(Digital) Campaigning in Dissonant Public Spheres

References

• Benkler, Y., Faris, R., & Roberts, H. (2018). Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Livingston, S. (Eds.). (2019). The disinformation age: Politics, technology, and disruptive communication in the United States. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Pfetsch, B. (2018). Rethinking political communication in a time of disrupted public spheres. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., Segerberg, A., & Knüpfer, C. B. (2018). The democratic interface: Technology, political organization, and diverging patterns of electoral representation. Information, Communication & Society, 21(11), 1655–1680. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1348533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bimber, B., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2020). The unedited public sphere. New Media & Society, 22(4), 700–715. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819893980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumler, J. G. (2019). The fourth age of political communication. Keynote address presented at the workshop on political communication online, Freie Universität, Berlin, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Blumler, J. G., & Kavanagh, D. (1999). The third age of political communication: Influences and features. Political Communication, 16(3), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossetta, M., & Schmøkel, R. (2023). Cross-Platform Emotions and Audience Engagement in Social Media Political Campaigning: Comparing Candidates’ Facebook and Instagram Images in the 2020 US Election. Political Communication, 40(1), 48–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2022.2128949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vreese, C. H., & Tromble, R. (2023). The Data Abyss: How lack of data access leaves research and society in the dark. Political Communication, 40(3), https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2023.2207488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Zúñigaa H, G., Marné, H. M., & Cart, E. (2023). Abating Dissonant Public Spheres: Exploring the Effects of Affective, Ideological and Perceived Societal Political Polarization on Social Media Political Persuasion. Political Communication, 40(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2022.2139310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freelon, D., & Wells, C. (2020). Disinformation as political communication. Political Communication, 37(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1723755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, R. (2023). Data-Driven Campaigning as a Disruptive Force. Political Communication, 40(3), https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2023.2207486
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (2022). Reflections and hypotheses on a further structural transformation of the political public sphere. Theory, Culture & Society, 39(4), 145–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764221112341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinger, U., Bennett, W. L., Knüpfer, C. B., Martini, F., & Zhang, X. (2022). From the fringes into mainstream politics: intermediary networks and movement-party coordination of a global anti-immigration campaign in Germany. Information, Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2050415
   Google Scholar
• Klinger, U., Koc-Michalska, K., & Russmann, U. (2023). Are Campaigns Getting Uglier, and Who Is to Blame? Negativity, Dramatization and Populism on Facebook in the 2014 and 2019 EP Election Campaigns. Political Communication, 40(3) . https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2022.2133198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiss, D., & McGregor, S. C. (2018). Technology firms shape political communication: The work of Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter, and Google with campaigns during the 2016 US presidential cycle. Political Communication, 35(2), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1364814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, R., & Marwick, A. (2021). Critical disinformation studies: History, power, and politics. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 2(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-76
   Google Scholar
• Persily, N., & Tucker, J. A. (Eds.). (2020). Social media and democracy: The state of the field, prospects for reform. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pfetsch, B. (2018). Dissonant and disconnected public spheres as challenge for political communication research. Javnost-The Public, 25(1–2), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2018.1423942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfetsch, B. (2023). Conditions of Campaigning in Dissonant Public Spheres and Crisis of Democracy. Political Communication, 40(3), . https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2023.2193554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quandt, T. (2018). Dark participation. Media and Communication, 6(4), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossini, P. (2023). Farewell to Big Data? Studying Misinformation in Mobile Messaging Applications. Political Communication, 40(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2023.2193563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlögl, S., Bürger, M., Kannan, S., Dietrich, P., & Mitrović, J. (2023). Dissonance from the Perspective of Agonistic Pluralism: A Study of Political Fragmentation on Facebook during the 2016 Austrian Presidential Election. Political Communication, 40(3), . https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2022.2141390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockmann, D. (2023). Tech companies and the public interest: The role of the state in governing social media platforms. Information, Communication & Society, 26(1) , 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2032796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenove, C., Tworek, H., Lore, G., Buffie, J., & Deley, T. (2023). Damage Control: How Campaign Teams Interpret and Respond to Online Incivility. Political Communication, 40(3), . https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2022.2137743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaccari, C., Chadwick, A., & Kaiser, J. (2023). The Campaign Disinformation Divide: Believing and Sharing News in the 2019 UK General Election. Political Communication, 40(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2022.2128948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2019). Questioning the ideal of the public sphere: The emotional turn. Social Media+ Society, 5(3), 2056305119852175. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119852175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waisbord, Silvio. 2016. “Disconnections: Media sociology and communication across differences.” Paper presented at the Conference of the International Communication Association, Fukuoka, Japan, June.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, F., & Kohring, M. (2020). Mistrust, disinforming news, and vote choice: A panel survey on the origins and consequences of believing disinformation in the 2017 German parliamentary election. Political Communication, 37(2), 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1686095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar