Computational Social Science and the Study of Political Communication

References

• Azucar, D., Marengo, D., & Settanni, M. (2018). Predicting the big 5 personality traits from digital footprints on social media: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 124(1), 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.12.018
   Google Scholar
• Bail, C. A., Argyle, L. P., Brown, T. W., Bumpus, J. P., Chen, H., Hunzaker, M. B. F., Lee, J., Mann, M., Merhout, F., & Volfovsky, A. (2018). Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(37), 9216–9221. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804840115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barberá, P. (2015). Birds of the same feather tweet together: Bayesian ideal point estimation using Twitter data. Political Analysis, 23(1), 76–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpu011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barberá, P., Boydstun, A. E., Linn, S., McMahon, R., & Nagler, J. (2020). Automated text classification of news articles: A practical guide. Political Analysis, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2020.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, K. (2020). Text as data: An overview. In L. Cuirini & R. Franzese, (Eds.), The sage handbook of research methods in political science and international relations (pp. 461–497). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526486387.n29
   Google Scholar
• Berinsky, A.J. (2020). New Directions in Public Opinion Research (3rd Edition). Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Bond, R. M., Fariss, C. J., Jones, J. J., Kramer, A. D. I., Marlow, C., Settle, J. E., & Fowler, J. H. (2012). A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature, 489(7415), 295–298. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruns, A. (2019). After the ‘APIcalypse’: Social media platforms and their fight against critical scholarly research. Information Communication and Society, 22(11), 1544–1566. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1637447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chancellor, S., & Choudhury, M. D. (2020). Methods in predictive techniques for mental health status on social media: A critical review. Npj Digital Medicine, 3(43), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-0233-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Christensen, G., Freese, J., & Miguel, E. (2019). Transparent and reproducible social science research: How to do open science. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Citron, D. K., & Pasquale, F. (2014). The scored society: Due process fo automated predictions. Washington Law Review, 89(1), 1–33. https://www.law.uw.edu/wlr/print-edition/print-edition/vol-89/1/the-scored-society-due-process-for-automated-predictions
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elster, J. (2015). Explaining social behavior: More nuts and bolts for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107763111
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerk, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freelon, D. (2014). On the interpretation of digital trace data in communication and social computing research. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2013.875018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freelon, D. (2018). Computational research in the post-api age. Political Communication, 35(4), 665–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1477506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. (2012). Social science methodology: A unified framework (2nd ed. ed.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilardi, F., Baumgartner, L., Dermont, C., Donnay, K., Gessler, T., Kubli, M., … Müller, S. (2020). Building research infrastructures to study digital technology and politics: Lessons from Switzerland. (Working Paper). https://www.fabriziogilardi.org/resources/papers/Research_Infrastructures_Digital_Technology_and_Politics.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Golder, S. A., & Macy, M. W. (2014). Digital footprints: Opportunities and challenges for online social research. Annual Review of Sociology, 40(1), 129–152. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Bailón, S. (2017). Decoding the social world: Data science and the unintended consequences of communication. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grimmer, J., & Steward, B. M. (2013). Text as data: The promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts. Political Analysis, 21(3), 267–297. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mps028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grinberg, N., Joseph, K., Friedland, L., Swire-Thompson, B., & Lazer, D. (2019). Fake news on twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Science, 363(6425), 374–378. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau2706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guess, A., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. A. (2019). Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on facebook. Science Advances, 5(1), eaau4586. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau4586
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habel, P., & Theocharis, Y. (2020). Citizens, elites, and social media methodological challenges and opportunities in the study of persuasion and mobilization. In E. Suhay, B. Grofman, & A. H. Trechsel, (Eds.), The oxford handbook of electoral persuasion (pp. 1037–1058). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190860806.013.27
   Google Scholar
• Hofman, J. M., Sharma, A., & Watts, D. J. (2017). Prediction and explanation in social systems. Science, 355(6324), 486–488. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal3856
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howison, J., Wiggins, A., & Crowston, K. (2011). Validity issues in the use of social network analysis with digital trace data. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 12(12), 767–797. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Japec, L., Kreuter, F., Berg, M., Biemer, P., Decker, P., Lampe, C., Lane, J., O’Neil, C., & Usher, A. (2015). Big data in survey research: AAPOR task force report. Public Opinion Quarterly, 79(4), 839–880. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfv039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jungherr, A. (2015). Analyzing political communication with digital trace data: The role of twitter messages in social science research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20319-5
   Google Scholar
• Jungherr, A. (2019). Normalizing digital trace data. In N. J. Stroud & S. C. McGregor, (Eds.), Digital discussions: How big data informs political communication (pp. 9–35). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351209434-2
   Google Scholar
• Jungherr, A., & Jürgens, P. (2013). Forecasting the pulse: How deviations from regular patterns in online data can identify offline phenomena. Internet Research, 23(5), 589–607. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-06-2012-0115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jungherr, A., Metaxas, P. T., & Posegga, O. (2020a). The next 10 years of computational social science: Accounting for theory, transparency, and interests (Working Paper).
   Google Scholar
• Jungherr, A., Posegga, O., & An, J. (2019). Discursive power in contemporary media systems: A comparative framework. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 24(4), 404–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161219841543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jungherr, A., Rivero, G., & Gayo-Avello, D. (2020b). Retooling politics: How digital media are shaping democracy. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jungherr, A., Schoen, H., Posegga, O., & Jürgens, P. (2017). Digital trace data in the study of public opinion: An indicator of attention toward politics rather than political support. Social Science Computer Review, 35(3), 336–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439316631043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jungherr, A., & Theocharis, Y. (2017). The empiricist’s challenge: Asking meaningful questions in political science in the age of big data. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 14(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2017.1312187
   Google Scholar
• Keller, F. B., Schoch, D., Stier, S., & Yang, J. (2020). Political astroturfing on twitter: How to coordinate a disinformation campaign. Political Communication, 37(2), 256–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1661888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellstedt, P. M., & Whitten, G. D. (2018). The fundamentals of political science research (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• King, G. (2011). Ensuring the data-rich future of the social sciences. Science, 331(6018), 719–721. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G., & Persily, N. (2019). A new model for industry–academic partnerships. PS, Political Science & Politics. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096519001021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Jerit, J., Schwieder, D., & Rich, R. F. (2000). Misinformation and the currency of democratic citizenship. The Journal of Politics, 62(3), 790–816. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazer, D., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M. J., Nyhan, B., Pennycook, G., Rothschild, D., Schudson, M., Sloman, S. A., Sunstein, C. R., Thorson, E. A., Watts, D. J., & Zittrain, J. L. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094–1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazer, D., Pentland, A., Adamic, L., Aral, S., Barabási, A.-L., Brewer, D., Contractor, N., Fowler, J., Gutmann, M., Jebara, T., King, G., Macy, M., Roy, D., Van Alstyne, M., & Christakis, N. (2009). Social science: Computational social science. Science, 323(5915), 721–723. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazer, D., & Radford, J. (2017). Data ex machina: Introduction to big data. Annual Review of Sociology, 43(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053457
   Google Scholar
• Leeper, T. J. (2020). Raising the floor or closing the gap? How media choice and media content impact political knowledge. Political Communication, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1753866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi, M., & Rajala, B. (2020). Alternatives to social science one. PS, Political Science & Politics. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercea, D., & Bastos, M. T. (2016). Being a serial transnational activist. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(2), 140–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minsky, C. (2016). Which colleges do Facebook, Google and other top employers recruit from? The World University Rankings. Retrieved August 2, 2020, from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/student/news/which-colleges-do-facebook-google-and-other-top-employers-recruit
   Google Scholar
• Munger, K. (2017). tweetment effects on the tweeted: Experimentally reducing racist harassment. Political Behavior, 39(3), 629–649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9373-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, W. R. (2016). The digital difference: Media technology and the theory of communication effects. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pentland, A. (2008). Honest signals: How they shape our world. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piper, A. (2018). Enumerations: Data and literary study. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popa, S. A., Fazekas, Z., Braun, D., & Leidecker-Sandmann, -M.-M. (2020). Informing the public: How party communication builds opportunity structures. Political Communication, 37(3), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1666942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puschmann, C. (2019). An end to the wild west of social media research: A response to axel bruns. Information, Communication & Society, 22(11), 1582–1589. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1646300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauchfleisch, A., & Kaiser, J. (2020). The false positive problem of automatic bot detection in social science research. Berkman Klein Center Research Publication. https://doi.org/org/https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?Abstract_id=3565233
   Google Scholar
• Rauh, C., & Schwalbach, J. (2020). The parlspeech v2 data set: Full-text corpora of 6.3 million parliamentary speeches in the key legislative chambers of nine representative democracies. V1: Harvard Dataverse. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/L4OAKN
   Google Scholar
• Salganik, M. J. (2018). Bit by bit: Social research in the digital age. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salganik, M. J., & Watts, D. J. (2009). Web-based experiments for the study of collective social dynamics in cultural markets. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(3), 439–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01030.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharkow, M., Mangold, F., Stier, S., & Breuer, J. (2020). How social network sites and other online intermediaries increase exposure to news. PNAS: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(6), 2761–2763. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1918279117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneier, B. (2020). Bots are destroying political discourse as we know it. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2020/01/future-politics-bots-drowning-out-humans/604489/
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, R. (2016). Big data and communication research. In J. F. Nussbaum (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of communication. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.276
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, R. (2018). Social theory after the internet: Media, technology and globalization. UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, R. (2019). Big data and cumulation in the social sciences. Information, Communication & Society, 23(11), 1593–1607. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1594334
   Google Scholar
• Sen, I., Floeck, F., Weller, K., Weiss, B., & Wagner, C. (2019). A total error framework for digital traces of humans. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.08228.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, A., & Badaan, V. (2020). #No2Sectarianism: Experimental approaches to reducing sectarian hate speech online. American Political Science Review, 114(3), 837–855. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stier, S., Breuer, J., Siegers, P., & Thorson, K. (2019). Integrating survey data and digital trace data: Key issues in developing an emerging field. Social Science Computer Review, 38(5), 503–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319843669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stopczynski, A., Sekara, V., Sapiezynski, P., Cuttone, A., Madsen, M. M., Larsen, J. E., & Lehmann, S. (2014). Measuring large-scale social networks with high resolution. PLoS One, 9(4), e95978. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedberg, R. (2014). The art of social theory. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Theocharis, Y., Barberá, P., Fazekas, Z., & Popa, S. A. (2020). The dynamics of political incivility on twitter. SAGE Open, 10(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020919447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theocharis, Y., Barberá, P., Fazekas, Z., Popa, S. A., & Parnet, O. (2016). A bad workman blames his tweets: The consequences of citizens’ uncivil twitter use when interacting with party candidates. Journal of Communication, 66(6), 1007–1031. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underwood, T. (2019). Distant horizons: Digital evidence and literary change. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Aelst, P., Strömbäck, J., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., de Vreese, C. H. D., Matthes, J., Hopmann, D., Salgado, S., Hubé, N., Stępińska, A., Papathanassopoulos, S., Berganza, R., Legnante, G., Reinemann, C., Sheafer, T., & Stanyer, J. (2017). Political communication in a high-choice media environment: A challenge for democracy? Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551
   Google Scholar
• van Atteveldt, W., & Peng, T.-Q. (2018). When communication meets computation: Opportunities, challenges, and pitfalls in computational communication science. Communication Methods and Measures, 12(2–3), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2018.1458084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varol, O., Ferrara, E., Davis, C. A., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2017). Online human-bot interactions: Detection, estimation, and characterization. In ICWSM 2017: Proceedings of the eleventh international aaai conference on web and social media (pp. 280–289). Menlo Park, CA: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI).
   Google Scholar
• Watts, D. J. (2011). Everything is obvious: How common sense fails us. Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Weidmann, N. B., & Schutte, S. (2017). Using night light emissions for the prediction of local wealth. Journal of Peace Research, 54(2), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343316630359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, C., & Thorson, K. (2017). Combining big data and survey techniques to model effects of political content flows in facebook. Social Science Computer Review, 35(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315609528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, N. W., Casas, A., & Wilkerson, J. D. (2020). Images as data for social science research. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108860741
   Google Scholar