Modeling Organizational and Locational Structure in Enterprise Content Management System Adoptions: Experience from a Large Polish Medical Company

References

• Abramowicz, W., Filipowska, A., Kaczmarek, M., Pendrinaci, C., Starzecka, M., & Walczak, A. (2008). Organization structure description for the needs of semantic business process management. Proceedings of 3rd International Workshop on Semantic Business Process Management, Tenerife, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Adonis Community. (2016). Adonis Community site. Retrieved December 2, 2016, from, htp://www.adonis-community.com
   Google Scholar
• ARIS community. (2016). ARIS community site. Retrieved December 4, 2016, from http://www.ariscommuninty.com
   Google Scholar
• Association for Information and Image Management. (2016). What is enterprise content management. Retrieved October 5, 2016, from http://www.aiim.org/What-is-ECM-Enterprise-Content-Management
   Google Scholar
• Becker, J., Rosemann, M., & Von Uthmann, C. W. (2000). Guidelines of business process modeling. In J. Van Der Aalst (Ed.), Business process management. LNCS 1806 (pp. 30–49). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Berisha, J., & Pula, G. (2015). Defining small and medium enterprises: A critical review. Academic Journal of Business, Administration, Law and Social Sciences, 1(1), 17–28.
   Google Scholar
• BOC Group. (2016). BOC Group site. Retrieved November 11, 2016, from https://pl.boc-group.com/
   Google Scholar
• Coad, P., De Luca, J., & Lefebvre, E. (1999). Java modeling in color with UML: Enterprise components and process. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Coad, P., & Yourdon, E. (1991). Object-oriented analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Gabryelczyk, R. (2006). ARIS w modelowaniu procesów biznesu (ARIS in modeling business processes). Warsaw, Poland: Difin.
   Google Scholar
• Gawin, B., & Marcinkowski, B. (2013). Symulacja procesów biznesowych. Standardy BPMS i BPMN w praktyce (Simulating business process. BPMS and BPMN standards in practice). Gliwice, Poland: Helion.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, M., Shegda, K., Chin, K., & Koehler-Kruener, H. (2014). Magic Quadrant for ECM 2014. Stamford, CT: Gartner Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Goikoetxea, A. (2004). A mathematical framework for enterprise architecture representation and design. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 3, 5–32. doi:10.1142/S0219622004000623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haskell, A., & Breaznell, J. (1922). Graphic charts in business: How to make and use them. New York, NY: Codex Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hevner, R., March, S., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information system research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karagiannis, D., Junginger, S., & Strobl, R. (1996). Introduction to Business Process Management System Concepts. In B., Scholz-Reiter, & E., Stickel (Eds.), Business process modelling. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Karagiannis, D., & Kühn, H. (2002). Metamodelling Platforms. In K. Bauknecht, A., Min Tjoa, & G., Quirchmayer (Eds.), Proceedings of the third international conference EC-Web 2002 – Dexa 2002, Aix-en-Provence, France, September 2–6, 2002, LNCS 2455, (pp. 182–196). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Krzyżanowski, L. (1994). Podstawy nauk o organizacji i zarządzaniu (Principles of organizational management). Warsaw, Poland: PWN.
   Google Scholar
• Lankhorst, M. (2005). Enterprise architecture at work - modelling, communication and analysis. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Larman, C. (2004). Agile and iterative development: A manager’s guide. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Lytras, M. D., Castillo-Merino, D., & Serradell-Lopez, E. (2010). New human resources practices, technology and their impact on SMEs’ efficiency. Information Systems Management, 267–273. doi:10.1080/10580530.2010.493843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, M., Majchrzak, A., & Gasser, L. (2002). A design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes. MIS Quarterly, 26(3), strony 179–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MetaCase. (2017). MetaCase. Retrieved from http://www.metacase.com/
   Google Scholar
• Nalepka, A., & Kozina, A. (2007). Podstawy badania struktur organizacyjnych (Principles of organizational structure research). Cracow, Poland: Cracow University of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, D., & Quick, J. (2002). Understanding organizational behavior. A multimedia approach. Cincinnati, Ohio: South Western.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Object Management Group. (2005). UML superstructure specification v2.0. Retrieved December 5, 2016, from OMG site http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?formal/05-07-04
   Google Scholar
• Object Management Group. (2006). Organization Structure Metamodel (OSM). 2nd initial submission. Retrieved November 10, 2016, from http://knmgt2.univera.de/documents/OSM_06-11-02.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Object Management Group. (2009). Organization Structure Metamodel (OSM). Revised submission. Retrieved November 12, 2016, from OMG site http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?bmi/09-08-02
   Google Scholar
• OMiLAB. (2017). ADOxx platform site. Retrieved July 10, 2017, from http://www.adoxx.org
   Google Scholar
• The Open Group. (2008). The Open Group Architectural Framework TOGAF 8.1.1 ‘The Book’. Zaltbommel, NL: Van Haren Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45–78. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, T., Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2005). Design research: A socially responsible approach to instructional technology research in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16(2), 96–115. doi:10.1007/BF02961476
   Google Scholar
• Rockley, A., & Cooper, C. (2012). Managing enterprise content. A unified content strategy (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: New Riders.
   Google Scholar
• Roztocki, N., & Weistroffer, H. (2008). Information technology investments in emerging economies. Information Technology for Development, 14(1), 1–10. doi:10.1002/itdj.20084
   Google Scholar
• Rummler, G., & Brache, A. (1996). Improving performance. How to manage the white space on the organizational chart. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc. Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, P., Almeida, J., & Guizzardi, G. (2013). An ontology-based analysis and semantics for organizational structure modeling in the ARIS method. Information Systems, 38, 690–780. doi:10.1016/j.is.2012.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheer, A. (1994). Wirtschaftinformatik - Referenzmodelle fur industrielle Geschaftsprozesse (Business informatics - Reference models for industrial business processes). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Sobczak, A. (2008). Analysis selected methodology to build enterprise architecture. Monografie I Opracowania - SGH Warsaw School of Economics, 551, 315–323.
   Google Scholar
• Software AG. (2016). ARIS Business Process Analysis (BPA). Retrieved from http://www2.softwareag.com/corporate/products/aris_alfabet/bpa/default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Soja, P., & Cunha, P. (2015). ICT in transition economies: Narrowing the research gap to developed countries. Information Technology for Development, 21(3), 323–329. doi:10.1080/02681102.2015.1028734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stabryła, A. (1992). Doskonalenie struktury organizacyjnej. Techniki przygotowania ekspertyzy i projektu (Improving the enterprise organizational structure. Techniques for the preparation of expertise and design). Cracow, Poland: Cracow University of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Stabryła, A. (2009). Doskonalenie struktur organizacyjnych przedsiębiorstw w gospodarce opartej na wiedzy (Improving the enterprise organizational structure in the knowledge economy). Warsaw, Poland: C.H. Beck.
   Google Scholar
• Stoner, J., & Wankel, C. (1989). Management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall International.
   Google Scholar
• Trąbka, J. (2013). Enterprise Content Management Platforms: Concept Update, Role in Organization and Main Technologies. In M. Pańkowska, J. Palonka, & H. Sroka (Eds.), Ambient technology and creativity support systems (pp. 192–205). Katowice, Poland: University of Economics in Katowice.
   Google Scholar
• Tyrväinen, P., Päivärinta, T., Salminen, A., & Iivari, J. (2006). Characterizing the evolving research on enterprise content management. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(6), 627–634. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (2006). Introducing educational design research. In J. Van Den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design reasearch (pp. 3–7). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Visual Paradigm. (2016). Visual Paradigm site. Retrieved from http://www.visual-paradigm.com/
   Google Scholar
• Vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., & Cleven, A. (2011). Towards a business process-oriented approach to enterprise content management: The ECM-blueprinting framework. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 9(4), 475–496. doi:10.1007/s10257-009-0124-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Workflow Management Coalition. (1999). Terminology & glossary, document number WFMC-TC-1011. Retrieved from http://www.wfmc.org/index.php? option=com_docman&Itemid=74
   Google Scholar
• Wrycza, S., Marcinkowski, B., & Wyrzykowski, K. (2005). Język UML 2.0 w modelowaniu systemów informatycznych (UML 2.0 in modeling information systems). Gliwice, Poland: Helion.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yourdon, E. (1988). Modern structured analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Zachman, J. (1987). A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 26(3), 454–470. doi:10.1147/sj.263.0276
   Google Scholar
• Żeliński, J. (2013). Modelowanie struktury organizacyjnej widać światełko w tunelu (Modeling organizational structure with seeing the light at the end of the tunnel). Retrieved from http://it-consulting.pl /autoinstalator/wordpress/2013/04/27/modelowanie-struktury-organizacyjnej-widac-swiatelko -w-tunelu/
   Google Scholar