304
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Themed Articles: European Research on Electronic Citizen Participation and Engagement in Public Policy Making

A Multi-Method Evaluation of Different Models of Structured Electronic Consultation on Government Policies

&
Pages 284-294 | Published online: 05 Oct 2012

REFERENCES

  • Bicking , M. and Wimmer , M. 2008 . Deliverable 2.5: E-Participation Projects Evaluation Methodology , MOMENTUM Project Deliverable .
  • Bicking , M. and Wimmer , M. September 1–3 2009 . “ Evaluation framework to assess eParticipation projects in Europe ” . In Proceedings of Ongoing Research, General Development Issues and Projects of ePart 2009—1st International Conference September 1–3 , Linz , , Austria
  • Coglianese , C. 1997 . Assessing consensus: The promise and performance of negotiated rulemaking . Duke Law Journal , 46 ( 6 ) : 1255 – 1349 .
  • Conklin , J. 2003 . “ Dialog mapping: Reflections on an industrial strength case study ” . In Visualizing argumentation: Software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making , Edited by: Kirschner , P. , Buckingham Shum , S. and Carr , C. London : Springer Verlag .
  • Conklin , J. and Begeman , M. 1989 . gIBIS: A tool for all reasons . Journal of the American Society for Information Science , 40 ( 3 ) : 200 – 213 .
  • Davis , F. D. 1989 . Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology . MIS Quarterly , 13 ( 3 ) : 319 – 340 .
  • Ferro , E. and Molinari , F. 2010 . Making sense of Gov 2.0 strategies: “No citizens, no party” . eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government , 2 ( 1 )
  • Frewer , L. J. and Rowe , G. 2005 . “ Evaluating public participation exercises: Strategic and practical issues ” . In Evaluating Public Participation in Policy Making , 85 – 108 . Paris , , France : OECD Publication Service .
  • Hagemann , C. 2002 . Participation in and contents of two Dutch political party discussion lists on the internet . Javnost – The Public , 9 ( 2 ) : 61 – 76 .
  • Karacapilidis , N. , Loukis , E. and Dimopoulos , S. 2005 . Computer-supported G2G collaboration for public policy and decision making . Journal of Enterprise Information Management , 18 ( 5 ) : 602 – 624 .
  • Kunz , W. and Rittel , H. W. J. 1979 . Issues as elements of information systems: Working paper No. 131 , Heidelberg , , Germany : Studiengruppe für Systemforschung .
  • Livingstone, S., Bober, M., & Helsper, E. (2004). Active participation or just more information?: Young people's take-up of opportunities to act and interact on the Internet. London: LSE Research Online. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk)
  • Loukis , E. 2012 . “ Evaluating e-participation projects and lessons learnt ” . In Empowering open and collaborative governance: Technologies and methods for electronic citizen participation in public policy making , Edited by: Charalabidis , Y. and Koussouris , S. Berlin : Heidelberg: Springer Verlag .
  • Loukis , E. , Wimmer , M. , Charalabidis , Y. , Triantafillou , A. and Gatautis , R. September 2007 . Argumentation systems and ontologies for enhancing public participation in the legislation process , September , 3 – 7 . Regensburg , , Germany : Proceedings of EGOV 2007 International Conference .
  • Loukis , E. and Xenakis , A. 2008 . “ A framework for evaluating eParticipation in the legislation development process ” . In Proceedings of ongoing research and projects of Electronic Government (EGOV 08) , Edited by: Ferro , E. , Scholl , H. J. and Wimmer , M. A. Turin , , Italy : August 31–September 5 .
  • Macintosh , A. January 2004 . Characterizing e-participation in policy-making , January , 5 – 8 . Big Island of Hawaii : Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-37) .
  • Macintosh , A. and Whyte , A. 2008 . Towards an evaluation framework for eParticipation . Transforming Government: People, Process & Policy , 2 ( 1 ) : 16 – 30 .
  • Nam , T. 2012 . Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via Government 2.0 . Government Information Quarterly , 29 : 12 – 20 .
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation & Development (OECD) . 2001 . Citizens as partners: Information, consultation and public participation in policy-making , Paris , , France : OECD Publication Service .
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation & Development (OECD) . 2003 . Promise and problems of e-Democracy: Challenges of online citizen engagement , Paris , , France : OECD Publication Service .
  • Panopoulou , E. , Tambouris , E. and Tarabanis , K. 2010 . eParticipation initiatives in Europe: Learning from practitioners . Proceedings of Electronic Participation – ePart 2010 , August 29–September 2 : 54 – 65 . Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Phang , C. W. and Kankanhalli , A. 2008 . A framework of ICT exploitation for e-participation initiatives . Communications of the ACM , 51 ( 12 ) : 128 – 132 .
  • Rittel , H. W. J. and Webber , M. M. 1973 . Dilemmas in a general theory of planning . Policy Sciences , 4 : 155 – 169 .
  • Rowe , G. and Frewer , L. J. 2004 . Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises: A research agenda . Science, Technology, & Human Values , 29 ( 4 ) : 512 – 57 .
  • Rose , J. and Sæbø , Ø . 2010 . Designing Deliberation Systems . The Information Society , 26 : 228 – 240 .
  • Schepers , J. and Wetzels , M. 2007 . A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects . Information & Management , 44 : 90 – 103 .
  • Scherer , S. , Neuroth , C. , Schefbeck , G. , Wimmer , M. A. and Tambouris , E. September 1–3 2009 . “ Enabling eParticipation of the youth in the public debate on legislation in Austria: A critical reflection. In A. Macintosh ” . In Proceedings of the ePart Conference 2009 September 1–3 , 151 – 162 . Linz , , Austria 2009
  • Venkatesh , V. and Davis , F. D. 2000 . A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies . Management Science , 46 ( 2 ) : 186 – 204 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.