A Cross-Case Study of Children’s Oral Narratives and Image Reading of a Wordless Picturebook

References

• Arnott, L., & Yelland, N. J. (2020). Multimodal lifeworlds: Pedagogies for play inquiries and explorations. Journal of Early Childhood Education Research, 9(1), 124–146.
   Google Scholar
• Arizpe, E. (2013). Meaning-making from wordless (or nearly wordless) picturebooks: What educational research expects and what readers have to say. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(2), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2013.767879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arizpe, E., & Styles, M. (2016). Children reading picturebooks: Interpreting visual texts (Rev. Ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bae, J. (2001). Cohesion and coherence in children’s written English: Immersion and English-only classes. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 51–88. https://doi.org/10.5070/L4121005043
   Google Scholar
• Bezemer, J., & Cowan, K. (2021). Exploring reading in social semiotics: Theory and methods. Education 3-13, 49(1), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2020.1824706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2016). Multimodality, learning and communication: A social semiotic frame. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Braid, C., Finch, B. (2015). “Ah, I know why…”: Children developing understandings through engaging with a picture book. Literacy, 49(3), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, K. (2003). Text comprehension and its relation to coherence and cohesion in children’s fictional narratives. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21(3), 335–351. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151003322277739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çetin, M., & Bayat, N., Akdeniz University. (2020). Characteristics of children’s oral texts in terms of coherence and cohesion. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 15(4), 234–252. https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2020.323.13
   Google Scholar
• Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2013). ‘Multiliteracies”: New literacies, new learning. In M. Hawkins (Ed.), Framing languages and literacies (pp. 115–145). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, K., & Kress, G. (2017). Documenting and transferring meaning in the multimodal World. In F. Serafini & E. Gee (Eds.), Remixing multiliteracies: Theory and practice from New London to new times (pp. 50–61). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dressman, M. (2015). Reading as the interpretation of signs. Reading Research Quarterly, 51(1), 111–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esin, C. (2011). Narrative analysis approaches. In N. Frost (Ed.), Qualitative research methods in psychology: Combining core approaches (pp. 92–117). Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, H. M. (2019). How young children learn language and speech. Pediatrics in Review, 40(8), 398–411. https://doi.org/10.1542/pir.2017-0325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández, C. (2013). Mindful storytellers: Emerging pragmatics and theory of mind development. First Language, 33(1), 20–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723711422633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foltz, P. W., Kintsch, W., & Landauer, T. K. (1998). The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25(2–3), 285–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539809545029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., & Cai, Z. (2004). Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(2), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03195564
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Halliday, M. A., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Harmon, S., & Jhala, A. (2021). Toward an automated measure of narrative complexity. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment, 11(4), 38–41. https://doi.org/10.1609/aiide.v11i4.12842
   Google Scholar
• Hornby, A. S., & Cowie, A. P. (1995). Oxford advanced learner’s dictionary (Vol. 1430). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, R., Liu, X., & Zheng, X. (2018). Examining meaning making from reading wordless picture books in Chinese and English by three bilingual children. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 18(2), 214–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798416643357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulston, S. J. (2019). Embodied meaning making: A case study investigating the use of gesture in the responses of year 1 children to a wordless picturebook. Cambridge Open-Review Educational Research e-Journal, 6, 13–33.
   Google Scholar
• Iordanaki, L. (2021). Older children’s responses to wordless picturebooks: Making connections. Children’s Literature in Education, 52(4), 493–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-020-09424-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C., & Kress, G. (2003). Introduction. In C. Jewitt & G. Kress (Eds.), Multimodal literacy (pp. 1–18). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2019). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, I., & Pellegrini, A. D. (1996). The effects of social relationships, writing media, and microgenetic development on first-grade students’ written narratives. American Educational Research Journal, 33(3), 691–718. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312033003691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabuto, B. (2009). Color as a semiotic resource in early sign-making. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 11(2), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Kalantzis, M., Cope, B., Chan, E., & Dalley-Trim, L. (2016). Literacies (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirby, M., Spencer, T., & Chen, Y. (2021). Oral narrative instruction improves kindergarten writing. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 37(6), 574–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2021.1879696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaus, P. (1982). Description and event in narrative. Orbis Litterarum, 37(3), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0730.1982.tb00801.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2020). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (3rd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. (2002). Travels in hypermodality. Visual Communication, 1(3), 299–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/147035720200100303
   Google Scholar
• Lubis, R. (2018). The progress of students reading comprehension through wordless picture books. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(1), 48–52. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.1p.48
   Google Scholar
• Lysaker, J. T., & Miller, A. (2013). Engaging social imagination: The developmental work of wordless book reading. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 13(2), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798411430425
   Google Scholar
• Lysaker, J., & Hopper, E. (2015). A kindergartner’s emergent strategy use during wordless picture book reading. The Reading Teacher, 68(8), 649–657. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lysaker, J. T., Shaw, K., & Alicia, Z. A. (2016). Emergent reading comprehension: Social imagination and kindergarteners’ readings of a wordless picture book. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 39(3), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03651977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lysaker, J. T. (2018). Before words: Wordless picture books and the development of reading in young children. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mathison, S. (2004). Encyclopedia of evaluation. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mavers, D. (2009). Student text-making as semiotic work. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 9(2), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798409105584
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., & Graesser, A. C. (2002). Coh-Metrix: Automated cohesion and coherence scores to predict text readability and facilitate comprehension (Technical report). Institute for Intelligent Systems, University of Memphis.
   Google Scholar
• Metsala, J. L., Sparks, E., David, M., Conrad, N., & Deacon, S. H. (2021). What is the best way to characterize the contributions of oral language to reading comprehension: Listening comprehension or individual oral language skills? Journal of Research in Reading, 44(3), 675–694. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• No author. (1987). I had measles. Wright Group.
   Google Scholar
• Nodelman, P. (1988). Words about pictures: The narrative art of children’s picture books. University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, S. (2019). Systematically working with multimodal data: Research methods in multimodal discourse analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantaleo, S. (2017). Critical thinking and young children’s exploration of picturebook artwork. Language and Education, 31(2), 152–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2016.1242599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris, A. H., & Paris, S. G. (2003). Assessing narrative comprehension in young children. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(1), 36–76. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.38.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, D. B., Gillam, S. L., & Gillam, R. B. (2008). Emerging procedures in narrative assessment: The index of narrative complexity. Topics in Language Disorders, 28(2), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.TLD.0000318933.46925.86
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto, G., Tarchi, C., & Bigozzi, L. (2015). The relationship between oral and written narratives: A three-year longitudinal study of narrative cohesion, coherence, and structure. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 551–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, L. (1978). The reader the text the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, L. (1995). Literature as exploration (5th ed.). Modern Language Association.
   Google Scholar
• Royce, T. (2002). Multimodality in the TESOL classroom: Exploring visual‐verbal synergy. TESOL Quarterly, 36(2), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schick, A., & Melzi, G. (2010). The development of children’s oral narratives across contexts. Early Education & Development, 21(3), 293–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409281003680578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serafini, F. (2022). Beyond the visual: An introduction to researching multimodal phenomena. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Serafini, F. (2012). Expanding the four resource model: Reading visual and multimodal texts. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 7(2), 150–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2012.656347
   Google Scholar
• Serafini, F. (2009). Understanding visual images in picturebooks. In J. Evans (Ed.), Talking beyond the page (pp. 10–25). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Serafini, F., & Gee, E. (2017). Introduction. In F. Serafini & E. Gee (Eds.), Remixing multiliteracies: Theory and practice from New London to new times (pp. 1–16). Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, L. R., & Hudson, J. A. (1991). Tell me a make-believe story: Coherence and cohesion in young children’s picture-elicited narratives. Developmental Psychology, 27(6), 960–974. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.27.6.960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smilan, C. (2017). Visual immersion for cultural understanding and multimodal literacy. Arts Education Policy Review, 118(4), 220–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2017.1287805
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. E. (2017). Composing across modes: A comparative analysis of adolescents’ multimodal composing processes. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(3), 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1182924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struthers, L., Lapadat, J. C., & MacMillan, P. D. (2013). Assessing cohesion in children’s writing: Development of a checklist. Assessing Writing, 18(3), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todaro, S., Millis, K., & Dandotkar, S. (2010). The impact of semantic and causal relatedness and reading skill on standards of coherence. Discourse Processes, 47(5), 421–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530903253825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todirascu, A., François, T., Gala, N., Fairon, C., Ligozat, A. L., Bernhard, D. (2013, October). Coherence and cohesion for the assessment of text readability. In Proceedings of 10th International Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Cognitive Science (NLPCS 2013), HAL (Hyper articles en ligne), (pp. 11–19).
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth, L. (2014). Multimodal reading comprehension: Curriculum expectations and large-scale literacy testing practices. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 9(1), 26–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2014.878968
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth, L., & Cléirigh, C. (2014). Multimodality and reading: The construction of meaning through image-text interaction. In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis. (2nd ed., pp. 176–188). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van Leeuwen, T. (1998). It was just like magic—A multimodal analysis of children’s writing. Linguistics and Education, 10(3), 273–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(99)00010-8
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yelland, N., Muspratt, S., Bartholomaeus, C., Karthikeyan, N., Chan, A. K. W., Leung, V. W. M., Lee, I.-F., Soo, L. M. J., Lim, K. M., & Saltmarsh, S. (2021). Lifeworlds of nine-and ten-year-old children: Out-of-school activities in three global cities. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 19(3), 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2020.1816921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1994). Discovering the future of the case study. Method in evaluation research. Evaluation Practice, 15(3), 283–290.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, R., Xue, M., & Lysaker, J. T. (2022). Between and within the pictures: Gaps and imagination in comprehending wordless books. Literacies across the Lifespan, 3, 3–12.
   Google Scholar