Board Level IT Governance: A Scoping Review to Set the Research Agenda

References

• Andriole, S. J. (2009). Boards of directors and technology governance: The surprising state of the practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 24(1), 22. doi:10.17705/1CAIS
   Google Scholar
• Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616
   Google Scholar
• Bart, C., & Turel, O. (2010). IT and the board of directors: An empirical investigation into the “governance questions” Canadian board members ask about IT. Journal of Information Systems, 24(2), 147–172. doi:10.2308/jis.2010.24.2.147
   Google Scholar
• Benaroch, M., & Chernobai, A. (2017). Operational IT failures, IT value-destruction, and board-level IT governance changes. MIS Quarterly, 41(3), 729–762. doi:10.25300/MISQ
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, P., & Buckby, S. (2007). Development of a board IT governance (ITG) review model. 2007 Accounting & Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand Conference (AFAANZ 2007). Gold Coast, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. E., & Grant, G. G. (2005). Framing the frameworks: A review of IT governance research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 15(1), 38. doi:10.17705/1CAIS
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C. V. (1997). Examining the emergence of hybrid IS governance solutions: Evidence from a single case site. Information Systems Research, 8(1), 69–94. doi:10.1287/isre.8.1.69
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, C. V., & Magill, S. L. (1994). Alignment of the IS functions with the enterprise: Toward a model of antecedents. MIS Quarterly, 18(4), 371–403. doi:10.2307/249521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, C. V., & Magill, S. L. (1998). Reconceptualizing the context-design issue for the information systems function. Organization Science, 9(2), 176–194. doi:10.1287/orsc.9.2.176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, R., & Butler, M. J. (2010). Beyond King III: Assigning accountability for IT governance in South African enterprises. South African Journal of Business Management, 41(3), 33–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadbury, A. (1992). Report of the committee on the financial aspects of corporate governance (Vol. 1). Gee.
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, J., Bastos, C., & Keyes, D. (2004). The evolution of IT governance at NB power. In W. Van Grembergen (Ed.), Strategies for information technology governance (pp. 343-356). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Institute for Chartered Accountants (CICA). (2004). 20 questions directors should ask about IT. Toronto, ON: CICA
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Institute for Chartered Accountants (CICA). (2012). 20 questions directors should ask about IT (2nd ed.). Toronto, ON: CICA.
   Google Scholar
• Ciborra, C., Braa, K., Cordella, A., Hepsø, V., Dahlbom, B., Failla, A., & Hanseth, O. (2000). From control to drift: The dynamics of corporate information infastructures. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.
   Google Scholar
• Coertze, J., & von Solms, R. (2014). The board and CIO: The IT alignment challenge. 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 4426–4435). Waikoloa, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Coertze, J., & Von Solms, R. (2013). The board and IT governance: A replicative study. African Journal of Business Management, 7(36), 3358. doi:10.5897/AJBM2013.7172
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., Strauss, A., & Strauss, A. L. (2014). Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Cannella, A. A. (2003). Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 371–382. doi:10.5465/amr.2003.10196703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daudt, H. M., van Mossel, C., & Scott, S. J. (2013). Enhancing the scoping study methodology: A large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13(1), 48. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Haes, S., & Van Grembergen, W. (2009). An exploratory study into IT governance implementations and its impact on business/IT alignment. [Article]. Information Systems Management, 26(2), 123–137. doi:10.1080/10580530902794786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Haes, S., & Van Grembergen, W. (2015). Enterprise governance of information technology. Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1988). Agency-and institutional-theory explanations: The case of retail sales compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 488–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74. doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4279003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 489–505. doi:10.5465/amr.1999.2202133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2003). Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature (Digest Summary). Economic Policy Review, 9, 7–26.
   Google Scholar
• Héroux, S., & Fortin, A. (2018). The moderating role of IT-business alignment in the relationship between IT governance, IT competence, and innovation. Information Systems Management, 35(2), 98–123. doi:10.1080/10580530.2018.1440729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgs, J. L., Pinsker, R. E., Smith, T. J., & Young, G. R. (2016). The relationship between board-level technology committees and reported security breaches. Journal of Information Systems, 30(3), 79–98. doi:10.2308/isys-51402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383–396. doi:10.5465/amr.2003.10196729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogervorst, J. A. (2009). Enterprise governance and enterprise engineering. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Huse, M. (2005). Accountability and creating accountability: A framework for exploring behavioural perspectives of corporate governance. British Journal of Management, 16(s1), S65–S79. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00448.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IT Governance Institute (ITGI). (2003). Board briefing on IT governance (2nd ed.). Retrieved from https://www.isaca.org/knowledge-center/research/researchdeliverables/pages/board-briefing-on-it-governance-2nd-edition.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewer, J., & McKay, K. N. (2012). Antecedents and consequences of board IT governance: institutional and strategic choice perspectives. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(7), 581–617. doi:10.17705/1jais
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. L., Daily, C. M., & Ellstrand, A. E. (1996). Boards of directors: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 22(3), 409–438. doi:10.1177/014920639602200303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kambil, A., & Lucas, H. C. (2002). The board of directors and the management of information technology. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 8(1), 26. doi:10.17705/1CAIS
   Google Scholar
• Keil, M., Tiwana, A., & Bush, A. (2002). Reconciling user and project manager perceptions of IT project risk: A Delphi study. Information Systems Journal, 12(2), 103–119. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2575.2002.00121.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering (Technical Report EBSE-2007-01). Keele: University of Keele and University of Durham.
   Google Scholar
• Kritzinger-von Solms, E., & Strous, L. A. M. (2003). Information security: A corporate governance issue. Integrity and Internal Control in Information Systems V, 124, 115–133.
   Google Scholar
• Kuruzovich, J., Bassellier, G., & Sambamurthy, V. (2012). IT governance processes and IT alignment: Viewpoints from the board of directors. 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS). Kauai, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(1), 69. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mähring, M. (2006). The role of the board of directors in IT governance: A review and agenda for research. AMCIS 2006 Proceedings (pp. 377). Acapulco, Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Mohamad, S., Hendrick, M., O’Leary, C., & Best, P. (2014). Developing a model to evaluate the information technology competence of boards of directors. Corporate Ownership & Control, 12(1), 12. doi:10.22495/cocv12i1p4
   Google Scholar
• Nolan, R., & McFarlan, F. W. (2005). Information technology and the board of directors. Harvard Business Review, 83(10), 96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2015). G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, E. (2004). Discussion of director responsibility for IT governance: A perspective on strategy. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 5(2), 101–104. doi:10.1016/j.accinf.2004.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, G. R., & Walker, R. G. (2006). Reporting on software development projects to senior managers and the board. Abacus-A Journal of Accounting Finance and Business Studies, 42(1), 43–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parent, M., & Reich, B. H. (2009). Governing information technology risk. California Management Review, 51(3), 134. doi:10.2307/41166497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. (2004). Crafting information technology governance. Information Systems Management, 21(4), 7–22. doi:10.1201/1078/44705.21.4.20040901/84183.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posthumus, S., & von Solms, R. (2008). Agency theory: Can it be used to strengthen IT governance? 23rd IFIP International Information Security Conference. Milano, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Posthumus, S., von Solms, R., & King, M. (2010). The board and IT governance: The what, who and how. South African Journal of Business Management, 41(3), 23–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Premuroso, R. F., & Bhattacharya, S. (2007). Is there a relationship between firm performance, corporate governance, and a firm’s decision to form a technology committee? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(6), 1260–1276. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00645.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghupathi, W. (2007). Corporate governance of IT: A framework for development. Communications of the ACM, 50(8), 94–99. doi:10.1145/1278201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read, T. J. (2004). Discussion of director responsibility for IT governance. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 5(2), 105–107. doi:10.1016/j.accinf.2004.01.003
   Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy, V., & Zmud, R. W. (1999). Arrangements for information technology governance: A theory of multiple contingencies. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 261–290. doi:10.2307/249754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schryen, G. (2013). Revisiting IS business value research: What we already know, what we still need to know, and how we can get there. European Journal of Information Systems, 22(2), 139–169. doi:10.1057/ejis.2012.45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits, D., & van Hillegersberg, J. (2014, September 11–12). The development of an IT governance maturity model for hard and soft governance. Proceedings of the 8th European conference on IS management and evaluation-ECIME 2014, Ghent.
   Google Scholar
• Smits, D., & van Hillegersberg, J. (2015). IT governance maturity: Developing a maturity model using the Delphi method. 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). Kauai, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Sohal, A. S., & Fitzpatrick, P. (2002). IT governance and management in large Australian organisations. International Journal of Production Economics, 75(1–2), 97–112. doi:10.1016/S0925-5273(01)00184-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe, A. L., & March, J. (1965). Social structure and organizations. Handbook of Organizations, 7, 142–193.
   Google Scholar
• Thorp, J. (2003). The information paradox: Realizing the business benefits of information technology. Toronto, ON: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
   Google Scholar
• Tolbert, P. S., & Zucker, L. G. (1983). Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880–1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(1), 22–39. doi:10.2307/2392383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosi, H. L., Jr, & Slocum, J. W., Jr. (1984). Contingency theory: Some suggested directions. Journal of Management, 10(1), 9–26. doi:10.1177/014920638401000103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trautman, L. J., & Altenbaumer-Price, K. (2010). The board’s responsibility for information technology governance. J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L., 28(3), 313.
   Google Scholar
• Trites, G. (2004). Director responsibility for IT governance. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 5(2), 89–99. doi:10.1016/j.accinf.2004.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Turel, O., & Bart, C. (2014). Board-level IT governance and organizational performance. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(2), 223–239. doi:10.1057/ejis.2012.61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turel, O., Liu, P., & Bart, C. (2017). Board-level information technology governance effects on organizational performance: The roles of strategic alignment and authoritarian governance style. Information Systems Management, 34(2), 117–136. doi:10.1080/10580530.2017.1288523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, E., & Stewart, G. (2013a). Director competencies for effective enterprise technology governance. Proceedings of the 24th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS 2013). Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, E., & Stewart, G. (2013b). The emerging role of the board of directors in enterprise business technology governance. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 10(4), 346–362. doi:10.1057/jdg.2013.11
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, E., & Stewart, G. (2015). Enterprise business technology governance: Three competencies to build board digital leadership capability. In T. X. Bui & R. H. Sprague (Eds.), 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 4513–4522). Kauai, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Van Grembergen, W., & De Haes, S. (2009). Enterprise governance of information technology: Achieving strategic alignment and value. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatraman, N., Henderson, J. C., & Oldach, S. (1993). Continuous strategic alignment: Exploiting information technology capabilities for competitive success. European Management Journal, 11(2), 139–149. doi:10.1016/0263-2373(93)90037-I
   Google Scholar
• Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii–xxiii.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weill, P., & Broadbent, M. (1998). Leveraging the new infrastructure: How market leaders capitalize on information technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weill, P., & Ross, J. W. (2004). IT governance: How top performers manage IT decision rights for superior results. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkin, C. L., & Chenhall, R. H. (2010). A review of IT governance: A taxonomy to inform accounting information systems. Journal of Information Systems, 24(2), 107–146. doi:10.2308/jis.2010.24.2.107
   Google Scholar
• Yayla, A. A., & Hu, Q. (2014). The effect of board of directors’ IT awareness on CIO compensation and firm performance. Decision Sciences, 45(3), 401–436. doi:10.1111/deci.2014.45.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Los Angeles, CA: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar