Reliability Risk Analysis for the Aeroelastic Piezoelectric Energy Harvesters

References

• M. Ouyang, Review on modeling and simulation of interdependent critical infrastructure systems, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 121, 43 (2014). DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2013.06.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. L. Cummings, Factors that influence the acceptance of new aerospace risk assessment techniques, AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum, USA, 2020, p. 0707. DOI: 10.2514/6.2020-0707.
   Google Scholar
• K. Choudhary, and S. Monisha, Aerospace power supply modules reliability estimation using ARINC reliability apportionment technique. In Varde P., Prakash R., Vinod G. (eds)., Reliability, safety and hazard assessment for risk-based technologies. Lecture notes in mechanical engineering. (Springer, 2020), pp. 825–832. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-9008-1_69
   Google Scholar
• H. Elahi, M. Eugeni, and P. Gaudenzi, A review on mechanisms for piezoelectric-based energy harvesters, Energies 11 (7), 1850 (2018). DOI: 10.3390/en11071850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Eugeni et al., Numerical and experimental investigation of piezoelectric energy harvester based on flag-flutter, Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 97, 105634 (2020). DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2019.105634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Guo et al., Assessing the vulnerability of megaprojects using complex network theory, Project Manage. J. 51 (4), 429 (2020). DOI: 10.1177/8756972820911236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Deng, Q. Li, and Y. Lu, A research on subway physical vulnerability based on network theory and FMECA, Saf. Sci. 80, 127 (2015). DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.07.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Gaudenzi, Smart Structures. Mathematical Modelling and Applications. (John Wiley and Sons, Ltd, USA, 2009).
   Google Scholar
• A. Ali et al., Investigation of deformation in bimorph piezoelectric actuator: Analytical, numerical and experimental approach, Integr. Ferroelectr. 201 (1), 94 (2019). DOI: 10.1080/10584587.2019.1668694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Bouzelata et al., Mitigation of high harmonicity and design of a battery charger for a new piezoelectric wind energy harvester, Sens. Actuators A 273, 72 (2018). DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2018.02.023.
   Google Scholar
• H. Elahi, M. Eugeni, and P. Gaudenzi, Design and performance evaluation of a piezoelectric aeroelastic energy harvester based on the limit cycle oscillation phenomenon, Acta Astronaut. 157, 233 (2019). DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.12.044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Keshmiri, X. Deng, and N. Wu, New energy harvester with embedded piezoelectric stacks, Compos. Part B Eng. 163, 303 (2019). DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Elahi et al., Response of piezoelectric materials on thermomechanical shocking and electrical shocking for aerospace applications, Microsyst. Technol. 24 (9), 3791 (2018). DOI: 10.1007/s00542-018-3856-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Memmolo et al., Experimental and numerical investigation of pzt response in composite structures with variable degradation levels, J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 28 (6), 3239 (2019). DOI: 10.1007/s11665-019-04011-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Butt et al., Generation of electrical energy using lead zirconate titanate (pzt-5a) piezoelectric material: Analytical, numerical and experimental verifications, J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 30 (8), 3553 (2016). DOI: 10.1007/s12206-016-0715-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Elahi et al., Piezoelectric thermo electromechanical energy harvester for reconnaissance satellite structure, Microsyst. Technol. 25 (2), 665 (2019). DOI: 10.1007/s00542-018-3994-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Elahi et al., Stability of piezoelectric material for suspension applications, 2017 Fifth International Conference on Aerospace Science & Engineering (ICASE), Pakistan, IEEE, 2017, pp. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• R. F. Swati et al., Extended finite element method (XFEM) analysis of fiber reinforced composites for prediction of micro-crack propagation and delaminations in progressive damage: A review, Microsyst. Technol. 25 (3), 747 (2019). DOI: 10.1007/s00542-018-4021-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Usman Khan et al., Deflection of coupled elasticity–electrostatic bimorph pvdf material: Theoretical, FEM and experimental verification, Microsyst. Technol. 25 (8), 3235 (2019). DOI: 10.1007/s00542-018-4182-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Ayyildiz et al., Structure health monitoring using wireless sensor networks on structural elements, Ad Hoc Networks 82, 68 (2019). DOI: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2018.06.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Saxena, R. Kumar Dwivedi, and V. Khare, Simulation study of uncoupled electrical equivalent model of piezoelectric energy harvesting device interfaced with different electrical circuits. In Rawat B., Trivedi A., Manhas S., Karwal V. (eds.), Advances in Signal Processing and Communication. Lecture notes in electrical engineering, 526. (Springer, Singapore, 2019), pp. 591–600. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-2553-3_58
   Google Scholar
• R. F. Swati et al., Investigation of tensile and in-plane shear properties of carbon fiber reinforced composites with and without piezoelectric patches for micro-crack propagation using extended finite element method, Microsyst. Technol. 25 (6), 2361 (2019). DOI: 10.1007/s00542-018-4120-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Butt et al., Characterizing barium titanate piezoelectric material using the finite element method, Trans. Electr. Electron. Mater. 18 (3), 163 (2017).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Triplett, and D. Dane Quinn, The effect of non-linear piezoelectric coupling on vibration-based energy harvesting, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 20 (16), 1959 (2009). DOI: 10.1177/1045389X09343218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Johansson, and H. Hassel, An approach for modelling interdependent infrastructures in the context of vulnerability analysis, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 95 (12), 1335 (2010). DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2010.06.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. An, W. Lin, and A. Stirling, Fuzzy-reasoning-based approach to qualitative railway risk assessment, Proc. Inst. Mech Eng. Part F J. Rail Rapid Transit 220 (2), 153 (2006). DOI: 10.1243/09544097JRRT34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Lu, Q. Li, and W. Xiao, Case-based reasoning for automated safety risk analysis on subway operation: Case representation and retrieval, Saf. Sci. 57, 75 (2013). DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.01.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Park, H. H. Cudney, and D. J. Inman, Feasibility of using impedance-based damage assessment for pipeline structures, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 30 (10), 1463 (2001). DOI: 10.1002/eqe.72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Baulmann et al., A new oscillometric method for assessment of arterial stiffness: Comparison with tonometric and piezo-electronic methods, J. Hypertens. 26 (3), 523 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Jena et al., Seismic hazard and risk assessment: A review of state-of-the-art traditional and GIS models, Arab. J. Geosci. 13 (2), 50 (2020). DOI: 10.1007/s12517-019-5012-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Hegde, and B. Rokseth, Applications of machine learning methods for engineering risk assessment–A review, Saf. Sci. 122, 104492 (2020). DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.09.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.-M. Salotti, and E. Suhir, Degraded situation awareness risk assessment in the aerospace domain, 2019 IEEE 5th International Workshop on Metrology for AeroSpace (MetroAeroSpace), Italy, IEEE, 2019, pp. 39–43. DOI: 10.1109/MetroAeroSpace.2019.8869575.
   Google Scholar
• W. Li et al., A proactive process risk assessment approach based on job hazard analysis and resilient engineering, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 59, 54 (2019). DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2019.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. P. Singh, Review of Risk Assessment: Procedures and Protocols by Edward A. Mcbean (2019). https://ascelibrary.org/doi/full/10.1061/%28ASCE%29HE.1943-5584.0001753
   Google Scholar
• Z. William Birnbaum, On the importance of different components in a multicomponent system. Technical report, Washington Univ Seattle Lab of Statistical Research, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• H. Dui et al., Semi-markov process-based integrated importance measure for multi-state systems, IEEE Trans. Rel. 64 (2), 754 (2015). DOI: 10.1109/TR.2015.2413031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. El-Neweihi, F. Proschan, and J. Sethuraman, Multistate coherent systems, J. Appl. Probab. 15 (4), 675 (1978). DOI: 10.2307/3213425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. E. Barlow, and A. S. Wu, Coherent systems with multi-state components, Math. OR. 3 (4), 275 (1978). DOI: 10.1287/moor.3.4.275.
   Google Scholar
• W. S. Griffith, Multistate reliability models, J. Appl. Probab. 17 (3), 735 (1980). DOI: 10.2307/3212967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Natvig, Multistate System Reliability (Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science, 2010). DOI: /10.1002/9780470400531.eorms0553
   Google Scholar
• A. Lisnianski, I. Frenkel, and Y. Ding, Multi-State System Reliability Analysis and Optimization for Engineers and Industrial Managers (Springer Science & Business Media, 2010). https://gnedenko.net/Journal/2010/RTA_3_2010.pdf#page=59
   Google Scholar
• G. Levitin et al., The Universal Generating Function in Reliability Analysis and Optimization, Vol. 6 (Springer, 2005). https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F1-84628-245-4
   Google Scholar
• S. Si et al., Component state-based integrated importance measure for multi-state systems, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 116, 75 (2013). DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2013.02.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar