Damage Control: How Campaign Teams Interpret and Respond to Online Incivility

References

• Auter, Z. J., & Fine, J. A. (2016). Negative campaigning in the social media age: Attack advertising on Facebook. Political Behavior, 38(4), 999–1020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9346-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardall, G., & Tenove, C. (forthcoming). online violence against women in politics: Global trends and the Canadian experience. In T. Raney & C. N. Collier (Eds.), Gender-based violence in Canadian politics in the #MeToo Era. University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boxell, L., Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2020). Cross-country trends in affective polarization. ( No. 0898–2937). National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, G. M. (2017). Online incivility and public debate: Nasty talk. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56273-5
   Google Scholar
• Coe, K., Kenski, K., & Rains, S. A. (2014). Online and uncivil? Patterns and determinants of incivility in newspaper website comments. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 658–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collignon, S., & Rüdig, W. (2020). Harassment and intimidation of parliamentary candidates in the United Kingdom. The Political Quarterly, 91(2), 422–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deley, T., Dubois, E., Taboada, M., Tenove, C., & Tworek, H. (2022). Nuance at scale? Detecting incivility using bespoke and off-the-shelf algorithms . ( Pol Comm Tech Lab). University of Ottawa. [Manuscript in preparation. Available on request].
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, J., Håkansson, S., & Josefsson, C. (2021). Three dimensions of gendered online abuse: Analyzing Swedish MPs’ experiences of social media. Perspectives on Politics First View, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592721002048
   Google Scholar
• Freelon, D. (2017). Campaigns in control: Analyzing controlled interactivity and message discipline on Facebook. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 14(2), 168–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2017.1309309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervais, B. T. (2019). Rousing the partisan combatant: Elite incivility, anger, and antideliberative attitudes. Political Psychology, 40(3), 637–655. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorrell, G., Bakir, M. E., Roberts, I., Greenwood, M. A., & Bontcheva, K. (2020). Which politicians receive abuse? Four factors illuminated in the UK general election 2019. EPJ Data Science, 9(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-020-00236-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmer, E., & Southern, R. (2021). Digital microaggressions and everyday othering: An analysis of tweets sent to women members of parliament in the UK. Information, Communication & Society, 24(14), 1998–2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1962941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbst, S. (2010). Rude democracy: Civility and incivility in American politics. Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herrick, R., Thomas, S., Franklin, L., Godwin, M. L., Gnabasik, E., & Schroedel, J. R. (2021). Physical violence and psychological abuse against female and male mayors in the United States. Politics, Groups, and Identities 9 4 681–698 . https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2019.1629321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalsnes, B., & Ihlebæk, K. A. (2021). Hiding hate speech: Political moderation on Facebook. Media, Culture & Society, 43(2), 326–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720957562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenski, K., Coe, K., & Rains, S. A. (2020). Perceptions of uncivil discourse online: An examination of types and predictors. Communication Research, 47(6), 795–814. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650217699933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiss, D., Lawrence, R. G., & McGregor, S. C. (2018). In their own words: Political practitioner accounts of candidates, audiences, affordances, genres, and timing in strategic social media use. Political Communication, 35(1), 8–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1334727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiss, D., & McGregor, S. C. (2019). The “Arbiters of what our voters see”: Facebook and google’s struggle with policy, process, and enforcement around political advertising. Political Communication, 36(4), 499–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1619639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krook, M. L. (2020). Violence against women in politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190088460.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Lawless, J. L., & Fox, R. L. (2010). It still takes a candidate: Why women don’t run for office. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mac Sweeney, C. (2019, October 20). Experts describe federal election campaign as “nasty,” “ugly,” “bitter.” CityNews Winnipeg. https://winnipeg.citynews.ca/2019/10/20/nasty-ugly-bitter-describe-the-campaign/
   Google Scholar
• McGravey, K. (2020). Digital public forums: Power and representation in the internet’s public squares. New Political Science, 42(3), 253–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2020.1807274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, S. C. (2020). “Taking the temperature of the room”: How political campaigns use social media to understand and represent public opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 84(S1), 236–256. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfaa012
   Google Scholar
• McKay, S., & Tenove, C. (2021). Disinformation as a threat to deliberative democracy. Political Research Quarterly, 74(3), 703–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912920938143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muddiman, A. (2017). Personal and public levels of political incivility. International Journal of Communication, 11, 3182–3202. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/6137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. (2015). In-your-face politics: The consequences of uncivil media. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nadim, M., & Fladmoe, A. (2021). Silencing women? Gender and online harassment. Social Science Computer Review, 39(2), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319865518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quandt, T. (2018). Dark participation. Media and Communication, 6(4), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rheault, L., Rayment, E., & Musulan, A. (2019). Politicians in the line of fire: Incivility and the treatment of women on social media. Research & Politics, 6(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168018816228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossini, P. (2022). Beyond incivility: Understanding patterns of uncivil and intolerant discourse in online political talk. Communication Research, 49(3), 399–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220921314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossini, P., Stromer-Galley, J., & Zhang, F. (2021). Exploring the relationship between campaign discourse on facebook and the public’s comments: A case study of incivility during the 2016 US presidential election. Political Studies, 69(1), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719890818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (2019, October 31). Women MPs say abuse forcing them from politics. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/election-2019-50246969
   Google Scholar
• Sobieraj, S. (2020). Credible threat: Attacks against women online and the future of democracy. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sobieraj, S., Masullo, G. M., Cohen, P. N., Gillespie, T., & Jackson, S. J. (2020). Politicians, social media, and digital publics: Old rights, new terrain. American Behavioral Scientist, 64(11), 1646–1669. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764220945357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stromer-Galley, J. (2019). Presidential campaigning in the internet age (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stromer-Galley, J., Zhang, F., Hemsley, J., & Tanupabrungsun, S. (2018). Tweeting the attack: Predicting gubernatorial candidate attack messaging and its spread. International Journal of Communication, 12, 3511–32. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/7980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stryker, R., Conway, B. A., & Danielson, J. T. (2016). What is political incivility? Communication Monographs, 83(4), 535–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2016.1201207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sydnor, E. (2019). Disrespectful democracy: The psychology of political incivility. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Theocharis, Y., Barberá, P., Fazekas, Z., & Popa, S. A. (2020). The dynamics of political incivility on Twitter. SAGE Open, 10(2), 215824402091944. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020919447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theocharis, Y., Barberá, P., Fazekas, Z., Popa, S. A., & Parnet, O. (2016). A bad workman blames his tweets: The consequences of citizens’ uncivil twitter use when interacting with party candidates. Journal of Communication, 66(6), 1007–1031. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trifiro, B. M., Paik, S., Fang, Z., & Zhang, L. (2021 Politics and politeness: Analysis of incivility on Twitter during the 2020 democratic presidential primary). Social Media + Society 7 (3): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211036939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tromble, R. (2018). Thanks for (actually) responding! How citizen demand shapes politicians’ interactive practices on Twitter. New Media & Society, 20(2), 676–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816669158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tunney, C., & Burke, A. (2019, October 6). Fearing violence, the RCMP are closely watching hateful online election chatter. CBC News. https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/rcmp-violence-campaign-1.5305905
   Google Scholar