Business Intelligence Acceptance: The Prominence of Organizational Factors

REFERENCES

• Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665–694. doi:10.2307/3250951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1997). The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decision Sciences, 28(3), 557–582. doi:10.1111/deci.1997.28.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998). A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 204–215. doi:10.1287/isre.9.2.204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1999). Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies? Decision Sciences, 30(2), 361–391. doi:10.1111/deci.1999.30.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11–39). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Benbasat, I., & Barki, H. (2007). Quo vadis, TAM? Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4), 211–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000). A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 169–196. doi:10.2307/3250983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumberg, B., Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2008). Business research methods (2nd ed.). Maidenhead, Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bronzo, M., Vliela de Resende, P. T. V., deoliveira, M. P. V., McCormack, K. P., de Sousa, P. R., & Lopes Ferreira, R. (2013). Improving performance aligning business analytics with process orientation. International Journal of Information Management, 33(2), 300–307. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. M., & Swatman, P. A. (2000). Structured-case: A methodological framework for building theory in information systems research. European Journal of Information Systems, 9(4), 235–242. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuttur, M. Y. (2009). Overview of the technology acceptance model: Origins, development and future directions. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 9(37), 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Claver, E., Llopis, J., Gonzalez, M. R., & Gasco, J. L. (2001). The performance of information systems through organizational culture. Information Technology & People, 14(3), 247–260. doi:10.1108/09593840110402149
   Google Scholar
• Collins, J. (2001). Good to great: Why some companies make the leap … and others don’t. New York, NY: Collins Business.
   Google Scholar
• Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189–211. doi:10.2307/249688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. B. (1994). The inertial impact of culture on IT implementation. Information & Management, 27(1), 17–31. doi:10.1016/0378-7206(94)90099-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, T. H. (1997). Information ecology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339. doi:10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111–1132. doi:10.1111/jasp.1992.22.issue-14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95. doi:10.1287/isre.3.1.60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, A., & Morris, G. M. (1996). User acceptance of new information technology: Theories and models. In M. Williams (Eds.), Annual review of information science and technology (Vol. 31, pp. 3–32). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
   Google Scholar
• Dishaw, M. T., & Strong, D. M. (1999). Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs. Information & Management, 36(1), 9–21. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00101-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djamasbi, S., Strong, D., & Dishaw, M. (2010). Affect and acceptance: Examining the effects of positive mood on the technology acceptance model. Decision Support Systems, 48(2), 383–394. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2009.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbashir, M. Z., Collier, P. A., & Davern, M. J. (2008). Measuring the effects of business intelligence systems: The relationship between business process and organizational performance. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 9(3), 135–153. doi:10.1016/j.accinf.2008.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Eppler, M. J. (2006). Managing information quality: Increasing the value of information in knowledge-intensive products and processes (2nd ed.). Berlin, Germany: Springer Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Fiedler, F. E. (1964). A contingency model of leadership effectiveness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 149–190). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Frolick, M. N. & Aryachandra, T. R. (2006). Business performance management: One truth. Information Systems Management, 23(1), 41–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartner Research. (2013). Gartner executive program survey of more than 2,000 CIOs shows digital technologies are top priorities in 2013. Retrieved from http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2304615
   Google Scholar
• Gefen, D. (2004). What makes an ERP implementation relationship worthwhile: Linking trust mechanisms and ERP usefulness. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(1), 263–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, M., Arnott, D., & Jagielska, I. (2004). Evaluating the intangible benefits of business intelligence: Review & research agenda. In Proceedings: Decision support in an uncertain and complex world: The IFIP TC8/WG8.3 International Conference 2004, Prato, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213–236. doi:10.2307/249689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopal, A., Miranda, S. M., Robichaux, B. P., & Bostrom, R. P. (1997). Leveraging diversity with information technology: Gender, attitude, and intervening influences in the use of group support systems. Small Group Research, 28(1), 29–71. doi:10.1177/1046496497281002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartono, E., Santhanam, R., & Holsapple, C. W. (2007). Factors that contribute to management support system success: An analysis of field studies. Decision Support Systems, 43(1), 256–268. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2006.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, C.-K. (2012). Examining the effect of user satisfaction on system usage and individual performance with business intelligence systems: An empirical study of Taiwan’s electronics industry. International Journal of Information Management, 32(6), 560–573. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igbaria, M., Guimaraes, T., & Davis, G. B. (1995). Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model. Journal of Management Information Systems Spring, 11(4), 87–114.
   Google Scholar
• Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P., & Cavaye, A. L. M. (1997). Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: A structural equation model. MIS Quarterly, 21(3), 279–302. doi:10.2307/249498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Staples, D. S. (2000). The use of collaborative electronic media for information sharing: An exploratory study of determinants. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(2–3), 129–154. doi:10.1016/S0963-8687(00)00042-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jourdan, Z., Rainer, R. K., & Marshall, T. E. (2008). Business intelligence: An analysis of the literature. Information Systems Management, 25(2), 121–131. doi:10.1080/10580530801941512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappos, A., & Rivard, S. (2008). A three-perspective model of culture, information systems, and their development and use. MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 301–634.
   Google Scholar
• Karahanna, E., & Limayem, M. (2000). E-Mail and V-Mail usage: Generalizing across technologies. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 10(1), 49–66. doi:10.1207/S15327744JOCE100103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (1999). The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use. Information & Management, 35(4), 237–250. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00096-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., & Chervany, N. L. (1999). Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 183–213. doi:10.2307/249751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, R. H. (1990). The relation between locus of control and computer literacy. Journal of Research on Computing and Education, 22(2), 464–475.
   Google Scholar
• Ke, W., & Wei, K. K. (2008). Organizational culture and leadership in ERP implementation. Decision Support Systems, 45(2), 208–218. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2007.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43(6), 740–755. doi:10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, W. R., & Teo, T. S. H. (1996). Key dimensions of facilitators and inhibitors for the strategic use of information technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4), 35–53.
   Google Scholar
• Kwahk, K., & Lee, J.-N. (2008). The role of readiness for change in ERP implementation: Theoretical bases and empirical validation. Information & Management, 45(7), 474–481. doi:10.1016/j.im.2008.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A. & Larsen, K. R. T. (2003). The technology acceptance model: Past, present and the future. Communications of the AIS, 12(50), 752–780.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, G., & Xia, W. (2006). Organizational size and IT innovation adoption: A meta-analysis. Information & Management, 43(8), 975–985. doi:10.1016/j.im.2006.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191–204. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukman, T., Hackney, R., Popovič, A., Jaklič, J., & Irani, Z. (2011). Business intelligence maturity: The economic transitional context within Slovenia. Information Systems Management, 28(3), 211–222. doi:10.1080/10580530.2011.585583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchand, D. A., Kettinger, W. J., & Rollins, J. D. (2001). Information orientation: The link to business performance. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmood, M. A., Hall, L., & Swanberg, D. L. (2001). Factors affecting information technology usage: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 11(2), 107–130. doi:10.1207/S15327744JOCE1102_02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshal, L., & Harpe, R. (2009). Decision making in the context of business intelligence and data quality. SA Journal of Information Management, 11(2), 1–15. doi:10.4102/sajim.v11i2.404
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expended sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192–222. doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, M. D., & Newman, M. (2007). The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft. Information and Organization, 17(1), 2–26. doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2006.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Negash, S. (2004). Business intelligence. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 13, 177–195.
   Google Scholar
• Negash, S., & Gray, P. (2008). Business intelligence. In F. Burstein & C. W. Holsapple (Eds.), Handbook on decision support systems (Vol. 2, pp. 175–193). Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Olszak, C. M., & Ziemba, E. (2007). Approach to building and implementing business intelligence systems. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 2, 135–148.
   Google Scholar
• Pare, G. (2004). Investigating information systems with positivist case study research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 13(1), 233–264.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 69–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poon, P., & Wagner, C. (2001). Critical success factors revisited: Success and failure cases of information systems for senior executives. Decision Support Systems, 30(4), 393–418. doi:10.1016/S0167-9236(00)00069-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popovič, A., Hackney, R., Coelho, P. S., & Jaklič, J. (2012). Towards business intelligence systems success: Effects of maturity and culture on analytical decision making. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 729–739. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.08.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popovič, A., Turk, T., & Jaklič, J. (2010). Conceptual model of business value of business intelligence systems. Management, 15(1), 5–30.
   Google Scholar
• Premkumar, G., & Potter, M. (1995). Adoption of Computer Aided Software Engineering (CASE) Technology: An innovation adoption perspective. ACM SIGMIS Database, 26(2–3), 105–124. doi:10.1145/217278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sabherwal, R., Jeyaraj, A., & Chowa, C. (2006). Information system success: Individual and organizational determinants. Management Science, 52(12), 1849–1864. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh, N. A. M., & Rohde, F. (2005). Enacted capabilities on adoption of information systems: A Study of small- and medium-sized enterprises. Communications of the IIMA, 5(3), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research methods for business students. Harlow, Essex: Financial Times/Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Seah, M., Hsieh, M. H., & Weng, P.-D. (2010). A case analysis of Savecom: The role of indigenous leadership in implementing a business intelligence system. International Journal of Information Management, 30(4), 368–373. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 561–570. doi:10.2307/249633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. (1991). Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15(1), 125–143. doi:10.2307/249443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tornatzky, L., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The process of technology innovation. Lexington, MA: Lexington Book.
   Google Scholar
• Tyran, C. K., & George, J. F. (1993). The implementation of expert systems: A survey of successful implementations. ACM SIGMIS Database, 24(1), 5–15. doi:10.1145/154421
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365. doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., Maruping, L. M., & Bala, H. (2008). Predicting different conceptualizations of system use: The competing roles of behavioral intention, facilitating conditions, and behavioral expectation. MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 483–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. G. (2000). Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 115–139. doi:10.2307/3250981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Towards a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Speier, C. (1999). Computer technology training in the workplace: A longitudinal investigation of the effect of mood. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79(1), 1–28. doi:10.1006/obhd.1999.2837
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, M., & Hulland, J. (2004). Review: The resource based view and information systems research: Review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 107–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsham, G. (1993). Interpreting information systems in oranizations. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Weil, P., & Olson, M. H. (1989). An assessment of the contingency theory of management information systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 6(1), 59–85.
   Google Scholar
• Wixom, B. H., & Todd, P. A. (2005). A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 85–102. doi:10.1287/isre.1050.0042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wixom, B. H., Watson, H., Reynolds, A. M., & Hoffer, J. A. (2008). Continental airlines continues to soar with business intelligence. Information Systems Management, 25(2), 102–112. doi:10.1080/10580530801941496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wixom, B. H., & Watson, H. J. (2001). An empirical investigation of the factors affecting data warehousing success. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 17–41. doi:10.2307/3250957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wixom, H. B., & Watson, H. (2010). The BI based organization. International Journal of Business Intelligence Research, 1(1), 13–28. doi:10.4018/IJBIR
   Google Scholar
• Wu, J., & Lederer, A. (2009). A meta-analysis of the role of environment-based voluntariness in information technology acceptance. MIS Quarterly, 33(2), 419–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, K., Zhao, Y., Zhu, Q., Tan, X., & Zheng, H. (2011). A meta-analysis of the impact of trust on technology acceptance model: Investigation of moderating influence of subject and context type. International Journal of Information Management, 31(6), 572–581. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia, W., & Lee, G. (2000, December). The influence of persuasion, training and experience on user perceptions and acceptance of IT innovation. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Information Systems, 371–384.
   Google Scholar
• Yeoh, W., & Koronios, A. (2010). Critical success factors for business intelligence systems. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 50(3), 23–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar