Redesigning the Core Literacy Block: A Two-Year Evaluation Study

References

• Austin, P. C. (2011). An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(3), 399–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.568786
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biancarosa, G., Bryk, A. S., & Dexter, E. (2010). Assessing the value-added effects of Literacy Collaborative professional development on student learning. Elementary School Journal, 111, 7–34. https://doi.org/10.1086/653468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, D., & Hiebert, E. H. (2010). If I follow the teachers’ editions, isn’t that enough?: Analyzing reading volume in six core reading programs. The Elementary School Journal, 110, 347–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/648982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, K., & Thurston, L. P. (2010). English language learner academic engagement and instructional grouping configurations. American Secondary Education, 39, 45–60. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41406182
   Google Scholar
• Buttaro, A., & Catsambis, S. (2019). Ability grouping in the early grades: Long-term consequences for educational equity in the United States. Teachers College Record, 121(2), 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811912100204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cefalu, M., Ridgeway, G., McCaffrey, D., Morral, A., Griffin, B. A., Burgette, L. (2021). twang: Toolkit for weighting and analysis of nonequivalent groups. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/package=twang
   Google Scholar
• Connor, C. M., Morrison, F. J., Fishman, B., Crowe, E. C., Al Otaiba, S., & Schatschneider, C. (2013). A longitudinal cluster-randomized controlled study on the accumulating effects of individualized literacy instruction on students’ reading from first through third grade. Psychological Science, 24(8), 1408–1419. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612472204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correnti, R., & Rowan, B. (2007). Opening up the black box: Literacy instruction in schools participating in three comprehensive school reform programs. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 298–338. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207302501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyne, M. D., Oldham, A., Leonard, K., Burns, D., & Gage, N. (2016). Delving into the details: Implementing multi-tiered K-3 reading supports in high priority schools. In B. Foorman (Ed.), Challenges and solutions to implementing effective reading intervention in schools. New directions in child and adolescent development, number 154 (pp. 67–85). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20175
   Google Scholar
• Denton, C. A., Fletcher, J. M., Taylor, W. P., Barth, A. E., & Vaughn, S. (2014). An experimental evaluation of guided reading and explicit interventions for primary-grade students at-risk for reading difficulties. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 7(3), 268–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2014.906010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwér, Å., Keenan, J. M., Olson, R. K., Byrne, B., & Samuelsson, S. (2013). Longitudinal stability and predictors of poor oral comprehenders and poor decoders. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115(3), 497–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Every Student Succeeds Act, 20 U.S.C. § 6301 (2015).
   Google Scholar
• Fien, H., Chard, D. J., & Baker, S. K. (2021). Can the evidence revolution and multi-tiered systems of support improve education equity and reading achievement? Reading Research Quarterly, 56, S105–S118. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fien, H., Smith, J. L. M., Smolkowski, K., Baker, S. K., Nelson, N. J., & Chaparro, E. (2015). An examination of the efficacy of a multitiered intervention on early reading outcomes for first grade students at risk for reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(6), 602–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414521664
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firmender, J. M., Reis, S. M., & Sweeny, S. M. (2013). Reading comprehension and fluency levels ranges across diverse classrooms: The need for differentiated reading instruction and content. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986212460084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, R. P., Solari, E. J., McIntyre, N. S., & Denton, C. A. (2018). Early reading skill profiles in typically developing and at-risk first grade readers to inform targeted early reading instruction. Journal of School Psychology, 69, 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.05.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossen, B. (1996). How should we group to achieve excellence with equity? National Center to Improve the Tools of Educators. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED460467.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hanford, E. (2018). Hard words: Why aren’t kids being taught to read? American Public Media, APM Reports. Retrieved from https://www.apmreports.org/story/2018/09/10/hard-words-why-american-kids-arent-being-taught-to-read
   Google Scholar
• Hoyer, K. M., Sparks, D. (2017). Stats in brief: Instructional time for third- and eighth-graders in public and private schools: School year 2011–12 (NCES 2017-076). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2017/2017076.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Illuminate Education (n.d.). Fastbridge learning. Author. Retrieved from www.fastbridgelearning.org
   Google Scholar
• Koh, G. A., & Askell-Williams, H. (2021). Sustainable school improvement in complex adaptive systems: A scoping review. Review of Education, 9, 281–314. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3246
   Google Scholar
• Lupo, S. M., Tortorelli, L., Invernizzi, M., Ryoo, J. H., & Strong, J. Z. (2019). An exploration of text difficulty and knowledge support on adolescents’ comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 54, 457–479. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathes, P. G., & Torgesen, J. K. (2000). A call for equity in reading instruction for all students: A response to Allington and Woodside-Jiron. Educational Researcher, 29, 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X029006004
   Google Scholar
• McGill-Franzen, A., Zmach, C., Solic, K., & Zeig, J. L. (2006). The confluence of two policy mandates: Core reading programs and 3rd-grade retention in Florida. The Elementary School Journal, 107, 67–91. https://doi.org/10.1086/509527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics (2019). Explore results for the 2019 NAEP reading assessment. National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://www.nationsreportcard.gov
   Google Scholar
• Parrila, R., Aunola, K., Leskinen, E., Nurmi, J. E., & Kirby, J. R. (2005). Development of individual differences in reading: Results from longitudinal studies in English and Finnish. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 299–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.299Mismatch]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilonieta, P. (2010). Instruction of research-based comprehension strategies in basal reading programs. Reading Psychology, 31, 150–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710902754119
   Google Scholar
• Poole, D. (2008). Interactional differentiation in the mixed-ability group: A situated view of two struggling readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 43, 228–250. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.43.3.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Redding, C., & Nguyen, T. D. (2020). The relationship between school turnaround and student outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42, 493–519. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373720949513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reutzel, D. R., Child, A., Jones, C. D., & Clark, S. K. (2014). Explicit instruction in core reading programs. The Elementary School Journal, 114, 406–430. https://doi.org/10.1086/674420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, L., Lambert, M. C., Towner, J., & Caros, J. (2016). A comparison of direct instruction and balanced literacy: An evaluative comparison for a Pacific Northwest rural school district. Reading Improvement, 53, 147–164.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J. A., Scott, G., & Sibbald, T. M. (2012). Student achievement outcomes comprehensive school reform: A Canadian case study. The Journal of Educational Research, 105, 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2010.532835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., Chambers, B., Cheung, A., & Davis, S. (2009). Effective reading programs for the upper elementary grades: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1391–1466. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309341374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St. John, E. P., Manset-Williamson, G., Chung, C. G., & Michael, R. S. (2005). Assessing the rationales for educational reforms: An examination of policy claims about professional development, comprehensive reform, and direct instruction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41, 480–519. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X04269618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenbergen-Hu, S., Makel, M. C., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2016). What one hundred years of research says about the effects of ability grouping and acceleration on K-12 students’ academic achievement: Findings of two second-order meta-analyses. Review of Educational Research, 86, 849–899. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316675417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torppa, M., Vasalampi, K., Eklund, K., Sulkunen, S., & Niemi, P. (2020). Reading comprehension difficulty is often distinct from difficulty in reading fluency and accompanied with problems in motivation and school well-being. Educational Psychology, 40, 62–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1670334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ryzin, M. J., Fishbein, D., & Biglan, A. (2018). The promise of prevention science for addressing intergenerational poverty. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 24, 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanzek, J., Vaughn, S., Scammacca, N., Gatlin, B., Walker, M. A., & Capin, P. (2016). Meta-analysis of the effects of tier 2 type reading interventions in grades K-3. Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 551–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9321-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woulfin, S., & Gabriel, R. E. (2020). Interconnected infrastructure for improving reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 55, S109–S117. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar