The Impact of Technology Availability and Structural Guidance on Group Development in Workgroups Using Computer-Mediated Communication

References

• Alnuaimi, O. A., Robert, L. P., & Maruping, L. M. (2010). Team Size, Dispersion, and Social Loafing in Technology-supported Teams: A Perspective on the Theory of Moral Disengagement. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(1), 203–230. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222270109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argote, L., & Olivera, F. (1999). Organizational Learning and New Product Development: CORE Processes. In L. L. Thompson, J. M. Levine, & D. M. Messick (Eds.), Shared Cognition in Organizations: The Management of Knowledge (pp. 297–325). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Barley, S. R. (1986). Technology as an Occasion for Structuring: Evidence from Observations of CT Scanners and the Social Order of Radiology Departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(1), 78–108. doi:10.2307/2392767
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, B. (1974). Stages of Group Development in a Mental Health Team. Psychiatric Quarterly, 48(3), 309–319. doi:10.1007/BF01562154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettenhausen, K. (1991). Five Years of Groups Research: What we have Learned and What Needs to be Addressed. Journal of Management, 17(2), 345–381. doi:10.1177/014920639101700205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., & Hoyle, R. H. (1990). Perceived Cohesion: A Conceptual and Empirical Examination. Social Forces, 69(2), 479–504. doi:10.1093/sf/69.2.479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, J., White, B. J., & Mennecke, B. E. (2003). Teams and Tasks – A Temporal Framework for the Effects of Interpersonal Interventions on Team Performance. Small Group Research, 34(3), 353–387. doi:10.1177/1046496403034003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, R. O., De Vreede, G. J., Nunamaker, J. F., & Tobey, D. (2001). Thinklets: Achieving Predictable, Repeatable Patterns of Group Interaction with Group Support Systems. In proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, Piscataway, NJ. Hawaii, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. (1996). Paradox Lost? Firm-Level Evidence on the Returns to Information Systems Spending. Management Science, 42(4), 541–558. doi:10.1287/mnsc.42.4.541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, K., & Chidambaram, L. (1999). An Assessment of Change in Behavioral Dynamics among Computer-Supported Groups: Different Factors Change at Different Rates. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 99(7), 288–295. doi:10.1108/02635579910262553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushe, G. R. (1987). Temporary or Permanent Middle-Management Groups? Correlates with Attitudes in QWL Change Projects. Group and Organization Studies, 12(1), 23–37. doi:10.1177/105960118701200103
   Google Scholar
• Chen, G. (2005). Newcomer Adaptation in Teams: Multilevel Antecedents and Outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 101–116. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2005.15993147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, W. W., Salisbury, W. D., Pearson, A. W., & Stollak, M. J. (1999). Perceived Cohesion in Small Groups: Adapting and Testing the Perceived Cohesion Scale in a Small-Group Setting. Small Group Research, 30(6), 751–767. doi:10.1177/104649649903000605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiocchio, F., Forgues, D., Paradis, D., & Iordanova, I. (2011). Teamwork in Integrated Design Projects: Understanding the Effects of Trust, Conflict, and Collaboration on Performance. Project Management Journal, 42(6), 78–91. doi:10.1002/pmj.20268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, J., & Wall, T. (1980). New Work Attitude Measures of Trust, Organizational Commitment and Personal Need Non-Fulfilment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53(1), 39–52. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1980.tb00005.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cozzarin, B. P., & Percival, J. C. (2010). IT, Productivity and Organizational Practices: Large Sample, Establishment-Level Evidence. Information Technology & Management, 11(2), 61–76. doi:10.1007/s10799-010-0067-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wit, F. R., Greer, L. L., & Jehn, K. A. (2012). The Paradox of Intragroup Conflict: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(2), 360–390. doi:10.1037/a0024844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121–147. doi:10.1287/orsc.5.2.121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fjermestad, J., & Hiltz, S. R. (1998). An Assessment of Group Support Systems Experimental Research: Methodology and Results. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(3), 7–149. doi:10.1080/07421222.1998.11518216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• France, M. H., & Wahl, J. (1997). What’s Going on Here? Strategies for Group Development. Guidance & Counseling, 12(3), 24–27.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. C., Roeder, D., & Mulholland, R. R. (1979). Centrality in Social Networks: II. Experimental Results. Social Networks, 2(2), 119–141. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(79)90002-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, J. F., Easton, G. K., Nunamaker, J. F., & Northcraft, G. B. (1990). A Study of Collaborative Group Work with and without Computer-Based Support. Information Systems Research, 1(4), 394–415. doi:10.1287/isre.1.4.394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersick, C. J. (1988). Time and Transition in Work Teams: Toward a New Model of Group Development. Academy of Management Journal, 31(1), 9–41. doi:10.2307/256496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladstein, D. L. (1984). Groups in Context: A Model of Task Group Effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(4), 499–517. doi:10.2307/2392936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glickman, A. S., Zimmer, S., Montero, R. C., Guerette, P. J., Campbell, W. J., Morgan, B., & Salas, E. (1987). The Evolution of Teamwork Skills: An Empirical Assessment with Implications for Training (Tech. Report 87-016). Orlando, FL, USA: Office of Naval Research, Human Factors Division.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1961). Fun in Games. Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction (pp. 15–81). Indianapolis, Indiana: Bobbs-Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Goodstein, L., Nolan, T., & Pfeiffer, J. W. (1993). Applied Strategic Planning: A Comprehensive Guide. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Grawitch, M. J., Munz, D. C., Elliott, E. K., & Mathis, A. (2003). Promoting Creativity in Temporary Problem-Solving Groups: The Effects of Positive Mood and Autonomy in Problem Definition on Idea-Generating Performance. Group Dynamics: Theory Research and Practice, 7(3), 200–213. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.7.3.200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guetzkow, H., & Simon, H. A. (1955). The Impact of Certain Communication Nets Upon Organization and Performance in Task-Oriented Groups. Management Science, 1(3–4), 233–250. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1.3-4.233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzzo, R. A., & Shea, G. P. (1992). Group Performance and Intergroup Relations in Organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 269–313). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hackman, J. R. (1987). The Design of Work Teams. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Behavior (pp. 315–342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hackman, J. R. (1990). Groups That Work (and Those That Don’t). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Haines, R., & Mann, J. E. C. (2011). A New Perspective on De-Individuation via Computer-Mediated Communication. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(2), 156–167. doi:10.1057/ejis.2010.70
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haines, R., & Riemer, K. (2011). The User-Centered Nature of Awareness Creation in Computer-Mediated Communication. In Proceedings of the Thirty Second International Conference on Information Systems (pp. Paper 8).
   Google Scholar
• Hendrickson, A. R., Townsend, A. M., Whitman, M. E., & Demarie, S. M. (1997). An Examination of Team Development on Computer-Mediated Decision Processes. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 38(2), 14–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, W. F., & Gruner, L. (1973). A Study of Development in Open and Closed Groups. Small Group Behavior, 4(3), 355–381. doi:10.1177/104649647300400303
   Google Scholar
• Hiltz, S., Turoff, M., & Johnson, K. (1989). Experiments in Group Decision Making, 3: Disinhibition, Deindividuation, and Group Process in Pen Name and Real Name Computer Conferences. Decision Support Systems, 5(2), 217–232. doi:10.1016/0167-9236(89)90008-0
   Google Scholar
• Hoegl, M., & Muethel, M. (2016). Enabling Shared Leadership in Virtual Project Teams: A Practitioners’ Guide. Project Management Journal, 47(1), 7–12. doi:10.1002/pmj.21564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollenbeck, J. R., O’Leary, A. M., Klein, H. J., & Wright, P. M. (1989). Investigation of the Construct Validity of a Self-Report Measure of Goal Commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(6), 951–956. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.6.951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollingshead, A. B., & McGrath, J. E. (1995). Computer-Assisted Groups: A Critical Review of the Empirical Research. In R. A. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations (pp. 46–78). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, G. P. (1990). A Theory of the Effects of Advanced Information Technologies on Organizational Design, Intelligence, and Decision Making. Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 47–71. doi:10.5465/AMR.1990.4308227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsson, C., Rydbo, N., & Börresen, J. E. (2014). The Links Between Group Development and Health in Manufacturing Industry. Small Group Research, 45(4), 400–415. doi:10.1177/1046496414534473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, C. Y. (2013). Facilitating Trust in Virtual Teams: The Role of Awareness. Advances in Competitiveness Research, 21(1/2), 61–77.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa, S. L., Rao, V. S., & Huber, G. P. (1988). Computer Support for Meetings of Groups Working on Unstructured Problems: A Field Experiment. MIS Quarterly, 12(4), 645–666. doi:10.2307/249137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehn, K. A. (1997). A Qualitative Analysis of Conflict Types and Dimensions in Organizational Groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 530–557. doi:10.2307/2393737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidder, T. (1981). The Soul of a New Machine. New York, NY: Avon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social Psychological Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication. American Psychologist, 39(10), 1123–1134. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.39.10.1123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S., & Ilgen, D. (2006). Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3), 77–124. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work Groups and Teams in Organizations. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology: Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 333–375). New York: Wiley Online Library. doi:10.1002/0471264385.wei1214
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W., Gully, S. M., Nason, E. R., & Smith, E. M. (1999). Developing Adaptive Teams: A Theory of Compilation and Performance Across Levels and Time. In D. R. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The Changing Nature of Work Performance: Implications for Staffing, Personnel Actions, and Development (pp. 240–292). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Langfred, C. W. (2007). The Downside of Self-Management: A Longitudinal Study of the Effects of Conflict on Trust, Autonomy, and Task Interdependence in Self-Managing Teams. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 885–900. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leavitt, H. (1951). Some Effects of Certain Communication Patterns on Group Performance. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46(1), 38–50. doi:10.1037/h0057189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in Group Development: Concept, Method and Reality in Social Science; Social Equilibria and Social Change. Human Relations, 1(1), 5–41. doi:10.1177/001872674700100103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, N., Chen, Y., Zha, Y., & Hu, H. (2015). Performance Evaluation of Individuals in Workgroups with Shared Outcomes using DEA. INFOR, 53(2), 78–89. doi:10.3138/infor.53.2.78
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limayem, M., Banerjee, P., & Ma, L. (2006). Impact of GDSS: Opening the Black Box. Decision Support Systems, 42(2), 945–957. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2005.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry, P. B., Romano, N. C., Jenkins, J. L., & Guthrie, R. W. (2009). The CMC Interactivity Model: How Interactivity Enhances Communication Quality and Process Satisfaction in Lean-Media Groups. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(1), 155–195. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222260107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manyika, J., Lund, S., Auguste, B., & Ramaswamy, S. (2012, March). Help Wanted: The Future of Work in Advanced Economies. In G. Lewis (Ed.), McKinsey & Company. New York, NY: McKinsey Global Institute. Retrieved June 9, 2016 from McKinsey & Company Website http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/employment_and_growth/future_of_work_in_advanced_economies
   Google Scholar
• Martinic, A., Fertalj, K., & Kalpic, D. (2012). Methodological Framework for Virtual Team Project Management. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 3(6), 702–707.
   Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse into the Future. Journal of Management, 34(3), 410–476. doi:10.1177/0149206308316061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Shoorman, F. D. (1995). An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. Academy of Management Journal, 20(3), 709–734. doi:10.5465/AMR.1995.9508080335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, J. E. (1986). Studying Groups at Work: Ten Critical Needs for Theory and Practice. In P. S. Goodman (Ed..), Designing Effective Work Groups (pp. 362–391). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Associates.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, J. E., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1994). Groups Interacting With Technology: Ideas, Evidence, Issues, and an Agenda. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• McKinney, E. H., Barker, J. R., Smith, D. R., & Davis, K. J. (2004). The Role of Communication Values in Swift Starting Action Teams: IT Insights from Flight Crew Experience. Information & Management, 41(8), 1043–1056. doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurray, A. J., Islam, M., Sarros, J. C., & Pirola-Merlo, A. (2012). The impact of leadership on workgroup climate and performance in a non-profit organization. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 33(6), 522–549. doi:10.1108/01437731211253000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyerson, D., Weick, K. E., & Kramer, R. M. (1996). Swift Trust and Temporary Groups. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research (pp. 166–195). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. doi:10.4135/9781452243610.n9
   Google Scholar
• Miyazaki, S., Idota, H., & Miyoshi, H. (2012). Corporate Productivity and the Stages of ICT Development. Information Technology & Management, 13(1), 17–26. doi:10.1007/s10799-011-0108-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, L., Paucar-Caceres, A., & Wright, G. (2014). Leading Effective Global Virtual Teams: The Consequences of Methods of Communication. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 27(6), 607–624. doi:10.1007/s11213-014-9315-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulder, I., Swaak, J., & Kessels, J. (2004). In Search of Reflective Behavior and Shared Understanding in Ad hoc Expert Teams. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(2), 141–154. doi:10.1089/109493104323024410
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nesterkin, D. A., Porterfield, T. E., & Li, X. (2016). Relationship Conflict, Conflict Management, and Performance of Information Technology Teams. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 56(3), 194–203. doi:10.1080/08874417.2016.1153893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nokes-Malach, T. J., Meade, M. L., & Morrow, D. G. (2012). The Effect of Expertise on Collaborative Problem Solving. Thinking & Reasoning, 18(1), 32–58. doi:10.1080/13546783.2011.642206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, T. A., Allen, N. J., & Hastings, S. E. (2013). Examining the “Pros” and “Cons” of Team Conflict: A Team-Level Meta-Analysis of Task, Relationship, and Process Conflict. Human Performance, 26(3), 236–260. doi:10.1080/08959285.2013.795573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oemig, C., & Gross, T. (2007). Shifts in Significance: How Group Dynamics Improves Group Awareness. In T. Gross (Ed.), Mensch & Computer Interaktion (pp. 109–118). Fachübergreifende konferenz fuer interaktive und kooperative menien. doi:10.1524/9783486845488-014
   Google Scholar
• Ogungbamila, B., Ogungbamila, A., & Adetula, G. A. (2010). Effects of Team Size and Work Team Perception on Workplace Commitment: Evidence from 23 Production Teams. Small Group Research, 41(6), 725–745. doi:10.1177/1046496410376306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404–428. doi:10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, A., Piccoli, G., & Ives, B. (2004). Virtual Teams: A Review of Current Literature and Directions for Future Research. The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 35(1), 6–36. doi:10.1145/968464.968467
   Google Scholar
• Poza, E. J., & Marcus, M. L. (1980). Success Story: The Team Approach to Work-Restructuring. Organizational Dynamics, 8(3), 3–25. doi:10.1016/0090-2616(80)90042-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raes, E., Kyndt, E., Decuyper, S., Van Den Bossche, P., & Dochy, F. (2015). An Exploratory Study of Group Development and Team Learning. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 26(1), 5–30. doi:10.1002/hrdq.21201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert, L. P. (2016). Healthy Divide or Detrimental Division? Subgroups in Virtual Teams. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 56(3), 253–260. doi:10.1080/08874417.2016.1153918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert, L. P., Dennis, A. R., & Hung, Y. T. (2009). Individual Swift Trust and Knowledge-based Trust in Face-to-Face and Virtual Team Members. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(2), 241–279. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222260210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarker, S., & Sahay, S. (2003). Understanding Virtual Team Development: An Interpretive Study. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 4(1), 1–38. doi:10.17705/1jais
   Google Scholar
• Sarri, R. C., & Galinsky, M. J. (1974). A Conceptual Framework for Group Development. In P. Glasser, R. Sarri, & R. Vinter (Eds.), Individual Change Through Small Groups (pp. 71–88). New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schutz, W. C. (1966). The Interpersonal Underworld. Palo Alto, CA: Science & Behavior Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, G., Qiang, Y., Wenjun, S., & Qi, L. (2013). Communication in Virtual World: Second Life and Business Opportunities. Information Systems Frontiers, 15(4), 677–694. doi:10.1007/s10796-012-9347-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemsen, E., Balasubramanian, S., & Roth, A. V. (2007). Incentives that Induce Task-related Effort, Helping, and Knowledge Sharing in Workgroups. Management Science, 53(10), 1533–1550. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1070.0714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G. (2001). Group Development: A Review of the Literature and a Commentary on Future Research Directions. Group Facilitation, 3, 14–46.
   Google Scholar
• Srivastva, S., Obert, S. L., & Neilson, E. (1977). Organizational Analysis through Group Processes: A Theoretical Perspective for Organization Development. In C. Cooper (Ed.), Organizational Development in the UK and USA: A Joint Evaluation (pp. 83–111). London, UK: Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-03284-6_5
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, M. J., & Campion, M. A. (1994). The Knowledge, Skill, and Ability Requirements for Teamwork: Implications for Human Resource Management. Journal of Management, 20(2), 503–530. doi:10.1177/014920639402000210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiroh, K. J. (2002). Information Technology and the U.S. Productivity Revival: What do the Industry Data Say?. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1559–1576. doi:10.1257/000282802762024638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolte, J. (1978). Power Structure and Personal Competence. The Journal of Social Psychology, 106(1), 83–92. doi:10.1080/00224545.1978.9924148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. (1988). The Articulation of Project Work: An Organizational Process. The Sociological Quarterly, 29(2), 163–178. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1988.tb01249.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundstrom, E., De Meuse, K. P., & Futrell, D. (1990). Work Teams: Applications and Effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45(2), 120–133. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.45.2.120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. C. (1977). Stages of Small-Group Development Revisited. Group & Organization Studies, 2(4), 419–427. doi:10.1177/105960117700200404
   Google Scholar
• Uhl-Bien, M., & Graen, G. B. (1998). Individual Self-Management: Analysis of Professionals’ Self-Managing Activities in Functional and Cross-Functional Work Teams. Academy of Management Journal, 41(3), 340–350. doi:10.2307/256912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van De Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (1995). Explaining Development and Change in Organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 510–540. doi:10.2307/258786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (1995). Relational Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication: Experimental Observations over Time. Organization Science, 6(2), 186–203. doi:10.1287/orsc.6.2.186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, M. A., Tjosvold, D., & Smith, K. G. (2003). International Handbook of Organizational Teamwork and Cooperative Working. Chichester, West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/9780470696712
   Google Scholar
• Wheelan, S. A. (1994). Group Processes: A Developmental Perspective. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Wheelan, S. A. (2009). Group Size, Group Development, and Group Productivity. Small Group Research, 40(2), 247–262. doi:10.1177/1046496408328703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheelan, S. A., Davidson, B., & Tilin, F. (2003). Group Development Across Time: Reality or Illusion?. Small Group Research, 34(2), 223–245. doi:10.1177/1046496403251608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheelan, S. A., & Kaeser, R. M. (1997). The Influence of Task Type and Designated Leaders on Developmental Patterns in Groups. Small Group Research, 28(1), 94–121. doi:10.1177/1046496497281004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheelan, S. A., & Tilin, F. (1999). The Relationship between Faculty Group Development and School Productivity. Small Group Research, 30(1), 59–81. doi:10.1177/104649649903000104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, Y. (2011). Task Effects on Focus on Form in Synchronous Computer‐Mediated Communication. The Modern Language Journal, 95(1), 115–132. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01143.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelditch, M., & Ford, J. B. (1994). Uncertainty, Potential Power, and Nondecisions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57(1), 64–73. doi:10.2307/2786975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar