Spheres of It Project Complexity and It Project Manager Archetypes and Roles: A Case Study

References

• Agarwal, R., & Ferratt, T. W. (2002). Enduring practices for managing IT professionals. Communications of the ACM, 45(9), 73–79. doi:10.1145/567498.567502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baccarini, D. (1996). The concept of project complexity: A review. International Journal of Project Management, 14(4), 201–204. doi:10.1016/0263-7863(95)00093-3
   Google Scholar
• Baccarini, D. (1999). The logical framework method for defining project success. Project Management Journal, 30(4), 25–32. doi:10.1177/875697289903000405
   Google Scholar
• Bar-Yam, Y. (2002). General Features of Complex Systems. Cambridge, MA: New England Complex Systems Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, S. (2015). Utilizing and adapting the delphi method for use in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(5), 1–6. doi:10.1177/1609406915621381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2009). Shifting the grounds: Constructivist grounded theory method. In J. M. Morse, P. N. Stern, & J. Corbin (Eds.), Developing grounded theory: The second generation (pp. 127-193). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Choudhury, V., & Sabherwal, R. (2003). Portfolios of control in outsourced software development projects. Information Systems Research, 14(3), 291–314. doi:10.1287/isre.14.3.291.16563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, L. (2003). Assessing and developing the project management competence of individuals. In J. R. Turner (Ed.), People in project management (pp. 13-29). Aldershot, UK: Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, L., Hobbs, J. B., & Turner, J. R. (2005). Project categorization systems: Aligning capability with strategy for better results. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. (1998). Research design: Qualitative & quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dalgarno, B. (2014). Polysynchronous learning: A model for student interaction and engagement. B. Hegarty, J. McDonald, & S. Loke Eds. Phetoric and Reality: Critical Perspectives on Educational Technology (pp. 673–677).Proceedings ASCILITE 2014, Dunedin, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargis, M. B., Watt, J. D., & Piotrowski, C. (2011). Developing leaders: Examining the role of transactional and transformational leadership across business contexts. Organization Development Journal, 29(3), 51–66.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, C., Strupeck, D., & Szostek, J. (2010). A behavioral roles approach to assessing and improving the team leadership capabilities of managers. International Journal of Management, 27(1), 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J., Boucher, K., Conners, K., & Robinson, J. (2001). Collaborating on Project Success. Software Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.softwaremag.com/archive/2001feb/CollaborativeMgt.html
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, N. (2007). Simply complexity: A clear guide to complexity theory. Oxford, England: Oneworld Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchberg, D., Roe, R., & Van Eerde, W. (2015). Polychronicity and multitasking. Human Performance, 28(2), 112–136. doi:10.1080/08959285.2014.976706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch, L., Sambamurthy, V., Ko, D., & Purvis, R. (2002). Controlling information systems development projects: The view from the client. Management Science, 48(4), 484–498. doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.4.484.204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen, S. (2014). Why do projects continue to fail and what can we do about It? Developing project leaders. Retrieved from https://www.susannemadsen.co.uk/blog/why-do-projects-continue-to-fail-and-what-can-we-do-about-it
   Google Scholar
• Magen, H. (2017). The relations between executive functions, media multitasking, and polychronicity. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathis, K. (2009). Six ways to give proper project leadership. Project Smart. Retrieved from http://www.projectsmart.co.uk/six-ways-to-give-proper-project-leadership.html
   Google Scholar
• Mills, J., Bonner, A., & Francis, K. (2006). The development of constructionist grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 25–35. doi:10.1177/160940690600500103
   Google Scholar
• Muller, R., Geraldi, J., & Turner, J. R. (2012). relationships between leadership and success in different types of project complexities. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 59(1), 77–90. doi:10.1109/TEM.2011.2114350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, R., & Turner, J. R. (2007). Matching the project manager’s leadership style to project type. International Journal of Project Management, 25, 21–31. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.04.003
   Google Scholar
• Muller, R., & Turner, R. (2010). Leadership competency profiles of successful project managers. International Journal of Project Management, 29, 437–448. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.09.003
   Google Scholar
• Nauman, S., Khan, A., & Ehsan, N. (2010). Patterns of empowerment and leadership style in project environment. International Journal of Project Management, 28(7), 638–649. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.11.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remington, K., Zolin, R., & Turner, R. (2009). A model of project complexity: Distinguishing dimensions of complexity from serverity. Paper presented at the The 9th International Research Network of Project Management Conference, Berlin, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Rockwood, K. (2018, January). Job Report. PM Network.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, C., Gemino, A., & Horner-Reich, B. (2007). the impact of size and volatility on it project performance. Communications of the ACM, 50(11), 79–84. doi:10.1145/1297797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. (1997). Managing Delphi surveys using nonparametric statistical techniques. Decision Sciences, 28(3), 763–774. doi:10.1111/deci.1997.28.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stagnaro, C., & Piotrowski, C. (2013). Shared leadership in IT project management: A practice survey. International Journal of Management & Information Systems, 17(4), 223–234.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. R., Muller, R., & Dulewicz, V. (2009). Comparing the leadership styles of functional and project managers. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 2(2), 198–216. doi:10.1108/17538370910949266
   Google Scholar
• Vidal, L., & Marle, F. (2008). Understanding project complexity: Implications on project management. Kybernetes, 37(8), 1094–1110. doi:10.1108/03684920810884928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitney, K., & Daniels, C. (2013). The root cause of failure in complex IT projects: complexity itself. Procedia Computer Science, 20, 325–330. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.280
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, M., Mahring, M., Remus, U., & Saunders, C. (2016). Control configuration and control enactment in information systems projects: review and expanded theoretical framework. MIS Quarterly, 40(3), 741–774. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2016/40.3.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, T. (2007). Post-project reviews to gain effective lessons learned. Newton Square, USA: Project Management Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, W., Rose, G., & Lyytinen, K. (2011). Recognizing and managing innovation points. MISQ Executive, 10(3), 121–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2008). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5, 4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, Inc.
   Google Scholar