784
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Investigating IT Governance through the Viable System Model

&

References

  • Achterbergh, J., & Vriens, D. (2002). Managing viable knowledge. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 19(3), 223–241. doi:10.1002/sres.440
  • Ali, S., & Green, P. (2012). Effective information technology (IT) governance mechanisms: An IT outsourcing perspective. Information Systems Frontiers, 14(2), 179–193. doi:10.1007/s10796-009-9183-y
  • Anderton, R. (1989). The need for formal development of the VSM. In R. Espejo & R. Harnden (Eds.), The viable system model: Interpretations and applications of Stafford Beer’s VSM (pp. 39–50). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Andriole, S. (2009). Boards of directors and technology governance: The surprising state of the practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 24, 373–394. doi:10.17705/1CAIS
  • Ashby, W. (1956). An introduction to cybernetics. London: Chapman & Hall.
  • Bart, C., & Turel, O. (2010). IT and the board of directors: An empirical investigation into the “governance questions” Canadian board members ask about IT. Journal of Information Systems, 24(2), 147–172. doi:10.2308/jis.2010.24.2.147
  • Beer, S. (1959). Cybernetics and management. London: The English Universities Press.
  • Beer, S. (1972). Brain of the firm. London: Allen Lane.
  • Beer, S. (1979). The heart of enterprise. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Beer, S. (1981). Brain of the firm, second edition. Chichester: John Wiley.
  • Beer, S. (1985). Diagnosing the system for organizations. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Beer, S. (1989). The viable system model: Its provenance, development, methodology and pathology. In R. Espejo & R. Harnden (Eds.), The viable system model: Interpretations and applications of Stafford Beer’s VSM (pp. 11–37). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Benaroch, M., & Chernobai, A. (2017). Operational IT Failures, IT Value Destruction, and Board-Level IT Governance Changes. MIS Quarterly, 41(3), 729–762. doi:10.25300/MISQ
  • Brown, C. V. (1997). Examining the emergence of hybrid IS governance solutions: Evidence from a single case site. Information Systems Research, 8(1), 69–94. doi:10.1287/isre.8.1.69
  • Brown, C. V., & Renwick, J. S. (1996). Alignment of the IS organization. Database, 27(4), 25–33.
  • Chatterjee, D., Richardson, V. J., & Zmud, R. W. (2001). Examining the shareholder wealth effects of announcements of newly created CIO positions. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 43–70. doi:10.2307/3250958
  • Davenport, T. H. (1998). Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. Harvard Business Review, 76(4), 121–131.
  • De Haes, S., Huygh, T., & Joshi, A. (2017). Exploring the contemporary state of information technology governance transparency in Belgian firms. Information Systems Management, 34(1), 20–37. doi:10.1080/10580530.2017.1254444
  • De Haes, S., & Van Grembergen, W. (2009). An exploratory study into IT governance implementations and its impact on business/IT alignment. Information Systems Management, 26(2), 123–137. doi:10.1080/10580530902794786
  • De Haes, S., & Van Grembergen, W. (2015). Enterprise governance of information technology (2nd ed.). Switzerland: Springer.
  • Espejo, R. (1989). The VSM revisited. In R. Espejo & R. Harnden (Eds.), The viable system model: Interpretations and Applications of Stafford Beer’s VSM (pp. 77–100). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Espejo, R., & Gill, A. (1997). The viable system model as a framework for understanding organizations. Retrieved from http://www.moderntimesworkplace.com/good_reading/GRRespSelf/TheViableSystemModel.pdf
  • Espejo, R., & Harnden, R. (1989). The viable system model: Interpretations and applications of Stafford Beer’s VSM. New York: Wiley.
  • Espejo, R., & Reyes, A. (2011). Organizational systems: Managing complexity with the viable system model. Germany: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
  • Flood, R. L., & Jackson, M. C. (1991). Creative problem solving. Chichester: Wiley.
  • Gokhale, G. B., & Banks, D. A. (2004). Organisational information security: A viable system perspective. Proceedings of the 2nd Australian Information Security Management Conference 2004. School of Computing and Information Science, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, (pp. 178–184).
  • Gregor, S. (2006). The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 611–642. doi:10.2307/25148742
  • Herring, C., & Kaplan, S. (2001). The viable system architecture. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1–10). Maui, HI: IEEE Comput. Soc.
  • Hobbs, G., & Scheepers, R. (2009). Identifying capabilities for the IT function to create agility in information systems. Hyderabad, India: PACIS 2009 Proceedings.
  • Hoverstadt, P. (2010). The viable system model. In M. Reynolds & S. Holwell (Eds.), Systems approaches to managing change: A practical guide (pp. 87–133). London: Springer.
  • Huang, R., Zmud, R. W., & Price, R. L. (2009). IT governance practices in small and medium-sized enterprises: Recommendations from an empirical study. In Information systems – Creativity and innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises, edited by Dhillon G., Stahl B. C. and Baskerville R. (pp. 158–179). New York: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  • ISACA. (2012). COBIT 5: A business framework for the governance and management of enterprise IT. Retrieved from http://www.isaca.org/COBIT/Pages/COBIT-5-Framework-product-page.aspx
  • ISO/IEC. (2008). ISO/IEC standard 38500: Corporate governance of information technology.Switzerland
  • IT Governance Institute (ITGI). (2003). Board briefing on IT governance, 2nd edition. Retrieved from http://www.isaca.org/knowledge-center/research/researchdeliverables/pages/board-briefing-on-it-governance-2nd-edition.aspx
  • Jackson, M. C. (1991). Systems methodology for the management sciences. New York: Plenum Press.
  • Jackson, M. C. (2000). Systems approaches to management. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
  • Joshi, A., Bollen, L., & Hassink, H. (2013). An empirical assessment of IT governance transparency: Evidence from commercial banking. Information Systems Management, 30(2), 116–136. doi:10.1080/10580530.2013.773805
  • Karayaz, G., Keating, C. B., & Henrie, M. (2011). Designing project management systems. 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (p. 10). Kauai, HI: IEEE.
  • Kearns, G. S., & Sabherwal, R. (2006). Strategic alignment between business and information technology: A knowledge-based view of behaviors, outcome, and consequences. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(3), 129–162. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222230306
  • Laumann, M., & Rosenkranz, C. (2008). Analysing information flows for controlling activities within supply chains: An Arvato (Bertelsmann) business case. ECIS 2008 Proceedings. Galway, Ireland.
  • Lewis, E., & Millar, G. (2009). The viable governance model - A theoretical model for the governance of IT. 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1–10). Big Island, HI: IEEE.
  • Lin, C., & Pervan, G. (2003). The practice of IS/IT benefits management in large Australian organizations. Information & Management, 41(1), 13–24. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00002-8
  • Mingers, J., & White, L. (2010). A review of the recent contribution of systems thinking to operational research and management science. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(3), 1147–1161. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.12.019
  • Nolan, R., & McFarlan, F. (2005). Information technology and the board of directors. Harvard Business Review, 83(10), 96–106.
  • Overby, E., Bharadwaj, A., & Sambamurthy, V. (2006). Enterprise agility and the enabling role of information technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(2), 120–131. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000600
  • Peppard, J. (2005). The application of the viable systems model to information technology governance. ICIS 2005 Proceedings. Las Vegas, Nevada.
  • Peterson, R. R. (2004a). Crafting information technology governance. Information Systems Management, 21(4), 7–22. doi:10.1201/1078/44705.21.4.20040901/84183.2
  • Peterson, R. R. (2004b). Integration strategies and tactics for information technology governance. In In strategies for information technology governance, edited by Van Grembergen, W., (pp. 37–80).
  • Pollalis, Y. A., & Dimitriou, N. K. (2008). Knowledge management in virtual enterprises: A systemic multi-methodology towards the strategic use of information. International Journal of Information Management, 28(4), 305–321. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2008.02.005
  • Prasad, A., Green, P., & Heales, J. (2012). On IT governance structures and their effectiveness in collaborative organizational structures. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 13(3), 199–220. doi:10.1016/j.accinf.2012.06.005
  • Preece, G., Shaw, D., & Hayashi, H. (2013). Using the Viable System Model (VSM) to structure information processing complexity in disaster response. European Journal of Operational Research, 224(1), 209–218. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2012.06.032
  • Preston, D. S., & Karahanna, E. (2009). Antecedents of IS strategic alignment: A nomological network. Information Systems Research, 20(2), 159–179. doi:10.1287/isre.1070.0159
  • Pykäläinen, T., Yang, D., & Fang, T. (2009). Alleviating piracy through open source strategy: An exploratory study of business software firms in China. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 18(4), 165–177. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2009.10.001
  • Raghupathi, W. (2007). Corporate governance of IT: A framework for development. Communications of the ACM, 50(8), 94–99. doi:10.1145/1278201
  • Richter, J., & Basten, D. (2014). Applications of the viable systems model in IS research – A comprehensive overview and analysis. 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 4589–4598). Big Island, HI: IEEE.
  • Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., & Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 27(2), 237–263. doi:10.2307/30036530
  • Sambamurthy, V., & Zmud, R. (1999). Arrangements for information technology governance: A theory of multiple contingencies. Management Information Systems Quarterly. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/misq/vol23/iss2/6
  • Shaw, D. R., Snowdon, B., Holland, C. P., Kawalek, P., & Warboys, B. (2004). The viable systems model applied to a smart network: The case of the UK electricity market. Journal of Information Technology, 19(4), 270–280. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000028
  • Skeivys, R. (2016). Governance of IT and cybernetics. Norbert Wiener in the 21st Century (21CW), 2016 IEEE Conference on (pp. 46–49). Melbourne, Australia: IEEE.
  • Turel, O., & Bart, C. (2014). Board-level IT governance and organizational performance. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(2), 223–239. doi:10.1057/ejis.2012.61
  • Valentine, E., & Stewart, G. (2013). The emerging role of the board of directors in enterprise business technology governance. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 10(4), 346–362. doi:10.1057/jdg.2013.11
  • Valentine, E., & Stewart, G. (2015). Enterprise business technology governance: Three competencies to build board digital leadership capability. 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 4513–4522). Kauai, HI: IEEE.
  • Van Grembergen, W., & De Haes, S. (2009). Enterprise governance of information technology: Achieving strategic alignment and value. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Weill, P., & Ross, J. W. (2004). IT governance: How top performers manage IT decision rights for superior results. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Press.
  • Weill, P., & Ross, J. W. (2009). IT savvy: What top executives must know to go from pain to gain. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Press.
  • Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics. Paris, France: Hermann.
  • Wilkin, C. L., Campbell, J., & Moore, S. (2013). Creating value through governing IT deployment in a public/private-sector inter-organisational context: A human agency perspective. European Journal of Information Systems, 22(5), 498–511. doi:10.1057/ejis.2012.21
  • Winkler, T. J., & Brown, C. V. (2013). Horizontal allocation of decision rights for on-premise Applications and software-as-a-service. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(3), 13–48. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222300302
  • Wu, S. P.-J., Straub, D. W., & Liang, T.-P. (2015). How information technology governance mechanisms and strategic alignment influence organizational performance: Insights from a matched survey of business and IT managers. MIS Quarterly, 39(2), 497–518. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.2.10
  • Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  • Yolles, M. (1999). Management systems. London: Financial Times Ltd.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.