Towards an Understanding of Participants’ Sustained Participation in Crowdsourcing Contests

References

• Agresti, A. (2010). Analysis of ordinal categorical data. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Archak, N. (2010). Money, glory and cheap talk: Analyzing strategic behavior of contestants in simultaneous crowdsourcing contests on TopCoder. com. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on world wide web (pp. 21–30). Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. The Health Psychology Reader, edited by David F. Marks. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2009). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In Media effects, edited By Jennings Bryant and Mary Beth Oliver. (pp. 110–140). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bayus, B. L. (2013). Crowdsourcing new product ideas over time: An analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm community. Management science, 59(1), 226–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boons, M., Stam, D., & Barkema, H. G. (2015). Feelings of pride and respect as drivers of ongoing member activity on crowdsourcing platforms. Journal of Management Studies, 52(6), 717–741. Wiley Online Library. doi:10.1111/joms.2015.52.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudreau, K., Gaule, P., Lakhani, K., Riedl, Ch., Woolley, A. (2014) From crowds to collaborators: Initiating effort & catalyzing interactions among online creative workers. Working Paper, Harvard Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Boudreau, K., Waeyenberge, L., Viaene, N., & Moens, M. (2012) Field evidence on individual behavior & performance in rank-order tournaments. Working Paper, Harvard Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Brabham, D. C. (2010). Moving the crowd at threadless. Information, Communication & Society, 13(8), 1122–1145. doi:10.1080/13691181003624090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brabham, D. C. (2012). Motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application to improve public engagement in transit planning. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 40(3), 307–328. doi:10.1080/00909882.2012.693940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buettner, R. (2015). “ A systematic literature review of crowdsourcing research from a human resource management perspective.” USA: Hawaii. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2015.549
   Google Scholar
• Bullinger, A. C., Neyer, A.-K., Rass, M., & Moeslein, K. M. (2010). Community-based innovation contests: Where competition meets cooperation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(3), 290–303. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00565.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, C.-M., Hsu, M.-H., & Wang, E. T. G. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1872–1888. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2006.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dissanayake, I., Zhang, J., & Gu, B. (2015). Task division for team success in crowdsourcing contests: Resource allocation and alignment effects. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32(2), 8–39. Taylor & Francis. doi:10.1080/07421222.2015.1068604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. C., & Nembhard, I. M. (2009). Product development and learning in project teams: The challenges are the benefits. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(2), 123–138. Wiley Online Library. doi:10.1111/jpim.2009.26.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, Y., & Neufeld, D. (2009). Understanding sustained participation in open source software projects. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(4), 9–50. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222250401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feller, J., Finnegan, P., Hayes, J., & O’Reilly, P. (2012). “Orchestrating” sustainable crowdsourcing: A characterisation of solver brokerages. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 21(3), 216–232. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2012.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geri, N., Gafni, R., & Bengov, P. (2017). Crowdsourcing as a business model: Extrinsic motivations for knowledge sharing in user-generated content websites. Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing, 10(1), 90–111. Emerald Publishing Limited. doi:10.1108/JGOSS-05-2016-0018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, C., & Vermeulen, F. (2003). A healthy divide: Subgroups as a stimulus for team learning behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 202–239. SAGE Publications. doi:10.2307/3556657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillier, T., Chaffois, C., Belkhouja, M., Roth, Y., & Bayus, B. L. (2018). The effects of task instructions in crowdsourcing innovative ideas. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 134, 35–44. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, M. R., & Hansen, M. T. (2005). When using knowledge can hurt performance: The value of organizational capabilities in a management consulting company. Strategic Management Journal, 26(1), 1–24. doi:10.1002/smj.429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hippel, E. V., & Georg, V. K. (2003). Open source software and the ‘Private-Collective’ innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organization Science, 14(2), 209–223. doi:10.1287/orsc.14.2.209.14992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, J. (2006). The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired magazine, 14.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, M.-H., & Chiu, C.-M. (2004). Internet self-efficacy and electronic service acceptance. Decision Support Systems, 38(3), 369–381. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2003.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter, K., Hautz, J., Füller, J., Mueller, J., & Matzler, K. (2011). Communitition: The Tension between competition and collaboration in community-based design contests. Creativity and Innovation Management, 20(1), 3–21. Wiley Online Library. doi:10.1111/caim.2011.20.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javadi Khasraghi, H., Wang, X., & Hirschheim, R. A. (2017). Sustaining participant involvement in crowdsourcing contests through collaboration. In 33th American Conference of Information Systems (AMCIS 2017). Boston, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, N., Schulze, T., & Veit, D. (2011). More than fun and money. worker motivation in crowdsourcing – A study on mechanical turk. In The 17th Americas Conference on Information Systems . Detroit, Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, T., Yang, J., Adamic, L. A., & Chen, Y. (2014). Crowdsourcing with all-pay auctions: A field experiment on taskcn. Management Science, 60(8), 2020–2037. INFORMS. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2013.1845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A., Shaw, K. N., Saari, L. M., & Latham, G. P. (1981). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Psychological Bulletin, 90(1), 125. American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.90.1.125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majchrzak, A., & Malhotra, A. (2013). Towards an information systems perspective and research agenda on crowdsourcing for innovation. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 22(4), 257–268. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2013.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majchrzak, A., & Malhotra, A. (2016). Effect of knowledge-sharing trajectories on innovative outcomes in temporary online crowds. Information Systems Research, 27(4), 685–703. INFORMS. doi:10.1287/isre.2016.0669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manchanda, P., Packard, G., & Pattabhiramaiah, A. (2015). Social dollars: The economic impact of customer participation in a firm-sponsored online customer community. Marketing Science, 34(3), 367–387. INFORMS. doi:10.1287/mksc.2014.0890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntyre, J. S. (2011). Effectiveness of three case studies and associated teamwork in stimulating freshman interest in an introduction to engineering course. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 12(7/8), 36. Institute for SMET Education and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Mobley, W. H. (1977). Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(2), 237. American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.62.2.237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, J., Kocsis, D., Tripathi, A., Tarrell, A., Weerakoon, A., Tahmasbi, N., Xiong, J. Deng, W. Oh, O. De Vreede, G. (2013) Conceptual foundations of crowdsourcing: A Review of IS research. In 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 579–588). Hawaii, USA. doi:10.1177/1753193413486613
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxton, G. D., Oh, O., & Kishore, R. (2013). ‘Rules of crowdsourcing: Models, issues, and systems of control’. Information Systems Management, 30(1), 2–20. Taylor & Francis. doi:10.1080/10580530.2013.739883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, W., Hu, Y. J., & Ulmer, J. R. (2015). Competing for attention: An empirical study of online reviewers’ strategic behavior. MIS Quarterly, 39(3), 683–696. doi:10.25300/MISQ
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., Fang, Y., & Lim, K. H. (2012). Understanding sustained participation in transactional virtual communities. Decision Support Systems, 53(1), 12–22. Elsevier B.V. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2011.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Winkelen, C., & Ramsell, P. (2003). Why aligning value is key to designing communities. Knowledge Management Review, 5, 12–15. MELCRUM PUBLISHING.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, J., Adamic, L. A., & Ackerman, M. S. (2008). Competing to share expertise: The Taskcn knowledge sharing community. In The 2nd International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (pp. 161–168). Seattle, Washington, USA. doi:10.1039/b808741e
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., Chen, P., & Pavlou, P. (2009). Open innovation: An empirical study of online contests. In The 30th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2009). Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Ye, H. J., & Kankanhalli, A. (2017). Solvers’ participation in crowdsourcing platforms: Examining the impacts of trust, and benefit and cost factors. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 26(2), 101–117. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2017.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., & Zhu, Q. (2012). Exploring the motivation of participants in crowdsourcing contest. In The 33th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2012). Orlando, Florida, USA.
   Google Scholar