The Role of Cognitive-Motivational Factors in Reading Comprehension of Informative and Narrative Texts: Which Is More Effective?

References

• Ahmad, N. A., Hassan, S. A., Ahmad, A. R., Lay Nee, C., & Othman, N. H. (2016). The typology of parental engagement and its relationship with the typology of teaching practices, student motivation, self-concept and academic achievement. Journal of Management and Marketing Review, 1(1), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmadi, M. R. (2017). The impact of motivation on reading comprehension. International Journal of Research in English Education, 2(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.ijree.2.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Alvermann, D. E., Smith, L. C., & Readence, J. E. (1985). Prior knowledge activation and the comprehension of compatible and incompatible text. Reading Research Quarterly, 20(4), 420–436. https://doi.org/10.2307/747852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arıcı, A. F. (2015). What should Turkish teachers / prospective teachers read? - A “reading list” suggestion-. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 30(3), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. C., & Freebody, P. (1981). Vocabulary knowledge. In J. T. Guthrie (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews (pp. 77–117). International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, L., & Wigfield, A. (1999). Dimensions of reading motivation for reading and their relations to reading activity and reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 34(4), 452–477. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.34.4.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2006a). Going global with social cognitive theory: From prospect to paydirt. In S. I. Donaldson, D. E. Berger, & K. Pezdek (Eds.), Applied psychology: New frontiers and rewarding careers (pp. 53–79). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Barkley, J. M. (2006). Reading education: Is self-efficacy important? Reading Improvement, 43(4), 194–211.
   Google Scholar
• Baumann, J. F. (2009). Intensity in vocabulary instruction and effects on reading comprehension. Topics in Language Disorders, 29(4), 312–328. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0b013e3181c29e22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baydık, B. (2011). Examining the use of metacognitive reading strategies of students with reading difficulties and their teachers’ reading comprehension instruction practices. Education and Science, 36(162), 301–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blachowicz, C., & Ogle, D. (2008). Reading comprehension: Strategies for independent learners (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bordine, J. J. (1998). Improving reading, self-concept, and motivation in at-risk kindergarten students: An intervention [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Lemmon, K. (2004). Individual differences in the inference of word meanings from context: The influence of reading comprehension, vocabulary knowledge, and memory capacity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 671–681. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.4.671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calhoon, M. B. (2005). Effects of a peer-mediated phonological skill and reading comprehension program on reading skill acquisition for middle school students with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(5), 424–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194050380050501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Can, A. (2014). JQuantitative data analysis in the scientific research process with SPSS. Ankara: PegemA.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. M., & Fox, A. C. (2016). Reading self-efficacy predicts word reading but not comprehension in both girls and boys. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 2056–2018. Retrieved January, 2019, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5239817/
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çalışır, F., & Gürel, Z. (2011). Influence of text structure and prior knowledge of the learner on reading comprehension, browsing and perceived control. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 135–145.
   Google Scholar
• Chemers, M. M., Hu, L. T., & Garcia, B. F. (2001). Academic self-efficacy and first year college student performance and adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, P. J., Truelove, E., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2014). Developing reading comprehension. Willey-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Coiro, J., & Dobler, E. (2007). Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth‐grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(2), 214–257. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.42.2.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutting, L. E., & Scarborough, H. S. (2006). Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(3), 277–299. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr1003_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davoudi, M., & Moghadam, H. R. H. (2015). Critical review of the models of reading comprehension with a focus on situation models. International Journal of Linguistics, 7(5), 172–187. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v7i5.8357
   Google Scholar
• Dreyer, C., & Nel, C. (2003). Teaching reading strategies and reading comprehension within a technology-enhanced learning environment. System, 31(3), 349–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00047-2
   Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K. (2005). Comprehension. In S. G. Paris & S. J. Stahl (Eds.), Children’s reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 71–92). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 205–242). Newark: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K., Pearson, P. D., Strachan, S., & Billman, A. (2011). Essential elements of fostering and teaching reading comprehension. In S. J. Samuels & A. E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research says to about reading instruction (pp. 286–314). International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlich, M. F., Kurtz-Costes, B., & Loridant, C. (1993). Cognitive and motivational determinants of reading comprehension in good and poor readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25(4), 365–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969309547826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eidswick, J. (2010). Interest and prior knowledge in second language reading comprehension. JALT Journal, 32(2), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.37546/JALTJJ32.2-2
   Google Scholar
• Farvardin, M. T., & Koosha, M. (2011). The role of vocabulary knowledge in Iranian EFL students’ reading comprehension performance: Breadth or depth? Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(11), 1575–1580. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.11.1575-1580
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, L. G., & Pearson, P. D. (1994). Synthesis of research/reading comprehension: What works. Educational Leadership, 51(5), 62–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, J. R., & Cain, K. (2014). Decoding and reading comprehension: A meta-analysis to identify which reader and assessment characteristics influence the strength of the relationship in English. Review of Educational Research, 84(1), 74–111. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313499616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, D., & Mallery, P. (2016). IBM SPSS statistics 23 step by step: A simple guide and reference (14th ed.). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Williams, J. P., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 279–320. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071002279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golkar, M., & Yamini, M. (2007). Vocabulary, proficiency and reading comprehension. The Reading Matrix, 7(3), 88–112.
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C. (2007). An introduction to strategic reading compherension. In D. S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading compherension strategies: Theories, interventions and Technologies (pp. 1–26). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, Y., Roehrig, A. D., & Williams, R. S. (2011). The relation of morphological awareness and syntactic awareness to adults’ reading comprehension: Is vocabulary knowledge a mediating variable? Journal of Literacy Research, 43(2), 159–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X11403086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., Hoa, A. L. W., Wigfield, A., Tonks, S. M., Humenick, N. M., & Littles, E. (2007). Reading motivation and reading comprehension growth in the later elementary years. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(3), 282–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., & Klauda, A. L. (2014). Effects of classroom practices on reading comprehension, engagement and motivations for adolescents. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(4), 387–416. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., Klauda, S. L., & Ho, A. N. (2013). Modeling the relationships among reading instruction, motivation, engagement, and achievement for adolescents. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(1), 9–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., McRae, A., & Klauda, S. L. (2007). Contributions of concept-oriented reading ınstruction to knowledge about ınterventions for motivations in reading. Educational Psychologist, 42(4), 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701621087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Humenick, N. M., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., & Barbosa, P. (2006). Influences of stimulating tasks on reading motivation and comprehension. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(4), 232–245. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.4.232-246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Metsala, J. L., & Cox, K. E. (1999). Motivational and cognitive predictors of text comprehension and reading amount. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(3), 231–256. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0303_3
   Google Scholar
• Hackett, G., & Betz, N. E. (1989). An exploration of the mathematics self-efficacy/mathematics performance correspondence. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(3), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.2307/749515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, E. D. (2003). Reading comprehension requires knowledge of words and the world: scientific ınsights into the fourth-grade slump and the nation’s stagnant comprehension scores. American Educator, 27(1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hock, M. F., Brasseur, I. F., Deshler, D. D., Catts, H. W., Marquis, J. G., Mark, C. A., & Stribling, J. W. (2009). What is the reading component skill profile of adolescent struggling readers in urbanschools? Learning Disability Quarterly, 32(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/25474660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoy, A. W. (2015). Education psychology (Duygu Özen, trans.). Kaknüs.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, D. W., Paul, P. W., & Smith, F. C. (1997). Prior knowledge and reading comprehension ability of deaf adolescents. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2(3), 172–184.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karahan, B. Ü. (2017). The correlation of reading motivation & reading engagement with reading comprehension skills in 8th graders. Online Submission, 3(9), 527–540.
   Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., Muis, K. R., & Fulton, S. (2011). Reader and text factors in reading comprehension processes. Journal of Research in Reading, 34(4), 365–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01436.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., & Van Den Broek, P. (2007). The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts. Memory & Cognition, 35(7), 1567–1577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kırmızı, F. S. (2008). The effect of the creative drama method on the attitude and reading strategies in Turkish teaching. Pamukkale University Faculty of Education Journal, 23(23), 95–109.
   Google Scholar
• Klassen, R. M. (2010). The confidence to manage learning: The self-efficacy for selfregulated learning of early adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/073194871003300102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klauda, S. L., & Guthrie, J. T. (2015). Comparing relations of motivation, engagement, and achievement among struggling and advanced adolescent readers. Reading and Writing, 28(2), 239–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-014-9523-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koca, F., & Dadandı. (2019). The mediation roles of test anxiety and academic motivation in the relationship between academic self-efficacy and academic achievement. Elementary Education Online, 18(1), 241–252.
   Google Scholar
• Kolić-Vrhovec, S., Bajšanski, I., & Rončević Zubković, B. (2011). The role of reading strategies in scientific text comprehension and academic achievement of university students. Review of Psychology, 18(2), 81–90.
   Google Scholar
• Lau, K. L. (2009). Grade differences in reading motivation among Hong Kong primary and secondary students. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(Pt 4), 713–733. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709909X460042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. S., & Jonson-Reid, M. (2016). The role of self-efficacy in reading achievement of young children in urban schools. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 33(1), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-015-0404-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddux, J. E., & Gosselin, J. T. (2003). Self-efficacy. In. M. R. Leary & J. P. Tamgney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 218–238). The Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Metsala, J. L., Wigfield, A., & McCann, A. D. (1996). Children’s motivation for reading. The Reading Teacher, 50(4), 360–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of National Education (2019). Turkish course curriculum [The elementary school Turkish language arts course (1–8 grades) teaching program and guidance]. Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı.
   Google Scholar
• Moghadam, S. H., Zainal, Z., & Ghaderpour, M. (2012). A review on the important role of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 66, 555–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.300
   Google Scholar
• Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow, L. M. (1984). Reading stories to young children: Effects of story structure and traditional questioning strategies on comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 16(4), 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862968409547521
   Google Scholar
• Nagy, W. E., & Scott, J. (2000). Vocabulary processes. In M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 269–284). Lawrance Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Naseri, M., & Zaferanieh, E. (2012). The Relationship between reading self-efficacy beliefs, reading strategy use and reading comprehension level of Iranian EFL Learners. Word Journal of Eduvation, 2(2), 64–75.
   Google Scholar
• Oakhill, J., & Cain, K. (2012). The precursors of reading ability in young readers: Evidence from a four-year longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(2), 91–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2010.529219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ormrod, J. E. (2015). Learning psychology (Mustafa Baloğlu, trans.). Nobel.
   Google Scholar
• Ozuru, Y., Dempsey, K., & McNamara, D. S. (2009). Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 228–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öztürk, E. (2012). The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies ınventory. Elementary Education Online, 11(2), 292–305.
   Google Scholar
• Özyılmaz, G., & Alcı, B. (2011). The effect of reading comprehension strategy ınstruction on reading comprehension achievement of 7th grade students. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 4(1), 71–94.
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. (1993). Preservice teachers' beliefs: A focus for teacher education. Action in Teacher Education, 15(2), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.1993.10734409
   Google Scholar
• Paris, S. G., Cross, D. R., & Lipson, M. Y. (1984). Informed strategies for learning: A program to improve children's reading awareness and comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(6), 1239–1252. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.6.1239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, R., Hasbrouck, J. E., & Denton, C. (2003). How to tutor students with reading comprehension problems. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 47(1), 45–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/10459880309604429
   Google Scholar
• Paul, P. V. (1996). Reading vocabulary knowledge and deafness. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 1(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.deafed.a014279
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pecjak, S., Podlesek, A., & Pirc, T. (2011). Model of reading comprehension for 5th grade students. Studia Psychologica, 53(1), 53–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesa, N., & Sommers, S. (2007). Improving reading comprehension through application and transfer of reading strategies [Unpublished master's thesis]. Saint Xavier University, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.827687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polloway, E. A., Serna, L., Patton, J. R., & Bailey, J. W. (2014). Özel gereksinimi olan öğrenciler için öğretim stratejileri (Şerife Yücesoy Özkan, trans.). Nobel.
   Google Scholar
• Potelle, H., & Rouet, J. F. (2003). Effects of content representation and readers’ prior knowledge on the comprehension of hypertext. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(3), 327–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00016-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanford, K. L. (2015). Factors affecting the reading comprehension of secondary students with disabilities [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., & Rice, M. J. (1993). Strategy fading and progress feedback: Effects on self-efficacy and comprehension among students receiving remedial reading services. The Journal of Special Education, 27(3), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246699302700301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedita, J. (2005). Effective vocabulary instruction. Insights on Learning Disabilities, 2(1), 33–45.
   Google Scholar
• Shang, H. F. (2010). Reading strategy use, self-efficacy and EFL reading comprehension. Asian EFL Journal, 12(2), 18–42.
   Google Scholar
• Solheim, O. J. (2011). The impact of reading self-efficacy and task value on reading comprehension scores in different item formats. Reading Psychology, 32(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710903256601
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. K., Smith, L. F., Gilmore, A., & Jameson, M. (2012). Students' self-perception of reading ability, enjoyment of reading and reading achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(2), 202–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward a R&D program in reading comprehension. RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, S. A. (2003). Vocabulary and readability: How knowing word meanings affects comprehension. Topics in Language Disorders, 23(3), 241–247. https://doi.org/10.1097/00011363-200307000-00009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, S. A., & Nagy, W. E. (2006). Teaching word meanings. Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Stutz, F., Schaffner, E., & Schiefele, U. (2016). Relations among reading motivation, reading amount, and reading comprehension in the early elementary grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.11.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taboada, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (2006). Contributions of student questioning and prior knowledge to construction of knowledge from reading information text. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15548430jlr3801_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taboada, A., Tonks, S. M., Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (2009). Effects of motivational and cognitive variables on reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 22(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9133-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarchi, C. (2017). Comprehending and recalling from text: The role of motivational and cognitive factors. Issues in Educational Research, 27(3), 600–619.
   Google Scholar
• Tannenbaum, K. R., Torgesen, J. K., & Wagner, R. K. (2006). Relationships between word knowledge and reading comprehension in third-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(4), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr1004_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trapman, M., Van Gelderen, A., Van Steensel, R., Van Schooten, E., & Hulstijn, J. (2014). Linguistic knowledge, fluency and meta‐cognitive knowledge as components of reading comprehension in adolescent low achievers: Differences between monolinguals and bilinguals. Journal of Research in Reading, 37(S1), S3–S21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2012.01539.x
   Google Scholar
• Urfalı-Dadandı, P. (2020). Explanation of reading comprehension with cognitive and motivational factors: an ıntervention program to reading comprehension difficulties [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Trabzon University.
   Google Scholar
• Ürün Karahan, B., & Taşdan, M. (2016). The correlation of attitudes and motivations of 5th and 6th grade students toward reading with the skills of reading comprehension. International Journal of Turkish Literature Culture Education, 5(5/2), 949–969. https://doi.org/10.7884/teke.596
   Google Scholar
• Van Keer, H., & Verhaeghe, J. P. (2005). Effects of explicit reading strategies instruction and peer tutoring on second and fifth graders’ reading comprehension and self-efficacy perceptions. The Journal of Experimental Education, 73(4), 291–329. https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.73.4.291-329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, L., & Van Leeuwe, J. (2008). Prediction of the development of reading comprehension: A longitudinal study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(3), 407–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J. H.-Y., & Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Modeling the effect of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past reading achievement on text comprehension between U.S. and Chinese students. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(2), 162–186. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.39.2.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1997). Relations of children's motivation for reading to the amount and breadth or their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Tonks, S. (2004). The Development of Motivation for Reading and How It Is Influenced by CORI. In J. T. Guthrie, A. Wigfield, & K. C. Perencevich (Eds.), Motivating reading comprehension: Concept-oriented reading instruction (pp. 249–272). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Woolley, G. (2011). Reading comprehension: Assisting children with learning difficulties. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Woolley, G. A., & Hay, I. (2003). Students with late emerging reading difficulties: Reading engagement, motivation, and intervention issues. Reimagining Practice: Researching Change, 3, 175–184.
   Google Scholar
• Yıldırım, K., Yıldız, M., & Ateş, S. (2011). Is vocabulary a strong variable predicting reading comprehension and does the prediction degree of vocabulary vary according to text types? Educational Sciences, Theory & Practice, 11(3), 1531–1547.
   Google Scholar
• Yıldız, M. (2013). The role of the reading motivation, reading fluency and reading comprehension on Türkish 5th graders’ academic achievement. Turkish Studies, 8(4), 1461–1478.
   Google Scholar
• Yıldız, M., & Aktaş, N. (2015). Reading motivation and engagement scale: Turkish adaptation study. International Journal of Human Sciences, 12(2), 1349–1365. https://doi.org/10.14687/ijhs.v12i2.3379
   Google Scholar