Eisenstein Congruences for SO(4, 3), SO(4, 4), Spinor, and Triple Product L-values

References

• [Arthur 13] J. Arthur. The Endoscopic Classification of Representations. Orthogonal and Symplectic Groups. American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications 61. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, 2013. xviii+590 pp.
   Google Scholar
• [Bergström and Dummigan 15] J. Bergström and N. Dummigan. “Eisenstein Congruences for Split Reductive Groups.” Selecta Math. 2015. DOI 10.1007/s00029-015-0211-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Bergström et al. 14] J. Bergström, C. Faber, and G. van der Geer. “Siegel Modular Forms of Degree Three and the Cohomology of Local Systems.” Selecta Math. 20: N.S. (2014), 83–124.
   Google Scholar
• [Bloch and Kato 90] S. Bloch and K. Kato. L-Functions and Tamagawa Numbers of Motives, The Grothendieck Festschrift. Vol. I, pp. 333–400. Progress in Mathematics 86. Boston: Birkhäuser, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• [Böcherer and Schulze-Pillot 96] S. Böcherer and R. Schulze-Pillot. On the Central Critical Value of the Triple Product L-Function, Number Theory, pp. 1–46. London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 235. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• [Brown 07] J. Brown. “Saito-Kurokawa Lifts and Applications to the Bloch-Kato Conjecture.” Compos. Math. 143 (2007), 290–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Calegari and Gee 13] F. Calegari and T. Gee. “Irreducibility of Automorphic Galois Representations of GL(n), n at most 5.” Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 63 (2013), 1881–1912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Chenevier and Lannes 15] G. Chenevier and J. Lannes. “Formes automorphes et voisins de Kneser des réseaux de Niemeier.” Preprint, http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.7616v2, June 2015.
   Google Scholar
• [Chenevier and Renard 15] G. Chenevier and D. Renard. “Level One Algebraic Cusp Forms of Classical Groups of Small Ranks.” Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 237: 1121 (2015), 128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Chenevier and Renard] G. Chenevier and D. Renard. “Level One Algebraic Cusp Forms of Classical Groups.” Available online (http://gaetan.chenevier.perso.math.cnrs.fr/levelone.html).
   Google Scholar
• [Deligne 79] P. Deligne. “Valeurs de Fonctions L et Périodes d’Intégrales.” AMS Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 33: part 2 (1979), 313–346.
   Google Scholar
• [Diamond et al. 04] F. Diamond, M. Flach, and L. Guo. “The Tamagawa Number Conjecture of Adjoint Motives of Modular Forms.” Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. 37: 4 (2004), 663–727.
   Google Scholar
• [Dokchitser 04] T. Dokchitser. “Computing Special Values of Motivic L-Functions.” Experiment. Math. 13 (2004), 137–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Dummigan 14] N. Dummigan. Eisenstein Congruences for Unitary Groups. Preprint, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• [Dummigan 13] N. Dummigan. “A Simple Trace Formula for Algebraic Modular Forms.” Exp. Math. 22: 2 (2013), 123–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Dummigan and Fretwell 14] N. Dummigan and D. Fretwell. “Ramanujan-style Congruences of Local Origin.” J. Number Theory 143 (2014), 248–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Dummigan and Heim 10] N. Dummigan and B. Heim. “Triple Product L-values and Dihedral Congruences for Cusp Forms.” Int. Math. Res. Notices (2010), 1792–1815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Faber and van der Geer 04] C. Faber and G. van der Geer. “Sur la cohomologie des systèmes locaux sur les espaces de modules des courbes de genre 2 et des surfaces abéliennes, I, II.” C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 338: 381–384 (2004), 467–470.
   Google Scholar
• [Flach 90] M. Flach. “A Generalisation of the Cassels-Tate Pairing.” J. Reine Angew. Math. 412 (1990), 113–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [van der Geer 08] G. van der Geer. “Siegel Modular Forms and Their Applications.” In The 1-2-3 of Modular Forms, edited by K. Ranestad, pp. 181–245. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• [Ghitza et al. 06] A. Ghitza. N. C. Ryan, D. Sulon. “Computations of vector-valued Siegel modular forms.” J. Number Theory 113 (2013), 3921–3940.
   Google Scholar
• [Gross 98] B. H. Gross. “On the Satake Transform.” In Galois Representations in Arithmetic Algebraic Geometry, edited by A. J. Scholl and R. L. Taylor, pp. 223–237. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series 254, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• [Harder 08] G. Harder. “A Congruence between a Siegel and an Elliptic Modular Form.” Manuscript, 2003, Reproduced In The 1-2-3 of Modular Forms, edited by K. Ranestad, pp. 247–262. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• [Harder 13] G. Harder. “Secondary Operations in the Cohomology of Harish-Chandra Modules.” Available online (http://www.math.uni-bonn.de/people/harder/Manuscripts/Eisenstein/SecOPs.pdf), 2013.
   Google Scholar
• [Haruki 97] A. Haruki. “Explicit Formulae of Siegel Eisenstein Series.” Manuscripta Math. 92: 1 (1997), 107–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Ibukiyama 14] T. Ibukiyama. “Conjectures of Shimura type and of Harder Type Revisited.” Comment. Math. Univ. St. Pauli. 63 (2014), 79–103.
   Google Scholar
• [Ibukiyama et al. 14] T. Ibukiyama, H. Katsurada, C. Poor, and D. Yuen. “Congruences to Ikeda-Miyawaki Lifts and Triple L-values of Elliptic Modular Forms.” J. Number Theory 134 (2014), 142–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Ibukiyama and Zagier 97] T. Ibukiyama and D. Zagier. Higher Spherical Polynomials, MPI. Preprint Series 2014-41.
   Google Scholar
• [Katsurada 97] H. Katsurada. “An Explicit Formula for the Fourier Coefficients of Siegel-Eisenstein Series of Degree 3.” Nagoya Math. J. 146 (1997), 199–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Mégarbané 16] T. Mégarbané. “Traces des opérators de Hecke sur les espaces de formes automorphes de SO7, SO8 ou SO9 en niveau 1 et poids arbitraire.” Preprint, http://arxiv.org/abs/1604.01914v1, April 2016.
   Google Scholar
• [Mégarbané 16a] T. Mégarbané. “Calcul des opérateurs de Hecke sur les classes d'isomorphisme de réseaux pairs de déterminant 2 en dimension 23 et 25.” Preprint http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.03613, July 2016.
   Google Scholar
• [Mégarbané] T. Mégarbané. “Calcul des traces d’opérators de Hecke sur les espaces de formes automorphes.” Available online (http://megarban.perso.math.cnrs.fr/).
   Google Scholar
• [Mizumoto 00] S. Mizumoto. “Special Values of Triple Product L-functions and Nearly Holomorphic Eisenstein Series.” Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg 70 (2000), 191–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Petersen 15] D. Petersen. “Cohomology of Local Systems on the Moduli of Principally Polarized Abelian Surfaces.” Pacific J. Math. 275 (2015), 39–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Ribet 76] K. Ribet. “A Modular Construction of Unramified p-Extensions of .” Invent. Math. 34 (1976), 151–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Satoh 87] T. Satoh. “Some Remarks on Triple L-functions.” Math. Ann. 276: 4 (1987), 687–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Shimura 83] G. Shimura. “On Eisenstein Series.” Duke Math. J. 50 (1983), 417–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Shin 11] S. W. Shin. “Galois Representations Arising from Some Compact Shimura Varieties.” Ann. Math. 173: 2 (2011), 1645–1741.
   Google Scholar
• [Taïbi 15] O. Taïbi. “Arthur’s Multiplicity Formula for Certain Inner Forms of Symplectic and Special Orthogonal Groups.” Preprint, http://arxiv.org/abs/1510.08395, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• [Wallach 80] N. Wallach. “On the Constant Term of a Square Integrable Automorphic Form.” In Operator Algebras and Group Representations, 227–237. Vol. II (Neptun, 1980), Monographs Studies in Mathematics. Vol. 18. Boston, MA: Pitman, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• [Weissauer 05] R. Weissauer. “Four Dimensional Galois Representations.” Astérisque 302 (2005), 67–150.
   Google Scholar
• [Weissauer 09] R. Weissauer. “The Trace of Hecke Operators on the Space of Classical Holomorphic Siegel Modular Forms of Genus Two.” Preprint, http://arxiv.org/abs/0909.1744, 2009.
   Google Scholar