375
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Success Factors for Using Case Management System in Italian Courts

, &

References

  • Abdi, H. (2003). Partial least squares (PLS) regression. In M. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman, & T. Futing (Eds.), Encyclopedia of social sciences research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Agrifoglio, R., Lepore, L., & Metallo, C. (2013). Measuring the success of e-justice. A validation of the DeLone and McLean model. In P. Spagnoletti (Ed.), Organization change and information systems - working and living together in new ways (pp. 83–92). Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  • Azmi, Z. T. (2010, October). Using technology to improve court performance: Malaysia’s experience. Paper presented at ASIA Pacific Judicial Reform Forum 2010 Conference, Beijing, China.
  • Bailey, J. E., & Pearson, S. W. (1983). Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Management Science, 29, 530–545. doi:10.1287/mnsc.29.5.530
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  • Bernroider, E. W. N., Koch, S., & Stix, V. (2013). A comprehensive framework approach using content, context, process views to combine methods from operations research for IT assessments. Information Systems Management, 30(1), 75–88. doi:10.1080/10580530.2013.739896
  • Bhatt, J. K. (2005). Role of information technology in the Malaysian judicial system: Issues and current trends. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 19(2), 199–208. doi:10.1080/13600860500131614
  • Carnevali, D. (2010). Vent’anni di informatica negli uffici giudiziari: Un percorso (chiaro)scuro. In D. Carnevali (Eds.), Soggetti smarriti. Perché innovazione e giustizia non si incontrano (quasi) mai. Milan, Italy: Franco Angeli.
  • Casanovas, P., Sartor, G., Casellas, N., & Rubino, R. (2008). Computable models of the law. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
  • Cerrillo, M., & Fabra, P. (2009). E-justice: ICT in the court system. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  • Chang, I. C., Li, Y. C., Hung, W. F., & Hwang, H. G. (2005). An empirical study on the impact of quality antecedents on tax payers’ acceptance of Internet tax-filing systems. Government Information Quarterly, 22, 389–410. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2005.05.002
  • Cheney, P. H., Mann, R. I., & Amoroso, D. (1986). Organizational factors affecting the success of end user computing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 3, 65–80.
  • Chin, W. W. (1998). Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 7–16.
  • Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). (2010). European judicial systems. (Edition 2010 on data 2008). Efficiency and quality of justice. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.
  • Commission of the European Communities. (2008). Towards a European e-justice strategy. (Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic, and Social Committee 329). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/civiljustice/docs/com_2008_329_en.pdf
  • Contini, F., & Cordella, A. (2007). Information system and information infrastructure deployment: The challenge of the Italian e-justice approach. The Electronic Journal of E-Government, 5(1), 43–52.
  • Contini, F., & Lanzara, G. F. (2008). ICT and innovation in the public sector. London, UK: Pelgrave.
  • Contini, F., & Lanzara, G. F. (2014). The circulation of agency in e-justice. Law. Netherlands: Springer Governance and Technology Series.
  • Currie, W., & Guah, M. W. (2006). It-enabled healthcare delivery: The U.K. National Health Service. Information Systems Management, 23(2), 7–22. doi:10.1201/1078.10580530/45925.23.2.20060301/92670.3
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. doi:10.2307/249008
  • DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3, 60–95. doi:10.1287/isre.3.1.60
  • DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 9–30.
  • Doll, W. J., & Torkzadeh, G. (1988). The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction. MIS Quarterly, 12(2), 259–274. doi:10.2307/248851
  • Doty, P., & Erdelez, S. (2002). Information micro-practices in Texas rural courts: Methods and issues for e-government. Government Information Quarterly, 19, 369–387. doi:10.1016/S0740-624X(02)00121-1
  • Etezadi-Amoli, J., & Farhoomand, A. F. (1996). A structural model of end user computing satisfaction and user performance. Information & Management, 30, 65–73. doi:10.1016/0378-7206(95)00052-6
  • Fabri, M. (2003, July). E-government in European justice systems: Critical issues and trends (pp. 111–118). Proceedings of Third European Conference on E-Government, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Fabri, M. (2009). The Italian style of e-justice in a comparative perspective. In A. Cerrillo & P. Fabra (Eds.), E-justice: ICT in the court system (pp. 1–16). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  • Fabri, M., & Langbroek, P. M. (2000). The challenge of change for judicial systems. Developing a public administration perspective. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: IOS Press.
  • Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213–236. doi:10.2307/249689
  • Hamin, Z., Othman, M. B., & Mohamad, A. M. (2012, June). Benefits and achievements of ICT adoption by the high courts of Malaysia. IEEE Symposium on Humanities, Science and Engineering Research, Malaysia.
  • Hu, Y., Xiao, J., Pang, J., & Xie, K. (2005). A research on the appraisal framework of e-Government project success. In Proceedings of ICEC’05 (pp. 532–538). New York, NY: ACM.
  • Hung, S. Y., Tang, K. Z., Chang, C. M., & Ke, C. D. (2009). User acceptance of intergovernmental services: An example of electronic document management system. Government Information Quarterly, 26(2), 387–397. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2008.07.003
  • Hussein, R., Karim, N. S. A., Mohamed, N., & Ahlan, A. R. (2007). The influence of organizational factors on information systems success in e-government agencies in Malaysia. Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 29(1), 1–17.
  • Hussein, R., Selamat, H., & Karim, N. S. A. (2005, September). The impact of technological factors on information systems success in the electronic-government context. The Second International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology (IIT’05), Dubai: UAE.
  • Iivari, J. (2005). An empirical test of DeLone-McLean model of information systems success. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 36(2), 8–27. doi:10.1145/1066149.1066152
  • Kaisara, G., & Pather, S. (2011). The e-government evaluation challenge: A South African batho pele-aligned service quality approach. Government Information Quarterly, 28(2), 211–221. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.008
  • Kiškis, M., & Petrauskas, R. (2004). ICT adoption in the judiciary: Classifying of judicial information. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 18(1), 37–45. doi:10.1080/13600860410001674724
  • La Porte, T. M., De Jong, M., & Demchak, C. C. (1999, February). Public organizations on the World Wide Web: Empirical correlates of administrative openness. Fifth National Public Management Research Conference (PMRA), Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
  • Lepore, L., Metallo, C., & Agrifoglio, R. (2012). Evaluating court performance: Findings from two Italian courts. International Journal for Court Administration, 4, 1–12.
  • Lin, F., Fofanah, S. S., & Liang, D. (2011). Assessing citizen adoption of e-Government initiatives in Gambia: A validation of the technology acceptance model in information systems success. Government Information Quarterly, 28, 271–279. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.09.004
  • McGill, T., Hobbs, V., & Klobas, J. (2003). User-developed applications and information systems success: A test of DeLone and McLean’s model. Information Resources Management Journal, 16(1), 24–45. doi:10.4018/IRMJ
  • Palumbo, G., Giupponi, G., Nunziata, L., & Mora-Sanguinetti, J. (2013). Judical performance and its determinantes: A cross-country perspective (Economic Policy Paper). OECD.
  • Petter, S., DeLone, W., & McLean, E. R. (2008). Measuring information systems success: Models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. European Journal of Information Systems, 17, 236–263. doi:10.1057/ejis.2008.15
  • Petter, S., & McLean, E. R. (2009). A meta-analytic assessment of the DeLone and McLean IS success model: An examination of IS success at the individual level. Information & Management, 46(3), 159–166. doi:10.1016/j.im.2008.12.006
  • Prybutok, V., Zhang, X., & Ryan, S. (2008). Evaluating leadership, IT quality, and net benefits in an e-government environment. Information & Management, 45(3), 143–152. doi:10.1016/j.im.2007.12.004
  • Rai, A., Lang, S. S., & Welker, R. B. (2002). Assessing the validity of IS success models: An empirical test and theoretical analysis. Information Systems Research, 13, 50–69. doi:10.1287/isre.13.1.50.96
  • Reiling, D. (2012). Technology in courts in Europe: Opinions, practices and innovations. International Journal for Court Administration, 4(2), 1–10.
  • Rosa, J., Teixeira, C., & Pinto, J. S. (2013). Risk factors in e-justice information systems. Government Information Quarterly, 30, 241–256. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.02.002
  • Seddon, P. B. (1997). A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information Systems Research, 8(3), 240–253. doi:10.1287/isre.8.3.240
  • Teo, T. S. H., Srivastava, S. C., & Jiang, L. (2009). Trust and electronic government success: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(3), 99–131. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222250303
  • Thong, J. Y. L., Hong, S. J., & Tam, K. Y. (2006). The effects of post-adoption beliefs on the expectation-confirmation model for information technology continuance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(9), 799–810. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.05.001
  • Velicogna, M. (2007). Justice systems and ICT. What Can Be Learned from Europe? Utrecht Law Review, 3(1), 129–147. doi:10.18352/ulr.41
  • Velicogna, M. (2008). Use of information and communication technologies (ICT) (Study No. 7). European judicial systems, Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ).
  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27, 3451–3482. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb01822.x
  • Wang, Y. S., & Liao, Y. W. (2008). Assessing egovernment systems success: A validation of the DeLone and McLean model of information systems success. Government Information Quarterly, 25, 717–733. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2007.06.002
  • World Bank. (2008). Doing business. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Yildiz, M. (2007). E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly, 24(3), 646–665. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2007.01.002

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.