Boundaries and Boundary Spanning in Digital Innovation Outsourcing: The Influence of Institutional Logics and Governance Systems

References

• Agostini, L., Galati, F., & Gastaldi, L. (2020). The digitalization of the innovation process: Challenges and opportunities from a management perspective. European Journal of Innovation Management, 23(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-11-2019-0330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, A. D., Marin, A., & Simensen, E. O. (2018). Innovation in natural resource-based industries: A pathway to development? Introduction to special issue. Innovation and Development, 8(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2018.1439293
   Google Scholar
• Ang, S., & Slaughter, S. A. (2001). Work outcomes and job design for contract versus permanent information systems professionals on software development teams. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 321–350. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang, S., & Straub, D. W. (1998). Production and transaction economies and IS outsourcing: A study of the US banking industry. MIS Quarterly, 22(4), 535–552. https://doi.org/10.2307/249554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angst, C. M., Wowak, K. D., Handley, S. M., & Kelley, K. (2017). Antecedents of information systems sourcing strategies in u.s. hospitals: a longitudinal study. MIS Quarterly, U. S. Hospitals: & A. Longitudinal Study,” 41(4), 1129–1152. https://aisel.aisnet.org/misq/vol41/iss4/8/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashforth, B. E., & Reingen, P. H. (2014). Functions of dysfunction: Managing the dynamics of an organizational duality in a natural food cooperative. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(3), 474–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839214537811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashraf, N., Ahmadsimab, A., & Pinkse, J. (2017). From animosity to affinity: The interplay of competing logics and interdependence in cross-sector partnerships. Journal of Management Studies, 54(6), 793–822. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bala, H., & Venkatesh, V. (2007). Assimilation of interorganizational business process standards. Information Systems Research, 18(3), 340–362. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., Sengul, M., Pache, A. C., & Model, J. (2015). Harnessing productive tensions in hybrid organizations: The case of work integration social enterprises. Academy of Management Journal, 58(6), 1658–1685. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechky, B. (2003). Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organizational Science, 14(3), 312–330. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.3.312.15162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berente, N., Lyytinen, K., Yoo, Y., & Maurer, C. (2019). Institutional logics and pluralistic responses to enterprise system implementation: A qualitative meta-analysis. MIS Quarterly, 43(3), 873–902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berente, N., & Yoo, Y. (2012). Institutional contradictions and loose coupling: Postimplementation of NASA’s enterprise information system. Information Systems Research, 23(2), 376–396. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1110.0373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R., & Exworthy, M. (2020). Clinical managers’ identity at the crossroad of multiple institutional logics in it innovation: The case study of a health care organization in England. Information Systems Journal, 30(3), 566–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjerregaard, T. (2010). Industry and academia in convergence: Micro-institutional dimensions of R&D collaboration. Technovation, 30(2), 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudreau, M., & Robey, D. (2005). Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective. Organization Science, 16(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browning, L. D., Beyer, J. M., & Shetler, J. C. (1995). Building cooperation in a competitive industry: SEMATECH and the semiconductor industry. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 113–151. https://doi.org/10.2307/256730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlile, P. R. (2002). A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y. B., & Gurbaxani, V. (2012). Information technology outsourcing, knowledge transfer, and firm productivity: An empirical analysis. MIS Quarterly, 36(4), 1043–1063. https://doi.org/10.2307/41703497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060410565074
   Google Scholar
• Chiasson, M. W., & Davidson, E. (2005). Taking industry seriously in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 29(4), 591–605. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, T.-H., & Robey, D. (2008). Explaining changes in learning and work practice following the adoption of online learning: A human agency perspective. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(1), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cramton, C. D. (2001). The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science, 12(3), 346–371. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.3.346.10098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowston, K., & Myers, M. D. (2004). Information technology and the transformation of industries: Three research perspectives. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 13(1), 5–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, T., Tong, Y., Teo, H. H., & Li, J. (2020). Managing Knowledge Distance: IT-Enabled Inter-Firm Knowledge Capabilities in Collaborative Innovation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 37(1), 217–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2019.1705504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, S., Davies, J., & Grimes, C. (1998). Collaborative research programmes: Building trust from difference. Technovation, 19(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/SO166-4972(98
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. P., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2011). Rotating leadership and collaborative innovation: Recombination processes in symbiotic relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(2), 159–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839211428131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiRomualdo, A., & Gurbaxani, V. (1998). Strategic intent of IT outsourcing. Sloan Management Review, 39(4), 67–80.
   Google Scholar
• Dodgson, M. (2014). Collaboration and innovation management. In The Oxford handbook of innovation management.
   Google Scholar
• Du, W., & Pan, S. L. (2012). Boundary spanning by design: Toward aligning boundary-spanning capacity and strategy in IT outsourcing. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 60(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2012.2206114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faik, I., Barrett, M., & Oborn, E. (2020). How Information Technology Matters in Societal Change: An Affordance-Based Institutional Logics Perspective. MIS Quarterly, 44(3), 1359–1390. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2020/14193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feller, J., Finnegan, P., Hayes, J., & O’Reilly, P. (2008). “Governance structures for open innovation: A preliminary framework.” IFIP Working Conference on Open IT-Based Innovation: Moving Towards Cooperative IT Transfer and Knowledge Diffusion, 511–525.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-87503-3_29
   Google Scholar
• Fennell, M. L., & Alexander, J. A. (1987). Organizational boundary spanning in institutionalized environments. Academy of Management Journal, 30(3), 456–476. https://doi.org/10.2307/256009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedland, R., & Alford, R. (1991). Bringing society back in: symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. the new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gefen, D., Wyss, S., & Lichtenstein, Y. (2008). Business Familiarity as Risk Mitigation in Software. MIS Quarterly, 32(3),531–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, R., Gasco, J., & Llopis, J. (2010). Information systems offshore outsourcing: An exploratory study of motivations and risks in large Spanish firms. Information Systems Management, 27(4), 340–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530903455205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., Díaz, A. M., Li, S. X., & Lorente, J. C. (2010). The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organization Science, 21(2), 521–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanafizadeh, P., & Zareravasan, A. (2020). A systematic literature review on IT outsourcing decision and future research directions. Journal of Global Information Management, 28(2), 160–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, K., & Mithas, S. (2013). Information Technology Outsourcing and Non-IT Operating Costs: An Empirical Investigation. MIS Quarterly, 37(1), 315–331. https://aisel.aisnet.org/misq/vol37/iss1/15/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultin, L., & Mähring, M. (2014). Visualizing institutional logics in sociomaterial practices. Information and Organization, 24(3), 129–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahimov, B. (2018). Open Innovation and application to Petroleum Industry. IFAC-PapersOnl ffkjt0ine, 51(30), 697–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.11.212
   Google Scholar
• Insights, D. (2017). “From bytes to barrels. The digital transformation in upstream oil and gas,”. Deloitte Center for Energy Solutions. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/Energy-and-Resources/gx-online-from-bytes-to-barrels.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jay, J. (2013). Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 137–159. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayatilaka, B. (2002). IT Sourcing: A dynamic phenomenon: Forming an institutional theory perspective. Information Systems Outsourcing in the New Economy, 100–130. Springer-Verlag https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04754-5
   Google Scholar
• Koh, C., Ang, S., & Straub, D. W. (2004). IT outsourcing success: A psychological contract perspective. Information Systems Research, 15(4), 356–373. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Könning, M., Westner, M., & Strahringer, S. (2019). A systematic review of recent developments in IT outsourcing research. Information Systems Management, 36(1), 78–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2018.1553650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotlarsky, J., Oshri, I., Dibbern, J., & Mani, D., (2018) “IS Sourcing,” in MIS Quarterly July 1, 2018 https://doi.org/10.25300/07012018
   Google Scholar
• Kotlarsky, J., Scarbrough, H., & Oshri, I. (2014). Coordinating Expertise across Knowledge Boundaries in Offshore-Outsourcing Projects: The Role of Codification. MIS Quarterly, 38(2), 607–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kranz, J. J., Leonhardt, D., & Kolbe, L. M. (2016). “The enabling effect of collaborative innovation in information technology outsourcing on individual intrapreneurial behavior,” Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Information Systems, Dublin, 1114, Dublin, 1114
   Google Scholar
• Lacity, M. C., Khan, S., Yan, A., & Willcocks, L. P. (2010). A review of the IT outsourcing empirical literature and future research directions. Journal of Information Technology, 25(4), 395–433. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2010.21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Kim, Y. (1999). Effect of partnership quality on is outsourcing success: Conceptual framework and empirical validation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(4), 29–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1999.11518221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M.-D. P., & Lounsbury, M. (2015). Filtering institutional logics: Community logic variation and differential responses to the institutional complexity of toxic waste. Organization Science, 26(3), 847–866. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Miranda, S., & Kim, Y. (2004). IT outsourcing strategies: Universalistic, contingency, and configurational explanations of success. Information Systems Research, 15(2), 109–213. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P. M., & Bailey, D. E. (2008). “Transformational Technologies and the Creation of New Work Practices: Making Implicit Knowledge Explicit in T.-B. Offshoring,” MIS Quarterly, 32(2),411–436. available at https://aisel.aisnet.org/misq/vol32/iss2/12/.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levina, N., & Kane, A. A. (2009). “Immigrant managers as boundary spanners on offshored software development projects: Partners or bosses?” Proceedings of the 2009 international workshop on Intercultural collaboration, 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1145/1499224.1499236
   Google Scholar
• Levina, N., & Ross, J. (2003). From the Vendor’s Perspective: Exploring the Value Proposition in Information Technology Outsourcing. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 331–364. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levina, N., & Vaast, E. (2005). The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: Implications for implementation and use of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 29(52), 335–363. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148682
   Google Scholar
• Levina, N., & Vaast, E. (2008). Innovating or doing as told? status differences and overlapping boundaries. MIS Quarterly, O. Collaboration,” 32(2), 307–332. https://aisel.aisnet.org/misq/vol32/iss2/8/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liyanage, S., & Mitchell, H. (1994). Strategic management of interactions at the academic-industry interface. Technovation, 14(10), 641–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(94)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, J. Y., & Li, H. (2018). In the eyes of the beholder: The effect of participant diversity on perceived merits of collaborative innovations. Research Policy, 47(7), 1229–1242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mah, A. (2020). “By the numbers - value of the NL offshore oil and gas industry,” Context: Energy Examined. https://context.capp.ca/energy-matters/2020/btn-value-of-the-nl-offshore-oil-and-gas-industry
   Google Scholar
• Mair, J., & Hehenberger, L. (2014). Front stage and back stage convening: The transition from opposition to mutualistic coexistence in organizational philanthropy. Academy of Management Journal, 57(4), 1174–1200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair, J., Mayer, J., & Lutz, E. (2015). Navigating institutional plurality: Organizational governance in hybrid organizations. Organization Studies, 36(6), 713–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615580007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayasandra, R., Pan, S., & Leidner, D. (2011). Examining the strategic alignment and implementation success of a KMS: A subculture based multilevel analysis. Information Systems Research, 22(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1080.0214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda, S. M., & Kim, K. (2006). Professional versus political contexts: institutional mitigation and the transaction cost heuristic in information systems outsourcing in I. S. Outsourcing,” MIS Quarterly, 30(3),725–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohtashami, M., Marlowe, T., Kirova, V., & Deek, F. P. (2006). Risk management for collaborative software development. Information Systems Management, 23(4), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1201/1078.10580530/46352.23.4.20060901/95109.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, F. (2010). The oncomouse that roared: Hybrid exchange strategies as a source of distinction at the boundary of overlapping institutions. American Journal of Sociology, 116(2), 341–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A., & Song, M. (2017). Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 223–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls, A., & Huybrechts, B. (2016). Sustaining inter-organizational relationships across institutional logics and power asymmetries: The case of fair trade. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(4), 699–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunoo, N. A. (2017). “Open Innovation in Drilling,” The Way Ahead, August 1. https://jpt.spe.org/twa/open-innovation-drilling
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J., & Barley, S. (2001). Technology and institutions: What can research on information technology and research on organizations learn from each other. MIS Quarterly, 25(2), 145–165. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oshri, I., Henfridsson, O., & Kotlarsky, J. (2018). Re-Representation as Work Design in Outsourcing: A Semiotic View. MIS Quarterly, 42(1), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oshri, I., Kotlarsky, J., & Gerbasi, A. (2015). Strategic innovation through outsourcing: The role of relational and contractual governance. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 24(3), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2015.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton University. https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691122380/understanding-institutional-diversity
   Google Scholar
• Pan, S. L., Newell, S., Huang, J. C. M., & Galliers, R. (2007). Overcoming knowledge management challenges during ERP implementation: The need to share and integrate different types of knowledge? J. Amer. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol, 58(3), 404–419. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellegrini, L., Lazzarotti, V., & Pizzurno, E. (2012). From outsourcing to open innovation: A case study in the oil industry. International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, 8(2), 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTIP.2012.048476
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B., & Hardy, C. (2000). Inter-organizational collaboration and the dynamics of institutional fields. Journal of Management Studies, 37(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plugge, A., & Bouwman, H. (2015). Understanding collaboration in multisourcing arrangements: A social exchange theory perspective. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, Achieving Success and Innovation in Global Sourcing: Perspectives and Practices, 236(1), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26739-5_10
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (2012). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Qiu, Y., Gopal, A., & Hann, I.-H. (2011). Logic pluralism in mobile platform ecosystems: A study of indie app developers on the iOS app store. Information Systems Research, 28(2), 225–249. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2016.0664
   Google Scholar
• Qu, W. G., & Wang, S. (2015). “The economic impact of knowledge intensive IT outsourcing,” Proceedings of the 19th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Singapore. https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2015/72
   Google Scholar
• Rai, A., Maruping, L. M., & Venkatesh, V. (2009). Offshore information systems project success: The role of social embeddedness and cultural characteristics. MIS Quarterly, 33(3), 617–641. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramus, T., Vaccaro, A., & Brusoni, S. (2017). Institutional complexity in turbulent times: Formalization, collaboration, and the emergence of blended logics. Academy of Management Journal, 60(4), 1253–1284. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravishankar, M. N., Pan, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (2011). Examining the strategic alignment and implementation success of a KMS: A subculture-based multilevel analysis. Information Systems Research, 22(1), 39–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2009). Managing the Rivalry of Competing Institutional Logics. Organization Studies, 30(6), 629–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Research, A. (2015a). digital transformation in the age of the customer. Accenture Interactive, October. https://www.the-digital-insurer.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/646-Accenture-Digital-Transformation-In-The-Age-Of-The-Customer.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Research, A. (2015b). Harnessing the power of entrepreneurs to open innovation. https://citizen-entrepreneurs.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/G20YEA-2015-Accenture-Harnessing-the-power-of-digital-collaboration.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, N., Zöller, B., & Rosenkranz, C. (2016). The clash of cultures in information technology outsourcing relationships: An institutional logics perspective. Shared Services and Outsourcing. A Contemporary Outlook. 10th Global Sourcing Workshop 2016, 266, 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47009-2_6
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and Organizations. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0956-5221(97
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests (3rd) ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R., Ruef, M., Mendel, P. J., & Caronna, C. A. (2000). Institutional change and healthcare organizations: From professional dominance to managed care. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (2012). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M., Mitra, S., & Narasimhan, S. (1998). Information Systems Outsourcing: A Study of Pre-Event Firm Characteristics. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(2), 61–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1998.11518209
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, P. (2020). “Tech and energy are teaming up, creating a market that could grow 500% in the next 5 years”, CNBC, https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/22/tech-and-energy-are-teaming-up-creating-a-market-that-could-grow-500percent-in-the-next-5-years.html
   Google Scholar
• St. John, J., Guynes, C. S., & Vedder, R. (2014). The client–vendor offshore relationship: Success factors. Information Systems Management, 31(2), 120–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2014.890429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svahn, F., Mathiassen, L., & Lindgren, R. (2017). Embracing Digital Innovation in Incumbent Firms: How Volvo Cars Managed Competing Concerns. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 239–253. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.1.12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T. S., & Bhattacherjee, A. (2014). Knowledge transfer and utilization in IT outsourcing partnerships: A preliminary model of antecedents and outcomes. Information & Management, 51(2), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: social science bases of administrative theory. McGraw-Hill. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1496215
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H. (1995). Accounting for acquisition waves: evidence from the u.s. college publishing industry. The Institutional Construction of Organizations: International and Longitudinal Studies, 199, 225.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H. (2004). Markets from culture: institutional logics and organizational decisions in higher education publishing. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801–843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tumbas, S., Berente, N., & Brocke, J. V. (2018). Digital innovation and institutional entrepreneurship: chief digital officer perspectives of their emerging role. Journal of Information Technology, 33(3), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41265-018-0055-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tumbas, S., Schmiedel, T., & Brocke, J. (2015). “Characterizing multiple institutional logics for innovation with digital technologies” In 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences,4151–4160, IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Tushman, M. L. (1977). “Special boundary roles in the innovation process,” Administrative science quarterly, 587–605. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392402
   Google Scholar
• Tushman, M. L., & Scanlan, T. J. (1981). Boundary spanning individuals: Their role in information transfer and their antecedents. Academy of Management Journal, 24(2), 289–305. https://doi.org/10.5465/255842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vurro, C., Dacin, M. T., & Perrini, F. (2010). Institutional Antecedents of Partnering for Social Change: How Institutional Logics Shape Cross-Sector Social Partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0778-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessel, L., Baiyere, A., Ologeanu-Taddei, R., Cha, J., Jensen, B., & Tina. (2021). Unpacking the Difference Between Digital Transformation and IT-Enabled Organizational Transformation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 22(1), 102–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, J., & Bogers, M. (2014). Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 814–831. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, J., Salter, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Chesbrough, H. (2014). Open Innovation: The Next Decade. Research Policy, 43(5), 805–811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Designing case studies. Qualitative Research Methods, 5(14), 359–386.
   Google Scholar
• Yoo, Y., Boland, R., Lyytinen, J., & Majchrzak, A. (2012). Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World. Organization Science, 23(5), 1398–1408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, M. Y., & Dodgson, M. (2007). A roasted duck can still fly away”: A case study of technology, nationality, culture and the rapid and early internationalization of the firm. Journal of World Business, 42(3), 336–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2007.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar