Intrinsic Enhancement of Permittivity with Ultralow Dielectric Loss in Donor-Acceptor Co-Doped Rutile TiO₂ Ceramics

References

• M. I. A. Abdel Maksoud et al., Advanced materials and technologies for supercapacitors used in energy conversion and storage: A review, Environ. Chem. Lett. 19 (1), 375 (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-01075-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Yao et al., Homogeneous/inhomogeneous-structured dielectrics and their energy-storage performances, Adv. Mater. 29 (20), 1601727 (2017). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201601727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Sriphan et al., High-performance hybridized composited-based piezoelectric and triboelectric nanogenerators based on BaTiO3/PDMS composite film modified with Ti0.8O2 nanosheets and silver nanopowders cofillers, ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2 (5), 3840 (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.9b00513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Charoonsuk et al., Tetragonal BaTiO3 nanowires: A template-free salt-flux-assisted synthesis and its piezoelectric response based on mechanical energy harvesting, J. Mater. Chem. C. 7 (27), 8277 (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TC01622H.
   Google Scholar
• T. Charoonsuk et al., Utilization of commodity thermoplastic polyethylene (PE) by enhanced sensing performance with liquid phase electrolyte for a flexible and transparent triboelectric tactile sensor, Sustain. Matertechnol. 27, e00239 (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2020.e00239.
   Google Scholar
• D. Huang et al., Electron-pinned defect dipoles in (Li, Al) co-doped ZnO ceramics with colossal dielectric permittivity, J. Mater. Chem. A. 8 (9), 4764 (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TA12808E.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• P. Lunkenheimer et al., Colossal dielectric constants in transition-metal oxides, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 180 (1), 61 (2009). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2010-01212-5.
   Google Scholar
• M. Zhu et al., Point-defect-induced colossal dielectric behavior in GaAs single crystals, RSC Adv. 7 (42), 26130 (2017). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA00058H.
   Google Scholar
• S.-Y. Chung, I.-D. Kim, and S.-J. L. Kang , Strong nonlinear current-voltage behaviour in perovskite-derivative calcium copper titanate, Nat. Mater. 3 (11), 774 (2004). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Krohns et al., Colossal dielectric constant up to gigahertz at room temperature, Appl. Phys. Lett. 94 (12), 122903 (2009). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3105993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. T. Buscaglia et al., High dielectric constant and frozen macroscopic polarization in dense nanocrystalline BaTiO3 ceramics, Phys. Rev. B. 73 (6), 064114 (2006). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.73.064114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Wang et al., Giant dielectric permittivity in Li and Nb doped NiO, Adv. Sci. Lett. 19 (6), 1763 (2013). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2013.4522.
   Google Scholar
• J. Wu et al., Giant dielectric permittivity observed in Li and Ti doped NiO, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (21), 217601 (2002). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.217601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. A. Subramanian et al., High dielectric constant in ACu3Ti4O12 and ACu3Ti3FeO12 phases, J. Solid State Chem. 151 (2), 323 (2000). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jssc.2000.8703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Sarkar, P. K. Jana, and B. K. Chaudhuri, Origin of electrically heterogeneous microstructure in CuO from scanning tunneling spectroscopy study, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 (14), 142901 (2008). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2907700.
   Google Scholar
• P. Salame et al., IBLC effect leading to colossal dielectric constant in layered structured Eu2CuO4 ceramic, Ceram. Int. 40 (3), 4491 (2014). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.08.123.
   Google Scholar
• C. Zhao, and J. Wu, Effects of secondary phases on the high-performance colossal permittivity in titanium dioxide ceramics, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10 (4), 3680 (2018). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b18356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.-Y. Tse et al., Enhanced dielectric properties of colossal permittivity co-doped TiO2/polymer composite films, RSC Adv. 8 (57), 32972 (2018). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RA07401A.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Hu et al., Electron-pinned defect-dipoles for high-performance colossal permittivity materials, Nat. Mater. 12 (9), 821 (2013). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Cheng, Z. Li, and J. Wu, Colossal permittivity in ceramics of TiO2 Co-doped with niobium and trivalent cation, J. Mater. Chem. A. 3 (11), 5805 (2015). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA00141B.
   Google Scholar
• X. Wei et al., Colossal permittivity properties of Zn, Nb co-doped TiO2 with different phase structures, J. Mater. Chem. C. 3 (42), 11005 (2015). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TC02578H.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Song et al., Origin of colossal dielectric permittivity of rutile Ti0.9In0.05Nb0.05O2: Single crystal and polycrystalline, Sci. Rep. 6 (1), 21478 (2016). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21478.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• B. Guo et al., Colossal permittivity and dielectric relaxations in Tl + Nb co-doped TiO2 ceramics, Ceram. Int. 44 (11), 12137 (2018). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.03.255.
   Google Scholar
• W. Dong et al., Colossal permittivity with ultralow dielectric loss in In + Ta co-doped rutile TiO2, J. Mater. Chem. A. 5 (11), 5436 (2017). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA08337D.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Bovtun et al., Wide range dielectric and infrared spectroscopy of (Nb + In) co-doped rutile ceramics, Phys. Rev. Mater. 2 (7), 075002 (2018). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.075002.
   Google Scholar
• K. Elghniji et al., Synthesis and characterization of Fe3+ doped TiO2 nanoparticles and films and their performance for photocurrent response under UV illumination, J. Alloys Compd. 541, 421 (2012). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.07.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Yang et al., Colossal permittivity of (Mg + Nb) co-doped TiO2 ceramics with low dielectric loss, J. Mater. Chem. C. 5 (21), 5170 (2017). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TC01020F.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Moslah et al., Synthesis of W-doped TiO2 by low-temperature hydrolysis: Effects of annealing temperature and doping content on the surface microstructure and photocatalytic activity, J. Chin. Chem. Soc. 66 (1), 99 (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jccs.201800201.
   Google Scholar
• F. Ruggieri et al., Electrospun Cu-, W- and Fe-doped TiO2 nanofibres for photocatalytic degradation of rhodamine 6G, J. Nanopart. Res. 15 (10), 1982 (2013). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-013-1982-x.
   Google Scholar
• W. Dong et al., Colossal dielectric behavior of Ga + Nb Co-doped rutile TiO2, ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7 (45), 25321 (2015). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b07467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Li et al., Niobium and divalent-modified titanium dioxide ceramics: Colossal permittivity and composition design, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 100 (7), 3004 (2017). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.14850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Poolphol et al., The study of trivalent-dopants effect on electrical properties of the BaZr0.7In0.3O3-δ system, Integr. Ferroelectr. 195 (1), 109 (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584587.2019.1570025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Cao et al., Colossal permittivity of (Gd + Nb) co-doped TiO2 ceramics induced by interface effects and defect cluster, Ceram. Int. 47 (5), 6711 (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.012.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Dang, and A. R. West, Oxygen stoichiometry, chemical expansion or contraction, and electrical properties of rutile, TiO2 ± δ ceramics, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 102 (1), 251 (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.15889.
   Google Scholar
• D. K. Lee et al., Oxygen nonstoichiometry (δ) of TiO2 − δ-revisited, J. Solid State Chem. 178 (1), 185 (2005). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2004.07.034.
   Google Scholar
• J.-F. Marucco, J. Gautron, and P. Lemasson, Thermogravimetric and electrical study of non-stoichiometric titanium dioxide TiO2 − x, between 800 and 1100 °C, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 42 (5), 363 (1981). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3697(81)90043-3.
   Google Scholar
• C. Di Valentin, G. Pacchioni, and A. Selloni, Reduced and n-type doped TiO2: nature of Ti3+ species, J. Phys. Chem. C. 113 (48), 20543 (2009). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jp9061797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Wypych et al., Dielectric properties and characterisation of titanium dioxide obtained by different chemistry methods, J. Nanomater., 2014, 124814 (2014).
   Google Scholar