References
- Ahler, D., Citrin, J., Dougal, M., & Lenz, G. (2017). Face value? Experimental evidence that candidate appearance influences electoral choice. Political Behavior, 39(1), 77–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9348-6
- Anastasopoulos, L. J., Badani, D., Lee, C., Ginosar, S., & Williams, J. (2016). Photographic home styles in congress: A computer vision approach. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1611.09942. https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.09942
- Antonakis, J., & Dalgas, O. (2009). Predicting elections: Child’s play! Science, 323(5918), 1183. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167748
- Antonakis, J., & Eubanks, D. (2017). Looking leadership in the face. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(3), 270–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417705888
- Argyle, M., Alkema, F., & Gilmour, R. (1971). The communication of friendly and hostile attitudes by verbal and nonverbal signals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(3), 385–402. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420010307
- Argyle, M., Salter, V., Nicholson, H., Williams, M., & Burgess, P. (1970). The communication of inferior and superior attitudes by verbal and nonverbal signals. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9(3), 222–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1970.tb00668.x
- Bauer, N. M. (2017). The effects of counterstereotypic gender strategies on candidate evaluations. Political Psychology, 38(2), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12351
- Benoit, W., Hansen, G., & Verser, R. (2003). A meta-analysis of the effects of viewing us presidential debates. Communication Monographs, 70(4), 335–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02251887
- Birdwhistell, R. (1955). ETC: A review of general semantics. In Background to kinesics (Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 10–18).
- Boehm, C. (1999). Hierarchy in the forest: Egalitarianism and the evolution of human altruism. Harvard University Press.
- Boydstun, A., Glazier, R., Pietryka, M., & Resnik, P. (2014). Real-time reactions to a 2012 presidential debate: A method for understanding which messages matter. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(1), 330–343. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfu007
- Brooks, D. J. (2011). Testing the double standard for candidate emotionality: Voter reactions to the tears and anger of male and female politicians. The Journal of Politics, 73(2), 597–615. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381611000053
- Brooks, D. J. (2013). He runs, she runs: Why gender stereotypes do not harm women candidates. Princeton University Press.
- Bruschke, J., & Divine, L. (2017). Debunking Nixon’s radio victory in the 1960 election: Re-analyzing the historical record and considering currently unexamined polling data. The Social Science Journal, 54(1), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2016.09.007
- Bucy, E. (2016). The look of losing, then and now: Nixon, obama, and nonverbal indicators of opportunity lost. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(14), 1772–1798. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764216678279
- Bucy, E., & Gong, Z. (2018). In/appropriate aggression in presidential debate: How trump’s nonverbal displays intensified verbal norm violations. In C. Senior (Ed.), 2016. In the facial displays of leaders (pp. 73–95). Palgrave Macmillan.
- Bucy, E., & Newhagen, J. (1999). The emotional appropriateness heuristic: Processing televised presidential reactions to the news. Journal of Communication, 49(4), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02817.x
- Bucy, E., & Stewart, P. (2018). The personalization of campaigns: Nonverbal cues in presidential debates. In Oxford research encyclopedias series. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.52
- Bucy, E. P., & Grabe, M. E. (2008). “Happy warriors” revisited: Hedonic and agonic display repertoires of presidential candidates on the evening news. Politics and the Life Sciences, 27(1), 78–98. https://doi.org/10.2990/27_1_78
- Budesheim, T., & DePaola, S. (1994). Beauty or the beast? The effects of appearance, personality, and issue information on evaluations of political candidates. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(4), 339–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294204001
- Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018). Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency (pp. 77–91). Nice, France.
- Burgoon, J. K., Guerrero, L. K., & Manusov, V. (2011). Nonverbal signals. In Knapp, M. L., & Daly, J. A. (Eds.). The SAGE handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 239–280). Sage Publications.
- Bush, L. K., Barr, C. L., McHugo, G. J., & Lanzetta, J. T. (1989). The effects of facial control and facial mimicry on subjective reactions to comedy routines. Motivation and Emotion, 13(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00995543
- Campbell, R., Benson, P., Wallace, S., Doesbergh, S., & Coleman, M. (1999). More about brows: How poses that change brow position affect perceptions of gender. Perception, 28(4), 489–504. https://doi.org/10.1068/p2784
- Camras, L. (1980). Children’s understanding of facial expressions used during conflict encounters. In L. A. Camras (Ed.), Child development (Vol. 48, No. 4, pp. 1431–1435).
- Cantú, F. (2019). The fingerprints of fraud: Evidence from mexico’s 1988 presidential election. American Political Science Review, 113(3), 710–726. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000285
- Carpini, M., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. Yale University Press.
- Casas, A., & Williams, N. W. (2019). Images that matter: Online protests and the mobilizing role of pictures. Political Research Quarterly, 72(2), 360–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912918786805
- Cassese, E. C., & Holman, M. R. (2019). Playing the woman card: Ambivalent sexism in the 2016 U.S. Presidential race. Political Psychology, 40(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12492
- Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (editors). (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. Guilford Press.
- Chance, M. (1976). The organization of attention in groups. Methods of inference from animal to human behavior: Proceedings of the Conference on “The Logic of Inference from Animal to Human Behavior” held in Murten, Switzerland, in March 1973.
- Cohn, J., & Ekman, P. (2005). Measuring facial action. In J. A. Harrigan, R. A. Rosenthal, K. R., & Scherer (Eds.), The new handbook of methods in nonverbal behavior research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Coleman, S. (2000). Televised election debates. International perspectives.
- Darwin, C. (1872). In F. Darwin, P. H. Barrett, & R. B. Freeman (Eds.), The expression of the emotions in man and animals: Works of Charles Darwin (Vol 23). Routledge.
- De Waal, F., & Waal, F. B. (2007). Chimpanzee politics: Power and sex among apes. JHU Press.
- Dietrich, B. J., Hayes, M., & O’Brien, D. Z. (2017). Pitch perfect: Vocal pitch and the emotional intensity of congressional speech. American Political Science Review, 113(4), 941–962. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000467
- Druckman, J. (2003). The power of television images: The first Kennedy Nixon debate revisited. The Journal of Politics, 65(2), 559–571. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.t01-1-00015
- Efrain, M., & Patterson, E. (1974). Voters vote beautiful: The effect of physical appearance on a national election. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du, 6(4), 352–356. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0081881
- Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1979). Ritual and ritualization from a biological perspective. In Human ethology: Claims and limits of a new discipline. University Press.
- Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (2003). Unmasking the face: A guide to recognizing emotions from facial clues. Ishk.
- Fein, S., Goethals, G. R., & Kugler, M. B. (2007). Social influence on political judgments: The case of presidential debates. Political Psychology, 28(2), 165–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00561.x
- Fridkin, K. L., Gershon, S. A., Courey, J., & LaPlant, K. (2019). Gender differences in emotional reactions to the first 2016 presidential debate. Political Behavior, 1–31. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11109-019-09546-9
- Friedenberg, R. (1997). Patterns and trends in national political debates: 1960-1992. rhetorical studies of. In R. V. Friedenberg (Ed.), National political debates—1996 (pp. 61–90). Praeger.
- Garcia, M. (2016). Racist in the machine: The disturbing implications of algorithmic bias. World Policy Journal, 33(4), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1215/07402775-3813015
- Hass, H. (1970). The human animal. Delta.
- Hellweg, S. A., Pfau, M., & Brydon, S. R. (1992). Televised presidential debates: Advocacy in contemporary America. Praeger Publishers.
- Hitchon, J. C., Chang, C., & Harris, R. (1997). Should women emote? Perceptual bias and opinion change in response to political ads for candidates of different genders. Political Communication, 14(1), 49–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846097199533
- Hughes, S., & Bucy, E. (2016). Moments of partisan divergence in presidential debates: Indicators of verbal and nonverbal influence. In D. Schill, R. Kirk, & A. Jasperson (Eds.), Political communication in real time: Theoretical and applied research approaches (pp. 249–274). Routledge.
- Jarman, J. (2005). Political affiliation and presidential debates: A real-time analysis of the effect of the arguments used in the presidential debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(2), 229–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764205280921
- Joo, J., Bucy, E. P., & Seidel, C. (2019). Computational communication science— Automated coding of televised leader displays: Detecting nonverbal political behavior with computer vision and deep learning. International Journal of Communication, 13, 23.
- Joo, J., & Steinert-Threlkeld, Z. (2018). Image as data: Automated visual content analysis for political science. arxiv preprint arXiv:1810.01544.
- Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697
- Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan.
- Kirk, R., & Schill, D. (2014). CNN’s dial testing of the presidential debates. In J. A. Hendricks, & L. L. Kaid (Eds.), Techno politics in presidential campaigning: New voices, new technologies, and new voters (pp. 131–151). Routledge.
- Kraus, S. (1996). Winners of the first 1960 televised presidential debate between Kennedy and Nixon. Journal of Communication, 46(4), 78–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01507.x
- Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. (2012). Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In F. Pereira, C. J. C. Burges, L. Bottou, & K. Q. Weinberger (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 1097–1105). Curran Associates, Inc. http://papers.nips.cc/paper/4824-imagenet-classification-with-deep-convolutional-neural-networks.pdf
- Lanoue, D., & Schrott, P. (1989). Voters’ reactions to televised presidential debates: Measurement of the source and magnitude of opinion change. Political Psychology.
- Lanzetta, J., Sullivan, D., Masters, R., & McHugo, G. (1985). Emotional and cognitive responses to televised images of political leaders. Mass media and political thought: An information-processing approach. SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Lanzetta, J. T., & Orr, S. P. (1980). Influence of facial expressions on the classical conditioning of fear. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077713
- LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. nature, 521(7553), 436. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539
- LeCun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998). Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE (Vol. 86, pp. 2278–2324).
- Little, A., Burriss, R., Jones, B., & Roberts, S. (2007). Facial appearance affects voting decisions. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.09.002
- Little, A., Roberts, S., Jones, B., & DeBruine, L. (2012). The perception of attractiveness and trustworthiness in male faces affects hypothetical voting decisions differently in wartime and peacetime scenarios. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(10), 2018–2032. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.677048
- Lorenz, K. (1966). On aggression. Routledge.
- Masters, R. (1989). The nature of politics. Yale University Press.
- Masters, R. D., Sullivan, D. G., Feola, A., & McHugo, G. J. (1987). Television coverage of candidates’ display behavior during the 1984 democratic primaries in the united states. International Political Science Review, 8(2), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251218700800203
- Masters, R. D., Sullivan, D. G., Lanzetta, J. T., McHugo, G. J., & Englis, B. G. (1986). The facial displays of leaders: Toward an ethology of human politics. Journal of Social & Biological Structures, 9(4), 319–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-1750(86)90190-9
- McArthur, L., & Baron, R. (1983). Toward an ecological theory of social perception. Psychological Review, 90(3), 215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.90.3.215
- McNeil, D. (1970). The acquisition of language: The study of developmental psycholinguistics. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc.
- Mehrabian, A., & Wiener, M. (1967). Decoding of inconsistent communications. Journal of personality and social. psychology, 6(1), 109. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024532
- Messaris, P., & Abraham, L. (2001). The role of images in framing news stories. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, Jr., A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life (pp. 231–242). Routledge.
- Montepare, J., & Dobish, H. (2003). The contribution of emotion perceptions and their overgeneralizations to trait impressions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27(4), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027332800296
- Nagel, F., Maurer, M., & Reinemann, C. (2012). Is there a visual dominance in political communication? How verbal, visual, and vocal communication shape viewers’ impressions of political candidates. Journal of Communication, 62(5), 833–850. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01670.x
- Olivola, C., & Todorov, A. (2010). Elected in 100 milliseconds: Appearance-based trait inferences and voting. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34(2), 83–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-009-0082-1
- Pennebaker, J. W., Francis, M. E., & Booth, R. J. (2001). Linguistic inquiry and word count: Liwc 2001. Mahway: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 71(2001), 2001. https://doi.org/10.1.1.600.7227
- Reinemann, C., & Maurer, M. (2005). Unifying or polarizing? Short-term effects and postdebate consequences of different rhetorical strategies in televised debates. Journal of Communication, 55(4), 775–794. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb03022.x
- Richell, R., Mitchell, D., Peschardt, K., Winston, J., Leonard, A., & Dolan, R. (2005). Trust and distrust: The perception of trustworthiness of faces in psychopathic and non-psychopathic offenders. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(8), 1735–1744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.11.017
- Salter, F. (1995). Emotions in command: A naturalistic study of institutional dominance. Oxford University Press.
- Schill, D., & Kirk, R. (2014). Courting the swing voter: “real time” insights into the 2008 and 2012 us presidential debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(4), 536–555. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213506204
- Schill, D., Kirk, R., & Jasperson, A. E. (2016). Political communication in real time: Theoretical and applied research approaches. Taylor & Francis.
- Schmidt, K., & Cohn, J. (2001). Human facial expressions as adaptations: Evolutionary questions in facial expression research. American Journal of Physical Anthropology: The Official Publication of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists, 116(33), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.20001
- Schwemmer, C., Bello-Pardo, E., Knight, C., Lockhart, J. W., Oklobdzija, S., Pozzana, I., & Schoonvelde, M. (2018). The politics of social media images: Potentials and biases of image recognition algorithms for studying congressional behavior. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/as25q
- Senior, C., Phillips, M., Barnes, J., & David, A. (1999). An investigation into the perception of dominance from schematic faces: A study using the world-wide. Web. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31(2), 341–346. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207730
- Somit, A., & Peterson, S. (1997). Darwinism, dominance, and democracy: The biological bases of authoritarianism. Praeger Publishers.
- Stewart, P., Salter, F., & Mehu, M. (2011). The face as a focus of political communication: Evolutionary perspectives and the ethological methods. The sourcebook for political communication research. Routledge.
- Stewart, P. A., Eubanks, A. D., Dye, R. G., Gong, Z. H., Bucy, E. P., Wicks, R. H., & Eidelman, S. (2018). Candidate performance and observable audience response: Laughter and applause–cheering during the first 2016 Clinton–Trump presidential debate. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1182. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01182
- Sullivan, D., & Masters, R. (1988). Happy warriors”: Leaders’ facial displays, viewers. Emotions, and Political Support. American Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 345–368. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111127
- Tiedens, L. Z. (2001). Anger and advancement versus sadness and subjugation: The effect of negative emotion expressions on social status conferral. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 86. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.86
- Todorov, A., Mandisodza, A., Goren, A., & Hall, C. (2005). Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science, 308(5728), 1623–1626. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1110589
- Todorov, A., Olivola, C., Dotsch, R., & Mende-Siedlecki, P. (2015). Social attributions from faces: Determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance. Annual Review of Psychology, 66(1), 519–545. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143831
- Todorov, A., Said, C., Engell, A., & Oosterhof, N. (2008). Understanding evaluation of faces on social dimensions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(12), 455–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.10.001
- Torres, M. (2018). Give me the full picture: Using computer vision to understand visual frames and political communication. http://qssi. psu. edu/new-faces-papers-2018/torres-computer-vision-and-politicalcommunication
- Trichas, S., & Schyns, B. (2012). The face of leadership: Perceiving leaders from facial expression. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(3), 545–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.12.007
- Trichas, S., Schyns, B., Lord, R., & Hall, R. (2017). “Facing” leaders: Facial expression and leadership perception. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(2), 317–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.10.013
- Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
- Van Hooff, J. (1967). The facial displays of the catarrhine monkeys and apes. In D. Morris (Ed.), Primate ethology (pp. 7–68). AldineTransaction.
- Vancil, D. L., & Pendell, S. D. (1987). The myth of viewer-listener disagreement in the first Kennedy-Nixon debate. Central States Speech Journal, 38(1), 16–27. Routledge.
- Way, B. M., & Masters, R. D. (1996). Political attitudes: Interactions of cognition and affect. Motivation and Emotion, 20(3), 205–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02251887
- Zhang, H., & Pan, J. (2019). CASM: A deep-learning approach for identifying collective action events with text and image data from social media. Sociological Methodology, 49(1), 1–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081175019860244
- Zhu, J., Milavsky, J., & Biswas, R. (1994). Do televised debates affect image perception more than issue knowledge? a study of the first. Human Communication Research, 20(3), 302–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1994.tb00325.x