Investigating the Prevalence and Performance Correlates of Vertical Versus Shared Leadership in Emergent Software Development Teams

References

• Albrecht, T. L., & Hall, B. J. (1991). Facilitating talk about new ideas: The role of personal relationships in organizational innovation. Communications Monographs, 58(3), 273–288. doi:10.1080/03637759109376230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External process and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 527–548. doi:10.2307/2393475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avolio, B., Walumbwa, F., & Weber, T. (2009). Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 421–449. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, D. (1991). Managing the bossless team: Lessons in distributed leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 20(1), 31–47. doi:10.1016/0090-2616(91)90081-J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2002). A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Group and Organization Management, 27, 14–49. doi:10.1177/1059601102027001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, N., Wise, C., Woods, P., & Harvey, J. (2003). Distributed leadership: Full report. Nottingham, UK: National College for School Leadership.
   Google Scholar
• Bligh, M. C., Pearce, C. L., & Kohles, J. C. (2006). The importance of self-and shared leadership in team based knowledge work: A meso-level model of leadership dynamics. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(4), 296–318. doi:10.1108/02683940610663105
   Google Scholar
• Boehm, B., & Turner, R. (2003). Using risk to balance agile and plan-driven methods. Computer, 36(6), 57–66. doi:10.1109/MC.2003.1204376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boehm, B., & Turner, R. (2004, May). Balancing agility and discipline: Evaluating and integrating agile and plan-driven methods. In Software Engineering, 2004. ICSE 2004. Proceedings. 26th International Conference on (pp. 718-719). Alamitos, CA: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, F. P. (1997). No silver bullet essence and accidents of software engineering. Computer, 4, 10–19.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. E., & Gioia, D. A. (2002). Making things click: Distributive leadership in an online division of an offline organization. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 397–419. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00123-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46(4), 823–847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramanica, L., & Rosenbecker, S. (1991). A pilot unit approach to shared governance. Nursing Management, 22, 46–49. doi:10.1097/00006247-199101000-00016
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carayannis, E., & Coleman, J. (2005). Creative system design methodologies. Technovation, 25(3), 831–840. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2004.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1978). Partialled products are interactions: Partialled powers are curve components. Psychological Bulletin. 85, 858–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239–290. doi:10.1177/014920639702300303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. G., Chang, L., & Ledford, G. E. (1997). A hierarchical construct of self-management leadership and its relationship to quality of work life and perceived work group effectiveness. Personnel Psychology, 50, 275–309. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00909.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conboy, K., & Morgan, L. (2010). Future research in agile systems development: Applying open innovation principles within the agile organization. In Agile software development (pp. 223–235).
   Google Scholar
• Conger, J. A., & Pearce, C. L. (2003). Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cortina, J. M. (1993). Interaction, nonlinearity, and multicollinearity: Implications for multiple regression. Journal of Management, 9(4), 915–922.
   Google Scholar
• Cougar, J. (1990). Ensuring creative approaches in information system design. Managerial and Decision Economics, 11(2), 281–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, J. F., Pearce, C. L., & Perry, M. L. (2003). Toward a model of shared leadership and distributed influence in the innovation process. In C. L. Pearce & J. A. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership (pp. 48–76). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, J. F., Pearce, C. L., & Sims, H. P. (2003). Developing shared leadership, as well as directive and empowering leader behaviors, to extend the transactional-transformational leader behavior paradigm: Toward a deeper and broader agenda for leadership development. In S. Murphy & R. Riggio (Eds.), The future of leadership development (pp. 161–180). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, R. A. & Gullone, E. (2000), Why we should not use 5-point Likert scales: The case for subjective quality of life measurement. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Quality of Life in Cities National University of Singapore, Singapore (pp. 74–93).
   Google Scholar
• Day, D. V., Gronn, P., & Salas, E. (2004). Leadership capacity in teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 857–880. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denis, J. L., Lamothe, L., & Langley, A. (2001). The dynamics of collective leadership and strategic change in pluralistic organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 809–837. doi:10.2307/3069417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingsøyr, T., Nerur, S., Balijepally, V., & Moe, N. B. (2012). A decade of agile methodologies: Towards explaining agile software development. Journal of Systems and Software, 85(6), 1213–1221. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2012.02.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druskat, V. U., & Wheeler, J. V. (2003). Managing from the boundary: The effective leadership of self-managing work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 46(4), 435–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duarte, D. L., & Snyder, N. T. (1999). Mastering virtual teams. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, W. P & Kemery, E. R. (1987). Failure to detect moderating effects: Is multicollinearity the problem? Psychological Bulletin. 102, 418–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elam, J., & Mead, M. (1987). Designing for creativity: Considerations for DSS development. Information & Management, 13(2), 215–222. doi:10.1016/0378-7206(87)90045-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, K. (1993). Leading self-directed work teams: A guide to developing new team leadership skills. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Follett, M. P. (1924). Creative experience. New York, NY: Longmans Green.
   Google Scholar
• Gallivan, M. (2003). The influence of software developer’s creative style on their attitudes to and assimilation of a software process innovation. Information & Management, 40(1), 443–465. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00039-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibb, C. A. (1954). Leadership. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 877–917). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Guinan, P. J., Cooprider, J. G., & Faraj, S. (1998). Enabling R&D team performance during requirements definition: A behavioral versus technical approach. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 101–125. doi:10.1287/isre.9.2.101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackman, J. R. (1992). Group influences on individuals in organizations. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hackman, L., & Warnow-Blewett, J. (1987). The documentation strategy process: a model and a case study. The American Archivist, 50(1), 12–47.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. S., & John, C. H. S. (1996). Managing and partnering with external stakeholders. The Academy of Management Executive, 10(2), 46–60.
   Google Scholar
• Hertel, G., Geister, S., & Konradt, U. (2005). Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15, 69–95. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2005.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Hiller, N. J., Day, D. V., & Vance, R. J. (2006). Collective enactment of leadership roles and team effectiveness: A field study. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(4), 387–397. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hislop, G. W., Lutz, M. J., Naveda, J. F., McCracken, W. M., Mead, N. R., & Williams, L. A. (2002). Integrating agile practices into software engineering courses. Computer Science Education, 12(3), 169–185. doi:10.1076/csed.12.3.169.8619
   Google Scholar
• Hoch, J. E. (2007). Verteilte führung in virtuellen teams: Zum einfluss von struktureller, interaktionaler und teambasierter führung auf den teamerfolg. [Distributed leadership in virtual teams: The impact of structural, interactional and team shared leadership on team success] ( Dissertation an der Universität Kiel), Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Hoda, R. (2011). Self-Organizing Agile Teams: A Grounded Theory. PHD, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Hoegl, M., & Gemuenden, H. (2001). Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organization Science, 12(4), 435–449. doi:10.1287/orsc.12.4.435.10635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoegl, M., & Parboteeah, K. P. (2006). Team reflexivity in innovative projects. R&D Management, 36(2), 113–125. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00420.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooker, C., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2003). Flow, creativity, and shared leadership. In C. L. Pearce & J. A. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership (pp. 217–234). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. E. (1989). Does job control control job stress? In S. L. Sauter, J. J. Hurrell Jr., & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Job control and worker health. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. (2000). A qualitative evaluation of shared leadership barriers, drivers and recommendations. Journal of Management in Medicine, 14(3/4), 166–178.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2002). Liberalism, neoliberalism, and urban governance: A state–theoretical perspective. Antelope, 34(3), 105–125.
   Google Scholar
• Kakar, A. K. (2014). Teaching theories underlying agile methods in a systems development course. In 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS; pp. 4970–4978). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Katzenbach, J. R. (1998). The irony of senior leadership teams. The Journal for Quality and Participation, 21(3), 8.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 58–74. doi:10.2307/256874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klenke, K. (1997). Leadership dispersion as a function of performance in information systems teams. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 8(1), 149–169. doi:10.1016/S1047-8310(97)90018-3
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman & D. R. Ilgen (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology: Industrialand organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 333–375). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., Gully, S. M., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1996). Team leadership and development: Theory, principles, and guidelines for training leaders and teams. In M. M. Beyerlein, D. A. Johnson, et al. (Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary study of work teams: Team leadership (Vol. 3, pp. 253–292). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kruglianskas, I., & Thamhain, H. J. (2000). Managing technology-based projects in multinational environments. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 47(1), 55–64. doi:10.1109/17.820725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawler, E. E., Mohrman, S. A., & Benson, G. (2001). Organizing for high performance: Employee involvement, TQM, reengineering, and knowledge management in the Fortune 1000. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Lee-Davies, L., Kakabadse, N. K., & Kakabadse, A. (2007). Shared leadership: Leading through polylogue. Business Strategy Series, 8(4), 246–253. doi:10.1108/17515630710684295
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, D., & Sensiper, S. (1998). The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation. California Management Review, 40(3), 112–132. doi:10.2307/41165946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobert, B., & Dologite, D. (1994). Measuring creativity of information system ideas: An exploratory investigation. In Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science, Hawaii. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Manz, C. C., & Sims, Jr., H. P. (1987). Leading workers to lead themselves: The external leadership of self managing work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 106–130. doi:10.2307/2392745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer, F., & Melnik, G. (2006, May). Agile methods: Moving towards the mainstream of the software industry. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering (pp. 1057–1058). Shanghai, China: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Melnik, G., & Maurer, F. (2006, June 17-22). Comparative analysis of job satisfaction in agile and non-agile software development teams. 7th International Conference, XP 2006, Oulu, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, S. A., & Watkins, M. D. (2007). The leadership team. Harvard Business Review, 85(4), 90–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe, N. B., Dingsøyr, T., & Røyrvik, E. A. (2009). Putting agile teamwork to the test—An preliminary instrument for empirically assessing and improving agile software development. In Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming, Pula, Sardinia, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Murdock, G. (1967). Ethnographic atlas. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nambisan, S., & Wilemon, D. (2000). Software development and new product development: Potentials for cross-domain knowledge sharing. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 47(2), 211–220. doi:10.1109/17.846788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nerur, S., Mahapatra, R., & Mangalaraj, G. (2005). Challenges of migrating to agile methodologies. Communications of the ACM, 48(5), 72–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’May, F., & Buchan, J. (1999). Shared governance: A literature review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 36, 281–300. doi:10.1016/S0020-7489(99)00023-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Toole, J., Galbraith, J., & Lawler, E. E. (2002). When two (or more) heads are better than one: The promise and pitfalls of shared leadership. California Management Review, 44(4), 65–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, S. K., Wall, T. D., & Cordery, J. (2001). Future work design research and practice: Towards an elaborated model of work design. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 413–440. doi:10.1348/096317901167460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, R. (1990). The effectiveness of research teams: A review. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, C. L., & Conger, J. A. (Eds.). (2003). Preface. In Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership (pp. xi–xiii). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, C. L. and Manz, C. C. (2005). The new silver bullets of leadership: The importance of self- and shared leadership in knowledge work. Organizational Dynamics, 34(2), 130–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, C. L., & Sims, H. P. (2002). Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 172–197. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.6.2.172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, M. L., Pearce, C. L., & Sims, H. P. (1999). Empowered selling teams: How shared leadership can contribute to selling team outcomes. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 19, 35–52.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, K., & Wohlin, C. (2010). The effect of moving from a plan-driven to an incremental software development approach with agile practices. Empirical Software Engineering, 15(6), 654–693. doi:10.1007/s10664-010-9136-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, W. (1990). Neither markets nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodgers, H., Gold, J., Frearson, M. and Holden, R. (2003). The rush to leadership: explaining leadership development in the public sectors, working paper, Leeds Business School, Leeds.
   Google Scholar
• Schwaber, K. (1995). Scrum development process. Presented at OOPSLA’95 Workshop on Business Object Design and Implementation, Austin, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Seers, A., Keller, T., & Wilkerson, J. M. (2003). Can team members share leadership? Foundations in research and theory. In C. L. Pearce & J. A. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership (pp. 77–102). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Short, P. M. (1994). Defining teacher empowerment. Education, 114(4), 488–493.
   Google Scholar
• Sicotte, H., & Langley, A. (2000). Integration mechanisms and R&D project performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 1(17), 1–37. doi:10.1016/S0923-4748(99)00018-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, A. L. (1992). The tyranny of a team ideology. Organization Studies, 13, 611–626. doi:10.1177/017084069201300405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spreitzer, G. M. (1996). Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 483–504. doi:10.2307/256789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, I. D. (1966). Models for inferring relationships between group size and potential group productivity. Behavioral Science, 11(4), 273–283.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stewart, G. L., & Manz, C. C. (1995). Leadership for selfmanaging work teams: A typology and integrative model. Human Relations, 48, 747–770. doi:10.1177/001872679504800702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, E. F. and Holfenbeck, J. R. (1989). CIarifying some controversial issues surrounding statistical procedures for detecting moderator variables: Empirical evidence and related matters. Jownal of Applied Psychology, 74, 3–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjosvold, D., Tang, M. M., & West, M. (2004). Reflexivity for team innovation in China the contribution of goal interdependence. Group & Organization Management, 29(5), 540–559. doi:10.1177/1059601103254911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulhoi, J. P., & Muller, S. (2014). Mapping the landscape of shared leadership: A review and synthesis. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 8, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Wall, T. D., Cordery, J. L., & Clegg, C. W. (2002). Empowerment, performance, and operational uncertainty: A theoretical integration. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 146–169. doi:10.1111/apps.2002.51.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegge, J., & Schmidt, K.-H. (2007). Management von arbeitsgruppen. In H. Schuler & K. Sonntag (Eds.), Handbuch der arbeits—Und organisations psychologie (pp. 690–697). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Wegge, J., Van Dick, R., Fisher, G. K., Wecking, C., & Moltzen, K. (2006). Work motivation, organisational identification, and well-being in call centre work. Work & Stress, 20(1), 60–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1990). Innovation at work. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 3–13). Chichester, England: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, M. S. (2005). Determinants of shared leadership in management teams. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 1(1), 64–85.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B. M., & Cordery, J. L. (1999). Production uncertainty as a contextual moderator of employee reactions to job design. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 456–463. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeatts, D. E., & Hyten, C. (1998). High performing self-managed work teams: A comparison of theory to practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zaccaro, S. J., Rittman, A. L., & Marks, M. A. (2001). Team leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 12, 451–483. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(01)00093-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar