Negotiating News: How Cross-Cutting Romantic Partners Select, Consume, and Discuss News Together

References

• Alford, J. R., Hatemi, P. K., Hibbing, J. R., Martin, N. G., & Eaves, L. J. (2011). The politics of mate choice. The Journal of Politics, 73(2), 362–379. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381611000016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anspach, N. M. (2017). The new personal influence: How our Facebook friends influence the news we read. Political Communication, 34(4), 590–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1316329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arceneaux, K., & Johnson, M. (2013). Changing minds or changing channels?: Partisan news in an age of choice. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnidge, M., Gunther, A. C., Kim, J., Hong, Y., Perryman, M., Tay, S. K., & Knisely, S. (2020). Politically motivated selective exposure and perceived media bias. Communication Research, 47(1), 82–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650217713066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Pfetsch, B. (2018). Rethinking political communication in a time of disrupted public spheres. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, T. N., & Settle, J. E. (2022). What goes without saying. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cramer, K. J. (2004). Talking about politics: Informal groups and social identity in American life. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cramer, K. J. (2016). The politics of resentment: Rural consciousness in Wisconsin and the rise of Scott Walker. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N., Levendusky, M. S., & McLain, A. (2018). No need to watch: How the effects of partisan media can spread via interpersonal discussions. American Journal of Political Science, 62(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgerly, S., Thorson, K., Thorson, E., Vraga, E. K., & Bode, L. (2018). Do parents still model news consumption? Socializing news use among adolescents in a multi-device world. New Media & Society, 20(4), 1263–1281. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816688451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P., Jr., Morey, A. C., & Hutchens, M. J. (2011). Beyond deliberation: New directions for the study of informal political conversation from a communication perspective. Journal of Communication, 61(6), 1082–1103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01598.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, D., Ling, R., Huang, L., & Liew, D. (2019). News sharing as reciprocal exchanges in social cohesion maintenance. Information, Communication & Society, 22(8), 1128–1144. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2017.1406973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, S. K., & Mutz, D. C. (2011). The friendly media phenomenon: A cross-national analysis of cross-cutting exposure. Political Communication, 28(1), 42–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2010.544280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/decoding. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe, & P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, media, language (pp. 128–138). Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Haridakis, P., & Hanson, G. (2009). Social interaction and co-viewing with YouTube: Blending mass communication reception and social connection. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53(2), 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150902908270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersh, E., Ghitza, Y., & Murray, G. R. (2018). Mixed partisan households and electoral participation in the United States. PloS One, 13(10), e0203997. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmielowski, J. D., Staggs, S., Hutchens, M. J., & Beam, M. A. (2022). Talking politics: The relationship between supportive and opposing discussion with partisan media credibility and use. Communication Research, 49(2), 221–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220915041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, G. A., & Malhotra, N. (2016). Political homophily in social relationships: Evidence from online dating behavior. Journal of Politics, 79(1), 269‐283. https://doi.org/10.1086/687533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ihlebaek, K. A., & Holter, C. R. (2021). Hostile emotions: An exploratory study of far-right online commenters and their emotional connection to traditional and alternative news media. Journalism, 22(5), 1207–1222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920985726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., Konitzer, T., & Tedin, K. (2018). The home as a political fortress: Family agreement in an era of polarization. The Journal of Politics, 80(4), 1326–1338. https://doi.org/10.1086/698929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. (1955). Personal influence. Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Luker, K. (2008). Salsa dancing into the social sciences. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, L. (2018). Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A., & Moy, P. (1999). Community, communication, and participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation. Political Communication, 16(3), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messing, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2014). Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online. Communication Research, 41(8), 1042–1063. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212466406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey, A. C., Eveland, W. P., Jr., & Hutchens, M. J. (2012). The “who” matters: Types of interpersonal relationships and avoidance of political disagreement. Political Communication, 29(1), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2011.641070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. (2002). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 838–855. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathanson, A. I., & Eveland, W. P., Jr. (2019). Parental mediation during the US 2016 presidential election campaign: How parents criticized, restricted, and co-viewed news coverage. Communication Monographs, 86(2), 184–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2018.1527035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappu, S. (2018 August 13). He likes Trump. She doesn’t. Can this marriage be saved? The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/14/fashion/marriage-politics-donald-trump-hillary-clinton.html
   Google Scholar
• Peacock, C., & Pederson, J. R. (2022). Love and politics: The influence of politically (dis) similar romantic relationships on political participation and relationship satisfaction. Human Communication Research, 48(4), 567–578. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqac011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, C., Schrøder, K. C., Lehaff, J., & Vulpius, J. (2022). News as they know it: Young adults’ information repertoires in the digital media landscape. Digital Journalism, 10(1), 62–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1885986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D. (2007). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory, 17(3), 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00296.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, D. H., & Knobloch, L. K. (2004). A model of relational turbulence: The role of intimacy, relational uncertainty, and interference from partners in appraisals of irritations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21(6), 795–816. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407504047838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, H., Cho, J., & Benefield, G. A. (2020). The dynamics of message selection in online political discussion forums: Self-segregation or diverse exposure? Communication Research, 47(1), 125–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218790144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J. (2011). Niche news: The politics of news choice. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tal-Or, N. (2021). The effects of co-viewers on the viewing experience. Communication Theory, 31(3), 316–335. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtz012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorson, E., Hawthorne, J., Swasy, A., & McKinney, M. S. (2015). Co-viewing, tweeting, and facebooking the 2012 presidential debates. Electronic News, 9(3), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1931243115593320
   Google Scholar
• Toff, B., & Nielsen, R. K. (2022). How news feels: Anticipated anxiety as a factor in news avoidance and a barrier to political engagement. Political Communication, 39(6), 697–714. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2022.2123073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Duyn, E. (2021). Democracy lives in darkness: How and why people keep their politics a secret. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, M. C., & Boczkowski, P. J. (2021). Angry, frustrated, and overwhelmed: The emotional experience of consuming news about President Trump. Journalism, 22(7), 1577–1593. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919878545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, B. E., Lane, D. S., Kim, D. H., Lee, S. S., & Kwak, N. (2017). Incidental exposure, selective exposure, and political information sharing: Integrating online exposure patterns and expression on social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(6), 363–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar