The Contribution of the Project Management Office: A Balanced Scorecard Perspective

REFERENCES

• Ahn, H. (2001). Applying the balanced scorecard concept: An experience report. Long Range Planning,34(4), 441–461. doi:10.1016/S0024-6301(01)00057-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, B., Henriksen, B., & Wenche, A. (2007). Benchmarking of project management office establishment: Extracting best practices. Journal of Management in Engineering,23(2), 97–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artto, K., Kulvik, I., Poskela, J., & Turkulainen, V. (2001). The integrative role of the project management office in the front end of innovation. International Journal of Project Management,29, 408–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aubry, M., Hobbs, B., & Thuillier, D. (2008). Organisational project management: An historical approach to the study of PMOs. International Journal of Project Management,26(1), 38–43.
   Google Scholar
• Aubry, M., Müller, R., Hobbs, B., & Blomquist, T. (2010). Project management offices in transition. International Journal of Project Management,28(8), 766–778. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, P. (2002). Putting strategy into the balanced scorecard. Strategic Finance,83(7), 44–52.
   Google Scholar
• Buttrick, R. (1997). Project workout. London, UK: Pearson Education Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Cerpa, N., & Verner, J. M. (2009). Why did your project fail? Communications of the ACM,52(12), 130–134. doi:10.1145/1610252.1610286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C. C., Law, C. C. H., & Yang, S. C. (2009). Managing ERP implementation failure: A project management perspective. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,56(1), 157–170. doi:10.1109/TEM.2008.2009802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiung-Ju, L., & Lung-Chun, H. (2006). A dynamic connection of balanced scorecard applied for the hotel. Journal of Services Research,6(2), 91–118.
   Google Scholar
• Cuellar, M. J. (2010). Using realist social theory to explain project outcomes. International Journal of Information Technology Project Management,1(4), 38–52. doi:10.4018/jitpm.2010100103
   Google Scholar
• Dai, C., & Wells, W. (2004). An exploration of project management office features and their relationship to project performance. International Journal of Project Management,22(7), 523–532. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Desouza, K. C., & Evaristo, J. R. (2006). Project management offices: A case of knowledge-based archetypes. International Journal of Information Management,26(5), 414–423. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drury, L. (2008). IT project manager levels, PMO adoption rising. Computer Economics Report,30(12), 12–20.
   Google Scholar
• Evaristo, J. R., & Van Fenema, P. C. (1999). A typology of project management: Emergence and evolution of new forms. International Journal of Project Management,17(5), 275–281. doi:10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00041-6
   Google Scholar
• Hill, G. M. (2004). Evolving the project management office: A competency continuum. Information Systems Management,21(4), 45–51. doi:10.1201/1078/44705.21.4.20040901/84187.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbs, B., & Aubry, M. (2007). A multi-phase research program investigating project management offices (PMOs): The results of phase 1. Project Management Journal,38(1), 74–86.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, B., & Aubry, M. (2008). An empirically grounded search for a typology of project management offices. Project Management Journal,39, S69–S82. doi:10.1002/pmj.20061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbs, B., Aubry, M., & Thuillier, D. (2008). The project management office as an organisational innovation. International Journal of Project Management,26(5), 547–555. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.05.008
   Google Scholar
• Howard, R. A. (1989). Knowledge maps. Management Science,35(8), 903–922. doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S. (1996). The balanced scorecard. Boston, MA: HBS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001a). Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: Part I. Accounting Horizons,15(1), 87–104. doi:10.2308/acch.2001.15.1.87
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001b). Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: Part II. Accounting Horizons,15(2), 147–160. doi:10.2308/acch.2001.15.2.147
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004a). How strategy maps frame an organization’s objectives. Financial Executive,20(2), 40–45.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004b). Strategy maps: Converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Keil, M., Mann, J., & Rai, A. (2000). Why software projects escalate: An empirical analysis and test of four theoretical models. MIS Quarterly,24(4), 631–664. doi:10.2307/3250950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendra, K., & Taplin, L. J. (2004). Project success: A cultural framework. Project Management Journal,35(1), 30–45.
   Google Scholar
• Li, L., & Yetton, P. (2007). The contingent effects on project performance of conducting project reviews and deploying project management offices. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,54(4), 789–799. doi:10.1109/tem.2007.906852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lock, D. (2000). Project management. Aldershot, UK: Gower Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Marr, B., & Schiuma, G. (2003). Business performance measurement—Past, present and future. Management Decision,41(8), 680–687. doi:10.1108/00251740310496198
   Google Scholar
• Martin, N. L., Pearson, J. M., & Furumo, K. (2007). IS project management: Size, practices and the project management office. Journal of Computer Information Systems,47(4), 52–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinsons, M., Davison, R., & Tse, D. (1999). The balanced scorecard: A foundation for the strategic management of information systems. Decision Support Systems,25(1), 71–88. doi:10.1016/S0167-9236(98)00086-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadkarni, S., & Shenoy, P. P. (2004). A causal mapping approach to constructing Bayesian networks. Decision Support Systems,38(2), 259–281. doi:10.1016/S0167-9236(03)00095-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R. (2007). IT project management: Infamous failures, classic mistakes, and best practices. MIS Quarterly Executive,6(2), 67–78.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D. (1998). Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrinelli, S. (2002). Shaping context: The role and challenge for programmes. International Journal of Project Management,20(3), 229–233. doi:10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00073-4
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrinelli, S., & Garagna, L. (2009). Towards a conceptualisation of PMOs as agents and subjects of change and renewal. International Journal of Project Management,27(7), 649–656. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pemsel, S., & Wiewiora, A. (2013). Project management office a knowledge broker in project-based organisations. International Journal of Project Management,31(1), 31–42. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto, J. K., & Cleland, D. I. (2004). The elements of project success. In Anonymous (Ed.), Field guide to project management (Vol. 2, pp. 14–27). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Project Management Institute. (2008). A guide to the project management body of knowledge. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Project Management Offices Grow in Popularity. (2012). Computer Economics Report.34(5), 8–13.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, C., Gemino, A., & Reich, B. H. (2007). The impact of size and volatility on IT project performance. Communications of the ACM,50(11), 79–84. doi:10.1145/1297797.1297801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scavarda, A., Bouzdine-Chameeva, T., Goldstein, S. M., Hays, J. M., & Hill, A. V. (2006). A methodology for constructing collective causal maps. Decision Sciences,37(2), 263–283. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2006.00124.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenk, K. D., Vitalari, N. P., & Davis, K. S. (1998). Differences between novice and expert analysts: What do we know and what do we do? Journal of Management Information Systems,15(1), 9–50.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R., Lyytinen, K., Keil, M., & Cule, P. (2001). Identifying software project risks: An international Delphi study. Journal of Management Information Systems,17(4), 5–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, R., Keil, M., & Kasi, V. (2009). Identifying and overcoming the challenges of implementing a project management office. European Journal of Information Systems,18(5), 409–427. doi:10.1057/ejis.2009.29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spelta, A. G., & Albertin, A. L. (2012). Project management offices in the IT area: A context-discriminant model for their establishment. Information Systems Management,29(1), 40–54. doi:10.1080/10580530.2012.634296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanleigh, M. (2006). From crisis to control: New standards for project management. Ivey Business Journal,70(4), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, L. J., & Bestor, W. E. (2000). Applying a balanced scorecard to health care organizations. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance,11(3), 75–82. doi:10.1002/1097-0053(200003/04)11:3<75::AID-JCAF12>3.0.CO;2-Y
   Google Scholar
• Unger, B. N., Gemünden, H. G., & Aubry, M. (2012). The three roles of a project portfolio management office: Their impact on portfolio management execution and success. International Journal of Project Management,30(5), 608–620. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Zee, J. T. M., & De Jong, B. (1999). Alignment is not enough: Integrating business and information technology management with the balanced business scorecard. Journal of Management Information Systems,16(2), 137–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, L., & Keil, M. (2004). Software projects risks and their effect on outcomes. Communications of the ACM,47(4), 68–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, J., & Daniel, E. M. (2013). The role of project management offices (PMOs) in IS project success and management satisfaction. Journal of Enterprise Information Management,26(3), 316–336. doi:10.1108/17410391311325252
   Google Scholar
• Williams, T. (2008). How do organizations learn lessons from projects—And do they? IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,55(2), 248–266. doi:10.1109/tem.2007.912920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windeatt, J., & Knox, I. (1991). Catalyst: A programme for change within British Airways. Journal of Information Technology,6(3–4), 204–207. doi:10.1057/jit.1991.34
   Google Scholar
• Young, T. L. (1998). The handbook of project management. London, UK: Kogan Page Ltd.
   Google Scholar