Agenda-Setting With Satire: How Political Satire Increased TTIP’s Saliency on the Public, Media, and Political Agenda

References

• Abel, A. D., & Barthel, M. (2013). Appropriation of mainstream news: How Saturday Night Live changed the political discussion. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 30(1), 1–16. doi:10.1080/15295036.2012.701011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baek, Y. M., & Wojcieszak, M. E. (2009). Don’t expect too much! Learning from late-night comedy and knowledge item difficulty. Communication Research, 36(6), 783–809. doi:10.1177/0093650209346805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bas, O., & Grabe, M. E. (2015). Emotion-provoking personalization of news: Informing citizens and closing the knowledge gap?Communication Research, 42(2), 159–185. doi:10.1177/0093650213514602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, M. A. (2003). Soft news goes to war: Public opinion and American foreign policy in the new media age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, J., & Morris, J. S. (2006). The Daily show effect: Candidate evaluations, efficacy, and American youth. American Politics Research, 34(3), 341–367. doi:10.1177/1532673X05280074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baym, G. (2005). The Daily Show: Discursive integration and the reinvention of political journalism. Political Communication, 22(3), 259–276. doi:10.1080/10584600591006492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baym, G. (2010). From Cronkite to Colbert: The evolution of broadcast news. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, A. B. (2011). Political humor as democratic relief? The effects of exposure to comedy and straight news on trust and efficacy. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 19(5), 235–250. doi:10.1080/15456870.2011.622191
   Google Scholar
• Becker, A. B. (2013). What about those interviews? The impact of exposure to political comedy and cable news on factual recall and anticipated political expression. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(3), 344–356. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edt014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, A. B., & Bode, L. (2018). Satire as a source for learning? The differential impact of news versus satire exposure on net neutrality knowledge gain. Information, Communication & Society, 21(4), 612–625. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1301517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, A. B., & Waisanen, D. J. (2013). From funny features to entertaining effects: Connecting approaches to communication research on political comedy. Review of Communication, 13(3), 161–183. doi:10.1080/15358593.2013.826816
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58(4), 707–731. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2010). The shifting foundations of political communication: Responding to a defense of the media effects paradigm. Journal of Communication, 60(1), 35–39. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01471.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives (vol. 1): Cognitive domain. New York, NY: McKay.
   Google Scholar
• Borden, S. L., & Tew, C. (2007). The role of journalist and the performance of journalism: Ethical lessons from “fake” news (seriously). Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 22(4), 300–314. doi:10.1080/08900520701583586
   Google Scholar
• Boukes, M., Boomgaarden, H. G., Moorman, M., & de Vreese, C. H. (2015). At odds: Laughing and thinking? The appreciation, processing, and persuasiveness of political satire. Journal of Communication, 65(5), 721–744. doi:10.1111/jcom.12173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boukes, M., & Quintanilla, E. (in press). Shattering the late night glass ceiling: Samantha Bee. In J.Baumgartner (Ed.), American political humor: Masters of satire and their impact on U.S. policy and culture. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
   Google Scholar
• Boumans, J., Trilling, D., Vliegenthart, R., & Boomgaarden, H. (2018). The agency makes the (online) news world go round: The impact of news agency content on print and online news. International Journal of Communication, 12, 1768–1789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, P. R. (2013). Science: Whats it up to? The Daily Show and the social construction of science. International Journal of Communication, 7, 452–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, P. R., & Marquardt, E. (2007). Mock news and democracy: Analyzing The Daily Show. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 15(4), 249–267. doi:10.1080/15456870701465315
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, D. (1997). News media, political socialization and popular citizenship: Towards a new agenda. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 14(4), 344–366. doi:10.1080/15295039709367023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, X. (2010). Hearing it from Jon Stewart: The impact of The Daily Show on public attentiveness to politics. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22(1), 26–46. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edp043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, M., & Peifer, J. T. (2013). The impudence of being earnest: Jon Stewart and the boundaries of discursive responsibility. Journal of Communication, 63(2), 333–350. doi:10.1111/jcom.12019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, H. D., Mishler, W., & Whiteley, P. (1990). Recapturing the Falklands: Models of Conservative popularity, 1979–83. British Journal of Political Science, 20(1), 63–81. doi:10.1017/S0007123400005706
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, S., Kuik, A., & Van Zoonen, L. (2009). Laughter and liability: The politics of British and Dutch television satire. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 11(4), 652–665. doi:10.1111/j.1467-856X.2009.00375.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison, W. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 47(1), 1–15. doi:10.1086/268763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dayan, D., & Katz, E. (1992). Media events: The live broadcasting of history. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, L. (2007). The news about comedy: Young audiences,The Daily Show, and evolving notions of journalism. Journalism, 8(4), 406–427. doi:10.1177/1464884907078655
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, L. (2013). Cloudy with a chance of heat balls: The portrayal of global warming on The Daily Show and The Colbert Report. International Journal of Communication, 7, 430–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, L., & Young, D. G. (2008). Late-night comedy as a gateway to traditional news: An analysis of time trends in news attention among late-night comedy viewers during the 2004 presidential primaries. Political Communication, 25(4), 401–422. doi:10.1080/10584600802427013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferré-Pavia, C., Sintes, M., & Gayà, C. (2016). The perceived effects of televised political satire among viewers and the communication directors of political parties: A European case. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 19(4), 299–317. doi:10.1177/1367549415592892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J. R., Koloen, G., & Sahin, V. M. S. (2007). No joke: A comparison of substance in The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and broadcast network television coverage of the 2004 presidential election campaign. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 51(2), 213–227. doi:10.1080/08838150701304621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golan, G. (2006). Inter-media agenda setting and global news coverage. Journalism Studies, 7(2), 323–333. doi:10.1080/14616700500533643
   Google Scholar
• Graber, D. A. (2004). Mediated politics and citizenship in the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 545–571. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, J. (2006). Watching with The Simpsons: Television, parody, and intertextuality. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J., Jones, J. P., & Thompson, E. (2009). The state of satire, the satire of state. In J.Gray, J. P.Jones, &E.Thompson (Eds.), Satire TV: Politics and comedy in the post-network era (pp. 3–36). New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haigh, M. M., & Heresco, A. (2010). Late-night Iraq: Monologue joke content and tone from 2003 to 2007. Mass Communication and Society, 13(2), 157–173. doi:10.1080/15205430903014884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, B. W., Gottfried, J. A., Winneg, K. M., & Jamieson, K. H. (2014). Stephen Colbert’s civics lesson: How Colbert Super PAC taught viewers about campaign finance. Mass Communication and Society, 17(3), 329–353. doi:10.1080/15205436.2014.891138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heim, K. (2013). Framing the 2008 Iowa democratic caucuses: Political blogs and second-level intermedia agenda setting. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90(3), 500–519. doi:10.1177/1077699013493785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, M. R., & Holbert, R. L. (2017). Jon Stewart and the 9/11 first responders health bill. In C. M.Madere (Ed.), Viewpoints on media effects: Pseudo-reality and its influence on media consumers (pp. 1–18). Lanham, MD: Lexington.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, L. H., & Thomson, T. L. (2009). The effect of television viewing on adolescents’ civic participation: Political efficacy as a mediating mechanism. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53(1), 3–21. doi:10.1080/08838150802643415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, L. H., & Young, D. G. (2011). Satire, punch lines, and the nightly news: Untangling media effects on political participation. Communication Research Reports, 28(2), 159–168. doi:10.1080/08824096.2011.565278
   Google Scholar
• Holbert, R. L., & Grill, C. (2015). Clarifying and expanding the use of confirmatory factor analysis in journalism and mass communication research. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 92(2), 292–319. doi:10.1177/1077699015583718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbert, R. L., Weeks, B. E., & Esralew, S. (2013). Approaching the 2012 U.S. presidential election from a diversity of explanatory principles: Understanding, consistency, and hedonism. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(12), 1663–1687. doi:10.1177/0002764213490693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, R. A., & Hill, T. G. (2005). Agenda-setting and priming in prime time television: Crime dramas as political cues. Political Communication, 22(3), 277–295. doi:10.1080/10584600591006519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, M., & Marien, S. (2013). A comparative analysis of the relation between political trust and forms of political participation in Europe. European Societies, 15(1), 131–152. doi:10.1080/14616696.2012.692807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., Peters, M. D., & Kinder, D. R. (1982). Experimental demonstrations of the “not-so-minimal” consequences of television news programs. The American Political Science Review, 76(4), 848–858. doi:10.2307/1962976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, J. P. (2010). More than “Fart noises and funny faces”: The Daily Show’s coverage of the US recession. Popular Communication, 8(3), 165–169. doi:10.1080/15405702.2010.493443
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J. P., Baym, G., & Day, A. (2012). Mr. Stewart and Mr. Colbert go to Washington: Television satirists outside the box. Social Research, 79(1), 33–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaMarre, H. L. (2013). When parody and reality collide: Examining the effects of Colbert’s super PAC satire on issue knowledge and policy engagement across media formats. International Journal of Communication, 7(Breaking Boundaries), 394–413.
   Google Scholar
• LaMarre, H. L., Landreville, K. D., Young, D., & Gilkerson, N. (2014). Humor works in funny ways: Examining satirical tone as a key determinant in political humor message processing. Mass Communication and Society, 17(3), 400–423. doi:10.1080/15205436.2014.891137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaMarre, H. L., & Walther, W. (2013). Ability matters: Testing the differential effects of political news and late-night political comedy on cognitive responses and the role of ability in micro-level opinion formation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(3), 303–322. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edt008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landreville, K. D., Holbert, R. L., & LaMarre, H. L. (2010). The influence of late-night TV comedy viewing on political talk: A moderated-mediation model. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 15(4), 482–498. doi:10.1177/1940161210371506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landreville, K. D., & LaMarre, H. L. (2013). Examining the intertextuality of fictional political comedy and real-world political news. Media Psychology, 16(3), 347–369. doi:10.1080/15213269.2013.796585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H., & Jang, S. M. (2017). Talking about what provokes us. American Politics Research, 45(1), 128–154. doi:10.1177/1532673X16657805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Matsa, K. E. (2018). Across Western Europe, public news media are widely used and trusted sources of news. Pew Research Center, FactTank. Retrieved fromhttp://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/06/08/western-europe-public-news-media-widely-used-and-trusted/
   Google Scholar
• Mattheiß, T., Weinmann, C., Löb, C., Rauhe, K., Bartsch, K., Roth, F. S., … Vorderer, P. (2013). Political learning through entertainment – Only an illusion?. Journal of Media Psychology, 25(4), 171–179. doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000100
   Google Scholar
• Maurer, M., & Holbach, T. (2016). Taking online search queries as an indicator of the public agenda. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(3), 572–586. doi:10.1177/1077699015610072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombs, M. (2005). A look at agenda-setting: Past, present and future. Journalism Studies, 6(4), 543–557. doi:10.1080/14616700500250438
   Google Scholar
• McCombs, M. (2014). Setting the agenda: Mass media and public opinion (2nd ed.). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. doi:10.1086/267990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, J. M., Becker, L. B., & Byrnes, J. E. (1974). Another look at the agenda-setting function of the press. Communication Research, 1(2), 131–166. doi:10.1177/009365027400100201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meddaugh, P. M. (2010). Bakhtin, Colbert, and the center of discourse: Is there no “truthiness” in humor?Critical Studies in Media Communication, 27(4), 376–390. doi:10.1080/15295030903583606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaud Wild, N. (2015). Dumb vs. fake: Representations of Bush and Palin on Saturday Night Live and their effects on the journalistic public sphere. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59(3), 494–508. doi:10.1080/08838151.2015.1055001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moy, P., Xenos, M. A., & Hess, V. K. (2005). Communication and citizenship: Mapping the political effects of infotainment. Mass Communication and Society, 8(2), 111–131. doi:10.1207/s15327825mcs0802_3
   Google Scholar
• Nabi, R. L., Moyer-Gusé, E., & Byrne, S. (2007). All joking aside: A serious investigation into the persuasive effect of funny social issue messages. Communication Monographs, 74(1), 29–54. doi:10.1080/03637750701196896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., Levy, D. A. L., & Kleis Nielsen, R. (2017). Reuters institute: Digital news report 2017. Oxford, United Kingdom: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
   Google Scholar
• Painter, C., & Hodges, L. (2010). Mocking the news: How The Daily Show with Jon Stewart holds traditional broadcast news accountable. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 25(4), 257–274. doi:10.1080/08900523.2010.512824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paletz, D. L. (1990). Political humor and authority: From support to subversion. International Political Science Review/Revue Internationale De Science Politique, 11(4), 483–493.
   Google Scholar
• Pavitt, C. (2010). Alternative approaches to theorizing in communication science. In C. R.Berger, M. E.Roloff, &D. R.Roskos-Ewoldsen (Eds.), The handbook of communication science (pp. 37–54). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. doi:10.4135/9781412982818.n3
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, I., & Boler, M. (2014). The Rally to Restore Sanity, prepoliticization, and the future of politics. Communication, Culture & Critique, 7(4), 435–452. doi:10.1111/cccr.12057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripberger, J. T. (2011). Capturing curiosity: Using internet search trends to measure public attentiveness. Policy Studies Journal, 39(2), 239–259. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00406.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roessler, P. (2008). Agenda-setting, framing and priming. In W.Donsbach&M. W.Traugot (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of public opinion research (pp. 205–218). London, UK: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781848607910.n20
   Google Scholar
• Scharkow, M., & Vogelgesang, J. (2011). Measuring the public agenda using search engine queries. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 23(1), 104–113. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edq048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication & Society, 3(2), 297–316. doi:10.1207/S15327825MCS0323_07
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, S. R. (1994). Effects of humor on sentence memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4), 953–967. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.953
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheafer, T. (2007). How to evaluate it: The role of story‐evaluative tone in agenda setting and priming. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 21–39. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00327.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheafer, T., & Weimann, G. (2005). Agenda building, agenda setting, priming, individual voting intentions, and the aggregate results: An analysis of four Israeli elections. Journal of Communication, 55(2), 347–365. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02676.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, S. (2000). Schindler’s list’s intermedia influence: Exploring the role of “entertainment” in media agenda-setting. Canadian Journal of Communication, 25(2), 211–230. doi:10.22230/cjc.2000v25n2a1152
   Google Scholar
• Tan, Y., & Weaver, D. H. (2007). Agenda-setting effects among the media, the public, and congress, 1946–2004. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 84(4), 729–744. doi:10.1177/107769900708400405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Loon, W. (2017, March31). Plots bepaalde Lubach het gesprek van de dag [Suddenly, Lubach determined the talk of the day]. Metro, pp. 3. Retrieved fromhttps://www.metronieuws.nl/nieuws/showbizz/2017/03/ook-politici-benieuwd-wie-gaat-lubach-nu-aanpakken
   Google Scholar
• Vargo, C. J., & Guo, L. (2017). Networks, big data, and intermedia agenda setting: An analysis of traditional, partisan, and emerging online U.S. news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(4), 1031–1055. doi:10.1177/1077699016679976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vesnic-Alujevic, L. (2012). Political participation and web 2.0 in Europe: A case study of Facebook. Public Relations Review, 38(3), 466–470. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vliegenthart, R., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2007). Real-world indicators and the coverage of immigration and the integration of minorities in Dutch newspapers. European Journal of Communication, 22(3), 293–314. doi:10.1177/0267323107079676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vliegenthart, R., & Walgrave, S. (2008). The contingency of intermedia agenda setting: A longitudinal study in Belgium. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 85(4), 860–877. doi:10.1177/107769900808500409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vliegenthart, R., & Walgrave, S. (2011). When the media matter for politics: Partisan moderators of the mass media’s agenda-setting influence on parliament in Belgium. Party Politics, 17(3), 321–342. doi:10.1177/1354068810366016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, S., Boydstun, A. E., Vliegenthart, R., & Hardy, A. (2017). The nonlinear effect of information on political attention: Media storms and U.S. congressional hearings. Political Communication, 34(4), 548–570. doi:10.1080/10584609.2017.1289288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, S., Soroka, S., & Nuytemans, M. (2008). The mass media’s political agenda-setting power. Comparative Political Studies, 41(6), 814–836. doi:10.1177/0010414006299098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, S., & Van Aelst, P. (2006). The contingency of the mass media’s political agenda setting power: Toward a preliminary theory. Journal of Communication, 56(1), 88–109. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00005.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanta, W., & Hu, Y. (1994). Time-lag differences in the agenda-setting process: An examination of five news media. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 6(3), 225–240. doi:10.1093/ijpor/6.3.225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watt, J. H., Mazza, M., & Snyder, L. (1993). Agenda-setting effects of television news coverage and the effects decay curve. Communication Research, 20(3), 408–435. doi:10.1177/009365093020003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, D. H. (1980). Audience need for orientation and media effects. Communication Research, 7(3), 361–373. doi:10.1177/009365028000700305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welbers, K., Van Atteveldt, W., Kleinnijenhuis, J., & Ruigrok, N. (2018). A gatekeeper among gatekeepers. Journalism Studies, 19(3), 315–333. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2016.1190663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte, C. E. (2016). Thinking inside the (black) box: Agenda setting, information seeking, and the marketplace of ideas in the 2012 presidential election. New Media & Society, 18(8), 1680–1697. doi:10.1177/1461444814567985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, B. A., & Delli Carpini, M. X. (2011). After broadcast news: Media regimes, democracy, and the new information environment. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xenos, M. A., & Becker, A. B. (2009). Moments of Zen: Effects of The Daily Show on information seeking and political learning. Political Communication, 26(3), 317–332. doi:10.1080/10584600903053569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, D. G. (2008). The privileged role of the late-night joke: Exploring humor’s role in disrupting argument scrutiny. Media Psychology, 11(1), 119–142. doi:10.1080/15213260701837073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, D. G. (2011). Political entertainment and the press’ construction of Sarah Feylin. Popular Communication, 9(4), 251–265. doi:10.1080/15405702.2011.605314
   Google Scholar
• Young, D. G. (2013). Laughter, learning, or enlightenment? Viewing and avoidance motivations behind The Daily Show and The Colbert Report. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57(2), 153–169. doi:10.1080/08838151.2013.787080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, D. G., & Hoffman, L. (2012). Acquisition of current-events knowledge from political satire programming: An experimental approach. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 20(5), 290–304. doi:10.1080/15456870.2012.728121
   Google Scholar
• Young, D. G., & Tisinger, R. M. (2006). Dispelling late-night myths: News consumption among late-night comedy viewers and the predictors of exposure to various late-night shows. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 11(3), 113–134. doi:10.1177/1081180X05286042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar