The moderating role of IT-business alignment in the relationship between IT governance, IT competence, and innovation

References

• Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1988). Innovation in large and small firms: An empirical analysis. The American Economic Review, 78(4), 678–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, S., & Green, P. (2007). IT governance mechanisms in public sector organisations: An Australian context. Journal of Global Information Management, 15(4), 41–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 33–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvanitis, S., Loukis, E., & Diamantopoulou, V. (2013). The effect of soft ICT capital on innovation performance of Greek firms. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 26(6), 679–701.
   Google Scholar
• Askarany, D., & Smith, M. (2008). Diffusion of innovation and business size: A longitudinal study of PACIA (Plastics and Chemicals Industries Association). Managerial Auditing Journal, 23(9), 900–916.
   Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., & Acs, Z. J. (1991). Innovation and size at the firm level. Southern Economic Journal, 57(3), 739–744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badescu, M., & Garcés-Ayerbe, C. (2009). The impact of information technologies on firm productivity: Empirical evidence from Spain. Technovation, 29(2), 122–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, J., Jones, D. R., Cao, Q., & Song, J. (2011). Conceptualizing the dynamic strategic alignment competency. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 12(4), 299–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bantel, K., & Jackson, S. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10, ( summer), 107–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barney, J. B., Ketchen, D. J., & Wright, M. (2011). The future of resource-based theory. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1299–1315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barreto, I. (2010). Dynamic capabilities: A review of past research and an agenda for the future. Journal of Management, 36(1), 256–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bart, C., & Turel, O. (2010). IT and the board of directors: An empirical investigation into the “governance questions” Canadian board members ask about IT. Journal of Information Systems, 24(2), 147–172.
   Google Scholar
• Basselier, G., Benbasat, I., & Reich, B. H. (2003). The influence of business managers’ IT competence on championing IT. Information Systems Research, 14(4), 317–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergeron, F., Raymond, L., & Rivard, S. (2001). Fit in strategic information technology management research: An empirical comparison of perspectives. Omega, 29(2), 125–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000). A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 169–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatt, G. D., & Grover, V. (2005). Types of information technology capabilities and their role in competitive advantage: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(2), 253–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, P. L., Cheung, M.-Y. D., & Rohde, F. H. (2007). Enhancing IT governance practices: A model and case study of an organization’s efforts. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 8, 191–221.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C. V., & Magill, S. L. (1994). Alignment of the IS functions with the enterprise: Toward a model of antecedents. MIS Quarterly, 14(4), 371–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckly, S., Best, P., & Stewart, J. (2009). The current state of information technology governance. In A. Cater-Steel (Ed.), Information technology governance and service management (pp. 1–43). Hershey, PA and Covent Garden, London: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Byrd, T. A., & Davidson, N. W. (2003). Examining possible antecedents of IT impact on the supply chain and its effect on firm performance. Information & Management, 41(2), 243–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camelo, C., Fernandez-Alles, M., & Hernandez, A. B. (2010). Strategic consensus, top management teams, and innovation performance. International Journal of Manpower, 31(6), 678–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, G., Wiengarten, F., & Humphreys, P. (2011). Towards a contingency resource-based view of IT business value. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24(1), 85–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capron, L., & Hulland, J. (1999). Redeployment of brands, sales forces, and general marketing management expertise following horizontal acquisitions: A resource-based view. Journal of Marketing, 63(April), 41–54.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, Y. (2001). Information systems strategy, structure and alignment. In R. Papp (Ed.), Strategic information technology: Opportunities for competitive advantage (pp. 56–81). Hershey, PA and Covent Garden, London: Idea Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, Y., Huff, S. L., Barclay, D. W., & Copeland, D. G. C. (1997). Business strategic orientation, information systems strategic orientation, and strategic alignment. Information Systems Research, 8(2), 125–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, Y., & Reich, B. H. (2007). State of the Art. IT alignment: What have we learned? Journal of Information Technology, 22(4), 297–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, Y. E., Sabherwal, R., & Thatcher, J. B. (2006). Antecedents and outcomes of strategic IS alignment: An empirical investigation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53(1), 27–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H., & Crowther, A. K. (2006). Beyond high-tech: Early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management, 36(3), 229–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 189–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, Y.-C., Chuang, H. H.-C., & Shao, B. B. M. (2014). The impacts of information technology on total factor productivity: A look at externalities and innovations. International Journal of Production Economics, 158, 290–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chouaibi, J., & Jarboui, A. (2012). Investigating the effect of the directors’ Board characteristics on financial performance through innovation activities. International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance, 3(1/2), 65–87.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. M., & Overdorf, M. (2000). Meeting the challenge of disruptive change. Harvard Business Review, 78(2), 67–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, M., & Mooney, J. (2009). CIO roles and responsibilities: Twenty-five years of evolution and change. Information & Management, 46(6), 323–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, M. W. S., Griffy-Brown, C., & Koeppel, H. (2014). The new normal: Fundamental shifts for 21th century organizations and for the CIOs who lead them. Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 16(5), 27–49.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cui, T., Ye, H., Teo, H. H., & Li, J. (2015). Information technology and open innovation: A strategic alignment perspective. Information & Management, 52, 348–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumps, B., Martens, D., De Backer, M., Haesen, R., Viaene, S., Dedene, G., … Snoeck, M. (2009). Inferring comprehensible business/ICT alignment rules. Information & Management, 46(2), 116–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damanpour, F. (2010). An integration of research findings of effects of firm size and market competition on product and process innovations. British Journal of Management, 21(4), 996–1010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daulatkar, S., & Sangle, P. S. (2015). Causality in information technology business value: A review. Business Process Management Journal, 21(3), 482–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Haes, S., & Van Grembergen, W. (2009). An exploratory study into IT governance implementation and its impact on business/IT alignment. Information Systems Management, 26(2), 123–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Haes, S., & Van Grembergen, W. (2013). Improving enterprise governance of IT in a major airline: A teaching case. Journal of Information Technology Teaching Cases, 3, 60–69.
   Google Scholar
• Devaraj, S., & Kohli, R. (2003). Performance impacts of information technology: Is actual usage the missing link? Management Science, 49(3), 273–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys – the tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Mesa, A., Ferreras-Mendez, Alegre, J., & Chiva, R. (2014). IT competency and the commercial success of innovation. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114(4), 550–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garson, G. D. (2016). Partial least squares: Regression & structural equation models. Asheboro, NC: Statistical Associates Publishers. Retrieved October 20, 2016, from http://info.smartpls.com/data/uploads/ebook_on_pls-sem.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gerow, J. E., Thatcher, J. B., & Grover, V. (2015). Six types of IT-business strategic alignment: An investigation of the constructs and their measurement. European Journal of Information Systems, 24, 465–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gressgard, L. J., Amundsen, O., Aasen, T. M., & Hansen, K. (2014). Use of information and communication technology to support employee driven innovation in organizations: A knowledge management perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(4), 633–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Anderson, F. R., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate analysis (5th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R. (1997). Complex systems, complex learning, and competence building. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D., & Mason, P. (1984). Upper echelon: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(1), 193–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., Teece, D., & Winter, S. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997–1010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Héroux, S., & Fortin, A. (2014). Exploring IT dependence and IT governance. Information Systems Management, 31(2), 143–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Héroux, S., & Fortin, A. (2016). Antecedents of innovation: The influence of diversity and IT competence of boards of directors and executive management. International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 8(3), 18–43.
   Google Scholar
• Huff, S. L., Maher, P. M., & Munro, M. C. (2006). Information technology and the Board of directors: Is there an IT attention deficit? MIS Quarterly Executive, 5(2), 55–68.
   Google Scholar
• Itami, H., & Roehl, T. (1987). Mobilizing invisible assets. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ITGI (IT Governance Institute). (2003). Board briefing on IT governance (2nd ed.), Rolling Meadows, Illinois: IT Governance Institute. Retrieved April 20, 2016, from http://www.isaca.org/restricted/Documents/26904_Board_Briefing_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Ives, B. (1994). The global network organization of the future: Information management opportunities and challenges. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10(4), 25–57.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, C. B., Mackenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewer, J., & McKay, K. N. (2012). Antecedents and consequences of Board IT governance: Institutional and strategic choice perspectives. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(7), 581–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judd, C. M., Smith, E. R., & Kidder, L. H. (1991). Research methods in social relations. (6th ed.). Fort Worth, Texas: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Karake, Z. A. (1995). Information technology performance: Agency and upper echelon theories. Management Decision, 33(9), 30–37.
   Google Scholar
• Karanja, E., & Bhatt, G. D. (2014). The role of IT investments in fostering firm innovations: An empirical study. Journal of Management and Management, 20(2), 25–50.
   Google Scholar
• Karimi, J., Somers, T. M., & Bhattacherjee, A. (2007). The role of information systems resources in ERP capability building and business process outcomes. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(2), 221–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpovsky, A., & Galliers, R. D. (2015). Aligning in practice: From current cases to a new agenda. Journal of Information Technology, 30, 136–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearns, G., & Lederer, A. L. (2003). A resource-based view of strategic IT-alignment: How knowledge sharing creates competitive advantage. Decision Sciences, 34(1), 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, G., Shin, B., Kim, K. K., & Lee, H. G. (2011). IT capabilities, process-oriented dynamic capabilities, and firm financial performance. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 12(7), 487–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, W., & Wadhams, T. (2012). Overcoming competitive inertia: Board composition and strategic persistence. International Journal of Management & Information Systems, 16(1), 111–124.
   Google Scholar
• Kohli, R., & Grover, V. (2008). Business value of IT: An essay on expanding research directions to keep up with the times. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(1), 23–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kor, Y. Y. (2006). Direct and interaction effects of top management team and board compositions on R&D investment strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 1081–1099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuruzovich, J., Basselier, G., & Sambamurthy, V. (2012). IT governance processes and IT alignment: Viewpoints from the board of directors. Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, Hawaii, 5043–5052.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C.-Y., & Sung, T. (2005). Schumpeter’s legacy: A new perspective on the relationship between firm size and R&D. Research Policy, 34(6), 914–931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Lee, C. (2009). IT governance-based IT strategy and management: Literature review and future research directions. In A. Cater-Steel (Ed.), Information technology governance and service management (pp. 44–62). Hershey, PA and Covent Garden, London: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, H., Saraf, N., Hu, Q., & Xue, Y. (2007). Assimilation of enterprise systems: The effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 59–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, T.-P., You, J.-J., & Liu, -C.-C. (2010). A resource-based perspective on information technology and firm performance: A meta analysis. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110(8), 1138–1158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Chen, J., & Tao, Y. (2015). Innovation performance in new product development teams in China’s technology ventures: The role of behavioural integration dimensions and collective efficacy. Journal of Product Development & Management Association, 32(1), 29–44.
   Google Scholar
• Luftman, J., & Kempaiah, R. (2007). An update on business-IT alignment: “A line” has been drawn. MIS Quarterly Executive, 6(3), 165–177.
   Google Scholar
• Lunardi, G. L., Maçada, A. C. G., Becker, J. L., & Van Grembergen, W. (2017). Antecedents of IT governance effectiveness: An empirical examination in Brazilian firms. Journal of Information Systems, 31(1), 41–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCurtain, S., Flood, P. C., Ramamoorthy, N., West, M. A., & Dawson, J. F. (2010). The top management team, reflexivity, knowledge sharing and new product performance: A study of the Irish software industry. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(3), 219–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manner, M. H. (2010). The impact of CEO characteristics on corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 53–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masli, A., Richardson, V., Sanchez, J. M., & Smith, R. E. (2011). The business value of IT: A synthesis and framework of archival research. Journal of Information Systems, 25(2), 81–116.
   Google Scholar
• Mata, F. J., Fuerst, W. L., & Barney, J. B. (1995). Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 487–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAfee, A., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2008). Investing in the IT that makes a competitive difference. Harvard Business Review, 86(7/8), 98–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melville, N., Kraemer, K., & Gurbaxani, V. (2004). Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quarterly, 28(2), 283–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra, S., & Chaya, A. K. (1996). Analyzing cost-effectiveness of organizations: The impact of information technology spending. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(2), 29–57.
   Google Scholar
• Mooney, J. G., Gurbaxani, V., & Kraemer, K. L. (1995). A process oriented framework for assessing the business value of information technology. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 68–81.
   Google Scholar
• Müeller, K., Rammer, C., & Trüby, J. (2009). The role of creative industries in industrial innovation. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 11(2), 148–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolan, R., & McFarlan, F. W. (2005). Information technology and the boards of directors. Harvard Business Review, 83(10), 96–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)/European Communities. (2005). Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. (3rd Ed.). Paris, France: OECD Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Parent, M., & Reich, B. H. (2009). Governing information technology risk. California Management Review, 51(3), 134–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlou, P. A., & El Sawy, O. A. (2006). From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: The case of new product development. Information Systems Research, 17(3), 198–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlou, P. A., & El Sawy, O. A. (2011). Understanding the elusive black box of dynamic capabilities. Decision Sciences, 42(1), 239–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. (2004). Crafting information technology governance. Information Systems Management, 21(4), 7–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prajogo, D. I., & Ahmed, P. K. (2006). Relationship between innovation stimulus, innovation capacity, and innovation performance. R&D Management, 36(5), 499–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prybutok, V. R., Zhang, X., & Ryan, S. D. (2008). Evaluating leadership, IT quality, and net benefits in an e-government environment. Information & Management, 45(3), 143–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PwC (Price WaterhouseCoopers). (2017). 20th CEO Survey: 20 years inside the mind of a CEO… What’s next? Retrieved March 20, 2017, from http://www.pwc.com/gx/en/ceo-agenda/ceosurvey/2017/gx.html
   Google Scholar
• Ranganathan, C., Dhaliwal, J. S., & Teo, T. S. H. (2004). Assimilation and diffusion of web technologies in supply-chain management: An examination of key drivers and performance impacts. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 9(1), 127–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravichandran, T., & Lertwongsatien, C. (2005). Effect of information systems resources and capabilities on firm performance: A resource-based perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(4), 237–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhard, N., & Bigueti, J. R. (2013). The influence of shared mental models between the CIO and the top management team on the strategic alignment of information systems: A comparison between Brazilian and US companies. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 10(3), 503–520.
   Google Scholar
• Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Straub, D. W. (2012). A critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS Quarterly. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), iii–xiv.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH. Retrieved from October 15, 2016, http://www.smartpls.com
   Google Scholar
• Rivard, S., Raymond, L., & Verreault, D. (2006). Resource-based view and competitive strategy: An integrated model of the contribution of information technology to firm performance. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 15, 29–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothaermel, F. T., & Hess, A. M. (2007). Building capabilities: Innovation driven by individual-, firm-, and network-level effects. Organization Science, 18(6), 898–921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabherwal, R., Hirschheim, R., & Goles, T. (2001). The dynamics of alignment: Insights from a punctuated equilibrium model. Organization Science, 12(2), 179–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., & Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualising the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 237–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, R., Heene, A., & Thomas, H. (1996). Introduction: Towards the theory and practice of competence-based competition. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Santamaria, L., Nieto, M. J., & Gil, A. B. (2009). Beyond R&D: Taking advantage of other sources of innovation in low and medium technology industries. Research Policy, 38(3), 507–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheeren, A. W., Fontes-Filho, J. R., & Tavares, E. (2013). Impacts of a relationship model of informational technology governance: An analysis of managerial perceptions in Brazil. Journal of Information Systems of Technology and Management, 10(3), 621–642.
   Google Scholar
• Schoemaker, P., & Amit, R. (1994). Investment in strategic assets: Industry and firm level perspectives. In P. Shrivastava, A. S. Huff, & J. E. Dutton (Eds.), Advances in strategic management (10A): Resource-based view of the firm (pp. 3–33). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, C., Kalika, M., Kefi, H., & Schwarz, A. (2010). A dynamic capabilities approach to understanding the impact of IT-enabled businesses processes and IT-business alignment on the strategic and operational performance of the firm. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 26, 57–84.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, N. (2006). The impact of information technology on the financial performance of diversified firms. Decision Support Systems, 41(4), 698–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sing Wong, S. K. (2013). The role of management involvement in innovation. Management Decision, 51(4), 709–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soh, C., & Markus, M. L. (1995). How IT creates business value: A process theory synthesis. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 29–42.
   Google Scholar
• Song, L. Z., & Song, M. (2010). The role of information technologies in enhancing R&D-marketing integration: An empirical investigation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27, 382–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava, R. K., Shervani, T. A., & Fahey, L. (1998). Market-based assets and shareholder value: A framework for analysis. Journal of Marketing, 62(1), 2–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subirana, B. (2004). Executive leadership and ITs technical details: Teaching approach for Steelscreen.com and beyond. Journal of Information Technology, 19(2), 159–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talke, K., Salomo, S., & Rost, K. (2010). How top management team diversity affects innovativeness and performance via the strategic choice to focus on innovation fields. Research Policy, 39(7), 907–918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallon, P. (2003, November 15). The alignment paradox. CIO Insight. Retrieved April 20, 2016, from http://www.cioinsight.com/c/a/Past-News/Paul-Tallon-The-Alignment-Paradox
   Google Scholar
• Tam, K. Y. (1998). The impact of information technology investments on firm performance and evaluation: Evidence from newly industrialized economies. Information Systems Research, 9(1), 85–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tippins, M. J., & Sohi, R. S. (2003). IT competency and firm performance: Is organizational learning a missing link? Strategic Management Journal, 24(8), 745–761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turel, O., & Bart, C. (2014). Board-level IT governance and organizational performance. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(2), 223–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, E. L. H., & Stewart, G. (2013). The emerging role of the Board of directors in enterprise business technology governance. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 10(4), 346–362.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, B., Den Hertog, R., Menkveld, B., & Thurik, R. (1997). Some new evidence on the determinants of large- and small-firm innovation. Small Business Economics, 9(4), 335–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Grembergen, W., & De Haes, S. (2009). Enterprise governance of information technology – Achieving strategic alignment and value. New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatraman, N. (1989). The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 423–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, M., & Hulland, J. (2004). Review: The resource-based view and information systems research: Review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 107–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weill, P. (1992). The relationship between investment in information technology and firm performance: A study of the valve manufacturing sector. Information Systems Research, 3(4), 307–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weill, P., & Ross, J. (2005). A matrixed approach to designing IT governance. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(2), 26–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., & McAfee, A. (2012). The digital capabilities your company needs. Retrieved March 29, 2017, from http://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/the-digital-capabilities-your-company-needs/
   Google Scholar
• Wiengarten, F., Humphreys, P., Cao, G., & McHugh, M. (2013). Exploring the important role of organizational factors in IT business value: Taking a contingency perspective on the resource-based view. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15, 30–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkin, C. L., & Chenhall, R. H. (2010). A review of IT governance: A taxonomy to inform accounting information systems. Journal of Information Systems, 24(2), 107–146.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, S. P.-J., Straub, D. W., & Liang, T.-P. (2015). How information technology governance mechanisms and strategic alignment influence organizational performance: Insights from a matched survey of business and IT managers. MIS Quarterly, 39(2), 497–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap, C.-M., Chai, K.-H., & Lemaire, P. (2005). An empirical study on functional diversity and innovation in SMEs. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(2), 176–190.
   Google Scholar
• Yayla, A. A., & Hu, Q. (2014). The effect of Board of directors’ IT awareness on CIO compensation and firm performance. Decision Sciences, 45(3), 401–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh, C.-H., Lee, G.-G., & Pai, J.-C. (2012). How information system capability affects e-business information technology strategy implementation. Business Process Management Journal, 18(2), 197–218.
   Google Scholar
• Yoo, J. W., & Kim, K. (2012). Board competence and the top management team’s external ties for performance. Journal of Management & Organization, 18(2), 142–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, X., Guo, Z., & Fang, E. (2014). An examination of how and when the top management team matters for firm innovativeness: The effects of TMT functional backgrounds. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 16(3), 323–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, K. Z., & Li, C. B. (2012). How knowledge affects radical innovation: Knowledge base, market knowledge acquisition, and internal knowledge sharing. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1090–1102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, K. (2004). The complementarity of information technology infrastructure and e-commerce capability: A resource-based assessment of their business value. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(1), 167–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zona, F., Zattoni, A., & Minichilli, A. (2013). A contingency model of Boards of directors and firm innovation: The moderating role of firm size. British Journal of Management, 24(3), 299–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar