Are Campaigns Getting Uglier, and Who Is to Blame? Negativity, Dramatization and Populism on Facebook in the 2014 and 2019 EP Election Campaigns

References

• Ansolabehere, S., & Iyengar, S. (1995). Going negative. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Auter, Z. J., & Fine, J. A. (2016). Negative campaigning in the social media age: Attack advertising on Facebook. Political Behavior, 38(4), 999–1020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9346-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Pfetsch, B. (2018). Rethinking political communication in a time of disrupted public spheres. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bimber, B., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2020). The unedited public sphere. New Media & Society, 22(4), 700–715. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819893980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobba, G. (2019). Social media populism: Features and ‘likeability’ of Lega Nord communication on Facebook. European Political Science, 18(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-017-0141-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossetta, M. (2018). The digital architectures of social media: Comparing political campaigning on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat in the 2016 US election. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(2), 471–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018763307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulianne, S., & Larsson, A. O. (2021). Engagement with candidate posts on Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook during the 2019 election. New Media & Society, 146144482110095. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211009504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracciale, R., & Martella, A. (2017). Define the populist political communication style: The case of Italian political leaders on Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1310–1329. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brader, T., & Marcus, G. E. (2013). Emotion and political psychology. In L. Huddy, D. O. Sears & J. S. Levy (eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 165-204). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cappella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cicero, Q. T. (2012). How to win an election. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400841646-003
   Google Scholar
• Crabtree, C., Golder, M., Gschwend, T., & Indriđason, I. H. (2020). It is not only what you say, it is also how you say it: The strategic use of campaign sentiment. The Journal of Politics, 82(3) , 1044–1060. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/707613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derks, D., Fischer, A. H., & Bos, A. E. R. (2008). The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 766–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vreese, C., Esser, F., Aalberg, T., Reinemann, C., & Stanyer, J. (2018). Populism as an expression of political communication content and style: A new perspective. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(4), 423–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218790035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Digital News Report. (2021). Interactive. https://www.digitalnewsreport.org/interactive/
   Google Scholar
• Dimitrova, D. V., & Matthes, J. (2018). Social media in political campaigning around the world: Theoretical and methodological challenges. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(2), 333–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018770437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, N., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., Blassnig, S., & Esser, F. (2017). Extreme parties and populism: An analysis of Facebook and Twitter across six countries. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1347–1364. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1329333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EU Parliament. (2019). 2019 European election results. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/election-results-2019/en/
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, R., & McAllister, I. (2015). Normalising or equalising party competition? Assessing the impact of the web on election campaigning. Political Studies, 63(3), 529–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, J. H., & Johnson, K. T. (2016). Twitter taunts and tirades: Negative campaigning in the age of Trump. PS: Political Science & Politics, 49(4), 748–754 https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909651600170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameleers, M., Bos, L., & de Vreese, C. H. (2016). “They did it.” The effects of emotionalized blame attribution in populist communication. Communication Research, 44(6), 870–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216644026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameleers, M., Bos, L., & de Vreese, C. H. (2017). “They did it”: The effects of emotionalized blame attribution in populist communication. Communication Research, 44(6), 870-900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216644026
   Google Scholar
• Haselmayer, M. (2019). Negative campaigning and its consequences: A review and a look ahead. French Politics, 17(3), 355–372. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41253-019-00084-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. A., Mondak, J. J., & Huckfeldt, R. (2009). Examining the possible corrosive impact of negative advertising on citizens’ attitudes toward politics. Political Research Quarterly, 62(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912908317031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagers, J., & Walgrave, S. (2007). Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research, 46(3), 319–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jungherr, A. (2016). Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(1), 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, K. F., & Kenney, P. J. (2000). How negative campaigning enhances knowledge of senate elections. In J. A. Thurber, C. J. Nelson, & D. A. Dulio (Eds.), Crowded airwaves: Campaign advertising in elections (pp. 65–95). Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalsnes, B. (2016). The social media paradox explained: Comparing political parties’ Facebook strategy versus practice. Social Media+ Society, 2(2), 2056305116644616 https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051166446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalsnes, B., Larsson, A. O., & Enli, G. S. (2017). The social media logic of political interaction: Exploring citizens’ and politicians’ relationship on Facebook and Twitter. First Monday, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v22i2.6348
   Google Scholar
• Klemm, C., Das, E., & Hartmann, T. (2016). Swine flu and hype: A systematic review of media dramatization of the H1N1 influenza pandemic. Journal of Risk Research, 19(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2014.923029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinger, U., & Russmann, U. (2017). “Beer is more efficient than social media”—Political parties and strategic communication in Austrian and Swiss national elections. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 14(4), 299–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2017.1369919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koc-Michalska, K., & Lilleker, D. (2020). Political communities on Facebook across 28 European countries. Questions de Communication, (36), 245–265 https://doi.org/10.4000/questionsdecommunication.21297.
   Google Scholar
• Koc-Michalska, K., Lilleker, D. G., Michalski, T., Gibson, R., & Zajac, J. M. (2021). Facebook affordances and citizen engagement during elections: European political parties and their benefit from online strategies? Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 18(2), 180–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2020.1837707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krastev, I. (2014). From politics to protest. Journal of Democracy, 25(4), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2014.0065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiss, D., & McGregor, S. C. (2018). Technology firms shape political communication: The work of Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter, and Google with campaigns during the 2016 US presidential cycle. Political Communication, 35(2), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1364814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lau, R. R., & Rovner, I. B. (2009). Negative campaigning. Annual Review of Political Science, 12(1), 285–306. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.071905.101448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lünenborg, M. (2019). Affective publics: Understanding the dynamic formation of public articulations beyond the public sphere. In A. Fleig & C. von Scheve (Eds.), Public spheres of resonance (pp. 29–48). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, I., & Porter, R. (2011). Dramatization as method in political theory. Contemporary Political Theory, 10(4), 482–501. https://doi.org/10.1057/cpt.2010.38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattes, K., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2015). The positive case for negative campaigning. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merrill, J. B., & Oremus, W. (2021, October 26). Five points for anger, one for a ‘like’: How Facebook’s formula fostered rage and misinformation. The Washington Post, https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/10/26/facebook-angry-emoji-algorithm/
   Google Scholar
• Moffitt, B., & Tormey, S. (2014). Rethinking populism: Politics, mediatisation and political style. Political Studies, 62(2), 381–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2000). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism. Reihe Politikwissenschaft Political Science Series 72. Institute for Advanced Studies, 1–17 https://irihs.ihs.ac.at/id/eprint/1312.
   Google Scholar
• Nai, A. (2018). Fear and loathing in populist campaigns? Comparing the communication style of populists and non-populists in elections worldwide. Journal of Political Marketing, 20(2), 219–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2018.1491439
   Google Scholar
• Nai, A. (2020). Going negative, worldwide: towards a general understanding of determinants and targets of negative campaigning. Government & Opposition, 55(3), 430–455. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2018.32
   Google Scholar
• Nai, A., & Maier, J. (2021). The wrath of candidates. Drivers of fear and enthusiasm appeals in election campaigns across the globe. Journal of Political Marketing, 1–18. http://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2021.1930327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (2016). Affective publics and structures of storytelling: Sentiment, events and mediality. Information, Communication & Society, 19(3), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1109697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauwels, T. (2011). Measuring populism: A quantitative text analysis of party literature in Belgium. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 21(1), 97–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2011.539483
   Google Scholar
• Pfetsch, B. (2018). Dissonant and disconnected public spheres as challenge for political communication research. Javnost-The Public, 25(1–2), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2018.1423942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfetsch, B., Löblich, M., & Eilders, C. (2018). Dissonante Öffentlichkeiten als Perspektive kommunikationswissenschaftlicher Theoriebildung. Publizistik, 63(4), 477–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-018-0441-1
   Google Scholar
• Pfetsch, B., Löblich, M., & Eilders, C. (2018). Dissonante öffentlichkeiten als Perspektive kommunikationswissenschaftlicher Theoriebildung. Publizistik, 63(4), 477–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-018-0441-1
   Google Scholar
• Puhle, H. J. (2020). Populism and democracy in the 21st Century. SCRIPTS Working Paper No. 2, Cluster of Excellence 2055 “Contestations of the Liberal Script - SCRIPTS.” https://www.scripts-berlin.eu/publications/working-paper-series/Working-Paper-No_-2-2020/SCRIPTS_Working_Paper_02_Web_II.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Roemmele, A., & Gibson, R. (2020). Scientific and subversive: The two faces of the fourth era of political campaigning. New Media & Society, 22(4), 595–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819893979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russmann, U. (2018). Going negative on Facebook: Negative user expressions and political parties’ reactions in the 2013 Austrian national elections. International Journal of Communication, 12, 2578–2598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabur, R. (2021, October 4). European political parties ‘forced to take more extreme positions’ by Facebook algorithm tweak, says whistleblower. The Telegraph, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2021/10/04/whistleblower-claims-facebook-choose-profit-safety/
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, D., & Norris, P. (2005). The impact of political advertising in the 2001 U.K. general elections. Political Research Quarterly, 58(4), 525–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290505800401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz, W., & Zeh, R. (2005). The changing election coverage of German television. A content analysis: 1990–2002. Communications, 30(4), 385–407. https://doi.org/10.1515/comm.2005.30.4.385
   Google Scholar
• Song, H., Nyhuis, D., & Boomgaarden, H. (2019). A network model of negative campaigning: The structure and determinants of negative campaigning in multi-party systems. Communication Research, 46(2), 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650217712596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spierings, N., & Jacobs, K. (2019). Political parties and social media campaigning. Acta Politica, 54(1), 145–173. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-018-0079-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanyer, J., Salgado, S., & Strömbäck, J. (2016). Populist actors as communicators or political actors as populist communicators: Cross-national findings and perspectives. In T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Stromback, & C. De Vreese (Eds.), Populist political communication in Europe (pp. 363–374). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stockemer, D., & Amengay, A. (2020). The 2019 elections to the European Parliament: The continuation of a populist wave but not a populist tsunami. Journal of Common Market Studies, 58(S1), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13077
   Google Scholar
• Strömbäck, J., & Kiousis, S. (2014). Strategic political communication in election campaigns. In Political communication (pp. 109–128). De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Waisbord, S. (2016). Disconnections: Media sociology and communication across differences. Paper presented at the conference of the international communication association, Fukuoka, Japan
   Google Scholar
• Weeks, B. E. (2015). Emotions, partisanship, and misperceptions: How anger and anxiety moderate the effect of partisan bias on susceptibility to political misinformation. Journal of Communication, 65(4), 699–719. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widmann, T. (2019). How emotional are populists really? Factors explaining emotional appeals in the communication of political parties. Political Psychology, 42(1 https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12693).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilke, J., & Leidecker, M. (2013). Regional – National – Supranational. How the German press covers election campaigns on different levels of the political system. Central European Journal of Communication, 6, 122–143 https://cejc.ptks.pl/Volume-6-No-1-10-Spring-2013/Regional--national--supranationalHowtheGermanpresscoverselectioncampa.
   Google Scholar