Do Online Ads Sway Voters? Understanding the Persuasiveness of Online Political Ads

References

• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashley, S., Maksl, A., & Craft, S. (2017). News media literacy and political engagement: What’s the connection? Journal of Media Literacy Education, 9(1), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.23860/JMLE-2017-9-1-6
   Google Scholar
• Backlinko. (2021). Facebook mobile vs. desktop usage statistics. https://backlinko.com/facebook-users#facebook-mobile-vs-desktop-usage-statistics
   Google Scholar
• Baron, H. (1996). Strengths and limitations of ipsative measurement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69(1), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1996.tb00599.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartle, J., & Bellucci, P. (2014). Political parties and partisanship: Social identity and individual attitudes (Vol. 57). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bartsch, M., & Dienlin, T. (2016). Control your Facebook: An analysis of online privacy literacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berridge, G. R. (2015). Diplomacy: Theory and practice (Third Edition ed.). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Boerman, S. C., Kruikemeier, S., & Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. J. (2017). Online behavioral advertising: A literature review and research agenda. Journal of Advertising, 46(3), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2017.1339368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, S., & Howard, P. N. (2019). The global disinformation order: 2019 global inventory of organised social media manipulation. Project on Computational Propaganda.
   Google Scholar
• Burge, C. D., Wamble, J. J., & Laird, C. N. (2020). Missing the mark? An exploration of targeted campaign advertising’s effect on black political engagement. Politics, Groups & Identities, 8(2), 423–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2020.1757807
   Google Scholar
• Cano-Orón, L., Calvo, D., López García, G., & Baviera, T. (2021). Disinformation in Facebook ads in the 2019 Spanish general election campaigns. Media and Communication, 9(1), 217–228. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carpini, M. X. D., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coppock, A., Green, D. P., & Porter, E. (2022). Does digital advertising affect vote choice? Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Research & Politics, 9(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/20531680221076901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craft, S., Ashley, S., & Maksl, A. (2017). News media literacy and conspiracy theory endorsement. Communication and the Public, 2(4), 388–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047317725539
   Google Scholar
• Dermont, C., & Stadelmann-Steffen, I. (2018). Who decides? Characteristics of a vote and its influence on the electorate. Representation, 54(4), 391–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2018.1550109
   Google Scholar
• Dobber, T., Fathaigh, Ó., & Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. J. (2019). The regulation of online political micro-targeting in Europe. Internet Policy Review, 8(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobber, T., Trilling, D., Helberger, N., & de Vreese, C. H. (2017). Two crates of beer and 40 pizzas: the adoption of innovative political behavioural targeting techniques. Internet Policy Review, 6(4), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.14763/2017.4.777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dommett, K. (2019, December). Data-driven political campaigns in practice: understanding and regulating diverse data-driven campaigns. Internet Policy Review, 8(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endres, K. (2020, March). Targeted issue messages and voting behavior. American Politics Research, 48(2), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X19875694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facebook users in Netherlands 2021. (2021, March). https://napoleoncat.com/stats/facebook-users-in-netherlands
   Google Scholar
• Farha, G. N., & Hamdar, B. C. (2008). The impact of perceived political advertising: The 2005 Lebanese parliamentary election. American Communication Journal, 10(3), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, E. F., Franz, M. M., Martin, G. J., Peskowitz, Z., & Ridout, T. N. (2021). Political advertising online and offline. American Political Science Review, 115(1), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, E. F., Franz, M. M., & Ridout, T. N. (2020). Online political advertising in the United States, In N. Persily, & J. Tucker (Eds.), Social media and democracy: The state of the field, prospects for reform (pp. 111–138). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fowles, J. (1992). Why viewers watch: A reappraisal of television’s effects. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Franz, M. M., Freedman, P., Goldstein, K., & Ridout, T. N. (2008). Understanding the effect of political advertising on voter turnout: A response to krasno and green. The Journal of Politics, 70(1), 262–268. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381607080188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galasso, V., Nannicini, T., & Nunnari, S. (2021). Positive spillovers from negative campaigning. American Journal of Political Science, 67(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galston, W. A. (2001). Political knowledge, political engagement, and civic education. Annual Review of Political Science, 4(1), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, R. K., & McAllister, I. (2015). Normalising or equalising party competition? Assessing the impact of the web on election campaigning. Political Studies, 63(3), 529–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haenschen, K. (2022). The conditional effects of microtargeted Facebook advertisements on voter turnout. Political Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-022-09781-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haenschen, K., & Jennings, J. (2019). Mobilizing millennial voters with targeted internet advertisements: A field experiment. Political Communication, 36(3), 357–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1548530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersh, E. D., & Schaffner, B. F. (2013). Targeted campaign appeals and the value of ambiguity. The Journal of Politics, 75(2), 520–534. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381613000182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopmann, D. N., Vliegenthart, R., De Vreese, C., & Albæk, E. (2010). Effects of election news coverage: How visibility and tone influence party choice. Political Communication, 27(4), 389–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2010.516798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IDEA, I. (2021). First national code of conduct on online political advertising in the European Union signed by Dutch political parties and global online platforms. https://www.idea.int/news-media/news/first-national-code-conduct-online-political-advertising-european-union-signed-dutch
   Google Scholar
• Jain, S., & Wood, A. K. (2020). Facebook political ads and accountability: Outside groups are most negative, especially when disappearing or hiding donors. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.01730
   Google Scholar
• Kefford, G., Dommett, K., Baldwin-Philippi, J., Bannerman, S., Dobber, T., Kruschinski, S., Kruikemeier, S., & Rzepecki, E. (2022). Data-driven campaigning and democratic disruption: Evidence from six advanced democracies. Party Politics, 29(3), 448–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688221084039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall, C., Nannicini, T., & Trebbi, F. (2015). How do voters respond to information? Evidence from a randomized campaign. The American Economic Review, 105(1), 322–353. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20131063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konitzer, T., Rothschild, D., Hill, S., & Wilbur, K. C. (2019). Using big data and algorithms to determine the effect of geographically targeted advertising on vote intention: Evidence from the 2012 U.S. Presidential election. Political Communication, 36(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1467985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krasno, J. S., & Green, D. P. (2008). Do televised presidential ads increase voter turnout? Evidence from a natural experiment. The Journal of Politics, 70(1), 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381607080176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krotzek, L. J. (2019). Inside the voter’s mind: The effect of psychometric microtargeting on feelings toward and propensity to vote for a candidate. International Journal of Communication, 13, 3609–3629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavigne, M. (2020). Strengthening ties: The influence of microtargeting on partisan attitudes and the vote. Party Politics, 27(5), 965–976. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068820918387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecheler, S., & de Vreese, C. H. (2012). News framing and public opinion: A mediation analysis of framing effects on political attitudes. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(2), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699011430064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, G., de Barreda, I. M., & Razin, R. (2021). Polarized extremes and the confused centre: Campaign targeting of voters with correlation neglect. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 16(2), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00019125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y.-I. (2019). Online and offline communication and political knowledge and participation in presidential campaigns: Effects of geographical context. International Journal of Communication, 24, 1438–1461.
   Google Scholar
• Llaudet, E. (2018). The mobilizing and demobilizing effects of political TV ads: A midterm election study. Electoral Studies, 54, 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2018.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis, M., Resnick, D., & Levy, J. (2003). Major parties dominate, minor parties struggle: US elections and the internet. In R. Gibson, P. Nixon & S. Ward (Eds.), Political parties and the internet (pp. 67–72). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Paparo, A., & Sio, L. D. (2017). PTV gap as a new measure of partisanship: A panel-data, multi-measure validation showing surprising partisanship stability. Contemporary Italian Politics, 9(1), 60–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/23248823.2017.1289733
   Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., Holbert, R. L., Szabo, E. A., & Kaminski, K. (2002). Issue-advocacy versus candidate advertising: Effects on candidate preferences and democratic process. Journal of Communication, 52(2), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02546.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, J. M., Reynolds, T. J., Reynolds, K., & Harris, P. (2010). Decision-based voter segmentation: An application for campaign message development. European Journal of Marketing, 44(3/4), 310–330. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561011020444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, W. J. (2010). The state of media literacy. Journal of Broadcasting &electronic Media, 54(4), 675–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2011.521462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridout, T. N., Fowler, E. F., & Franz, M. M. (2021). The influence of goals and timing: How campaigns deploy ads on Facebook. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 18(3), 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2021.1874585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russmann, U. (2020). Voter targeting online in comparative perspectives: Political party websites in the 2008/2009 and 2013 Austrian and German election campaigns. Journal of Political Marketing, 19(3), 177–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2016.1179241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sances, M. W. (2019). Missing the target? Using surveys to validate social media ad targeting. Political Science Research and Methods, 9(1), 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2018.68
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savoy, J., & Wehren, M. (2021). Trump’s and Biden’s styles during the 2020 US presidential election. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 37(1), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqab046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, H., Hobolt, S. B., Popa, S. A., & Teperoglou, E. (2015). European parliament election study 2014, voter study. Newcastle University.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, F., Dardis, F. E., & Edwards, H. H. (2011). Advertising exposure and message type: Exploring the perceived effects of soft-money television political ads. Journal of Political Marketing, 10(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2011.588097
   Google Scholar
• Small, T. A., & Giasson, T. (2020). Political parties: Political campaigning in the digital age. In T.A. Small & H.J. Jansen (Eds.), Digital politics in Canada: Promises and realities (pp. 136–158). University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Statista. (2020). Share of households with internet access in the Netherlands from 2007 to 2020. https://www.statista.com/statistics/377747/household-internet-access-in-the-netherlands/
   Google Scholar
• Thorson, K., Cotter, K., Medeiros, M., & Pak, C. (2019). Algorithmic inference, political interest, and exposure to news and politics on Facebook. Information, Communication & Society, 24(2), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1642934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trepte, S., Teutsch, D., Masur, P. K., Eicher, C., Fischer, M., Hennhöfer, A., & Lind, F. (2015). Do people know about privacy and data protection strategies? Towards the “online privacy literacy scale” (OPLIS). In S. Gutwirth, R. Leenes, & P. de Hert (Eds.), Reforming European data protection law (Vol. 20, pp. 333–365). Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2013). The differential susceptibility to media effects model. Journal of Communication, 63(2), 221–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Eijk, C., & Franklin, M. (1996). Choosing Europe? The European electorate and national politics in the face of union. The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Eijk, C., & Marsh, M. (2007). Don’t expect me to vote for you just because Ilike you, even if you do make me feel warm inside: A comparison of the validity of non-ipsative measures of party support. Presented at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, 29 August–1 September 2007. Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Eijk, C., & Niemoller, B. (1983). Electoral change in the Netherlands: Empirical results and methods of measurement. CT-press.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Eijk, C., & Niemoller, B. (1984). Het potentiele electoraat van de nederlandse politieke partijen. Beleid En Maatschappij, 11(7–8), 192–204.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Meer, T. G., & Hameleers, M. (2020). Fighting biased news diets: Using news media literacy interventions to stimulate online cross-cutting media exposure patterns. New Media & Society, 23(11), 3156–3178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820946455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Erkel, P. F. A., & Van Aelst, P. (2021). Why don’t we learn from social media? Studying effects of and mechanisms behind social media news use on general surveillance political knowledge. Political Communication, 38(4), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1784328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Schuur, W. H. (2003). Mokken scale analysis: Between the guttman scale and parametric item response theory. Political Analysis, 11(2), 139–163. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpg002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Spanje, J., & Azrout, R. (2020). Killing them softly? Two complementary studies on visibility and framing of new parties in the news. Journalism, 23(1), 278–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920919311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergeer, M. (2015). Twitter and political campaigning. Sociology Compass, 16(9), 745–760. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12294
   Google Scholar
• Vliegenthart, R., & Kruikemeier, S. (2017). Political advertising in the Netherlands:(Still) little ado about (almost) nothing. In Routledge handbook of political advertising. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Votta, F. (2021). Dutch election observatory dashboard. https://favstats.github.io/DutchElectionObservatory/nl/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Vraga, E. K., & Tully, M. (2021). News literacy, social media behaviors, and skepticism toward information on social media. Information, Communication & Society, 24(2), 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1637445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittenborg, J. (2018). Netherlands leads Europe in internet access. https://www.wittenborg.eu/netherlands-leads-europe-internet-access.htm
   Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social, 9(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Zarouali, B., Dobber, T., De Pauw, G., & de Vreese, C. (2020). Using a personality-profiling algorithm to investigate political microtargeting: Assessing the Persuasion effects of personality-tailored ads on social media. Communication Research, 49(8), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220961965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. J., Möller, J., Kruikemeier, S., Fathaigh, Ó., Irion, R., Dobber, K., Bodo, T., & De Vreese, B. (2018). Online political microtargeting: Promises and threats for democracy. Utrecht Law Review, 14(1), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar