Political Parallelism in Media and Political Agenda-Setting

References

• Aalberg, T., Van Aelst, P., & Curran, J. (2010). Media systems and the political information environment: A cross-national comparison. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 15(3), 255–271. doi:10.1177/1940161210367422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altheide, D. L., & Snow, R. P. (1979). Media logic. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, L. M. (1996, September). Politicians and the press: Who leads, who follows? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R., & Chaqués Bonafont, L. (2015). All news is bad news: Newspaper coverage of political parties in Spain. Political Communication, 32(2), 268–291. doi:10.1080/10584609.2014.919974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, N., Katz, J. N., & Tucker, R. (1998). Taking time seriously: Time-series-cross-section analysis with a binary dependent variable. American Journal of Political Science, 42(4), 1260–1288. doi:10.2307/2991857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boomgaarden, H. G., & Vliegenthart, R. (2007). Explaining the rise of anti-immigrant parties: The role of news media content. Electoral Studies, 26(2), 404–417. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2006.10.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brambor, T., Clark, W. R., & Golder, M. (2005). Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis, 14(1), 63–82. doi:10.1093/pan/mpi014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandenburg, H. (2002). Who follows whom? The impact of parties on media agenda formation in the 1997 British general election campaign. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 7(3), 34–54. doi:10.1177/1081180X0200700303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brants, K., & Van Kempen, H. (2002). The ambivalent watchdog: The changing culture of political journalism and its effects. In R. Kuhn & E. Neveu (Eds.), Political journalism: New challenges, new practices (pp. 168–185). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brants, K., & Van Praag, P. (2006). Signs of media logic: Half a century of political communication in the Netherlands. Javnost-The Public, 13(1), 25–40. doi:10.1080/13183222.2006.11008905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, D. B., & Signorino, C. S. (2010). Back to the future: Modeling time dependence in binary data. Political Analysis, 18, 271–292. doi:10.1093/pan/mpq013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. (2004). Democratic challenges, democratic choices: The erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, C. E. (2009). The impact of EU referenda on national electoral politics: The Dutch case. West European Politics, 32(1), 142–171. doi:10.1080/01402380802509925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, G. C., & Wood, B. D. (1999). Who influences whom? The president, congress, and the media. The American Political Science Review, 93(2), 327–344. doi:10.2307/2585399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eshbaugh-Soha, M., & Peake, J. S. (2004). Presidential influence over the systemic agenda. Congress & the Presidency, 31(2), 181–201. doi:10.1080/07343460409507704
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. (2007). Case study research: Principles and practices. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green-Pedersen, C., & Stubager, R. (2010). The political conditionality of mass media influence: When do parties follow mass media attention? British Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 1–15. doi:10.1017/S0007123410000037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harcup, T., & O’Neill, D. (2001). What is news? Galtung and Ruge revisited. Journalism Studies, 2(2), 261–280. doi:10.1080/14616700118449
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, J. (2008). Western media systems. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hilbe, J. M. (2011). Negative binomial regression (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hilgartner, S., & Bosk, C. L. (1988). The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model. The American Journal of Sociology, 94(1), 53–78. doi:10.1086/228951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., Marks, G., & Wilson, C. J. (2002). Does Left/Right structure party positions on European integration? Comparative Political Studies, 35(8), 965–989. doi:10.1177/001041402236310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopmann, D. N., de Vreese, C. H., & Albæk, E. (2011). Incumbency bonus in election news coverage explained: The logics of political power and the media market. Journal of Communication, 61(2), 264–282. doi:10.1111/jcom.2011.61.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopmann, D. N., Elmelund-Praestekaer, C., Albaek, E., Vliegenthart, R., & de Vreese, C. H. (2012). Party media agenda-setting: How parties influence election news coverage. Party Politics, 18(2), 173–191. doi:10.1177/1354068810380097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S., & Frey, T. (2008). West European politics in the age of globalization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lancendorfer, K., & Lee, B. (2010). Who influences whom? The agenda-building relationship between political candidates and the media in the 2002 Michigan governor’s race. Journal of Political Marketing, 9(3), 186–206. doi:10.1080/15377857.2010.497737
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (1968). The politics of accommodation: Pluralism and democracy in the Netherlands. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mancini, P. (2012). Instrumentalization of the media vs. political parallelism. Chinese Journal of Communication, 5(3), 262–280. doi:10.1080/17544750.2012.701415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, S. (2011). Parliamentary questions, the behaviour of legislators, and the function of legislatures: An introduction. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 17(3), 259–270. doi:10.1080/13572334.2011.595120
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2009). Comparative political communications: Common frameworks or Babelian confusion? Government and Opposition, 44(3), 321–340. doi:10.1111/j.1477-7053.2009.01290.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, T. E., & Donsbagh, W. (1996). News decisions: Journalists as partisan actors. Political Communication, 13, 455–468. doi:10.1080/10584609.1996.9963131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. (2005). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata (2nd ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruigrok, N., Schaper, J., Welbers, K., Jacobi, C., & Denekamp, M. (2013). Kamervragen, Kamerleden en Media [Parliamentary Questions, Members of Parliament, and Media]. Retrieved from www.nieuwsmonitor.net/d/240/Kamervragen2002_2013_pdf
   Google Scholar
• Russo, F., & Wiberg, M. (2010). Parliamentary questioning in 17 European parliaments: Some steps towards comparison. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 16(2), 215–232. doi:10.1080/13572331003740115
   Google Scholar
• Seymour-Ure, C. (1974). The political impact of the mass media. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Strömbäck, J. (2008). Four phases of mediatization: An analysis of the mediatization of politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(3), 228–246. doi:10.1177/1940161208319097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thesen, G. (2013). When good news is scarce and bad news is good: Government responsibilities and opposition possibilities in political agenda-setting. European Journal of Political Research, 52(3), 364–389. doi:10.1111/ejpr.2013.52.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todosijevic, B., Aarts, K., & Van Der Kaap, H. (2010). Dutch Parliamentary Election Study Cumulative Dataset, 1971-2006. ICPSR28221-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2010-09-13. doi:10.3886/ICPSR28221.v1
   Google Scholar
• Van Aelst, P., & Vliegenthart, R. (2014). Studying the tango: An analysis of parliamentary questions and press coverage in the Netherlands. Journalism Studies,15(4), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Eijk, C. (2000). The Netherlands: Media and politics between segmented pluralism and market forces. In R. Gunther & A. Mughan (Eds.), Democracy and the media: A comparative perspective (pp. 303–342). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van der Pas, D. J. (2014). Making hay while the sun shines: Do parties only respond to media attention when the framing is right? The International Journal of Press/Politics, 19(1), 42–65. doi:10.1177/1940161213508207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Pas, D. J., & Vliegenthart, R. (2015). Do media respond to party conflict? Debates on European integration in British, Dutch and German party manifestos and newspapers, 1987–2006. Political Studies, 64(2), 260–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kempen, H. (2007). Media-party parallelism and its effects: A cross-national comparative study. Political Communication, 24(3), 303–320. doi:10.1080/10584600701471674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Klingeren, M., Boomgaarden, H. G., Vliegenthart, R., & de Vreese, C. H. (2014). Real world is not enough: The media as an additional source of negative attitudes toward immigration, comparing Denmark and the Netherlands. European Sociological Review, 31(3), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vliegenthart, R. (2007). Framing immigration and integration: Facts, parliament, media and anti-immigrant party support in the Netherlands (Doctoral dissertation). Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1871/13082
   Google Scholar
• Vliegenthart, R. (2012). U Kletstuit Uw Nek. Over de Relatietussen Politiek, Media en de Kiezer [You are talking nonsense! The relation between politics, media and the electorate]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Bert Bakker.
   Google Scholar
• Vliegenthart, R., & Mena Montes, N. (2014). How political and media system characteristics moderate interactions between newspapers and parliaments: Economic crisis attention in Spain and the Netherlands. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 19(3), 318–339. doi:10.1177/1940161214531335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vliegenthart, R., Schuck, A. R. T., Boomgaarden, H. G., & de Vreese, C. H. (2008). News coverage and support for European integration, 1990–2006. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20(4), 415–439. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edn044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vliegenthart, R., & Walgrave, S. (2011). When the media matter for politics: Partisan moderators of the mass media’s agenda-setting influence on parliament in Belgium. Party Politics, 17(3), 321–342. doi:10.1177/1354068810366016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, S., Soroka, S., & Nuytemans, M. (2008). The mass media’s political agenda-setting power: A longitudinal analysis of media, parliament, and government in Belgium (1993 to 2000). Comparative Political Studies, 41(6), 814–836. doi:10.1177/0010414006299098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, S., & Van Aelst, P. (2006). The contingency of the mass media’s political agenda setting power: Toward a preliminary theory. Journal of Communication, 56(1), 88–109. doi:10.1111/jcom.2006.56.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar