“That Looks Hard!”: Effects of Objective and Perceived Textual Complexity on Factual and Structural Political Knowledge

References

• Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 219–235. doi:10.1177/1088868309341564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, P. (2010). Representations of Islam in British broadsheet and tabloid newspapers 1999–2005. Journal of Language and Politics, 9, 310–338. doi:10.1075/jlp
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barabas, J., Jerit, J., Pollock, W., & Rainey, C. (2014). The question(s) of political knowledge. American Political Science Review, 108, 840–855. doi:10.1017/S0003055414000392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, L. M. (2005). Homer gets a tax cut: Inequality and public policy in the American mind. Perspectives on Politics, 3, 15–31. doi:10.1017/S1537592705050036
   Google Scholar
• Bischof, D., & Senninger, R. (2018). Simple politics for the people? Complexity in campaign messages and political knowledge. European Journal of Political Research, 57, 473–495. doi:10.1111/ejpr.2018.57.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Feng Kao, C. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306–307. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212–252). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1975). The logical structure of linguistic theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Ö. (2004). The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1993). Measuring political knowledge: Putting first things first. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 1179–1206. doi:10.2307/2111549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlosky, J., Baker, J., Rawson, K. A., & Hertzog, C. (2006). Does aging influence people’s metacomprehension? Effects of processing ease on judgments of text learning. Psychology and Aging, 21, 390–400. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P., Cortese, J., Park, H., & Dunwoody, S. (2004). How Web site organization influences free recall, factual knowledge, and knowledge structure density. Human Communication Research, 30, 208–233. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00731.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P., & Hively, M. H. (2009). Political discussion frequency, network size, and “heterogeneity” of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation. Journal of Communication, 59(2), 205–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P., & Hively, M. H. (2011). Political knowledge. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of communication. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P., Marton, K., & Seo, M. (2004). Moving beyond “just the facts”: The influence of online news on the content and structure of public affairs knowledge. Communication Research, 31, 82–108. doi:10.1177/0093650203260203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P., & Schmitt, J. B. (2015). Communication content and knowledge content matters: Integrating manipulation and observation in studying news and discussion learning effects. Journal of Communication, 65, 170–191. doi:10.1111/jcom.12138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flesch, R. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32, 221–233. doi:10.1037/h0057532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funke, R., Wieland, R., Schönenberg, S., & Melzer, F. (2013). Exploring syntactic structures in first-language education: Effects on literacy-related achievements. L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 13, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68, 1–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., & Levine, W. H. (2002). Memory-load interference in syntactic processing. Psychological Science, 13, 425–430. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graber, D. A. (2001). Processing politics: Learning from television in the Internet age. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heil, M., Rolke, B., & Pecchinenda, A. (2004). Automatic semantic activation is no myth: Semantic context effects on the N400 in the letter-search task in the absence of response time effects. Psychological Science, 15, 852–857. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00766.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai, K., Keele, L., & Tingley, D. (2010). A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychological Methods, 15, 309–334. doi:10.1037/a0020761
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, J. V., & Barabas, J. (2019). No harm in checking: Using factual manipulation checks to assess attentiveness in experiments. American Journal of Political Science, 63, 234–249. doi:10.1111/ajps.2019.63.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinnijenhuis, J. (1991). Newspaper complexity and the knowledge gap. European Journal of Communication, 6, 499–522. doi:10.1177/0267323191006004006
   Google Scholar
• Koriat, A., Ackerman, R., Lockl, K., & Schneider, W. (2009). The memorizing effort heuristic in judgments of learning: A developmental perspective. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 265–279. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2008.10.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koriat, A., & Ma’ayan, H. (2005). The effects of encoding fluency and retrieval fluency on judgments of learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 478–492. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, A., Park, B., Sanders-Jackson, A. N., Wilson, B. D., & Wang, Z. (2007). Cognition and emotion in TV message processing: How valence, arousing content, structural complexity, and information density affect the availability of cognitive resources. Media Psychology, 10, 317–338. doi:10.1080/15213260701532880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leroy, G., Helmreich, S., & Cowie, J. R. (2010). The influence of text characteristics on perceived and actual difficulty of health information. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 79, 438–449. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y. I., Shen, F., Eveland, W. P., & Dylko, I. (2013). The impact of news use and news content characteristics on political knowledge and participation. Mass Communication & Society, 16, 713–737. doi:10.1080/15205436.2013.778285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowrey, T. M. (1998). The effects of syntactic complexity on advertising persuasiveness. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7, 187–206. doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp0702_04
   Google Scholar
• Lupia, A. (2016). Uninformed: Why people know so little about politics and what we can do about it. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, P. M., & Jarvis, S. (2010). MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 381–392. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.2.381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messing, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2014). Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online. Communication Research, 41, 1042–1063. doi:10.1177/0093650212466406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitkov, R. (2005). The Oxford handbook of computational linguistics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nadkarni, S., & Gupta, R. (2007). A task-based model of perceived website complexity. MIS Quarterly, 31, 501–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, W. R. (1986). The paradox of mass politics: Knowledge and opinion in the American electorate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J. (2003). Message properties, mediating states, and manipulation checks: Claims, evidence, and data analysis in experimental persuasive message effects research. Communication Theory, 13, 251–274. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00292.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, D. M. (2006). Consequences of erudite vernacular utilized irrespective of necessity: Problems with using long words needlessly. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 139–156. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., Tormala, Z. L., & Wegener, D. T. (2007). The role of metacognition in social judgment. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 254–284). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (Eds.). (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion.  In Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change (pp. 1–24). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, M. (2014). Visual political knowledge: A different road to competence? The Journal of Politics, 76, 41–57. doi:10.1017/S0022381613001096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reah, D. (2002). The language of newspapers. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rhee, J. W., & Cappella, J. N. (1997). The role of political sophistication in learning from news: Measuring schema development. Communication Research, 24, 197–233. doi:10.1177/009365097024003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2006). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57, 9–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N. (2011). Feelings-as-information theory. In P. van Lange, A. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 289–308). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., & Simons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195–202. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, H. C., & Sweitzer, M. D. (2018). Varying metacognition through public opinion questions: How language can affect political engagement. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 37(2), 224–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotirovic, M. (2001). Effects of media use on complexity and extremity of attitudes toward the death penalty and prisoners’ rehabilitation. Media Psychology, 3, 1–24. doi:10.1207/S1532785XMEP0301_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spirling, A. (2016). Democratization and linguistic complexity: The effect of franchise extension on parliamentary discourse, 1832–1915. The Journal of Politics, 78, 120–136. doi:10.1086/683612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strömbäck, J. (2005). In search of a standard: Four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism. Journalism Studies, 6, 331–345. doi:10.1080/14616700500131950
   Google Scholar
• Suedfeld, P., & Tetlock, P. (1977). Integrative complexity of communications in international crises. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 21, 169–184. doi:10.1177/002200277702100108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao, C. C., & Bucy, E. P. (2007). Conceptualizing media stimuli in experimental research: Psychological versus attribute-based definitions. Human Communication Research, 33, 397–426. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00305.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tingley, D., Yamamoto, T., Hirose, K., Keele, L., & Imai, K. (2014). Mediation: R package for causal mediation analysis. Journal of Statistical Software., 59, 1–38. doi:10.18637/jss.v059.i13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolochko, P., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2018). Analysis of linguistic complexity in professional and citizen media. Journalism Studies, 19(12), 1786–1803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolochko, P., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2019). Determining political text complexity: Conceptualizations, measurements, and application. International Journal of Communication, 13(21), 1784–1804.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, K., & Liu, H. (2000). Discovering structural association of semistructured data. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 12, 353–371. doi:10.1109/69.846290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. L., & Windschitl, P. D. (1999). Stimulus sampling and social psychological experimentation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1115–1125. doi:10.1177/01461672992512005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., Fazendeiro, T., & Reber, R. (2003). The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment. In J. Musch & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 189–217). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar