Artificial Intelligence Governance For Businesses

References

• Abraham, R., Schneider, J., & Vom Brocke, J. (2019). Data governance: A conceptual framework, structured review, and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 424–438. 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adadi, A., & Berrada, M. (2018). Peeking inside the black-box: A survey on explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). IEEE Access, 6, 52138–52160. 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2870052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggarwal, C. C. (2015). Data mining: The textbook. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Almeida, P., Santos, C., & Farias, J. S. (2020). Artificial intelligence regulation: A meta-framework for formulation and governance. In Proceedings Of The 53rd Hawaii International Conference On System Sciences, 10.24251/hicss.2020.647
   Google Scholar
• Alsheiabni, S., Messom, C., Cheung, Y., & Alhosni, M. (2020). Winning AI strategy: six-steps to create value from artificial intelligence. In Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (2020). Creativity, artificial intelligence, and a world of surprises. Academy of Management Discoveries, 6(3), 351–354. doi:10.5465/amd.2019.0075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amershi, S., Weld, D., Vorvoreanu, M., Fourney, A., Nushi, B., Collisson, P. et al. (2019). Guidelines for human-ai interaction. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–13. 10.1145/3290605.3300233
   Google Scholar
• Amodei, D., Olah, C., Steinhardt, J., Christiano, P., Schulman, J., & Mané, D. (2016). Concrete problems in AI safety. arXiv Preprint arXiv, 1606.06565
   Google Scholar
• Arena, S., Florian, E., Zennaro, I., Orrù, P. F., & Sgarbossa, F. (2022). A novel decision support system for managing predictive maintenance strategies based on machine learning approaches. Safety Science, 146, Article 105529. 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, T., & Scheutz, M. (2018). The “big red button” is too late: An alternative model for the ethical evaluation of ai systems. Ethics and Information Technology, 20(1), 59–69. 10.1007/s10676-018-9447-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashmore, R., Calinescu, R., & Paterson, C. (2021). Assuring the machine learning lifecycle: Desiderata, methods, and challenges. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR). doi:10.1145/3453444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellet, T., Cunneen, M., Mullins, M., Murphy, F., Pütz, F., Spickermann, F., Braendle, C., & Baumann, M. F. (2019). From semi to fully autonomous vehicles: New emerging risks and ethico-legal challenges for human-machine interactions. Transportation Research. Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 63, 153–164. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2019.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhagat, S., & Bolton, B. (2008). Corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(3), 257–273. 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgman, H., Heier, H., Bahli, B., & Boekamp, T. (2016). Dotting the I and Crossing (out) the T in IT governance: new challenges for information governance. In Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), (pp. 4901–4909). 10.1109/hicss.2016.608
   Google Scholar
• Brodley, C. E., & Friedl, M. A. (1999). Identifying mislabeled training data. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 11, 11. 131–167. 10.1613/jair.606
   Google Scholar
• Brundage, M., Avin, S., Wang, J., Belfield, H., Krueger, G., Hadfield, G. et al. (2020). Toward trustworthy AI development: Mechanisms for supporting verifiable claims. arXiv Preprint arXiv, 2004.07213
   Google Scholar
• Burt, A. (2021). New AI regulations are coming. is your organization ready? Harvard Business Review
   Google Scholar
• Chen, A., Chow, A., Davidson, A., DCunha, A., Ghodsi, A., Hong, S. A. et al. (2020). Developments in MLflow: A system to accelerate the machine learning lifecycle. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Data Management for End-to-End Machine Learning, (pp. 1–4). 10.1145/3399579.3399867
   Google Scholar
• Chui, M., & Malhotra, S., (2018), “AI adoption advances, but foundational barriers remain”Mckinsey and company. Retrieved May 01, 2021, from https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/artificial-intelligence/ai-adoption-advances-but-foundational-barriers-remain
   Google Scholar
• Cihon, P. (2019). Standards for AI governance: International standards to enable global coordination in ai research & development. In Future of Humanity Institute. University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, R. (2019, August). Principles and business processes for responsible AI. Computer Law & Security Review, 35(4), 410–422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbett-Davies, S., & Goel, S. (2018). The measure and mismeasure of fairness: A critical review of fair machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv, 1808.00023
   Google Scholar
• DAMA International. (2009). Dama guide to the data management body of knowledge (1st edition ed.). Technics Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Das, A., & Rad, P. (2020). Opportunities and challenges in explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv, 2006. 11371
   Google Scholar
• Dastin, J. (2018). Amazon scraps secret ai recruiting tool that showed bias against women. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-amazon-com-jobs-automation-insight/amazon-scraps-secret-ai-recruiting-tool-that-showed-bias-against-women-idUSKCN1MK08G
   Google Scholar
• Davenport, Thomas, H., & Kirby, J. (2015). Beyond automation. Harvard Business Review, 59–65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Haes, S., & Van Grembergen, W. (2009). An exploratory study into IT governance implementations and its impact on business/IT alignment. Information Systems Management, 26(2), 123–137. 10.1080/10580530902794786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, M., Yang, F., Zou, N., & Hu, X. (2020). Fairness in deep learning: A computational perspective. IEEE Intelligent Systems. 36. 4. doi:10.1109/MIS.2020.3000681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2020). White paper on artificial intelligence. A European approach to excellence and trust., Retrieved November 02, 2020, from 10.2139/ssrn.3706099
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2021). Laying down harmonized rules on artificial intelligence Retrieved May 01, 2021, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52021PC0206
   Google Scholar
• Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., Schafer, B., Valcke, P., & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—an ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707. doi:10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, M. (2018). Architects of intelligence: The truth about ai from the people building it. Packt Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Fountaine, T., McCarthy, B., & Saleh, T. (2019). Building the ai-powered organization. Retrieved November 03, 2020, from https://hbr.org/2019/07/building-the-ai-powered-organization
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, S., & Graesser, A. (1996). Is it an agent, or just a program?: A taxonomy for autonomous agents. In International Workshop On Agent Theories, Architectures, And Languages, (pp. 21–35). 10.1007/bfb0013570
   Google Scholar
• Frénay, B., & Verleysen, M. (2013). Classification in the presence of label noise: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 25(5), 845–869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gama, J., Žliobaitė, I., Bifet, A., Pechenizkiy, M., & Bouchachia, A. (2014). A survey on concept drift adaptation. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 46(4), 1–37. 10.1145/2523813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garlick, B. (2017). Flying smarter: AI & machine learning in aviation autopilot systems. Retrieved November 04, 2020, from https://mse238blog.stanford.edu/2017/08/bgarlick/flying-smarter-ai-machine-learning-in-aviation-autopilot-systems/
   Google Scholar
• Gasser, U., & Almeida, V. A. (2017). A layered model for AI governance. IEEE Internet Computing, 21(6), 58–62. 10.1109/MIC.2017.4180835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbani, A., & Zou, J. (2019). Data shapley: equitable valuation of data for machine learning. Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., Courville, A., & Bengio, Y. (2016). Deep learning (Vol. 1, pp. No. 2). MIT press Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Grigorescu, S., Trasnea, B., Cocias, T., & Macesanu, G. (2020). A survey of deep learning techniques for autonomous driving. Journal of Field Robotics, 37. 3. 1–25. doi:10.1002/rob.21918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halckenhaeusser, A., Foerderer, J., & Heinzl, A. (2020). Platform governance mechanisms: An integrated literature review and research directions. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS).
   Google Scholar
• Hamada, K., Ishikawa, F., Masuda, S., Matsuya, M., & Ujita, Y. (2020). Guidelines for quality assurance of machine learning-based artificial intelligence. In SEKE2020: the 32nd International Conference on Software Engineering & Knowledge Engineering (pp. 335–341). 10.1142/s0218194020400227
   Google Scholar
• Hernández-Orallo, J., Martínez-Plumed, F., Avin, S., & Heigeartaigh, S. O. (2019). Surveying safety-relevant ai characteristics. In AAAI workshop on Artificial Intelligence Safety (SafeAI 2019) (pp. 1–9).
   Google Scholar
• Ho, C., Soon, D., Caals, K., & Kapur, J. (2019). Governance of automated image analysis and artificial intelligence analytics in healthcare. Clinical Radiology, 74(5), 329–337. 10.1016/j.crad.2019.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurley, J. (2018). Enabling successful artificial intelligence implementation in the department of defense. Journal of Information Warfare, 17(2), 65–82
   Google Scholar
• Iansiti, M., & Lakhani, K. R. (2020). Competing in the age of ai: Strategy and leadership when algorithms and networks run the world. Harvard Business Press. doi:10.1080/09700161.2021.1918951
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, M., Brous, P., Estevez, E., Barbosa, L. S., & Janowski, T. (2020). Data governance: Organizing data for trustworthy Artificial Intelligence. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarrahi, M. H. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-ai symbiosis in organizational decision making. Business Horizons, 61(4), 577–586. 10.1016/j.bushor.2018.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiao, Y., Wang, P., Feng, S., & Niyato, D. (2018). Profit maximization mechanism and data management for data analytics services. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 5(3), 2001–2014. 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2819706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöhnk, J., Weißert, M., & Wyrtki, K. (2021). Ready or not, AI comes—An interview study of organizational ai readiness factors. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 63(1), 5–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A., & Haenlein, M. (2019). Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Business Horizons, 62(1), 15–25. 10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keding, C. (2020). Understanding the interplay of artificial intelligence and strategic management: Four decades of research in review. Management Review Quarterly, 71. 3. 1–44. doi:10.1007/s11301-020-00181-x
   Google Scholar
• Khang, A. B. (2021). Superhuman floorplans for microchips. Nature, 594, (27). 207–212. doi:10.1038/d41586-021-01515-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khatri, V., & Brown, C. V. (2010). Designing data governance. Communications of the ACM, 53(1), 148–152. 10.1145/1629175.1629210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, W. R., & He, J. (2005). Understanding the role and methods of metaanalysis in is research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16(1), 32. 10.17705/1CAIS.01632
   Google Scholar
• Kruhse-Lehtonen, U., & Hofmann, D. (2020). How to define and execute your data and AI strategy. Retrieved 2020, November 01, from https://hdsr.mitpress.mit.edu/pub/4vlrf0x2/release/2
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H., Eksmo, S., Risberg, J., & Hebig, R. (2020). Emerging and changing tasks in the development process for machine learning systems. In Proceedings of The International Conference on Software and System Processes (pp. 125–134). 10.1145/3379177.3388905
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H. Y., & Maas, M. M. (2021). ‘Solving for X?’ Towards a problem-finding framework to ground long-term governance strategies for artificial intelligence. Futures, 126, 102672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, J., Liu, A., Dong, F., Gu, F., Gama, J., & Zhang, G. (2018). Learning under concept drift: A review. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 31(12), 2346–2363. doi:10.1109/tkde.2018.2876857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maedche, A., Legner, C., Benlian, A., Berger, B., Gimpel, H., Hess, T., Hinz, O., Morana, S., & Söllner, M. (2019). Ai-based digital assistants. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 61(4), 535–544. doi:10.1007/s12599-019-00600-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magistretti, S., Dell’Era, C., & Petruzzelli, A. M. (2019). How intelligent is Watson? Enabling digital transformation through artificial intelligence. Business Horizons, 62(6), 819–829. 10.1016/j.bushor.2019.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & López-Cózar, E. D. (2018). Google scholar, web of science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1160–1177. 10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, P. (2016). The racist hijacking of Microsoft’s chatbot shows how the internet teems with hate. Retrieved November 01, 2020, from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/mar/29/microsoft-tay-tweets-antisemitic-racism
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R., & Jacobsen, H. A. (2020). Scalable deep learning on distributed infrastructures: Challenges, techniques, and tools. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 53(1), 1–37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meske, C., Bunde, E., Schneider, J., & Gersch, M. (2022). Explainable Artificial Intelligence: objectives, stakeholders and future research opportunities. Information Systems Management, 39(1), 53–63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikalef, P., & Gupta, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence capability: conceptualization, measurement calibration, and empirical study on its impact on organizational creativity and firm performance. Information & Management, 58(1), 103434. doi:10.1016/j.im.2021.103434
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, S., Clark, J., & Perrault, C. R. (2020). Measurement in AI Policy: opportunities and challenges. arXiv, 2009.09071 [cs].
   Google Scholar
• Morgulis, N., Kreines, A., Mendelowitz, S., & Weisglass, Y. (2019). Fooling a real car with adversarial traffic signs. arXiv Preprint arXiv, 1907.00374.
   Google Scholar
• Mosley, M., Brackett, M., Earley, S., & Henderson, D. (2010). The DMA Guide to the Data Management Body of Knowledge (1st ed.). Technics Publications LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Nigam, N., Dutta, T., & Gupta, H. P. (2020). Impact of noisy labels in learning techniques: A survey. Advances in Data and Information Sciences, 403–411. doi:10.1007/978-981-15-0694-9_38
   Google Scholar
• Nocentini, O., Fiorini, L., Acerbi, G., Sorrentino, A., Mancioppi, G., & Cavallo, F. (2019). A survey of behavioral models for social robots. Robotics, 8(3), 54. 10.3390/robotics8030054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagallo, U., Aurucci, P., Casanovas, P., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P. D., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R, Schafer, B., Valcke, P. (2019). Ai4people-on good AI governance: 14 priority actions, a smart model of governance, and a regulatory toolbox. Retrieved October 30, 2020, from https://www.eismd.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/AI4Peoples-Report-on-Good-AI-Governance_compressed.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Palczewska, A., Fu, X., Trundle, P., Yang, L., Neagu, D., Ridley, M., & Travis, K. (2013). Towards model governance in predictive toxicology. International Journal of Information Management, 33(3), 567–582. 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, Y., Froese, F., Liu, N., Hu, Y., & Ye, M. (2022). The adoption of artificial intelligence in employee recruitment: The influence of contextual factors. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(6), 1125–1147. 10.1080/09585192.2021.1879206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pei, J. (2020). A survey on data pricing: From economics to data science. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. 10.1109/tkde.2020.3045927
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. R. (2004). Integration strategies and tactics for information technology governance. Strategies for Information Technology Governance, 37–80. doi:10.4018/978-1-59140-140-7.ch002
   Google Scholar
• Pichai, S. C. (2018). AI at Google: Our principles. Retrieved November 04, 2020, from https://www.blog.google/technology/ai/ai-principles
   Google Scholar
• Privacy Team, I. G. (2020). EU general data protection regulation (GDPR)–an implementation and compliance guide. IT Governance Ltd. doi:10.2307/j.ctv17f12pc
   Google Scholar
• Pumplun, L., Tauchert, C., & Heidt, M. (2019). A new organizational chassis for artificial intelligence-exploring organizational readiness factors. In European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS).
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, M. S., Rivera, E., Khomh, F., Guéhéneuc, Y.-G., & Lehnert, B. (2019). Machine learning software engineering in practice: An industrial case study. arXiv preprint arXiv, 1906.07154.
   Google Scholar
• Rai, A., Constantinides, P., & Sarker, S. (2019). Next generation digital platforms:: toward human-AI hybrids. MIS Quarterly, 43(1). 3–4
   Google Scholar
• Ransbotham, S., Khodabandeh, S., Fehling, R., LaFountain, B., & Kiron, D. (2019). Winning with ai. Retrieved November 01, 2020, from https://sloanreview.mit.edu/projects/winning-with-ai/
   Google Scholar
• Ransbotham, S., Khodabandeh, S., Kiron, D., Candelon, F., Chu, M., & LaFountain, B. (2020). Are you making the most of your relationship with AI? Retrieved November, 01, 2020, from https://www.bcg.com/publications/2020/is-your-company-embracing-full-potential-of-artificial-intelligence
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, S., Allan, S., Coghlan, S., & Cooper, P. (2020). A governance model for the application of AI in health care. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 27(3), 491–497. 10.1093/jamia/ocz192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2020). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th edition. ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Rzepka, C., & Berger, B. (2018). User interaction with ai-enabled systems: A systematic review of is research. In International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS)
   Google Scholar
• Schelter, S., Biessmann, F., Januschowski, T., Salinas, D., Seufert, S., & Szarvas, G. (2018). On challenges in machine learning model management. IEEE Bulletin Tech. Committee Data Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, M. U. (2015). Regulating artificial intelligence systems: Risks, challenges, competencies, and strategies. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 29, 353.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, J., & Handali, J. P. (2019). Personalized explanation for machine learning: A conceptualization. In European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS).
   Google Scholar
• Serban, A., van der Blom, K., Hoos, H., & Visser, J. (2020). Adoption and effects of software engineering best practices in Machine Learning. Proceedings of the 14th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM), 1–12. 10.1145/3382494.3410681
   Google Scholar
• Shirer, M., & Daquila, M. (2019). Worldwide spending on artificial intelligence systems will be nearly 98 billion in 2023. Retrieved November 01, 2020, from https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS48191221
   Google Scholar
• Sidorova, A., & Rafiee, D. (2019). AI agency risks and their mitigation through business process management: A conceptual framework. In Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). 10.24251/hicss.2019.704
   Google Scholar
• Siebert, J., Joeckel, L., Heidrich, J., Nakamichi, K., Ohashi, K., Namba, I., Yamamoto, R., Aoyama, M. (2020). Towards guidelines for assessing qualities of machine learning systems. In International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology (pp. 17–31). 10.1007/978-3-030-58793-2_2
   Google Scholar
• Silver, D., Schrittwieser, J., Simonyan, K., Antonoglou, I., Huang, A., Guez, A., Hubert, T., Baker, L., Lai, M., Bolton, A., Chen, Y., Lillicrap, T., Hui, F., Sifre, L., van den Driessche, G., Graepel, T., & Hassabis, D. (2017). Mastering the game of go without human knowledge. Nature, 550(7676), 354–359. doi:10.1038/nature24270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smit, K., & Zoet, M. (2020). A review of AI principles in practice. In Proceedings of the Pacific-Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS).
   Google Scholar
• song, H., Kim, M., Park, D., & Lee, J.-G. (2020). Learning from noisy labels with deep neural networks: A survey. arXiv, 2007.08199.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sridhar, V., Subramanian, S., Arteaga, D., Sundararaman, S., Roselli, D., & Talagala, N. (2018). Model governance: reducing the anarchy of production ML. In Proceedings of USENIX Annual Technical Conference, 351–358.
   Google Scholar
• Stecher, P., Pohl, M., & Turowski, K., 2020. Enterprise architecture’s effects on organizations’ ability to adopt artificial intelligence-A Resource-based perspective. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS).
   Google Scholar
• Stoica, I., Song, D., Popa, R. A., Patterson, D., Mahoney, M. W., Katz, R., Joseph, A.D., Jordan, M., Hellerstein, J.M., Gonzalez, J.E., Goldberg, K. (2017). A Berkeley view of systems challenges for AI. arXiv Preprint arXiv, 1712.05855.
   Google Scholar
• Tallon, P. P., Ramirez, R. V., & Short, J. E. (2013). The information artifact in IT governance: Toward a theory of information governance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(3), 141–178. 10.2753/MIS0742-1222300306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarafdar, M., Beath, C. M., & Ross, J. W. (2019). Using AI to enhance business operations 60(4), 37-44. Retrieved November 03, 2020, from 10.7551/mitpress/12588.003.0015
   Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., & Venkatraman, N. (2013). Special issue: information technology and organizational governance: the IT governance cube. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(3), 7–12. 10.2753/MIS0742-1222300301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Horn, J. D., Fierro, L., Kamdar, J., Gordon, J., Stewart, C., Bhattrai, A., … Jain, P. (2018). Democratizing data science through data science training. In Proccedings of Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing (PSB) (pp. 292–303). 10.1142/9789813235533_0027
   Google Scholar
• Vartak, M., Subramanyam, H., Lee, W.-E., Viswanathan, S., Husnoo, S., Madden, S., & Zaharia, M. (2016). Modeldb: A system for machine learning model management. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Human-In-the-Loop Data Analytics. 10.1145/2939502.2939516
   Google Scholar
• Verbraeken, J., Wolting, M., Katzy, J., Kloppenburg, J., Verbelen, T., & Rellermeyer, J. S. (2020). A survey on distributed machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 53(2), 1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma, S., & Rubin, J. (2018). Fairness definitions explained. In IEEE/ACM international workshop on software fairness (fairware) (pp. 1–7). 10.1145/3194770.3194776
   Google Scholar
• Wang, H., Li, C., Gu, B., & Min, W. (2019). Does AI-based credit scoring improve financial inclusion? Evidence from online payday lending. In International Conference on Information Systems(ICIS) (pp. 1–9).
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Xiong, M., & Olya, H. (2020). Toward an understanding of responsible artificial intelligence practices. In Proceedings of The Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences(HICSS). 10.24251/hicss.2020.610
   Google Scholar
• Watanabe, Y., Washizaki, H., Sakamoto, K., Saito, D., Honda, K., Tsuda, N., Fukazawa, Y., Yoshioka, N. (2019). Preliminary systematic literature review of machine learning system development process. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.05528. 10.1109/compsac51774.2021.00207
   Google Scholar
• Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS quarterly, xiii–xxiii.
   Google Scholar
• Winfield, A. F., Michael, K., Pitt, J., & Evers, V. (2019). Machine ethics: The design and governance of ethical ai and autonomous systems. Proceedings of the IEEE, 107( 3). 10.1109/jproc.2019.2900622
   Google Scholar
• Wirth, R., & Hipp, J. (2000). CRISP-DM: Towards a standard process model for data mining. In Proceedings of the International Conference on the Practical Applications of Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 29–39).
   Google Scholar
• Witten, I. H., & Frank, E. (2017). Data mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques (4th edition ed.). Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Zapadka, P., Hanelt, A., Firk, S., & Oehmichen, J., 2020. Leveraging “AI-as-a-Service”–antecedents and consequences of using artificial intelligence boundary resources. In International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS).
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J. M., Harman, M., Ma, L., & Liu, Y. (2020). Machine learning testing: Survey, landscapes and horizons. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 10.1109/tse.2019.2962027
   Google Scholar