Defining Blockchain Governance: A Framework for Analysis and Comparison

References

• Al-Jaroodi, J., & Mohamed, N. (2019). Blockchain in industries: A survey. IEEE Access, 7, 36500–36515. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2903554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atzori, M. (2016). Blockchain technology and decentralized governance: Is the state still necessary? University College of London. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2709713
   Google Scholar
• Baskerville, R., & Venable, J. (2009, May). Soft design science methodology. In V. Vaishanvi & P. Sandeep Eds., Proceedings of the 4th international conference on design science research in information systems and technology (pp. 1–11). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, R., Müller-Bloch, C., & Leslie King, J. (2018). Governance in the blockchain economy: A framework and research agenda. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(10), 1020–1034. doi:10.17705/1jais
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevir, M. (2012). Governance: A very short introduction. Hampshire, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biais, B., Bisiere, C., Bouvard, M., & Casamatta, C. (2018). The Blockchain folk theorem. The Review of Financial Studies, 32(5), 1662–1715. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhy095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bian, Y., Mu, W., & Zhao, J. L. (2018, June). Online leadership for open source project success: Evidence from the GitHub blockchain projects. In M. Tanabu & D. Senoo (Eds.), PACIS 2018. Proceedings of the 22nd Pacific Asia conference on information systems.
   Google Scholar
• Bitfury. (2015). Public versus private blockchains (Unpublished manuscript). Author. Retrieved from https://bitfury.com/content/downloads/public-vs-private -pt1-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bodo, B., van de Pol, J., van Deventer, O., Hoepman, J.-H., van den Hoven, J., de Kok, A., … Stevens, M. (2018). Dutch blockchain research agenda. Dutch Digital Delta. Retrieved from https://dare.uva.nl/search?identifier=b41faa27-8ca7-4240 -a48c-05876d7c9813
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2014). Thematic analysis. In P. Rohleder & A. C. Lyons (Eds.), Qualitative research in clinical and health psychology (pp. 95–114). Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Canidio, A. (2018). Financial incentives for open source development: The case of blockchain. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/93748/
   Google Scholar
• Carter, N. (2017). A cross-sectional overview of cryptoasset governance and implications for investors (Master’s thesis), University of Edinburgh. Retrieved from https://coinmetrics .io/papers/dissertation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Carter, N. (2018, June). An overview of governance in blockchains [Video]. Presentation at Zcon0 2018, Montreal, Canada. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v= D1NeTN AR18
   Google Scholar
• Castillo-Montoya, M. (2016). Preparing for interview research: The interview protocol refinement framework. The Qualitative Report, 21(5), 811–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifford, J. (2018, November). Bitcoin cash’s november 2018 fork [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://medium.com/@jcliff/bitcoin-cashs-november-2018-fork–804596268771
   Google Scholar
• Coinmarketcap. (2019). cryptocurrency market capitalizations [Web page]. Retrieved from https://coinmarketcap.com/
   Google Scholar
• de Laat, P. B. (2007). Governance of open source software: State of the art. Journal of Management & Governance, 11(2), 165–177. doi:10.1007/s10997-007-9022-9
   Google Scholar
• de Noni, I., Ganzaroli, A., & Orsi, L. (2011). The governance of open source software communities: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Business Systems, Governance and Ethics, 6(1), 1–18. doi:10.15209/jbsge.v6i1
   Google Scholar
• de Weerd, I., Brinkkemper, S., Nieuwenhuis, R., Versendaal, J., & Bijlsma, L. (2006, September). On the creation of a reference framework for software product management: Validation and tool Support. In IWSPM 2006. Proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on software product management (pp. 3–12). Minneapolis, MN: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• DiRose, S., & Mansouri, M. (2018, June). Comparison and analysis of governance mechanisms employed by blockchain-based distributed autonomous organizations. In SoSE 2018. Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on system of systems engineering (pp. 195–202). Paris, France: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Drescher, D. (2017). Blockchain Basics: A Non-Technical Introduction in 25 Steps. Frankfurt, DE: Apress.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrsam, F. (2017, November). Blockchain governance: programming our future [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://medium.com/@FEhrsam/blockchain-governance-programming -our-future-c3bfe30f2d74
   Google Scholar
• Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Sunusi, R. (2015). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. doi:10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
   Google Scholar
• Filippi, P. D., & Loveluck, B. (2016). The invisible politics of Bitcoin: Governance crisis of a decentralised infrastructure. Internet Policy Review, 5(3), 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finck, M. (2019). Blockchain governance. In Blockchain regulation and governance in Europe (pp. 182–209). Elcograf, GB: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Franck, E., & Jungwirth, C. (2003). Reconciling rent-seekers and donators – The governance structure of open source. Journal of Management and Governance, 7(4), 401–422. doi:10.1023/A:1026261005092
   Google Scholar
• Garagol, D., & Nilsson, O. (2018). Public blockchain communities (Master’s thesis). University of Gothenburg. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2077/57018
   Google Scholar
• Gartner. (2019, October 8). Gartner 2019 hype cycle shows most blockchain technologies are still five to 10 years away from transformational impact [Press release]. Retrieved from https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2019-10-08-gartner-2019-hype-cycle-shows-most-blockchain-technologies-are -still-five-to-10-years-away-from-transformational-impact
   Google Scholar
• Gasser, U., Budish, R., & West, S. M. (2015). Multistakeholder as governance groups: Observations from case studies. Berkman Center Research Publication. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract id=2549270
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, R. W. (2011). Design science research and the grounded theory method: Characteristics, differences, and complementary uses. In A. Heinzl, P. Buxmann, O. Wendt, & T. Weitzel (Eds.), Theory-guided modeling and empiricism in information systems research (pp. 111–127). Berlin, DE: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, J. T. (2017). Single case studies vs. multiple case studies: A comparative study (Unpublished manuscript). Academy of Business, Engineering and Science, Halmstad University. Retrieved from http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1064378/FULLTEXT01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hacker, P. (2017). Corporate governance for complex cryptocurrencies? A framework for stability and decision making in blockchain-based organizations. In P. Hacker, I. Lianos, G. Dimitropoulos, & S. Eich (Eds.), Regulating blockchain: Techno-social and legal challenges (pp. 40–166). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harrell, M., & Bradley, M. (2009). Data collection methods: Semi-structured interviews and focus groups (Tech. Rep. No. ADA512853). RAND National Defense Research Institute. Retrieved from https://apps.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA512853
   Google Scholar
• Hertel, G., Niedner, S., & Herrmann, S. (2003). Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: An Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel. Research Policy, 32(7), 1159–1177. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00047-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hevner, A., & Chatterjee, S. (2010). Design science research in information systems. In Ramesh Sharda and Stefan Voß (Eds.)., Design research in information systems (Vol. 22, pp. 9–22). Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, -Y.-Y., Vergne, J.-P., & Wang, S. (2017). The internal and external governance of blockchain-based organizations: Evidence from cryptocurrencies. In M. Campbell- Verduyn (Ed.), Bitcoin and beyond: Cryptocurrencies, blockchains and global governance (pp. 48–68). Abingdon, OX: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• IO, E. O. S. (2018, March). EOS.IO technical white paper v2 [White paper]. Retrieved from https://github.com/EOSIO/Documentation/blob/master/TechnicalWhitePaper.md
   Google Scholar
• Izquierdo, J. L. C., & Cabot, J. (2015, May). Enabling the definition and enforcement of governance rules in open source systems. In P. Kellenberger, Ed., 2015 IEEE/ACM. Proceedings of the 37th IEEE international conference on software engineering. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, C., & Scacchi, W. (2010, May). Governance in open source software development projects: A comparative multi-level analysis. In P. Ågerfalk, C. Boldyreff, J. M. González- Barahona, G. R. Madey, & J. Noll Eds., OSS 2010. Proceedings of the 6th International IFIP Conference on Open Source Systems (pp. 130–142). Notre Dame, IN; Springer.
   Google Scholar
• King, S., & Nadal, S. (2012, August). PPCoin: Peer-to-peer crypto-currency with proof-of- stake [White paper]. Retrieved from:https//bitcoin.peryaudo.org/vendor/peercoin -paper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lattemann, C., & Stieglitz, S. (2005, January). Framework for governance in open source communities. In J. F. Nunamaker & R. Briggs Eds., Proceedings of the 38th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 1–11). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, J., & Tirole, J. (2003). Some simple economics of open source. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 50(2), 197–234. doi:10.1111/joie.2002.50.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindman, J. (2017). Open source software research and blockchain. Opportunities and Risks of Blockchain Technologies (Seminar Report), 7(3), 114–116.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, S. (2019). Research on token incentive mechanism of open source project-take block chain project as an example. In IOP conference series: Earth and environmental science (Vol. 252, p. 022029). IOP Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, T., Courcelas, L., & Timsit, K. (2019). Scalability interoperability and sustainability of blockchains (Tech. Rep.). EU Blockchain Observatory and Forum. Retrieved from https://www.eublockchainforum.eu/sites/default/files/reports/report scalaibility 06 03 2019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Maddrey, N. (2018, August). The three branches of blockchain governance [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://medium.com/digitalassetresearch/the-three-branches-of -blockchain-governance-75a29bf98880
   Google Scholar
• Malone, D., & O’Dwyer, K. (2014, June). Bitcoin mining and its energy footprint. In ISSC 2014/CIICT 2014. Proceedings of the 25th IET irish signals & systems conference 2014 and 2014 china-ireland international conference on information and communities technologies (pp. 280–285). IET. doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00280
   Google Scholar
• March, S., & Smith, G. (1995). Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems, 15(4), 251–266. doi:10.1016/0167-9236(94)00041-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, L. (2007). The governance of free/open source software projects: Monolithic, multidimensional, or configurational? Journal of Management & Governance, 11(2), 151–163. doi:10.1007/s10997-007-9021-x
   Google Scholar
• Mattila, J. (2016). The blockchain phenomenon – The disruptive potential of distributed consensus architectures (ETLA Working Paper No. 43). Helsinki, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy
   Google Scholar
• Midha, V., & Bhattacherjee, A. (2012). Governance practices and software maintenance: A study of open source projects. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 23–32. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamoto, S. (2008, October). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system [White paper]. Retrieved from:https//nakamotoinstitute.org/bitcoin/
   Google Scholar
• Narayanan, A., Bonneau, J., Felten, E., Miller, A., & Goldfeder, S. (2016). Bitcoin and cryptocurrency technologies: A comprehensive introduction. Oxford, UK: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nyman, L., & Lindman, J. (2013). code forking, governance, and sustainability in open source software. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(1), 7–12. doi:10.22215/timreview/644
   Google Scholar
• O’Mahony, S., & Ferraro, F. (2007). the emergence of governance in an open source community. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1079–1106. doi:10.5465/amj.2007.27169153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ølnes, S., Ubacht, J., & Janssen, M. (2017). Blockchain in government: Benefits and implications of distributed ledger technology for information sharing. Journal of Government Information Quarterly, 34(3), 355–364. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2017.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterrieder, J., Lorenz, J., & Strika, M. (2016). Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies - Not for the faint-hearted (Unpublished manuscript). Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2867671
   Google Scholar
• Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45–77. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porru, S., Pinna, A., Marchesi, M., & Tonelli, R. (2017, May). Blockchain-oriented software engineering: Challenges and new directions. In R. Bilof (Ed.), ICSE-C 2017. Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 39th international conference on software engineering companion (pp. 169–171). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Societ
   Google Scholar
• Prat, N., Comyn-Wattiau, I., & Akoka, J. (2015). A taxonomy of evaluation methods for information systems artifacts. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32(3), 229–267. doi:10.1080/07421222.2015.1099390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R., & Venable, J. R. (2008, June). Strategies for design science research evaluation. In ECIS 2008. Proceedings of the 16th European conference on information systems (pp. 255–266). Galway, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Ramdhani, A., Ramdhani, M. A., & Amin, A. S. (2014). Writing a literature review research paper: A step-by-step approach. International Journal of Basics and Applied Sciences, 3(1), 47–56.
   Google Scholar
• Reijers, W., Wuisman, I., Mannan, M., De Filippi, P., Wray, C., Rae-Looi, V., … Orgad, L. (2018). Now the code runs itself: On-chain and off-chain governance of blockchain technologies. Topoi, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Rennock, M., Cohn, A., & Butcher, J. (2018). Blockchain technology and regulatory investigations (Tech. Rep.). Steptoe Johnson LLP. Retrieved from https://www.steptoe.com/images/content/1/7/v2/171967/LIT-FebMar18-Feature-Blockchain.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schief, M., & Buxmann, P. (2012, Jan). Business models in the software industry. In L. O’Conner (Ed.), HICSS 2012. Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 3328–3337). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, T., & Stein, V. (2018, December). The architecture of blockchain organization. In J. Pries-Heje, S. Ram, & M. Rosemann (Eds.), ICIS 2018. Proceedings of the 39th international conference on information systems, San Francisco, CA
   Google Scholar
• Shah, S. (2006). Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management Science, 52(7), 1000–1014. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha, A., Cater-Steel, A., & Toleman, M. (2014, December). How to communicate evaluation work in design science research? An Exemplar case study. In ACIS 2014. Proceedings of the 25th Australasian conference on information systems. Auckland, New Zealand: ACIS.
   Google Scholar
• Swan, M. (2015). Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly.
   Google Scholar
• Tasca, P., & Tessone, C. (2018). Taxonomy of blockchain technologies. Principles of identification and classification (Unpublished manuscript). Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn .com/abstract=2977811
   Google Scholar
• Tschorsch, F., & Scheuermann, B. (2016). Bitcoin and beyond: A technical survey on decentralized digital currencies. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 18(3), 2084–2123. doi:10.1109/COMST.2016.2535718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Deventer, O., Berkers, F., Vos, M., Zandee, A., Vreuls, T., & Piggelen, L., … others (2018, May). Techruption Consortium Blockchain – What it takes to run a blockchain together. In Proceedings of 1st ERCIM blockchain workshop 2018, Amsterdam, Netherlands: EUS- SET
   Google Scholar
• van Deventer, O., Brewster, C., & Everts, M. (2017). Governance and business models of blockchain technologies and networks (Tech. Rep. No. 776936). TNO. Retrieved from https://repository.tudelft.nl/view/tno/uuid:a593f6d3-6c67-4fb1-908b-4ac7662b9b7f
   Google Scholar
• van Pelt, R. L. (2019). Blockchain governance: A framework for analysis and comparison (Master’s thesis). Utrecht University. Retrieved from https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/381894
   Google Scholar
• Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J., & Baskerville, R. (2012). A comprehensive framework for evaluation in design science research. In K. Peffers, M. Rothenberger, & B. Kuechler (Eds.), Design science research in information systems. Advances in theory and practice (pp. 423–438). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, N. (2018). A fork in the blockchain: income tax and the bitcoin/bitcoin cash hard fork. North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology, 19(4), 283–310.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, T. G. (2000). Governance, good governance and global governance: Conceptual and actual challenges. In T. G. Weiss (Ed.), Thinking about global governance: Why people and ideas matter (pp. 795–814). Abingdon, OX: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wieringa, R. (2014). Empirical research methods for technology validation: Scaling up to practice. Journal of Systems and Software, 95, 19–31. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2013.11.1097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, A., & De Filippi, P. (2015). Decentralized blockchain technology and the rise of lex cryptographia (Unpublished manuscript). Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract id=2580664
   Google Scholar
• Yaga, D., Mell, P., Roby, N., & Scarfone, K. (2018). Blockchain technology overview (Tech. Rep. No. NIST.IR.8202). Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.11078
   Google Scholar
• Yermack, D. (2017). Corporate governance and blockchains. Review of Finance, 21(1), 7–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2013). Validity and generalization in future case study evaluations. Evaluation, 19(3), 321–332. doi:10.1177/1356389013497081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yli-Huumo, J., Ko, D., Choi, S., Park, S., & Smolander, K. (2016). Where is current research on blockchain technology?—A systematic review. PLoS ONE, 11(10), 1–27. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0163477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamfir, V. (2019, March). Blockchain governance [Video file]. Presentation at EthCC 2019, Paris, France. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKyk5DnmW50
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, L., Fan, S., & Yan, J. (2016). Overview of business innovations and research opportunities in blockchain and introduction to the special issue. Financial Innovation, 2(28), 1–7. doi:10.1186/s40854-016-0049-2
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H.-N., Chen, X., & Wang, H. (2018). Blockchain challenges and opportunities: A survey. International Journal of Web and Grid Services, 14(4), 325–375. doi:10.1504/IJWGS.2018.095647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziolkowski, R., Parangi, G., Miscione, G., & Schwabe, G. (2019, Januari). Examining gentle rivalry: Decision-making in blockchain systems. In T. Bui (Ed.), HICSS 2019. Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Hawaii international conference on system science (pp. 1–10). AISeL.
   Google Scholar