References
- Akhondi, M., Malayeri, F. A., & Samad, A. A. (2011). How to teach expository text structure to facilitate reading comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 64(5), 368–372. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.64.5.9
- Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., & Bloom, B. S. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
- Barcikowski, R. S. (1981). Statistical power with group mean as the unit of analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6(3), 267–285. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986006003267
- Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
- Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Multivariate Software.
- Bogaerds‐Hazenberg, S. T., Evers‐Vermeul, J., & van den Bergh, H. (2020). A meta‐analysis on the effects of text structure instruction on reading comprehension in the upper elementary grades. Reading Research Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.311.
- Bos, L. T., De Koning, B. B., Wassenburg, S. I., & van der Schoot, M. (2016). Training inference making skills using a situation model approach improves reading comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00116
- Buddin, R., & Zamarro, G. (2009). Teacher qualifications and student achievement in urban elementary schools. Journal of Urban Economics, 66(2), 103–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2009.05.001
- Burbank, M. D., & Kauchak, D. (2003). An alternative model for professional development: Investigations into effective collaboration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(5), 499–514. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(03)00048-9
- Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. V. (1999). Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and Writing, 11(5–6), 489–503. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008084120205
- Cain, K., Oakhill, J. V., Barnes, M. A., & Bryant, P. E. (2001). Comprehension skill, inference-making ability, and their relation to knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 29(6), 850–859. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196414
- Catts, H. W., Adlof, S. M., & Weismer, S. E. (2006). Language deficits in poor comprehenders: A case for the simple view of reading. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 49(2), 278–293. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/023)
- Croninger, R. G., Rice, J. K., Rathbun, A., & Nishio, M. (2007). Teacher qualifications and early learning: Effects of certification, degree, and experience on first-grade student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 26(3), 312–324. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2005.05.008
- De Naeghel, J., & Van Keer, H. (2013). The relation of student and class‐level characteristics to primary school students’ autonomous reading motivation: A multi‐level approach. Journal of Research in Reading, 36(4), 351–370. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jrir.12000
- Dewitz, P., Carr, E. M., & Patberg, J. P. (1987). Effects of inference training on comprehension and comprehension monitoring. Reading Research Quarterly, 22(1), 99–121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/747723
- Duncan, G. J., & Magnuson, K. A. (2005). Can family socioeconomic resources account for racial and ethnic test score gaps? The Future of Children, 15(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2005.0004
- Ebbs, D., & Wry, E. (2017). Translation and layout verification for PIRLS 2016. In I. V. S. Mullis, & M. Hooper (Eds.), Methods and procedures in PIRLS (pp. 1–15). TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College and International Association of the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
- Elbro, C., & Buch-Iversen, I. (2013). Activation of background knowledge for inference making: Effects on reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(6), 435–452. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.774005
- Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. The Guilford Press.
- Finch, H., & Bolin, J. (2017). Multilevel modeling using Mplus. CRC Press.
- Gallini, J. K., & Spires, H. (1995). Macro-based, micro-based, and combined strategies in text processing. Reading Psychology, 16(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0270271950160102
- Giambona, F., & Porcu, M. (2015). Student background determinants of reading achievement in Italy. A quantile regression analysis. International Journal of Educational Development, 44(1), 95–107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.07.005
- Goe, L. (2007). The link between teacher quality and student outcomes: A research synthesis. National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED521219
- Harris, D. N., & Sass, T. R. (2011). Teacher training, teacher quality and student achievement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 798–812. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.009
- Hebert, M., Bohaty, J. J., Nelson, J. R., & Brown, J. (2016). The effects of text structure instruction on expository reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(5), 609–629. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000082
- Heck, R. H., & Thomas, S. L. (2015). An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques: MLM and SEM approaches using Mplus. Routledge.
- Kintsch, W., & Rawson, K. (2005). Comprehension (pp. 209–226). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
- Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363–394. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363
- Lam, Y. H., Tse, S. K., Lam, J. W. I., & Loh, E. K. Y. (2010). Does the gender of the teacher matter in the teaching of reading literacy? teacher gender and pupil attainment in reading literacy in Hong Kong. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 754–759. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.010
- Lauer, C. (2003). Family background, cohort and education: A French–German comparison based on a multivariate ordered probit model of educational attainment. Labour Economics, 10(2), 231–251. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-5371(03)00007-1
- Lietz, P. (2006). A meta-analysis of gender differences in reading achievement at the secondary school level. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32(4), 317–344. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2006.10.002
- Martin, M., Mullis, I., Gonzalez, E., & Kennedy, A. (2003). PIRLS 2001 international report, IEA’s study of reading literacy achievement in primary schools in 35 countries. International Study Center.
- McCardle, P., Scarborough, H. S., & Catts, H. W. (2001). Predicting, explaining, and preventing children’s reading difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 16(4), 230–239. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/0938-8982.00023
- Meyer, B. J. F., & Poon, L. W. (2001). Effects of structure strategy training and signaling on recall of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 141–159. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.141
- Meyer, B. J. F., & Ray, M. N. (2011). Structure strategy interventions: Increasing reading comprehension of expository text. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(1), 127–152.
- Mueller, R. O., & Hancock, G. R. (2010). Structural equation modeling. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences (pp. 371–383). Routledge.
- Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., & Sainsbury, M. (2016). PIRLS 2016 reading framework (pp. 11–29). TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
- Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Drucker, K. T. (2012). PIRLS 2011 international results in reading. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
- Mullis, I. V., & Prendergast, C. O. (2017). Developing the PIRLS 2016 achievement items. In I. V. S. Mullis, & M. Hooper (Eds.), Methods and procedures in PIRLS. (pp. 1–29). TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
- Muralidharan, K., & Sheth, K. (2016). Bridging education gender gaps in developing countries: The role of female teachers. Journal of Human Resources, 51(2), 269–297. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.51.2.0813-5901R1
- Muthén, B. Q. (1994). Multilevel covariance structure analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 22(3), 376–398. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124194022003006
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. Q. (1998). Mplus 7.4 [Computer software]. Muthén & Muthén.
- Phillips, L. M. (1988). Young readers’ inference strategies in reading comprehension. Cognition and Instruction, 5(3), 193–222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0503_1
- Rice, J. K. (2003). Teacher quality: Understanding effectiveness of teacher attributes. Economic Policy Institute.
- Rosaen, C. L., Carlisle, J. F., Mihocko, E., Melnick, A., & Johnson, J. (2013). Teachers learning from analysis of other teachers’ reading lessons. Teaching and Teacher Education, 35, 170–184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.06.007
- Rubie-Davies, C., Flint, A., & McDonald, L. G. (2012). Teacher beliefs, teacher characteristics, and school contextual factors: What are the relationships? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(2), 270–288. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02025.x
- Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. Von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Sage.
- Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. Chapman & Hall.
- Scheele, A. F., Leseman, P. P. M., & Mayo, A. Y. (2010). The home language environment of monolingual and bilingual children and their language proficiency. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31(1), 117–140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716409990191
- Solheim, O. J., & Lundetrae, K. (2018). Can test construction account for varying gender differences in international reading achievement tests of children, adolescents and young adults?–A study based on nordic results in PIRLS, PISA and PIAAC. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 25(1), 107–126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1239612
- Stahl, K. A. D. (2015). Using professional learning communities to bolster comprehension instruction. Reading Teacher, 68(5), 327–333. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1311
- Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(2), 173–180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4
- Troyer, M. (2017). Teacher implementation of an adolescent reading intervention. Teaching and Teacher Education, 65(2017), 21–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.03.005
- Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291170
- Van der Schoot, M., Reijntjes, A., & Van Lieshout, E. C. (2012). How do children deal with inconsistencies in text? An eye fixation and self-paced reading study in good and poor reading comprehenders. Reading and Writing, 25(7), 1665–1690. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9337-4
- Van Der Schoot, M., Vasbinder, A. L., Horsley, T. M., & Van Lieshout, E. C. (2008). The role of two reading strategies in text comprehension: An eye fixation study in primary school children. Journal of Research in Reading, 31(2), 203–223. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2007.00354.x
- Wassenburg, S. I., Bos, L. T., de Koning, B. B., & van der Schoot, M. (2015). Effects of an inconsistency-detection training aimed at improving comprehension monitoring in primary school children. Discourse Processes, 52(5–6), 463–488. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2015.1025203
- Wilawan, S. (2011). Effects of lexical cohesion and macrorules on EFL students’ main idea comprehension. Reading Improvement, 48(2), 71–87.
- Yuill, N., & Joscelyne, T. (1988). Effect of organizational cues and strategies on good and poor comprehenders’ story understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 152–158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.2.152