References
- Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2017). Sixty years of language motivation research: Looking back and looking forward. SAGE Open, 7(1), 215824401770197–215824401770111. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017701976
- Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. R. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203832400
- Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 191–205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.08.001
- Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x
- Boggs, J. A. (2019). Effects of teacher-scaffolded and self-scaffolded corrective feedback compared to direct corrective feedback on grammatical accuracy in English L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 46, 100671. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100671
- Box, G. E. (1953). Non-normality and tests on variances. Biometrika, 40(3–4), 318–335. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/40.3-4.318
- Boyd, F. B. (2002). Motivation to continue: Enhancing literacy learning for struggling readers and writers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 18(3), 257–277. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07487630290061818
- Busse, V. (2013). How do students of German perceive feedback practices at university? A motivational exploration. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(4), 406–424. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2013.09.005
- Cheng, Y. S. (2004). A measure of second language writing anxiety: Scale development and preliminary validation. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), 313–335. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.07.001
- Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press.
- Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
- Csizér, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (2005). Language learners’ motivational profiles and their motivated learning behavior. Language Learning, 55(4), 613–659. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00319.x
- Csizér, K., & Tankó, G. (2017). English majors’ self-regulatory control strategy use in academic writing and its relation to L2 motivation. Applied Linguistics, 38(3), 386–404. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv033
- Daly, J. A., & Miller, M. D. (1975). Further studies on writing apprehension: SAT scores, success expectations, willingness to take advanced courses, and sex differences. Research in the Teaching of English, 9, 250–256. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/t73755-000
- Dewaele, J. M., & Alfawzan, M. (2018). Does the effect of enjoyment outweigh that of anxiety? In foreign language performance? Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(1), 21–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.1.2
- Dewaele, J.-M., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2014). The two faces of Janus? Anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign language classroom. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4(2), 237–274. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2014.4.2.5
- Dewaele, J. M., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2016). Foreign language enjoyment and foreign language classroom anxiety: The right and left feet of FL learning? In P. D. MacIntyre, T. Gregersen, & S. Mercer (Eds.), Positive psychology in SLA (pp. 215–236). Multilingual Matters.
- Dörnyei, Z., & Csizér, K. (1998). Ten commandments for motivating language learners: Results of an empirical study. Language Teaching Research, 2(3), 203–229. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/136216889800200303
- Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and researching motivation. Longman.
- Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
- Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Psychology Press.
- Dweck, C. S. (2008). Mindsets: How praise is harming youth and what can be done about it. School Library Media Activities Monthly, 24(5), 55.
- Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
- Faris, K. A., Golen, S. P., & Lynch, D. H. (1999). Writing apprehension in beginning accounting majors. Business Communication Quarterly, 62(2), 9–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/108056999906200203
- Ferris, D. (2009). Theory, research, and practice in written corrective feedback: Bridging the gap, or crossing the chasm? New Zealand Studies in Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 1.
- George, D., & Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for windows step by step. A simple study guide and reference. Pearson.
- Haimovitz, K., & Corpus, J. H. (2011). Effects of person versus process praise on student motivation: Stability and change in emerging adulthood. Educational Psychology, 31(5), 595–609. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2011.585950
- Henderlong, J., & Lepper, M. R. (2002). The effects of praise on children’s intrinsic motivation: A review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 128(5), 774–795. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.5.774
- Hidi, S., & Boscolo, P. (Eds.). (2006). Writing and motivation. Leiden: Brill.
- Horwitz, E. (2001). Language anxiety and achievement. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 112–126.
- Horwitz, E., & Young, D. (1991). Language anxiety. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Kamins, M. L., & Dweck, C. S. (1999). Person versus process praise and criticism: Implications for contingent self-worth and coping. Developmental Psychology, 35(3), 835–847. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.3.835
- Koestner, R., Zuckerman, M., & Koestner, J. (1989). Attributional focus of praise and children’s intrinsic motivation: The moderating role of gender. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167289151006
- Kormos, J. (2012). The role of individual differences in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 390–403. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.003
- Lee, S. Y., & Krashen, S. (2002). Predictors of success in writing in English as a foreign language: Reading, revision behavior, apprehension, and writing. College Student Journal, 36(4), 532–543.
- Lessard, L., Grossman, A., & Syme, M. L. (2015). Effects of gender and type of praise on task performance among undergraduates. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 20(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24839/2164-8204.JN20.1.11
- Li, J., Link, S., & Hegelheimer, V. (2015). Rethinking the role of automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback in ESL writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.10.004
- Limpo, T., & Alves, R. (2017). Relating beliefs in writing skill malleability to writing performance: The mediating role of achievement goals and self-efficacy. Journal of Writing Research, 9(2), 97–125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2017.09.02.01
- Lou, N., & Noels, K. (2017). Measuring language mindsets and modeling their relations with goal orientations and emotional and behavioral responses in failure situations. The Modern Language Journal, 101(1), 214–243. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12380
- Lou, N. M., & Noels, K. A. (2019). Promoting growth in foreign and second language education: A research agenda for mindsets in language learning and teaching. System, 86, 102126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102126
- Mahalanobis, P. C. (1936). On the generalized distance in statistics. National Institute of Science of India.
- Papi, M., Bondarenko, A.V., Wawire, B., Jiang, C., Zhou, S. (2019). Feedback-seeking behavior in second language writing: Motivational mechanisms. Reading and Writing, 32, 485–505. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09971-6
- Paulus, T. M. (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), 265–289. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80117-9
- Piniel, K., & Csizér, K. (2015). Changes in motivation, anxiety and self-efficacy during the course of an academic writing seminar. In Z. Dörnyei, A. Henry, & P. D. MacIntyre (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning 9pp (pp. 164–194). Multilingual Matters.
- Rattan, A., Good, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). “It’s ok—Not everyone can be good at math”: Instructors with an entity theory comfort (and demotivate) students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 731–737. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.012
- Schunk, D. H., & Cox, P. D. (1986). Strategy training and attributional feedback with learning disabled students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(3), 201–209. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.78.3.201
- Schunk, D. H., & Rice, J. M. (1986). Extended attributional feedback: Sequence effects during remedial reading instruction. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 6(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431686061005
- Skipper, Y., & Douglas, K. (2012). Is no praise good praise? Effects of positive feedback on children’s and university students’ responses to subsequent failures. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(2), 327–339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02028.x
- Tankó, G., & Csizér, K. (2018). Individual differences and micro-argumentative writing skills in EFL: An exploratory study at a Hungarian university. In M. Chitez, C. Doroholschi, O. Kruse, L. Salski, & D. Tucan (Eds), University writing in central and Eastern Europe: Tradition, transition, and innovation (pp. 149–166). Springer.
- Tavakoli, M., & Zarrinabadi, N. (2018). Differential effects of explicit and implicit corrective feedback on EFL learners’ willingness to communicate. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 12(3), 247–259. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2016.1195391
- Tsai, P. C., & Cheng, Y. S. (2009). The effects of rhetorical task type, English proficiency, and writing anxiety on senior high school students. English Teaching & Learning, 33(3), 95–131.
- Tukey, J. W. (1953). The problem of multiple comparisons. Unpublished manuscript. In The collected works of John W. Tukey VIII. Multiple Comparisons:1948–19831–300. Chapman and Hall.
- Uzun, K., & Zehir Topkaya, E. (2019). The Effects of genre-based instruction and genre-focused feedback on L2 writing performance. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 36(5), 438–461. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2019.1661317
- Waller, L., & Papi, M. (2017). Motivation and feedback: How implicit theories of intelligence predict L2 writers’ motivation and feedback orientation. Journal of Second Language Writing, 35, 54–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.01.004
- Wilks, S. S. (1932). Certain generalizations in the analysis of variance. Biometrika, 24(3–4), 471–494. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/24.3-4.471
- You, C., Dörnyei, Z., & Csizér, K. (2016). Motivation, vision, and gender: A survey of learners of English in China. Language Learning, 66(1), 94–123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12140
- Zarrinabadi, N. (2014). Communicating in a second language: Investigating the effect of teacher on learners’ willingness to communicate. System, 42, 288–295. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.12.014
- Zarrinabadi, N. & Rezazadeh, M. (2020). Why only feedback? Including feed up and feed forward improves non-linguistic aspects of L2 writing. Language Teaching Research, 1362168820960725. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820960725
- Zhao, Q., & Huang, X. (2020). Individual differences in response to attributional praise in an online learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1069–1087. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09720-0