Toward a Design Theory of User-Centered Score Mechanics for Gamified Competency Development

References

• Attali, Y., & Arieli-Attali, M. (2015). Gamification in assessment: Do points affect test performance? Computers & Education, 83, 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacharach, S. B. (1989). Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 496–515. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badaracco, M., & Martínez, L. (2011). An intelligent tutoring system architecture for competency-based learning. In A. König, A. Dengel, K. Hinkelmann, K. Kise, R. J. Howlett, & L. C. Jain (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science: Vol. 6882. Knowlege-based and intelligent information and engineering systems. KES 2011 (pp. 124–133). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23863-5_13
   Google Scholar
• Bartel, A., Figas, P., & Hagel, G. (2015, October 5–7).Towards a competency-based education with gamification design elements. Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, London, United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1145/2793107.2810325
   Google Scholar
• Baskerville, R., Baiyere, A., Gregor, S., Hevner, A., & Rossi, M. (2018). Design science research contributions: Finding a balance between artifact and theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(5), 358–376. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer, H., Holtzblatt, K., & Baker, L. (2004). An agile customer-centered method: Rapid contextual design. In C. Zannier, H. Erdogmus, & L. Lindstrom (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Vol. 3134. Extreme programming and agile methods – XP/Agile Universe 2004 (pp. 50–59). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27777-4_6
   Google Scholar
• Blohm, I., & Leimeister, J. M. (2013). Gamification. Design of IT-based enhancing services for motivational support and behavioral change. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 5(4), 275–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-013-0273-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böckle, M., Micheel, I., Bick, M., & Novak, J. (2018, January 2–6).A design framework for adaptive gamification applications. Proceedings of the 51th hawaii international conference on system sciences, Waikoloa Village, HI, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Böckle, M., Novak, J., & Bick, M. (2017, June –15).Towards adaptive gamification: A synthesis of current developments. Proceedings of the 25th European Conference on Information Systems ECIS, Guimarães, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. R., & Voltz, B. D. (2005). Elements of effective e-learning design. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 6(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v6i1.217
   Google Scholar
• Camuffo, A., & Gerli, F. (2004). An integrated competency-based approach to management education: An Italian MBA case study. International Journal of Training and Development, 8(4), 240–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-3736.2004.00212.x
   Google Scholar
• Carignan, J., & Kennedy, S. L. (2013). Case study: Identifying gamification opportunities in sales applications. In A. Marcus (Ed.), Lecture notes in computer science: Vol. 8013. Design, user experience, and usability. Health, learning, playing. cultural, and cross-cultural user experience. DUXU 2013 (pp. 501–507). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson, S. A. (2007). Developing knowledge through IS design science. Scandinavian Journal of Information System, 19(2), 75–86. https://aisel.aisnet.org/sjis/vol19/iss2/2
   Google Scholar
• Codish, D., & Ravid, G. (2014, June 9–11).Personality based gamification: How different personalities perceive gamification. Proceedings of the 22nd European Conference on Information Systems ECIS 2014, Tel Aviv, Israel.
   Google Scholar
• Codish, D., & Ravid, G. (2015). Detecting playfulness in educational gamification through behavior patterns. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 59(6), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1147/JRD.2015.2459651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, E. B., Toda, A. M., Mesquita, M. A. A., Matsunaga, F. T., & Brancher, J. D. (2014). Interactive data structure learning platform. In B. Murgante, S. Misra, A. M. A. C. Rocha, C. Torre, J. G. Rocha, M. I. Falcão, D. Taniar, B. O. Apduhan, & O. Gervasi (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science: Vol. 8584. Computational science and its applications. ICCSA 2014 (pp. 186–196). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cushing, B. E. (1990). Frameworks, paradigms and scientific research in management information systems. Journal of Information Systems, 4(2), 38–59.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, G. B., & Olson, M. H. (1985). Management information systems: Conceptual foundations, structure, and development. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(1), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108
   Google Scholar
• Derouin, R. E., Fritzsche, B. A., & Salas, E. (2005). E-Learning in Organizations. Journal of Management, 31(6), 920–940. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011, September 28–30).From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification.” Proceedings of the 15th international academic mindtrek conference: Envisioning future media environments, Tampere, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Doignon, J.P., & Falmagne, J.C. (1985). Spaces for the assessment of knowledge. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 23, 175–196.–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020–7373(85)80031
   Google Scholar
• Domínguez, A., Saenz-de-Navarrete, J., De-marcos, L., Fernández-Sanz, L., Pagés, C., & Martínez-Herráiz, -J.-J. (2013). Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes. Computers & Education, 63, 380–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.020
   Google Scholar
• Dubin, R. (1978). Theory building free press (2nd ed.). Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eilström, P.-E., & Kock, H. (2008). Competence development in the workplace: Concepts, strategies and effects. Asia Pacific Education Review, 9(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03025821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farzan, R., DiMicco, J. M., Millen, D. R., Dugan, C., Geyer, W., & Brownholtz, E. A. (2008, May 5–10).Results from deploying a participation incentive mechanism within the enterprise. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Florence, Italy. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357145
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, F. T., & Junior, P. T. A. (2016). Gamification aspects in the context of electronic government and education: A case study. In F. F.-H. Nah & C.-H. Tan (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science: Vol. 9752. International Conference HCI in business, government, and Organizations: Information Systems (pp. 140–150). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Filipcík, R., & Bieliková, M. (2014, November 6–7).Motivating learning by dynamic score and personalized activity stream. Proceedings of the 9th International workshop on semantic and social media adaptation and personalization, Corfu, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Folberg, R., Antonioli, D. A., & Alexander, C. B. (2002). Competency-based residency training in pathology: Challenges and opportunities. Human Pathology, 33(1), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1053/hupa.2002.30226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbis-Córdoba, A., Martí-Parreño, J., & Currás-Pérez, R. (2017). Higher education students’ attitude towards the use of gamification for competencies development. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 13, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregor, S., & Jones, D. (2007). The anatomy of a design theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(5), 313–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamari, J. (2013). Transforming homo economicus into homo ludens: A field experiment on gamification in a utilitarian peer-to-peer trading service. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 12(4), 236–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2013.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014, January 6–9).Does gamification work? – A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Waikoloa Village, HI, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Hamtini, T., Albasha, S., & Varoca, M. (2015). Towards Designing an Intelligent Educational Assessment Tool. Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, 8 (2), 35–42. Article 53903. https://doi.org/10.4236/jsea.2015.82005
   Google Scholar
• Hanus, M. D., & Fox, J. (2015). Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance. Computers & Education, 80, 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatcher, R. L., Fouad, N. A., Campbell, L. F., McCutcheon, S. R., Grus, C. L., & Leahy, K. L. (2013). Competency-based education for professional psychology: Moving from concept to practice. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 7(4), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holton, E. F., Coco, M. L., Lowe, J. L., & Dutsch, J. V. (2006). Blended delivery strategies for competency-based training. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 8(2), 210–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422305286153
   Google Scholar
• Holzinger, A., Errath, M., Searle, G., Thurnher, B., & Slany, W. (2005, July 26–28).From extreme programming and usability engineering to extreme usability in software engineering education (XP+UE /spl rarr/ XU). Proceedings of the 29th annual international Computer Software and Applications Conference COMPSAC’05, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Hunicke, R., LeBlanc, M., & Zubek, R. (2004, July 25–26).MDA: A formal approach to game design and game research. Proceedings of the AAAI workshop on challenges in game at the game developers conference, San José, CA, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Huotari, K., & Hamari, J. (2012, October 3–5).Defining gamification: A service marketing perspective Proceeding of the 16th International Academic MindTrek Conference, Tampere, Finland. https://doi.org/10.1145/2393132.2393137
   Google Scholar
• Ion, G., Cano, E., & Cabrera, N. (2016). Competency Assessment Tool (CAT). The evaluation of an innovative competency-based assessment experience in higher education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 25(5), 631–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2015.1134635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismail, J. (2001). The design of an e-learning system: Beyond the hype. The Internet and Higher Education, 4(3–4), 329–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00069-0
   Google Scholar
• Koivisto, J., & Hamari, J. (2014). Demographic differences in perceived benefits from gamification. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korossy, K. (1997). Extending the theory of knowledge space: A competence-performance approach. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 205, 53–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korossy, K. (1999). Modeling knowledge as competence and performance. In D. Albert & J. Lukas (Eds.), Knowledge spaces: Theories, empirical research, and applications (pp. 103–132). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuechler, B., & Vaishnavi, V. (2008). On theory development in design science research: Anatomy of a research project. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(5), 489–504. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, J. (2013). Gamification at work: Designing engaging business software. In A. Marcus (Ed.), Lecture notes in computer science: Vol. 8013. Design, user experience, and usability. Health, learning, playing, cultural, and cross-cultural user experience. DUXU 2013 (pp. 528–537). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Landers, R. N., Bauer, K. N., & Callan, R. C. (2017). Gamification of task performance with leaderboards: A goal setting experiment. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 508–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latham, G. P., Stajkovic, A. D., & Locke, E. A. (2009). The relevance and viability of subconscious goals in the workplace. Journal of Management, 36(1), 234–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309350777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, B. H., Chae, Y. M., Hokama, T., & Kim, S. (2010). Competency-based learning program in system analysis and design for health professionals. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, 22(3), 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539509357931
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ley, T., & Albert, D. (2003). Identifying employee competencies in dynamic work domains: Methodological considerations and a case study. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 9(12), 1500–1518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, D., Santhanam, R., & Webster, J. (2016). Toward meaningful engagement: A framework for design and research of gamified information systems. MIS Quarterly, 41(4), 1011–1034. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.4.01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, L. H., Cooper-Thomas, H. D., & Allpress, K. N. (2005). Confounded by competencies? An evaluation of the evolution and use of competency models. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 34(2), 117–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdams, D. P. (1995). What do we know when we know a person? Journal of Personality, 63(3), 365–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00500.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mekler, E. D., Brühlmann, F., & Tuch, A. N. (2013, October 2–4).Do points, levels and leaderboards harm intrinsic motivation? An empirical analysis of common gamification elements. Proceedings of the 1st International conference on gameful design, research, and applications, Toronto, ON, Canada. https://doi.org/10.1145/2583008.2583017
   Google Scholar
• Mekler, E. D., Brühlmann, F., Tuch, A. N., & Opwis, K. (2017). Towards understanding the effects of individual gamification elements on intrinsic motivation and performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 525–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihailidis, P., & Thevenin, B. (2013). Media literacy as a core competency for engaged citizenship in participatory democracy. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(11), 1611–1622. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213489015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miloff, A., Marklund, A., & Carlbring, P. (2015). The challenger app for social anxiety disorder: New advances in mobile psychological treatment. Internet Interventions, 2(4), 382–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2015.08.001
   Google Scholar
• Morschheuser, B., Werder, K., Hamari, J., & Abe, J. (2017, January 4–7).How to gamify? A method for designing gamification. Proceedings of the 50th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Waikoloa Village, HI, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Müller-Wienbergen, F., Müller, O., Seidel, S., & Becker, J. (2011). Leaving the beaten tracks in creative work – A design theory for systems that support convergent and divergent thinking. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 12(11), 714–740. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murawski, M., & Bick, M. (2017). Digital competences of the workforce – A research topic? Business Process Management Journal, 23(3), 721–734. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-06-2016-0126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nacke, L. E., & Deterding, S. (2017). The maturing of gamification research. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 450–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholson, S. (2012, June 13–15). A user-centered theoretical framework for meaningful gamification. Proceedings of the Games+Learning+Society 8.0, Madison, WI, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Pang, C., Pan, R., Wong, S., Neustaedter, C., & Wu, Y. (2017, May 6–11).City explorer: Gamifying public transit trips while exploring the city. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, Denver, CO, United States. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3053252
   Google Scholar
• Park, J. H., & Wentling, T. (2007). Factors associated with transfer of training in workplace e-learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 19(5), 311–329. https://doi.org/10.1108/13665620710757860
   Google Scholar
• Pedreira, O., García, F., Brisaboa, N., & Piattini, M. (2015). Gamification in software engineering – A systematic mapping. Information and Software Technology, 57, 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2014.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perryer, C., Celestine, N. A., Scott-Ladd, B., & Leighton, C. (2016). Enhancing workplace motivation through gamification: Transferrable lessons from pedagogy. The International Journal of Management Education, 14(3), 327–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2016.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raftopoulos, M., Walz, S., & Greuter, S. (2015, May 14–17).How enterprises play: Towards a taxonomy for enterprise gamification. Proceedings of the DiGRA 2015 international conference: diversity of play, Lüneburg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Ramakrisnan, P., & Jaafar, A. (2016). Usable, aesthetic, sociable and motivating interface for students’ online knowledge sharing (P. Zaphiris & A. Ioannou, Eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Vol. 9753. Learning and Collaboration Technologies. LCT 2016 (pp. 550–561). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Recker, J. (2016, January 5–8).Toward a design theory for green information systems. Proceedings of the 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences HICSS, Koloa, HI, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Rezaei-Zadeh, M., Cleary, B., O’Reilly, J., Abdollahi, A., & Murphy, E. (2011, September 15–16). Identification and classification of entrepreneurial competencies mapped with human personalities. Proceedings of the 6th european conference on innovation and entrepreneurship, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Royal College. (2015). The CanMEDS 2015 Physician Competency framework. Retrieved August 20, 2021, from https://www.royalcollege.ca/rcsite/documents/canmeds/canmeds-full-framework-e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ruhi, U. (2015). Level up your strategy: Towards a descriptive framework for meaningful enterprise gamification. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(8), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/918
   Google Scholar
• Sailer, M., Hense, J., Mandl, H., & Klevers, M. (2017). Fostering development of work competencies and motivation via gamification. In M. Mulder (Ed.), Technical and Vocational Education And Training: Issues, concerns and prospects: Vol. 23. Competence-based vocational and professional education: Bridging the worlds of work and education (pp. 795–818). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41713-4_37
   Google Scholar
• Santhanam, R., Liu, D., & Shen, W.-C. M. (2016). Research Note—Gamification of technology-mediated training: Not all competitions are the same. Information Systems Research, 27(2), 453–465. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2016.0630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheider, S., Kiefer, P., Weiser, P., Raubal, M., & Sailer, C. (2015, April 18–23).Score design for meaningful gamification. Proceedings of the CHI’15 gamifying research: strategies, opportunities, challenges and ethics, Seoul, South Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Seaborn, K., & Fels, D. I. (2015). Gamification in theory and action: A survey. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 74, 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaborn, K., Pennefather, P., & Fels, D. I. (2013, October 2–4).Reimagining leaderboards: Towards gamifying competency models through social game mechanics. Proceedings of the 1st international conference on gameful design, research, and applications, Toronto, ON, Canada. https://doi.org/10.1145/2583008.2583026
   Google Scholar
• Shi, L., & Cristea, A. I. (2016). Motivational gamification strategies rooted in self-determination theory for social adaptive e-learning. In A. Micarelli, J. Stamper, & K. Panourgia (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science: Vol. 9684. Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2016 (pp. 294–300). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sicilia, M.-A., & Naeve, A. (2007). Competencies and organizational learning: A conceptual framework. In M.-A. Sicilia (Ed.), Competencies in organizational e-learning: Concepts and tools (pp. 1–9). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-343-2.ch001
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1968). The sciences of the artificial. M.I.T. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spagnoletti, P., Resca, A., & Lee, G. (2015). A design theory for digital platforms supporting online communities: A multiple case study. Journal of Information Technology, 30(4), 364–380. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2014.37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanculescu, L. C., Bozzon, A., Sips, R.-J., & Houben, G.-J. (2016, February 27–March 02). Work and play: An experiment in enterprise gamification. Proceedings of the 19th ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work & social computing, San Francisco, CA, United States. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2820061
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, B., Hyde, J., Knight, R., Shires, A., & Alexander, R. (2017). Competency-based training and assessment in Australian postgraduate clinical psychology education. Clinical Psychologist, 21(3), 174–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/cp.12061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh, A. (2015, December 13–16).Applying game design elements in the workplace. Proceedings of the 36th international conference on information systems: Exploring the information frontier, Fort Worth, TX, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Suh, A., Cheung, C. M. K., Ahuja, M., & Wagner, C. (2017). Gamification in the workplace: The central role of the aesthetic experience. Journal of Management Information Systems, 34(1), 268–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2017.1297642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talaei-Khoei, A., Lewis, L., Khoei, T., Ghapanchi, A., & Vichitvanichphong, S. (2015, December 13–16).Senior’s perspective on perceived transfer effects of assistive robots in elderly care: Capability approach analysis. Proceedings of the 36th international conference on information systems: Exploring the information frontier, Fort Worth, TX, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). The past and future of mixed methods research: From data triangulation to mixed model designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 671–701). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thiebes, S., Lins, S., & Basten, D. (2014, June 9–11).Gamifying information systems – A synthesis of gamification mechanics and dynamics. Proceedings of the 22nd European Conference on Information Systems ECIS 2014, Tel Aviv, Israel.
   Google Scholar
• Thom, J., Millen, D., & DiMicco, J. (2012, February 11–15).Removing gamification from an enterprise SNS. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work, Seattle, WA, United States. https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145362
   Google Scholar
• Tondello, G. F., Premsukh, H., & Nacke, L. E. (2018, January 2–6).A theory of gamification principles through goal-setting theory. Proceedings of the 51th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Waikoloa Village, HI, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Tondello, G. F., Wehbe, R. R., Diamond, L., Busch, M., Marczewski, A., & Nacke, L. (2016, October 16–19).The gamification user types hexad scale. Proceedings of the CHI PLAY’16 annual symposium on computer-human interaction in play, Austin, TX, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Umbleja, K., Kukk, V., & Jaanus, M. (2017, April 25–28).Analysis of competency-based learning — 6 Years later. Proceedings of the IEEE global engineering education conference EDUCON, Athens, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Vaezipour, A., Rakotonirainy, A., & Haworth, N. (2016). Design of a gamified interface to improve fuel efficiency and safe driving. In A. Marcus (Ed.), Lecture notes in computer science: Vol. 9747. Design, user experience, and usability: Novel user experiences. DUXU 2016 (pp. 322–332). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Venable, J. (2006). The role of theory and theorising in design science research. Proceedings of the 1st international conference on design science research in information systems and technology DESRIST, Claremont, CA, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Venable, J. R. (2013). Lecture Notes In Computer Science: Vol. 7939. Design science at the intersection of physical and virtual design. DESRIST 2013. In J. vom Brocke, R. Hekkala, S. Ram, & M. Rossi (Eds.), Rethinking design theory in information systems (pp. 136–149). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walls, J. G., Widmeyer, G. R., & El Sawy, O. A. (1992). Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 36–59. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, G., Schaarschmidt, M., & von Kortzfleisch, H. (2016). Employees’ company reputation-related social media competence: Scale development and validation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 36, 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2016.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zampou, E., Mourtos, I., Pramatari, K., & Seidel, S. (in press). A design theory for energy and carbon management systems in the supply chain. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar