356
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Forum

Scholarly Solidarity: Building an Inclusive Field for Junior and Minority Researchers

ORCID Icon

References

  • Afnan, M., Afnan, M. A. M., Liu, Y., Savulescu, J., Mishra, A., Conitzer, V., & Rudin, C. (2022). Data solidarity for machine learning for embryo selection: A call for the creation of an open access repository of embryo data. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 45(1), 10–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.03.015
  • Ahn, S. J., Cripe, E. T., Foucault Welles, B., McGregor, S. C., Pearce, K. E., Usher, N., & Vitak, J. (2021). Academic caregivers on organizational and community resilience in academia (fuck individual resilience). Communication, Culture & Critique, 14(2), 301–305. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcab027
  • Aloia, L. S. (2022). Mental health among higher education faculty, administrators, and graduate students, Teresa Heinz housel. Journal of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqac029
  • Begum, N., & Saini, R. (2019). Decolonising the curriculum. Political Studies Review, 17(2), 196–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929918808459
  • Bell, M. P., Berry, D., Leopold, J., & Nkomo, S. (2021). Making black lives matter in academia: A black feminist call for collective action against anti‐blackness in the academy. Gender, Work & Organization, 28(S1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12555
  • Bieliauskaitė, J. (2021). Solidarity in academia and its relationship to academic integrity. Journal of Academic Ethics, 19(3), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-021-09420-6
  • Brown, D. K., & Searles, K. (2023). “New” Methods, “New” Challenges. Political Communication Report. https://doi.org/10.17169/refubium-39043
  • Chakravartty, P. (2020). # Communicationsowhite in the age of ultra-nationalisms. Communication, Culture & Critique, 13(2), 270–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcaa018
  • Chakravartty, P., Kuo, R., Grubbs, V., & McIlwain, C. (2018). # Communicationsowhite. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy003
  • de Vreese, C., & Tromble, R. (2023). The data abyss: How lack of data access leaves research and society in the dark. Political Communication, 40(3), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2023.2207488
  • Dienlin, T., Johannes, N., Bowman, N. D., Masur, P. K., Engesser, S., Kümpel, A. S., & De Vreese, C. (2021). An agenda for open science in communication. Journal of Communication, 71(1), 1–26.
  • Dion, M. L., Sumner, J. L., & Mitchell, S. M. (2018). Gendered citation patterns across political science and social science methodology fields. Political Analysis, 26(3), 312–327. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2018.12
  • Durkheim, E. (2014). The division of labor in society. ( Translation Copyright 1984; original publication 1893). Simon and Schuster.
  • Freelon, D., Pruden, M. L., Eddy, K. A., & Kuo, R. (2023). Inequities of race, place, and gender among the communication citation elite, 2000–2019. Journal of Communication, jqad002(4), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqad002
  • Guarino, C. M., & Borden, V. M. (2017). Faculty service loads and gender: Are women taking care of the academic family? Research in Higher Education, 58(6), 672–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9454-2
  • Herzog, L. (2018). Durkheim on social justice: The argument from “organic solidarity”. American Political Science Review, 112(1), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305541700048X
  • Housel, T. H. (2021). Mental Health among Higher Education Faculty, administrators, and graduate students. Rowman & Littlefield.
  • June, A. W., & Doran, M. (2009). Grad students think twice about jobs in academe. Chronicle of Higher Education, 55(20), A1–A10.
  • Korkman, Z. K. (2022). Transnational solidarity? Academia and the politics of knowledge, translation, and (im) mobility. Feminist Formations, 34(1), 166–190. https://doi.org/10.1353/ff.2022.0007
  • Langin, K. (2019, March 12). In a first, U.S. private sector employs nearly as many Ph.D.s as schools do. Science Magazine. https://www.science.org/content/article/first-us-private-sector-employs-nearly-many-phds-schools-do
  • Lawrence, R. G. (2023). Editor’s note. Political Communication, 40(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2022.2155758
  • Levine, F. J., Nasir, N. S., Rios-Aguilar, C., Gildersleeve, R. E., Rosich, K. J., Bang, M., Bell, N. E., & Holsapple, M. A. (2021). Voices from the field: The impact of COVID-19 on early career scholars and doctoral students [focus group study report]. American Educational Research Association; Spencer Foundation. https://doi.org/10.3102/aera20211
  • Luengo, M., & Ihlebæk, K. A. (2019). Journalism, solidarity and the civil sphere: The case of Charlie Hebdo. European Journal of Communication, 34(3), 286–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323119844411
  • Mathews, A. L., & Andersen, K. (2001). A gender gap in publishing? Women’s representation in edited political science books. PS: Political Science & Politics, 34(1), 143–147. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096501000221
  • Matias, J. N., & Mou, M. (2018, April). CivilServant: Community-led experiments in platform governance. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, April 21-26, 2018, Montréal, Canada (pp. 1–13).
  • Meyers, S. L., & Frankel, S. (2023, June 19). G.O.P. Targets researchers who study disinformation ahead of 2024 election. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/19/technology/gop-disinformation-researchers-2024-election.html
  • Murthy, D. (2020). From hashtag activism to inclusion and diversity in a discipline. Communication, Culture & Critique, 13(2), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcaa014
  • Museus, S. D. (2020). Humanizing scholarly resistance: Toward greater solidarity in social justice advocacy within the neoliberal academy. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 33(2), 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2019.1681544
  • Nettasinghe, B., Alipourfard, N., Krishnamurthy, V., & Lerman, K. (2021). Emergence of structural inequalities in scientific citation networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:210310944.
  • Ocholla, D. (2007). Marginalized knowledge: An agenda for indigenous knowledge develop-ment and integration with other forms of knowledge. The International Review of Information Ethics, 7, 236–245.
  • Overgaard, C. S. B., Masullo, G. M., Duchovnay, M., & Moore, C. (2022). Theorizing connective democracy: A new way to bridge political divides. Mass Communication and Society, 25(6), 861–885. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2022.2119870
  • Pyke, K. (2011). Service and gender inequity among faculty. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44(1), 85–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096510001927
  • Rodino-Colocino, M. (2016). Communication activism| critical-cultural communication activism research calls for ACADEMIC solidarity. International Journal of Communication, 10, 10.
  • Roskos, J., Gilich, Y., Kocik, D., Nassiri, H., & Vuković, V. (2023). Spotlight: Graduate student organization. JCMS: Journal of Cinema and Media Studies, 62(3), 4–7. https://doi.org/10.1353/cj.2023.0022
  • Rossini, P. (2023). Reassessing the role of inclusion in political communication research. Political Communication, 40(5), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2023.2220666
  • Schlosberg, D. (1995). Communicative action in practice: Intersubjectivity and new social movements. Political Studies, 43(2), 291–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1995.tb01713.x
  • Sil, R. (2000). The division of labor in social science research: Unified methodology or“organic solidarity”?. Polity, 32(4), 499–531. https://doi.org/10.2307/3235291
  • Smith, N. (2019, April 11). American employers are hung up on hiring Ph.D.s. Seattle Times. Retrieved from https://www.seattletimes.com/explore/careers/american-employers-are-hung-up-on-hiring-ph-d-s/
  • Smith, L. G., McGarty, C., & Thomas, E. F. (2018). After Aylan Kurdi: How tweeting about death, threat, and harm predict increased expressions of solidarity with refugees over time. Psychological Science, 29(4), 623–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617741107
  • Staunton, C., Barragán, C. A., Canali, S., Ho, C., Leonelli, S., Mayernik, M., Prainsack, B. and Wonkham, A. (2021). Open science, data sharing and solidarity: Who benefits?. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 43(4), 115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-021-00468-6
  • Stein, J. P., & Appel, M. (2021). How to deal with researcher harassment in the social sciences. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(2), 178–180. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01011-6
  • @THanitzsch. (2023, May 22). Growing publication pressure: Journal article output in communications by far outpaces growth of the discipline. Perhaps something worth talking about?. [Tweet]. https://twitter.com/THanitzsch/status/1660559789267509249
  • Thijssen, P. (2012). From mechanical to organic solidarity, and back: With Honneth beyond Durkheim. European Journal of Social Theory, 15(4), 454–470.
  • Thoits, P. A. (2011). Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 52(2), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146510395592
  • Tromble, R. (2021). NSF convergence accelerator track F: Building trust in communication systems by addressing misinformation-driven online abuse and harassment. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=2137448
  • Union of Concerned Scientists. (2015). Freedom to bully: How laws intended to free information are used to harass researchers. Retrieved from https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/freedom-bully#.VPA_eygwL1-
  • Varma, A. (2020). Evoking empathy or enacting solidarity with marginalized communities? A case study of journalistic humanizing techniques in the San Francisco Homeless Project. Journalism Studies, 21(12), 1705–1723
  • Waisbord, S. (2016). Translations| communication studies without frontiers? Translation and cosmopolitanism across academic cultures. International Journal of Communication, 10, 19.
  • Woolston, C. (2021). Scientists carry on through the pandemic. Nature, 592, 806.
  • Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The citation diversity statement: A practice of transparency, a way of life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.