Attacks and Issue Competition: Do Parties Attack Based on Issue Salience or Issue Ownership?

References

• Abou-Chadi, T., Green-Pedersen, C., & Mortensen, P. B. (2020). “Parties’ policy adjustments in response to changes in issue saliency. West European Politics, 43(4), 749–771. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1609296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansolabehere, S., & Iyengar, S. (1994). Riding the wave and claiming ownership over issues. Public Opinion Quarterly, 58(3), 335–357. https://doi.org/10.1086/269431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arndt, C. (2014). Beating social democracy on its own turf: Issue convergence as winning formula for the centre‐right in universal welfare states. Scandinavian Political Studies, 37(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan, S., Borghetto, E., & Seeberg, H. (2023). Do different parties respond to different problems? Journal of European Public Policy, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2193583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan, S., & John, P. (2016). Policy representation by party leaders and followers: What drives UK prime minister’s questions? Government and Opposition, 51(1), 59–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2015.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjarnøe, C., Adams, J., & Boydstun, A. (2023). Our issue positions are strong, and our opponents’ valence is weak. British Journal of Political Science, 53(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123421000715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borghetto, E., & Chaqués-Bonafont, L. (2019). Parliamentary questions. In F. Baumgartner, C. Breunig, & E. Grossman (Eds.), Comparative policy agendas (pp. 282–405). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198835332.003.0029
   Google Scholar
• Borghetto, E., & Russo, F. (2018). From agenda setters to agenda takers? The determinants of party issue attention in times of crisis. Party Politics, 24(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817740757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulton, A. J., & Williford, A. (2018). Analyzing skewed continuous outcomes with many zeros. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 9(4), 721–740. https://doi.org/10.1086/701235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budge, I., & Farlie, D. (1983). Party competition: Selective emphasis or direct confrontation? In H. Daalder & P. Mair (Eds.), West European party systems: Continuity and change (pp. 267–305). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Damore, D. F. (2002). Candidate strategy and the decision to go negative. Political Research Quarterly, 55(3), 669–685. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290205500309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidsson, J. B., & Marx, P. (2013). Losing the issue, losing the vote: Issue competition and the reform of unemployment insurance in Germany and Sweden. Political Studies, 61(3), 505–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00997.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vet, B., & Devroe, R. (2023). Party control, intraparty competition, and the substantive focus of women’s parliamentary questions: Evidence from Belgium. Politics & Gender, 19(1), 247–271. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X21000490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolezal, M., Ennser‐Jedenastik, L., Müller, W. C., & Winkler, A. K. (2014). How parties compete for votes: A test of saliency theory. European Journal of Political Research, 53(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolezal, M., Ennser-Jedenastik, L., & Müller, W. C. (2017). Who will attack the competitors? Party Politics, 23(6), 666–679. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068815619832
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Egan, P. J. (2013). Partisan priorities: How issue ownership drives and distorts American politics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107337138
   Google Scholar
• Elmelund-Præstekær, C. (2011). Issue ownership as a determinant of negative campaigning. International Political Science Review, 32(2), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512110382028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridkin, K. L., & Kenney, P. J. (2011). Variability in citizens’ reactions to different types of negative campaigns. American Journal of Political Science, 55(2), 307–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00494.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geer, J. G. (2006). In defense of negativity: Attack ads in presidential campaigns. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226285009.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Green‐Pedersen, C., & Mortensen, P. B. (2010). Who sets the agenda and who responds to it in the Danish parliament? European Journal of Political Research, 49(2), 257–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01897.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J., & Hobolt, S. B. (2008). Owning the issue agenda: Party strategies and vote choices in British elections. Electoral Studies, 27(3), 460–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2008.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossmann, M. (2013). The variable politics of the policy process: Issue-area differences and comparative networks. The Journal of Politics, 75(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381612000874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, K. M., & Pedersen, R. T. (2008). Negative campaigning in a multiparty system. Scandinavian Political Studies, 31(4), 408–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2008.00213.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haselmayer, M., Meyer, T. M., & Wagner, M. (2019). Fighting for attention: Media coverage of negative campaign messages. Party Politics, 25(3), 412–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817724174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, W., & John, P. (2009). The dynamics of political attention: Public opinion and the queen’s speech in the United Kingdom. American Journal of Political Science, 53(4), 838–854. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00404.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2005). The politics of attention: How government prioritizes problems. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kam, C. J. (2009). Party discipline and parliamentary politics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576614
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Little, Brown & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Klüver, H., & Sagarzazu, I. (2016). Setting the agenda or responding to voters? Political parties, voters and issue attention. West European Politics, 39(2), 380–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2015.1101295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klüver, H., & Spoon, J. J. (2016). Who responds? Voters, parties and issue attention. British Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 633–654. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123414000313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, R. R., & Pomper, G. M. (2002). Effectiveness of negative campaigning in U.S. Senate elections. American Journal of Political Science, 46(1), 47–66. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, R. R., Sigelman, L., & Rovner, I. B. (2007). The effects of negative political campaigns: A meta-analytic reassessment. The Journal of Politics, 69(4), 1176–1209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00618.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefevere, J., Seeberg, H. B., & Walgrave, S. (2020). Negatively affecting voters’ issue considerations. Political Communication, 37(6), 812–831. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1760407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, J., & Nai, A. (2021). Mapping the drivers of negative campaigning: Insights from a candidate survey. International Political Science Review, 44(2), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512121994512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, J., & Nai, A. (2022). When conflict fuels negativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 33(2), 101564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101564
   Google Scholar
• Martin, S., & Whitaker, R. (2019). Beyond committees. West European Politics, 42(7), 1464–1486. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1593595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombs, M. (2014). Setting the agenda: Mass media and public opinion (2nd ed.). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, T. M., Haselmayer, M., & Wagner, M. (2020). Who gets into the papers? Party campaign messages and the media. British Journal of Political Science, 50(1), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nai, A. (2013). What really matters is which camp goes dirty. European Journal of Political Research, 52(1), 44–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2012.02060.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nai, A., & Seeberg, H. B. (2018). A series of persuasive events. Journal of Marketing Communications, 24(4), 412–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2018.1428672
   Google Scholar
• Nai, A., Tresch, A., & Maier, J. (2022). Hardwired to attack. Candidates’ personality traits and negative campaigning in three European countries. Acta Politica, 57(4), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-021-00222-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nai, A., & Walter, A. (Eds). (2015). New perspectives on negative campaigning. ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Otjes, S., & Louwerse, T. (2018). Parliamentary questions as strategic party tools. West European Politics, 41(2), 496–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2017.1358936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peeters, J., Van Aelst, P., & Praet, S. (2021). Party ownership or individual specialization? Party Politics, 27(4), 692–703. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068819881639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrocik, J. R. (1996). Issue ownership and presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 825–850. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poljak, Ž. (2023a). Diverting issue attention in answers to parliamentary questions. Presented at 15th Annual Comparative Agendas Conference, Antwerp, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Poljak, Ž. (2023b). Negative interplay between cabinet and opposition agendas: Evidence from Croatia. Parliamentary Affairs, 76(3), 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsab067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poljak, Ž. (2023c). Parties’ attack behaviour in parliaments. European Journal of Political Research, 62(2), 903–923. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12542
   Google Scholar
• Poljak, Ž., & Mertens, T. (2022). QuestionTimeSpeech v.1, Harvard Dataverse, V1. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/0EPYVN
   Google Scholar
• Proksch, S. O., & Slapin, J. B. (2010). Position taking in European parliament speeches. British Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 587–611. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123409990299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proksch, S. O., & Slapin, J. B. (2012). Institutional foundations of legislative speech. American Journal of Political Science, 56(3), 520–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00565.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prosser, C. (2018). The strange death of multi-party Britain: The UK general election of 2017. West European Politics, 41(5), 1226–1236. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2018.1424838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roese, N. J., & Sande, G. N. (1993). Backlash effects in attack politics. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(8), 632–653. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01106.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagarzazu, I., & Klüver, H. (2017). Coalition governments and party competition. Political Science Research and Methods, 5(2), 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2015.56
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmond, R. (2014). Parliamentary question times: How legislative accountability mechanisms affect mass political engagement. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 20(3), 321–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2014.895121
   Google Scholar
• Seeberg, H. B. (2017). How Stable is Political Parties’ Issue Ownership? A cross-time, cross-National Analysis. Political studies, 65(2), 475–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321716650224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeberg, H. B. (2020a). The impact of opposition criticism on the Public’s evaluation of government competence. Party Politics, 26(4), 484–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeberg, H. B. (2020b). Issue ownership attack: How a political party can counteract a rival’s issue ownership. West European Politics, 43(4), 772–794. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1625242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeberg, H. B. (2022). First avoidance, then engagement: Political parties’ issue competition in the electoral cycle. Party Politics, 28(2), 284–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068820970353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeberg, H. B. (2023). The power of the loser. European Journal of Political Research, 62(2), 463–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeberg, H. B., & Nai, A. (2021). Undermining a rival party’s issue competence through negative campaigning. Political Studies, 69(3), 623–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321720916162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serban, R. (2023). The practice of accountability in questioning prime ministers: Comparative evidence from Australia, Canada, Ireland, and the United Kingdom. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 25(1), 42–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481211058584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevenans, J., Walgrave, S., & Vos, D. (2015). Political elites’ media responsiveness and their individual political goals: A study of national politicians in Belgium. Research & Politics, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015593307
   Google Scholar
• Slothuus, R. (2010). When can political parties lead public opinion? Evidence from a natural Experiment. Political Communication, 27(2), 158–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584601003709381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somer-Topcu, Z., & Weitzel, D. (2021). Negative campaigning and vote choice in Europe: How do different partisan groups react to campaign attacks? Comparative Political Studies, 55(13), 2283–2310. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140221074283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soontjens, K. (2021). The awareness paradox: (why) politicians overestimate citizens’ awareness of parliamentary questions and party initiatives. Representation, 57(1), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2020.1785538
   Google Scholar
• Soroka, S. N. (2002). Issue attributes and agenda‐setting by media, the public, and policymakers in Canada. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14(3), 264–285. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/14.3.264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, S. N. (2014). Negativity in democratic politics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107477971
   Google Scholar
• Spoon, J. J., & Klüver, H. (2014). Do parties respond? Electoral Studies, 35, 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2014.04.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strom, K. (1990). A behavioral theory of competitive political parties. American Journal of Political Science, 34(2), 565–598. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulkin, T. (2005). Issue politics in congress. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616013
   Google Scholar
• Van’t Riet, J., & Van Stekelenburg, A. (2022). The effects of political incivility on political trust and political participation. Human Communication Research, 48(2), 203–229. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqab022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vliegenthart, R., Walgrave, S., Baumgartner, F. R., Bevan, S., Breunig, C., BRouard, S., Bonafont, L. C., Grossman, E., Jennings, W., Mortensen, P. B., Palau, A. M., Sciarini, P., & Tresch, A. (2016). Do the media set the parliamentary agenda? A comparative study in seven countries. European Journal of Political Research, 55(2), 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, M., & Meyer, T. M. (2014). Which issues do parties emphasise? Salience strategies and party organisation in multiparty systems. West European Politics, 37(5), 1019–1045. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2014.911483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, S., & De Swert, K. (2007). Where does issue ownership come from? From the party or from the media? Harvard International Journal of Press/politics, 12(1), 37–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X06297572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, S., Tresch, A., & Lefevere, J. (2015). The conceptualisation and measurement of issue ownership. West European Politics, 38(4), 778–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2015.1039381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, A. S. (2014). Negative campaigning in Western Europe: Similar or different? Political Studies, 62, 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, A. S., & Vliegenthart, R. (2010). Negative campaigning across different communication channels: Different ball games? The International Journal of Press/politics, 15(4), 441–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161210374122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar