In Their Own Words: Political Practitioner Accounts of Candidates, Audiences, Affordances, Genres, and Timing in Strategic Social Media Use

References

• Alexander, J. C. (2010). The performance of politics: Obama’s victory and the democratic struggle for power. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin-Philippi, J. (2015). Using technology, building democracy: Digital campaigning and the construction of citizenship. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C. (2004). Speech acts, genres, and activity systems: How texts organize activity and people. What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices, 309–339.
   Google Scholar
• Bekafigo, M. A., & McBride, A. (2013). Who tweets about politics? Political participation of Twitter users during the 2011 gubernatorial elections. Social Science Computer Review, 31(5), 625–643. doi:10.1177/0894439313490405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bimber, B. (2014). Digital media in the Obama campaigns of 2008 and 2012: Adaptation to the personalized political communication environment. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 11, 130–150. doi:10.1080/19331681.2014.895691
   Google Scholar
• Bode, L., Hanna, A., Yang, J., & Shah, D. V. (2015). Candidate networks, citizen clusters, and political expression: Strategic hashtag use in the 2010 midterms. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 659(1), 149–165. doi:10.1177/0002716214563923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662–679. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright, J. (2016). The social news gap: How news reading and news sharing diverge. Journal of Communication, 66(3), 343–365. doi:10.1111/jcom.2016.66.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coddington, M., Molyneux, L., & Lawrence, R. G. (2014). Fact checking the campaign: How political reporters use Twitter to set the record straight (or not). The International Journal of Press/Politics, 19(4), 391–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, B. A., Kenski, A., & Wang, D. (2013). Twitter use by presidential primary candidates during the 2012 campaign. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(11), 1596–1610. doi:10.1177/0002764213489014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delany, C. (2016). How to use the Internet to win in 2016. Retrieved from http://www.epolitics.com/winning/
   Google Scholar
• Evans, H. K., Cordova, V., & Sipole, S. (2014). Twitter style: An analysis of how House candidates used Twitter in their 2012 campaigns. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(2), 454–462. doi:10.1017/S1049096514000389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, S. K., Pearce, K. E., Vitak, J., & Treem, J. W. (2017). Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(2017), 35–52. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenno, R. F. (1978). Home style: House members in their districts. HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, A., & Medway, P. (Eds.). (2003). Genre in the new rhetoric. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Gainous, J., & Wagner, K. M. (2014). Tweeting to power: The social media revolution in American politics. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., Garcia-Perdomo, V., & McGregor, S. C. (2015). What is second screening? Exploring motivations of second screen use and its effect on online political participation. Journal of Communication, 65(5), 793–815. doi:10.1111/jcom.12174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. (2015). Platforms intervene. Social Media + Society, 1(1).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glassman, M. E., Straus, J. R., & Shogan, C. J. (2010). Social networking and constituent communications: Member use of Twitter during a two-month period in the 111th Congress. Congressional Research Service. Retrieved from http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41066.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Graham, T., Broersma, M., Hazelhoff, K., & van ’t Haar, G. (2013). Between broadcasting political messages and interacting with voters: The use of Twitter during the 2010 UK general election campaign. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 692–716. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.785581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulati, G. J., & Williams, C. B. (2010). Communicating with constituents in 140 characters or less: Twitter and the diffusion of technology innovation in the United States Congress. Proceedings from Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1628247
   Google Scholar
• Hanna, A., Sayre, B., Bode, L., Yang, J., & Shah, D. (2011). Mapping the political Twitterverse: Candidates and their followers in the midterms. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Hersh, E. D. (2015). Hacking the electorate: How campaigns perceive voters. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jungherr, A. (2016a). Four functions of digital tools in election campaigns: The German case. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(3), 358–377. doi:10.1177/1940161216642597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jungherr, A. (2016b). Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(1), 72–91. doi:10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaid, L. L., & Johnston, A. (2001). Videostyle in presidential campaigns: Style and content of televised political advertising. Greenwood Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Karpf, D. (2012). Social science research methods in Internet time. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 639–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpf, D. (2016). Analytic activism: Digital listening and the new political strategy. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kreiss, D. (2012). Taking our country back: The crafting of networked politics from Howard Dean to Barack Obama. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kreiss, D. (2014). Seizing the moment: The presidential campaigns’ use of Twitter during the 2012 electoral cycle. New Media & Society.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiss, D. (2016). Prototype politics: Technology-intensive campaigning and the data of democracy. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kreiss, D. & McGregor, S.C. (forthcoming).Technology Firms Shape Political Communication: The Work of Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter, and Google With Campaigns During the 2016 U.S. Presidential Cycle. Political Communication.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, A. O. (2016). Online, all the time? A quantitative assessment of the permanent campaign on Facebook. New Media & Society, 18(2), 274–292. doi:10.1177/1461444814538798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassen, D. S., & Brown, A. R. (2011). Twitter: The electoral connection? Computer Review, 29, 419–436. doi:10.1177/0894439310382749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, R. G., Molyneux, L., Coddington, M., & Holton, A. (2014). Tweeting conventions: Political journalists’ use of Twitter to cover the 2012 presidential campaign. Journalism Studies, 15(6), 789–806. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2013.836378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomborg, S. (2011). Social media as communicative genres. Mediekultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 27(51), 17. doi:10.7146/mediekultur.v27i51.4012
   Google Scholar
• Lomborg, S. (2013). Social media, social genres: Making sense of the ordinary (vol. 16). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Luker, K. (2008). Salsa dancing into the social sciences. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marwick, A. E., & boyd, D. (2010). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media and Society, 13(1), 114–133. doi:10.1177/1461444810365313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, S. C. (2017). Personalization, social media, and voting: Effects of candidate self-personalization on vote intention. new media & society.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, S. C., Lawrence, R. G., & Cardona, A. (2017). Personalization, gender, and social media: Gubernatorial candidates’ social media strategies. Information, Communication & Society, 20(2), 264–283. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1167228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, E., & Han, H. (2014). Groundbreakers: How Obama’s 2.2 million volunteers transformed campaigning in America. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mourão, R. R. (2015). The boys on the timeline: Political journalists’ use of Twitter for building interpretive communities. Journalism, 16(8), 1107–1123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, C., & Hamilton, J. F. (2015). Open genre, new possibilities: Democratizing history via social media. Rethinking History, 19(2), 222–234. doi:10.1080/13642529.2014.973712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy, P., & Neff, G. (2015). Imagined affordance: Reconstructing a keyword for communication theory. Social Media + Society, 1(2).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (2015). We have always been social. Social Media + Society, 1(1).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmelee, J. H. (2014). The agenda-building function of political tweets. New Media & Society, 16(3), 434–450. doi:10.1177/1461444813487955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2015, August 19). The demographics of social media users. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/19/the-demographics-of-social-media-users/
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2016, November 11). Social media update 2016. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/11/11/social-media-update-2016/
   Google Scholar
• Ryfe, D. M. (2001). History and political communication: An introduction. Political Communication, 18, 407–420. doi:10.1080/10584600152647119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, J. H. (2014). Twitter and the rise of personal publics. Twitter and society, 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Serazio, M. (2014). The new media designs of political consultants: Campaign production in a fragmented era. Journal of Communication, 64, 743–763. doi:10.1111/jcom.2014.64.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanyer, J. (2013). Intimate politics: Publicity, privacy and the personal lives of politicians in media saturated democracies. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Stromer-Galley, J. (2014). Presidential campaigning in the Internet age. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. (2008, September 7). Brave new world of digital intimacy. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/07/magazine/07awareness-t.html
   Google Scholar
• Towner, T. L., & Dulio, D. A. (2012). New media and political marketing in the United States: 2012 and beyond. Journal of Political Marketing, 11(1–2), 95–119. doi:10.1080/15377857.2012.642748
   Google Scholar
• Treem, J. W., & Leonardi, P. M. (2013). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Annals of the International Communication Association, 36(1), 143–189. doi:10.1080/23808985.2013.11679130
   Google Scholar
• Vaccari, C. (2010). “Technology is a commodity”: The Internet in the 2008 United States presidential election. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 7(4), 318–339. doi:10.1080/19331681003656664
   Google Scholar
• Vaccari, C. (2013). Digital politics in Western democracies: A comparative study. JHU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vaccari, C., Chadwick, A., & O’Loughlin, B. (2015). Dual screening the political: Media events, social media, and citizen engagement. Journal of Communication, 65(6), 1041–1061. doi:10.1111/jcom.12187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Aelst, P., Sheafer, T., & Stanyer, J. (2011). The personalization of mediated political communication: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), 203–220. doi:10.1177/1464884911427802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergeer, M., Hermans, L., & Sams, S. (2011). Online social networks and micro-blogging in political campaigning: The exploration of a new campaign tool and a new campaign style. Party Politics, 19(3), 477–501. doi:10.1177/1354068811407580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, C. B., & Gulati, J. (2013). Social networks in political campaigns: Facebook and the congressional elections of 2006 and 2008. New Media & Society, 15(1), 52–71. doi:10.1177/1461444812457332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, G., & Clark, R. (2015). Social media and time. Social Media + Society, 1(1).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar