Quality and Value of the Data Resource in Large Enterprises

REFERENCES

• Ahituv, N. (1989). Assessing the value of information: Problems and approaches. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Information Systems, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Arazy, O. & Kopak, R. (2011). On the measurability of information quality. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(1), 89–99. doi:10.1002/asi.21447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, K. & McGaughey, R. (2006). Accounting for data: A shortcoming in accounting for intangible assets. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 10(2), 85–95.
   Google Scholar
• Badenoch, D., Reid, C., Burton, P., Gibb, F., & Oppenheim, C. (1994). The value of information. In M. Feeney & M. Grieves (Eds.), The value and impact of information (pp. 9–75). London, UK: Bowker-Saur.
   Google Scholar
• Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. doi:10.1177/014920639101700108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barney, J. (1995). Looking inside for competitive advantage. The Academy of Management Executive, 9(4), 49–61. doi:10.5465/AME.1995.9512032192
   Google Scholar
• Batini, C., Cappiello, C., Francalanci, C., & Maurino, A. (2009). Methodologies for data quality assessment and improvement. ACM Computing Surveys, 41(3), 1–52. doi:10.1145/1541880.1541883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, J., Poeppelbuss, J., Gloerfeld, F., & Bruhns, P. (2009). The impact of data quality on value based management of financial institutions. Proceedings of the 15th Americas Conference on Information Systems, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. K., & Mead, M. (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 369–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000). A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 169–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobrowski, M. & Vazques Soler, S. (2004). DQ options: Evaluating data quality projects using real options. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Information Quality, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Boisot, M. & Canals, A. (2004). Data, information, and knowledge: Have we got it right? Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14(1), 43–67. doi:10.1007/s00191-003-0181-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodie, M. L. (1980). Data quality in information systems. Information & Management, 3, 245–258. doi:10.1016/0378-7206(80)90035-X
   Google Scholar
• Caballero, I., Verbo, E., Calero, C., & Piattini, M. (2007). A data quality measurement information model based on ISO/IEC 15939. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Information Quality, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, M. P. (1984). Costing management information—A more formal approach. Journal of Information Science, 9(3), 117–122. doi:10.1177/016555158400900305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, P. P. -S. (1976). The entity-relationship model: Toward a unified view of data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 1(1), 9–36. doi:10.1145/320434.320440
   Google Scholar
• Cleven, A. & Wortmann, F. (2010). Uncovering four strategies to approach master data management. Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Poipu, Kauai, HI.
   Google Scholar
• DAMA. (2008). The DAMA dictionary of data management. Bradley Beach, NJ: Technics Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dierickx, I. & Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35(12), 1504–1511. doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.12.1504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. doi:10.5465/AMR.1989.4308385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eppler, M. J. & Helfert, M. (2004). A framework for the classification of data quality costs and an analysis of their progression. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Information Quality, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2006). Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation, and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH). Brussels, Belgium: European Parliament, Council of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Even, A. & Shankaranarayanan, G. (2007). Utility-driven assessment of data quality. ACM SIGMIS Database, 38(2), 75–93. doi:10.1145/1240616.1240623
   Google Scholar
• Fan, W., Geerts, F., Jia, X., & Kementsietsidis, A. (2008). Conditional functional dependencies for capturing data inconsistencies. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, Article 6 33(2), 1–48. doi:10.1145/1366102.1366103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feeny, D. F. & Ives, B. (1990). In search of sustainability: Reaping long-term advantage from investments in information technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7(1), 27–46.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, T. (2009). The data asset: How smart companies govern their data for business success. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, C., Levitin, A., & Redman, T. (1994). The notion of data and its quality dimensions. Information Processing & Management, 30(1), 9–19. doi:10.1016/0306-4573(94)90020-5]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, T. (2006). Gartner study on data quality shows that IT still bears the burden. Stamford, CT: Gartner.
   Google Scholar
• Fry, J. P. & Sibley, E. H. (1976). Evolution of data-base management systems. ACM Computing Surveys, 8(1), 7–42. doi:10.1145/356662.356664
   Google Scholar
• Goodhue, D. L., Kirsch, L. J., Quillard, J. A., & Wybo, M. D. (1992). Strategic data planning: Lessons from the field. MIS Quarterly, 16(1), 267–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodhue, D. L., Quillard, J. A., & Rockart, J. F. (1988). Managing the data resource: A contingency perspective. MIS Quarterly, 12(3), 373–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregor, S. (2006). The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 611–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haug, A. & Arlbjørn, J. S. (2011). Barriers to master data quality. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 24(3), 288–303. doi:10.1108/17410391111122862
   Google Scholar
• Heinrich, B. & Klier, M. (2009). A novel data quality metric for timeliness considering supplemental data. Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Information Systems, Verona, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Heinrich, B. & Klier, M. (2011). Assessing data currency—A probabilistic approach. Journal of Information Science, 37(1), 86–100. doi:10.1177/0165551510392653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfat, C. E. & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997–1010. doi:10.1002/smj.332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilton, R. W. (1981). The determinants of information value: Synthesizing some general results. Management Science, 27(1), 57–64. doi:10.1287/mnsc.27.1.57
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer, J. (1973). Where are we in the theory of information? American Economic Review, 63(2), 31–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horne, N. W. (1995). Information as an asset—The board agenda. Computer Audit Update, 1995(9), 5–11. doi:10.1016/0960-2593(95)90246-5
   Google Scholar
• Karr, A. F., Sanil, A. P., & Banks, D. L. (2006). Data quality: A statistical perspective. Statistical Methodology, 3, 137–173. doi:10.1016/j.stamet.2005.08.005
   Google Scholar
• Khatri, V. & Brown, C. V. (2010). Designing data governance. Communications of the ACM, 53(1), 148–152. doi:10.1145/1629175.1629210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, S. J. & Nehyba, S. J. (1982). Data resource management. In R. L. Nolan (Ed.), Managing the data resource function (2nd ed., pp. 185–209). St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Knolmayer, G. F. & Röthlin, M. (2006). Quality of material master data and its effect on the usefulness of distributed ERP systems. In J. F. Roddick (Ed.), Advances in conceptual modelling—Theory and practice (pp. 362–371). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, D. B. (1999). The economic value of information. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lederer, A. L. & Hannu, S. (1996). Toward a theory of strategic information systems planning. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 5(3), 237–253. doi:10.1016/S0963-8687(96)80005-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A. S. (1989). A scientific methodology for MIS case studies. MIS Quarterly, 13(1), 32–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. W., Strong, D. M., Kahn, B. K., & Wang, R. Y. (2002). AIMQ: A methodology for information quality assessment. Information & Management, 40(2), 133–146. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00043-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitan, K. B. (1982). Information resources as “Goods” in the life cycle of information production. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33(1), 44–54. doi:10.1002/asi.4630330108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitin, A. V. & Redman, T. C. (1998). Data as a resource: Properties, implications, and prescriptions. Sloan Management Review, 40(1), 89–101.
   Google Scholar
• Mata, F. J., Fuerst, W. L., & Barney, J. B. (1995). Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 487–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moody, D. & Walsh, P. (1999). Measuring the value of information: An asset valuation approach. Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Information Systems, Copenhagen, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, D. (2011). How to plan, participate, and prosper in the data economy. Stamford, CT: Gartner.
   Google Scholar
• Oppenheim, C., Stenson, J., & Wilson, R. M. S. (2001). The attributes of information as an asset. New Library World, 102(11), 458–464. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000006203
   Google Scholar
• Oppenheim, C., Stenson, J., & Wilson, R. M. S. (2003a). Studies on information as an Asset I: Definitions. Journal of Information Science, 29(3), 159–166. doi:10.1177/01655515030293003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheim, C., Stenson, J., & Wilson, R. M. S. (2003b). Studies on information as an Asset II: Repertory grid. Journal of Information Science, 29(5), 419–432. doi:10.1177/01655515030295007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheim, C., Stenson, J., & Wilson, R. M. S. (2004). Studies on information as an Asset III: Views of information professionals. Journal of Information Science, 30(2), 181–190. doi:10.1177/0165551504042809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orna, E. (1995). Valuing information: Problems and opportunities. In D. Best (Ed.), The fourth resource: Information and its management (pp. 18–40). Aldershot, UK: Aslib/Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Otto, B. (2011a). Data governance. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 3(4), 241–244. doi:10.1007/s12599-011-0162-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto, B. (2011b). Organizing data governance: Findings from the telecommunications industry and consequences for large service providers. Communications of the AIS, 29(1), 45–66.
   Google Scholar
• Otto, B., Hüner, K., & Österle, H. (2009). Identification of business oriented data quality metrics. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Information Quality, Potsdam, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Otto, B., Hüner, K., & Österle, H. (2012). Toward a functional reference model for master data quality management. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 10(3), 395–425. doi:10.1007/s10257-011-0178-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto, B. & Reichert, A. (2010). Organizing master data management: Findings from an expert survey. Proceedings of the 25th ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Sierre, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Pipino, L. L., Lee, Y. W., & Wang, R. Y. (2002). Data quality assessment. Communications of the ACM, 45(4), 211–218. doi:10.1145/505248.506010
   Google Scholar
• Repo, A. J. (1989). The value of information: Approaches in economics, accounting, and management science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(2), 68–85. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(198903)40:2<68::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanks, G. (1997). The challenges of strategic data planning in practice: An interpretive case study. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 6(1), 69–90. doi:10.1016/S0963-8687(96)01053-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H. A. & McKeen, J. D. (2008). Developments in practice: Master data management: Salvation or snake oil? Communications of the AIS, 23, 63–72.
   Google Scholar
• Stigler, G. J. (1961). The economics of information. The Journal of Political Economy, 69(3), 213–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tayi, G. K. & Ballou, D. P. (1998). Examining data quality. Communications of the ACM, 41(2), 54–57. doi:10.1145/269012.269021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsichritzis, D. C. & Lochovsky, F. (1982). Data models. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Hoven, J. (1999). Information resource management: Stewards of data. Information Systems Management, 16(1), 88–91. doi:10.1201/1078/43187.16.1.19990101/31167.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, M. & Hulland, J. (2004). Review: The resource-based view and information systems research: Review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 107–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, R. Y. (1998). A product perspective on total data quality management. Communications of the ACM, 41(2), 58–65. doi:10.1145/269012.269022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, R. Y., Kon, H. B., & Madnick, S. E. (1993). Data quality requirements analysis and modeling. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Data Engineering, Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, R. Y., Lee, Y. W., Pipino, L. L., & Strong, D. M. (1998). Manage your information as a product. Sloan Management Review, 39(4), 95–105.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, R. Y. & Strong, D. M. (1996). Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4), 5–33.
   Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. doi:10.1002/smj.4250050207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2002). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, V. Y., Aiken, P. G., & Guimaraes, T. (2000). Managing organizational data resources: Quality dimensions. Information Resources Management Journal, 13(3), 5–13. doi:10.4018/irmj.2000070101
   Google Scholar