Dissonance from the Perspective of Agonistic Pluralism: A Study of Political Fragmentation on Facebook during the 2016 Austrian Presidential Election

References

• Adamic, L. A., & Glance, N. (2005). The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: Divided they blog. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Link Discovery, 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1145/1134271.1134277
   Google Scholar
• Adamson, G. (2016). Populist parties and the failure of the political elites. The rise of the Austrian freedom party (FPÖ). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Arlt, D., Rauchfleisch, A., & Schäfer, M. S. (2019). Between fragmentation and dialogue. Twitter communities and political debate about the Swiss “Nuclear withdrawal initiative.” Environmental Communication, 13(4), 440–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1430600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balcells, J., & Padró-Solanet, A. (2020). Crossing lines in the twitter debate on Catalonia’s Independence. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(1), 28–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161219858687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barberá, P. (2020). Social media, echo chambers, and political polarization. In N. Persily & J. A. Tucker (Eds.), Social media and democracy: The state of the field, prospects for reform (pp. 34–55). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108890960
   Google Scholar
• Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. A., & Bonneau, R. (2015). Tweeting from left to right: Is online political communication more than an echo chamber? Psychological Science, 26(10), 1531–1542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615594620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Pfetsch, B. (2018). Rethinking political communication in a time of disrupted public spheres. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berenhaut, K. S., Barr, P. S., & Kogel, A. M. (2016). Redwalk: Network community detection [Manual] https://rdrr.io/github/barrpet/gclust/man/polblogs.html.
   Google Scholar
• Bilewicz, M., & Soral, W. (2020). Hate speech epidemic. The dynamic effects of derogatory language on intergroup relations and political radicalization. Advances in Political Psychology, 41(S1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12670
   Google Scholar
• Birkeneder, B., Mitrović, J., Niemeier, J., Teubert, L., & Handschuh, S. (2018). upInf - Offensive language detection in German tweets. Proceedings of the GermEval 2018 Workshop. 71–78. https://epub.oeaw.ac.at/?arp=0x003a10e8
   Google Scholar
• BMI. (2016). Bundespräsidentenwahl 2016 [2016 presidential election]. https://bundeswahlen.gv.at/2016/
   Google Scholar
• Borah, P. (2014). Does it matter where you read the news story? Interaction of incivility and news frames in the political blogosphere. Communication Research, 41(6), 809–827. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212449353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozdag, C. (2020). Managing diverse online networks in the context of polarization: Understanding how we grow apart on and through social media. Social Media + Society, 6(4), 205630512097571. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120975713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright, J. . (2017). Explaining the emergence of echo chambers on social media: the role of ideology and extremism (). SSRN. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2839728
   Google Scholar
• Clauset, A., Newman, M., & Moore, C. (2004). Finding community structure in very large networks. Physical Review E, 70(6), 066111. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.70.066111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constitutional Court. (2016). VfGH W I 6/2016-125. https://www.vfgh.gv.at/downloads/VfGH_W_I_6-2016_EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Csardi, G., & Nepusz, T. 2006. The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal, Complex Systems, Article 1695.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, L. (2001). The internet and democratic discourse: Exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere. Information, Communication & Society, 4(4), 615–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180110097030
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, L. (2005). The corporate colonization of online attention and the marginalization of critical communication? Journal of Communication Inquiry, 29(2), 160–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859904272745
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, L. (2007a). Rethinking the fragmentation of the cyberpublic: From consensus to contestation. New Media & Society, 9(5), 827–847. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807081228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, L. (2007b). The internet, deliberative democracy, and power: Radicalizing the public sphere. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 3(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1386/macp.3.1.47_1
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, L. (2007c). The internet and discursive exclusion: From deliberative to agonistic public sphere theory. In E. Siapera (Ed.), Radical democracy and the internet: Interrogating theory and practice (pp. 128–147). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, L. (2013). Exclusions of the public sphere conception: Examining deliberative and discourse theory accounts. Javnost—The Public, 20(1), 21–38 https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2013.11009106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, L. (2014). The habermasian public sphere and exclusion: An engagement with poststructuralist-influenced critics: The habermasian public sphere. Communication Theory, 24(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, L., & Siapera, E. (2007). Radical democracy and the internet: interrogating theory and practice. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592469
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgren, P. (2005). The internet, public spheres, and political communication: dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication, 22(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600590933160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkel, E. J., Bail, C. A., Cikara, M., Ditto, P. H., Iyengar, S., Klar, S., Mason, L., McGrath, M. C., Nyhan, B., Rand, D. G., Skitka, L. J., Tucker, J. A., Van Bavel, J. J., Wang, C. S., & Druckman, J. N. (2020). Political sectarianism in america. Science, 370(6516), 533–536. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe1715
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016). Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 298–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, (25/26), 56–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/466240
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. (2016). Racism, nationalism and right-wing extremism online: The Austrian presidential election 2016 on Facebook. Momentum Quarterly, 5(3), 172–196.
   Google Scholar
• Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2011). Ideological segregation online and offline. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(4), 1799–1839 https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:126:y:2011:i:4:p:1799-1839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervais, B. T. (2015). Incivility online: Affective and behavioral reactions to uncivil political posts in a web-based experiment. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 12(2), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2014.997416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidron, N., Adams, J., & Horne, W. (2019). Toward a comparative research agenda on affective polarization in mass publics. APSA Comparative Politics Newsletter, 29(1), 30–36.
   Google Scholar
• Grössenberger, I., & Pausch, M. (2018). Das unbehagen mit der repräsentativen demokratie: Demokratievertrauen und Reformwünsche in Österreich [Discomfort with representative democracy: Confidence in democracy and desires for reform in Austria]. Momentum Quarterly, 7(3), 124–135. https://doi.org/10.15203/momentumquarterly.vol7.no3.p124-135
   Google Scholar
• Guess, A. M. (2021). (Almost) everything in moderation: New evidence on Americans’ Online MEDIA DIets. American Journal of Political Science, 65(4), 1007–1022 https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere. An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (2018). Interview with Jürgen Habermas. In A. Bächtiger, J. S. Dryzek, J. Mansbridge, & M. Warren (Eds.), The oxford handbook of deliberative democracy (pp. 871–882). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198747369.013.60
   Google Scholar
• Heinisch, R. C., Holtz-Bacha, C., & Mazzoleni, O. (2017). Introduction. In R. C. Heinisch, C. Holtz-Bacha, & O. Mazzoleni (Eds.), Political populism (pp. 19–38). Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845271491-19
   Google Scholar
• Jezierska, K. (2020). With Habermas against Habermas. Deliberation without consensus. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.326
   Google Scholar
• Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017). ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Communications of the ACM, 60(6), 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1145/3065386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kušen, E., & Strembeck, M. (2017). An analysis of the twitter discussion on the 2016 Austrian presidential elections. ArXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.09939
   Google Scholar
• Leonhard, R. (2016, May 22). Analyse der Wahl in Österreich: Ein tief gespaltenes Land [Analysis of the Election in Austria: A Deeply Divided Country]. taz. http://www.taz.de/!5306300/
   Google Scholar
• Markell, P. (1997). Contesting consensus: Rereading Habermas on the public sphere. Constellations, 3(3), 377–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8675.1997.tb00066.x
   Google Scholar
• Masullo Chen, G., & Lu, S. (2017). Online political discourse: exploring differences in effects of civil and uncivil disagreement in news website comments. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 61(1), 108–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2016.1273922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitrović, J., Birkeneder, B., & Granitzer, M. (2019). nlpUP at SemEval-2019 Task 6: A deep neural language model for offensive language detection. Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, 722–726. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/S19-2127
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2000). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism. Institute for Advanced Studies. https://www.ihs.ac.at/publications/pol/pw_72.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2004). Pluralism, dissensus and democratic citizenship. In F. Inglis (Ed.), Education and the good society (pp. 42–53). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523449_4
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics: thinking the world politically. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Neuendorf, K. A. (2017). The content analysis guidebook (second) ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, M. E. J., & Girvan, M. (2004). Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review. E, Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 69(2 Pt 2), 026113 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.026113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ORF. (2016). Bundespräsidentschaftswahl 2016 [2016 Presidential Election]. news.orf.at. http://orf.at/wahl/bp16/
   Google Scholar
• Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Pfetsch, B. (2020). Democracy and digital dissonance: The co-occurrence of the transformation of political culture and communication infrastructure. Central European Journal of Communication, 13(1), 96–110. https://doi.org/10.19195/1899-5101.13.1(25).7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfetsch, B., Löblich, M., & Eilders, C. (2018). Dissonante Öffentlichkeiten als Perspektive kommunikationswissenschaftlicher Theoriebildung [Dissonant Public Spheres—A New Perspective in Communication Theory]. Publizistik, 63(4), 477–495 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11616-018-0441-1.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, O., & Prior, T. (2016, May 21). Das gespaltene Land [The divided country]. Die Presse. https://diepresse.com/home/politik/bpwahl/4993555/Das-gespaltene-Land
   Google Scholar
• Politometer. (2017). Politometer Ranking. politometer. http://politometer.at
   Google Scholar
• Poster, M. (1997). Cyberdemocracy: The internet and the public sphere. In D. Holmes (Ed.), Virtual politics. identity and community in cyberspace (pp. 212–228). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Manual]. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Schabus, D., Skowron, M., & Trapp, M. (2017). One million posts: A data set of German online discussions. Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 1241–1244. https://doi.org/10.1145/3077136.3080711
   Google Scholar
• Simsa, R. (2019). Civil society capture by early stage autocrats in well-developed democracies—The case of Austria. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 10(3), Article 20190029. https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2019-0029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundermeyer, M., Schlüter, R., & Ney, H. (2012, September 9–13). LSTM neural networks for language modeling [conference presentation]. Thirteenth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Portland, OR, United States. https://www.isca-speech.org/archive/archive_papers/interspeech_2012/i12_0194.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. (2004). Democracy and filtering. Communications of the ACM, 47(12), 57–59. https://doi.org/10.1145/1035134.1035166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Toepfl, F., & Piwoni, E. (2015). Public spheres in interaction: comment sections of news websites as counterpublic spaces. Journal of Communication, 65(3), 465–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urman, A. (2020). Context matters: Political polarization on twitter from a comparative perspective. Media, Culture & Society, 42(6), 857–879. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719876541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van’t Riet, J., & Van Stekelenburg, A. (2022). The Effects of Political Incivility on Political Trust and Political Participation: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Research. Human Communication Research, 48(2), 203–229. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqab022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiegand, M., Siegel, M., & Ruppenhofer, J. (2018). Overview of the GermEval 2018 shared task on the identification of offensive language. In J. Ruppenhofer, M. Siegel, & M. Wiegand (Eds.), Proceedings of GermEval 2018, 14th Conference on Natural Language Processing (pp. 1–10). https://epub.oeaw.ac.at/0xc1aa5576_0x003a10d2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak, M. (2016). Polarization, political. The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication, Retrieved July 4, 2021 from https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc168
   Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak, M. E., & Mutz, D. C. (2009). Online groups and political discourse: Do online discussion spaces facilitate exposure to political disagreement? Journal of Communication, 59(1), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01403.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarchi, M., Baden, C., & Kligler-Vilenchik, N. (2021). Political polarization on the digital sphere: A cross-platform, over-time analysis of interactional, positional, and affective polarization on social media. Political Communication, 38(1–2), 98–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1785067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yardi, S., & Boyd, D. (2010). Dynamic debates: An analysis of group polarization over time on Twitter. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(5), 316–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467610380011
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (1996). Communication and the other—Beyond deliberative democracy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference—contesting the boundaries of the political (pp. 120–135). Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zirnig, D. (2016, May 23). Transkript: Alexander Van der Bellen als gewählter Bundespräsident [Transcript: Alexander Van der Bellen as President-Elect]. neuwal.com. https://neuwal.com/2016/05/23/transkript-alexander-van-der-bellen-als-gewaehlter-bundespraesident-bpw16/
   Google Scholar
• Zirnig, D. (2017, January 26). Angelobung von Bundespräsident Alexander Van der Bellen [Inauguration of President Alexander Van der Bellen]. neuwal.com. https://neuwal.com/transkript/20170126-alexander-van-der-bellen-angelobung.php
   Google Scholar