Developing Multi-Layer Information Infrastructures: Advancing Social Innovation through Public–Private Governance

REFERENCES

• De Bruijn, J. A., & Ten Heuvelhof, E. F. (2008). Management in networks: On multi-actor decision making. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Bruijn, J. A., Ten Heuvelhof, E. F., & In ‘t Veld, R. J. (2010). Procesmanagement: Why project management fails in complex decision making processes (2nd ed.). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management is dead—Long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3),467–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chwelos, P., Benbasat, I., & Dexter, A. S. (2001). Research report: Empirical test of an EDI adoption model. Information Systems Research, 12(3), 304–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantinides, P. (2012). Perspectives and implications for the development of information infrastructures. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• El-Haddadeh, R., Weerakkody, V., & Al-Shafi, S. (2013). The complexities of electronic services implementation and institutionalization in the public sector. Information & Management, 50, 135–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flinders, M. (2005). The politics of public–private partnerships. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations (BJPIR), 7, 215–239.
   Google Scholar
• Fountain, J. E. (2001). Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimsey, D., & Lewis, M. K. (2007). Public private partnerships: The worldwide revolution in infrastructure provision and project finance. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Hanseth, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: The case of building internet. Journal of Information Technology, 25, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, P., & Saunders, C. (1997). Power and trust: Critical factors in the adoption and use of electronic data interchange. Organization Science, 8(1), 23–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiskala, R. (2007). Social innovations: Structural and power perspectives. In T. J. Hämäläinen & R. Heiskala (eds.), Social innovations, institutional change, and economic performance. Making sense of structural adjustment processes in industrial, regions, and societies sectors (pp. 52–79). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Howaldt, J. R., & Schwarz, M. (2010). Social innovation: Concepts, research fields, and international trends. Dortmund, Germany: TU Dortmund.
   Google Scholar
• Irani, Z., Elliman, T., & Jackson, P. (2007). Electronic transformation of government in the UK: A research agenda. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(4), 327–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, M., Chun, S. A., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2009). Building the next generation digital government infrastructures. Government Information Quarterly, 26(2), 233–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, T. B., & Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values: An inventory. Administration & Society, 39(3), 354–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klievink, B., Janssen, M., & Tan, Y.-H. (2012). A stakeholder analysis of business-to-government information sharing: The governance of a public–private platform. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 8(4), 54–64.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, K., & Van Dissel, H. G. (1996). Sustainable collaboration: Managing conflict and cooperation in interorganizational systems. MIS Quarterly, 20(3), 279–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linder, S. H. (1999). Coming to terms with the public–private partnership: A grammar of multiple meanings. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(1), 35–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milward, H. B., Provan, K. G., Fish, A., Isett, K. R., & Huang, K. (2010). Governance and collaboration: An evolutionary study of two mental health networks. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(Supplement 1), i125–i141.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., Martinelli, F., Swyngedouw, E., & González, S. (2005). towards alternative model(s) of local innovation. Urban Studies, 42(11), 1969–1990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northrop, L., Feiler, P., Gabriel, R. P., Goodenough, J., Linger, R., Longstaff, T., … Wallnau, K. (2006). Ultra-large-scale systems: The software challenge of the future—ultra-large-scale systems study report. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. (2004). Crafting information technology governance. EDPACS: The EDP Audit, Control, and Security Newsletter, XXXII(6), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Podolny, J. M., & Page, K. L. (1998). Network forms of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 57–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public management reform: A comparative analysis (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pongsiri, N. (2003). Public–private partnerships in Thailand: A case study of the electric utility industry. Public Policy and Administration, 18(3), 69.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenau, P. V. (1999). Introduction. The strengths and weaknesses of public–private policy partnerships. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(1), 10–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rü, D., & Lurtz, K. (2012). Mapping the various meanings of social innovation: Towards a differentiated understanding of an emerging concept. EBS Business School Research Paper Series, 12(3), 1–51.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M. (2002). The tools of government: A guide to the new governance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Selsky, J. W., & Parker, B. (2005). Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. Journal of Management, 31(6), 849–873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 17–28.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. (2006). Public value management: A new narrative for networked governance? The American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 41–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K., & Sørensen, C. (2010). Digital infrastructures: The missing IS research agenda. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 748–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weerakkody, V., & Dhillon, G. (2008). Moving from e-government to t-government: A study of process re-engineering challenges in a UK local authority perspective. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 4(4), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zapf, W. (1991). The role of innovations in modernization theory. International Review of Sociology, 2(3), 83–94.
   Google Scholar