References
- E. Mahmou et al., Fabrication, characterization and gamma rays shielding properties of nano and micro lead oxide-dispersed-high density polyethylene composites, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 145, 160 (2018). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2017.10.017.
- Y. S. Rammah et al., Environment friendly La3+ ions doped phosphate glasses/glass-ceramics for gamma radiation shielding: Their potential in nuclear safety applications, Ceram. Int. 46 (17), 27616 (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.07.256.
- E. Kavaz et al., Nuclear radiation shielding using barium borosilicate glass ceramics, J. Phys 142, 109437 (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2020.109437.
- G. Li et al., A facile route to prepare lead borate crystals for jointly shielding neutron and gamma rays, Inorg. Chem. 112, 107719 (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2019.107719.
- B. Ahmed et al., Gamma-ray shielding characteristics of flexible silicone tungsten composites, Appl. Radiat. 155, 108901 (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2019.108901.
- M. H. A. Mhareb et al., Structural and radiation shielding properties of BaTiO3 ceramic with different concentrations of Bismuth and Ytterbium, Ceram. Int 46 (18), 28877 (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.08.055.
- Y. S. Rammah, A. A. Ali, and F. I. El-Agawany, γ-ray shielding features and crystallization of TiO2 borotellurite glasses, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 526, 119720 (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2019.119720.
- M. I. Sayyed, S. Qashou, and Z. Y. Khattari, Radiation shielding competence of newly developed TeO2–WO3 glasses, J. Alloys Compd 696, 632 (2017). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.11.160.
- S. Ahn et al., Reactive-ion-etched glass surface with 2D periodic surface texture for application in solar cells, Optik 229, 166304 (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.166304.
- L. Hao et al., Double-sensitivity temperature sensor based on excitation intensity ratio of Eu3+ doped phosphate glass ceramic, Optik 204, 164188 (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.164188.
- S. Kang et al., Hybrid glass optical fibers-novel fiber materials for optoelectronic application, Opt. Mater.: X 6, 100051 (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omx.2020.100051.
- K. Linganna et al., Implementation of fluorophoshate laser glass for short length active fiber at 1.5 μm, Opt. Laser Technol 127, 106189 (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106189.
- H. O. Tekin et al., Characterization of SiO2–PbO–CdO–Ga2O3 glasses for comprehensive nuclear shielding performance: Alpha, proton, gamma, neutron radiation, Ceram. Int 45 (15), 19206 (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.06.168.
- S. Dhal et al., Simulation of very-low energy alkali ion (<10 KeV) induced effects on Al2O3micro flakes, Indian J Sci Technol 13 (21), 2111 (2020).
- J. Kaewkhao, and P. Limsuwan, Mass attenuation coefficients and effective atomic numbers in phosphate glass containing Bi2O3, PbO and BaO at 662 keV, Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 619 (1-3), 295 (2010). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2009.11.033.
- S. AM Issa, Effective atomic number and mass attenuation coefficient of PbO–BaO–B2O3 glass system, Phys. Chem 120, 33 (2016). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2015.11.025.
- D. Salehi, D. Sardar, and M. S. Jozani, A study of energy absorption and exposure buildup factors in natural uranium, Adv. Mater. Res 4 (1), 23 (2015). DOI: https://doi.org/10.12989/amr.2015.4.1.23.
- S. M. H. Hadi, and B. M. S. Saied, Stopping power and range of proton interaction with Al2O3, ZrO2 and SiO2, AIP Conference Proceedings, AIP Conf. Proc 2201, 020017 (2019).
- R. C. Lasky, and D. College, A Simple Equation Results in Decades of Technical Fun, Modern Concepts in Mater. Sci. 1 (4) 2692 (2020).