-Velasco, Carlos A., Quintana-Garcia, Cristina & Guzman-Parra, Vanesa F. (2013). Trends in family business research. Small Business Economics, 40(1), 41–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borner, Katy, Chen, Chaornei & Boyack, Kevin W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 179–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chabowski, Brian R., Samiee, Saeed & Tomas M Hult, G. (2013). A bibliometric analysis of the global branding literature and a research agenda. Journal of International Business Studies :advance Online Publication, 20.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, Y., Chowdhury, Gobinda G. & Foo, S. (2001). Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using coword analysis. Information Processing and Management, 37, 817–842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guardo, Maria Chiara Di & Harrigan, Kathryn R. (2012). Mapping research on strategic alliances and innovation: a co-citation analysis. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(6), 789–811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Hongxia (2013). Information network analysis system for scientific and technological documents. Informatics and Management Science V: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 208, 301–307.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Mei, Zhong & Wang, Xu Kun (2013). China’s environmental governance and law development review based on co-word analysis. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 295–298, 2172–2176.
   Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, Loet & Vaughan, Liwen (2006). Co-occurrence matrices and their applications in information science: extending ACA to the Web environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(12), 1616–1628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Library, Information Science & Technology Thesaurus (LISTA Thesaurus) (2010). Library, information science & technology thesaurus. Retrieved January 24, 2010, from http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/thesaurus.
   Google Scholar
• Magiran: database of Iran periodicals. Retrieved May 26, 2013, from http://www.magiran.com.
   Google Scholar
• McIlwaine, I. C. (2003). Trends in knowledge organization research. Knowledge Organization, 30(2), 75–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milstead, Jessica L. (1998). Asis thesaurus of information science and librarianship. American Society for Information Science.
   Google Scholar
• Modern approaches in information organization congress (2006). Abstracts of first annual meeting of Iranian library and information science association. Rahmatollah Fattahi. Tehran: National library and archives of IR of Iran.
   Google Scholar
• Nowkarizi, Mohsen (2006). A review on texts in material organization in Iran: review on books, theses and researches in organization domain (cataloging and classification). Faslnameye Ketab, 17(4), 141–158.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, H. (2000). Codes, costs, and critiques: the organization of information in Library Quarterly, 1931–2004. Library Quarterly, 76(1), 19–35.
   Google Scholar
• Saumure, Kristie & Shiri, Ali (2008). Knowledge organization trends in library and information studies: a preliminary comparison of the pre- and post-web eras. Journal of Information Science, 34(5), 651–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiau, Wen-Lung & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. (2013). Citation and co-citation analysis to identify core and emerging knowledge in electronic commerce research. Scientometrics, 94(3), 1317–1337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (2010). UNESCO thesaurus. Retrieved November 8, 2009, from http://www2.ulcc.ac.uk/unesco. Accessed.
   Google Scholar
• Vlieger, Esther & Leydesdorff, Loet (2009). How to analyze frames using semantic maps of a collection of messages?: Pajek Manual. Amsterdam: Amsterdam School of Communications Research (ASCoR), University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Xiaoguang Wang, & Mitsuyuki Inaba. (2009). Analyzing structures and evolution of digital humanities based on correspondence analysis and co-word analysis, 9, 123–134.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, Wenjia & Guan, Jiancheng (2013). A bibliometric study of service innovation research: based on complex network analysis. Scientometrics, 94(3), 1195–1216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zong, Qian-Jin, Shen, Hong-Zhou, Yuan, Qin-Jian, Hu, Xiao-Wei, & Hou, Zhi-Ping, Shun-Guo, Deng (2013). Doctoral dissertations of library and information science in China: A co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 94(2), 781–799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar