The Efficiency of Briefly Presenting Word Forms in a Computerized Repeated Spelling Training

References

• Abbott, R. D., Berninger, V. W., & Fayol, M. (2010). Longitudinal relationships of levels of language in writing and between writing and reading in grades 1 to 7. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 281–298. doi:10.1037/a0019318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apel, K. (2011). What is orthographic knowledge? Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 42, 592–603. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2011/10-0085)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arndt, E. J., & Foorman, B. R. (2010). Second graders as spellers: What types of errors are they making? Assessment for Effective Intervention, 36(1), 57–67. doi:10.1177/1534508410380135
   Google Scholar
• Berends, I. E., & Reitsma, P. (2006). Remediation of fluency: Word specific or generalized training. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 221–234. doi:10.1007/s11145-005-5259-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhide, A. (2018). Copying helps novice learners build orthographic knowledge: Methods for teaching Devanagari akshara. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 31, 1–33. doi:10.1007/s11145-017-9767-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosman, A. M. T., De Graaff, S., & Gijsel, M. A. R. (2006). Double Dutch: The Dutch spelling system and learning to spell in Dutch. In R. M. Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 135–150). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Bosman, A. M. T., Van Hell, J. G., & Verhoeven, L. (2006). Learning the spelling of strange words in Dutch benefits from regularized reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 879–890. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosman, A. M. T., Van Huygevoort, M., & Verhoeven, L. (2006). Spelling feedback in an IT-learning environment: Issues of proficiency, training efficiency, and transfer. International Journal of Educational Research, 45(6), 341–361. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2007.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Bosman, A. M. T., & Van Leerdam, M. (1993). Aanvankelijk spellen: De dominatie van de verklankende spelwijze en de geringe effectiviteit van lezen als spellingsinstructie-methode [Beginning spelling: Prevalence of the phonological strategy in spelling and the scant effectivity of reading as a spelling instruction method]. Pedagogische Studiën, 70(1), 28–45.
   Google Scholar
• Bosse, M., Chaves, N., Largy, P., & Valdois, S. (2015). Orthographic learning during reading: The role of whole-word visual processing. Journal of Research in Reading, 38(1), 141–158. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2012.01551.x
   Google Scholar
• Bosse, M. L., Valdois, S., & Tainturier, M. J. (2003). Analogy without priming in early spelling development. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(7), 693–716. doi:10.1023/A:1025883815395
   Google Scholar
• Brus, B. T., & Voeten, M. J. (1979). Eén-Minuut-Test, vorm A en B. Verantwoording en handleiding [One-Minute-Test, form A and B. Justification and manual] (2nd ed.). Nijmegen and Lisse, The Netherlands: Berkhout Testmateriaal, Swets & Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Caravolas, M. (2006). Learning to spell in different languages: How orthographic variables might affect early literacy. In R. M. Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 497–511). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cates, G. L., Dunne, M., Erkfritz, K. N., Kivisto, A., Lee, N., & Wierzbicki, J. (2007). Differential effects of two spelling procedures on acquisition, maintenance and adaption to reading. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16, 71–82. doi:10.1007/s10864-006-9019-5
   Google Scholar
• Coenen, M., Van Bon, W., & Schreuder, R. (1998). The effect of reading and spelling practice on reading skill. In P. Reitsma & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Problems and interventions in literacy development (pp. 321–334). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, N.J. (2008). From reading to spelling and spelling to reading: Transfer goes both ways. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 869–878. doi:10.1037/a0012544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordewener, K., Bosman, A., & Verhoeven, L. (2015). Implicit and explicit instruction: The case of spelling acquisition. Written Language & Literacy, 18(1), 121–152. doi:10.1075/wll.18.1.06cor
   Google Scholar
• Critten, S., Sheriston, L., & Mann, F. (2016). Young children’s spelling representations and spelling strategies. Learning and Instruction, 46, 34–44. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deacon, S. H., Conrad, N., & Pacton, S. (2008). A statistical learning perspective on children’s learning about graphotactic and morphological regularities in spelling. Canadian Psychology, 49(2), 118–124. doi:10.1037/0708-5591.49.2.118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, P. F., & Share, D. L. (2007). Orthographic learning during oral and silent reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(1), 55–71. doi:10.1080/10888430709336634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (2017). Orthographic mapping and literacy development revisited. In K. Cain, D. L. Compton, & R. K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (pp. 127–145). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Elbro, C., & De Jong, P. F. (2017). Orthographic learning is verbal learning: The role of spelling pronunciations. In K. Cain, D. L. Compton, & R. K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (pp. 169–189). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Erion, J., Davenport, C., Rodax, N., Scholl, B., & Hardy, J. (2009). Cover-Copy-Compare and spelling: One versus three repetitions. Journal of Behavioral Education, 18, 319–330. doi:10.1007/s10864-009-9095-4
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (and sex and drugs and rock ‘n’ roll) (3rd ed.). London, UK: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gaintza, Z., & Goikoetxea, E. (2016). Spelling instruction in Spanish: A comparison of self-correction, visual imagery, and copying. Journal of Research in Reading, 39(4), 428–447. doi:10.1111/1467-9817.12055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Santangelo, T. (2014). Does spelling instruction make students better spellers, readers, and writers? A meta-analytic review. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 27, 1703–1743. doi:10.1007/s11145-014-9517-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, R. (2013). Statistical analyses for language testers. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hepner, C., McCloskey, M., & Rapp, B. (2017). Do reading and spelling share orthographic representations? Evidence from developmental dysgraphia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 34(3–4), 119–143. doi:10.1080/02643294.2017.1375904
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilte, M., & Reitsma, P. (2006). Spelling pronunciation and visual preview both facilitate learning to spell irregular words. Annals of Dyslexia, 56(2), 301–318. doi:10.1007/s11881-006-0013-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilte, M., & Reitsma, P. (2008). What type of computer-assisted exercise supports young less skilled spellers in resolving problems in open and closed syllable words? Annals of Dyslexia, 58(2), 97–114. doi:10.1007/s11881-008-0019-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilte, M., & Reitsma, P. (2011a). Activating the meaning of a word facilitates the integration of orthography: Evidence from spelling exercises in beginning spellers. Journal of Research in Reading, 34(3), 333–345. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01442.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilte, M., & Reitsma, P. (2011b). Effects of explicit rules in learning to spell open- and closed- syllable words. Learning and Instruction, 21(1), 34–45. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huemer, S., Aro, M., Landerl, K., & Lyytinen, H. (2010). Repeated reading of syllables among Finnish-speaking children with poor reading skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 14(4), 317–340. doi:10.1080/10888430903150659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaspers, K. E., Williams, R. L., Skinner, C. H., Cihak, D., McCallum, R. S., & Ciancio, D. J. (2012). How and to what extent do two cover, copy, and compare spelling interventions contribute to spelling, word recognition, and vocabulary development? Journal of Behavioral Education, 21, 80–98. doi:10.1007/s10864-011-9137-6
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. C., Wilson, J., & Roscoe, R. D. (2017). College student perceptions of writing errors, text quality, and author characteristics. Assessing Writing, 34, 72–87. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, R. M., & Aaron, P. G. (2006). Handbook of orthography and literacy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, N., & Bryant, P. (2003). Do beez buzz? Rule-based and frequency-based knowledge in learning to spell plural-s. Child Development, 74(1), 63–74. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keuning, J., & Verhoeven, L. (2008). Spelling development throughout the elementary grades: The Dutch case. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(4), 459–470. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2007.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohnen, S., Nickels, L., & Coltheart, M. (2010). Skill generalisation in teaching spelling to children with learning difficulties. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 15(2), 115–129. doi:10.1080/19404158.2010.502588
   Google Scholar
• Kort, W., Schittekatte, M., Dekker, P.H., Verhaeghe, P., Compaan, E.L., Bosmans, M., & Vermeir, G. (2005). WISC-IIINL Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. David Wechsler. Derde Editie NL. Handleiding en Verantwoording [3rd ed. Manual and justification]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Harcourt Test Publishers, NIP Dienstencentrum.
   Google Scholar
• Kyu Kwak, S., & Hae Kim, J. (2017). Statistical data preparation: Management of missing values and outliers. The Korean Society of Anesthesiology, 70(4), 407. doi:10.4097/kjae.2017.70.4.407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, B. (2001). Moving the bottom: Improving reading fluency. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 357–379). Timonium, MD: York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marinelli, C.V., Romani, C., Burani, C., & Zoccolotti, P. (2015). Spelling acquisition in English and Italian: A cross-linguistic study. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(1843), 1–13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01843
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin-Chang, S., Quelette, G., & Madden, M. (2014). Does poor spelling equate to slow reading? The relationship between reading, spelling, and orthographic quality. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 27(8), 1485–1505. doi:10.1007/s11145-014-9502-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nies, K. A., & Belfiore, P. J. (2006). Enhancing spelling performance in students with learning disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 15, 163–170. doi:10.1007/s10864-006-9017-7
   Google Scholar
• Nunn, A. M. (1998). Dutch orthography: A systematic investigation of the spelling of Dutch words. The Hague, The Netherlands: Holland Academic Graphics.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, S. C., Rubin, B. R., & Rickard, T. C. (2015). Does testing with feedback improve adult spelling skills relative to copying and reading? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 21(4), 356–369. doi:10.1037/xap0000062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy – Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162(1–2), 8–13. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P. B. Gough, L. E. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145–174). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. (2017). Lexical quality revisited. In E. Segers & P. Van den Broek (Eds.), Developmental perspectives in written language and literacy: In honor of Ludo Verhoeven (pp. 51–67). Amsterdam, The Netherlands/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Planbureau, S. E. (2016). Sociaaleconomische status [Socio-economic status]. Retrieved from http://www.scp.nl/Formulieren/Statusscores_opvragen
   Google Scholar
• Python Software Foundation. (2016) Python language reference (Version 3.6.0). Available at http://www.python.org
   Google Scholar
• Ouellette, G. (2010). Orthographic learning in learning to spell: The roles of semantics and type of practice. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107, 50–58. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2010.04.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankoff, G. (2006). Linguistic outcomes of language contact. In J. K. Chambers, P. Trudgill, & N. Schilling-Estes (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (pp. 638–668). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Shahar-Yames, D., & Share, D. L. (2008). Spelling as a self-teaching mechanism in orthographic learning. Journal of Research in Reading, 31(1), 22–39. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2007.00359.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Share, D. L. (2004). Orthographic learning at a glance: On the time course and developmental onset of self-teaching. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87(4), 267–298. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2004.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, A. C., Sinatra, G. M., & Reynolds, R. E. (2008). The development of children’s orthographic knowledge: A microgenetic perspective. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(3), 206–226. doi:10.1598/RRQ.43.3.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffler, D. (2001). Implicit cognition and spelling development. Developmental Review, 21(2), 168–204. doi:10.1006/drev.2000.0517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnik, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Tellings, A., Hulsbosch, M., Vermeer, A., & Van den Bosch, A. (2014). BasiLex: An 11.5 million words corpus of Dutch texts written for children. Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands Journal, 4, 191–208.
   Google Scholar
• Thaler, V., Ebner, E. M., Wimmer, H., & Landerl, K. (2004). Training reading fluency in dysfluent readers with high reading accuracy: Word specific effects but low transfer to untrained words. Annals of Dyslexia, 54(1), 89–113. doi:10.1007/s11881-004-0005-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, R., Castles, A., Laroche, A., & Deacon, S. H. (2016). The nature of orthographic learning in self-teaching: Testing the extent of transfer. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 145, 79–94. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2015.12.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gorp, K., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2017). The role of feedback and differences between good and poor decoders in a repeated word reading paradigm in first grade. Annals of Dyslexia, 67(1), 1–25. doi:10.1007/s11881-016-0129-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Leerdam, M., Bosman, A. M. T., & Van Orden, G.C. (1998). The ecology of spelling instruction: Effective training in first grade. In P. Reitsma & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Problems and interventions in literacy development (pp. 307–320). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Westwood, P. (2014). Teaching spelling: Exploring common sense strategies and best practices. Oxfordshire, UK/New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar