Automorphic Forms on Feit’s Hermitian Lattices

References

• [Abdukhalikov 04] K. Abdukhalikov. “Unimodular Hermitian Lattices in Dimension 13.” J. Algebra 272:1 (2004), 186–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Abdukhalikov and Scharlau 09] K. Abdukhalikov and R. Scharlau. “Unimodular Lattices in Dimensions 14 and 15 Over the Eisenstein Integers.” Math. Comput. 78:265 (2009), 387–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Arthur 13] J. Arthur. The Endoscopic Classification of Representations: Orthogonal and Symplectic Groups, American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, Vol. 61. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• [Bachoc and Nebe 97] C. Bachoc and G. Nebe. “Classification of Two Genera of 32-Dimensional Lattices of Rank 8 over the Hurwitz Order.” Exp. Math. 6:2 (1997), 151–162.
   Google Scholar
• [Bergström and Dummigan 16] J. Bergström and N. Dummigan. “Eisenstein Congruences for Split Reductive Groups.” Sel. Math. New. Ser. 22:3 (2016), 1073–1115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Billerey and Menares 16] N. Billerey and R. Menares. “On the modularity of reducible mod l Galois representations.” Math. Res. Lett. 23:1 (2016), 15–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Bosma et al. 97] W. Bosma, J. Cannon, and C. Playoust. “The Magma Algebra System. I. The User Language.” J. Symb. Comput. 24:3–4 (1997), 235–265. Computational algebra and number theory (London, 1993).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Cartier 79] P. Cartier. “Representations of p-Adic Groups: A Survey.” In Automorphic Forms, Representations and L-Functions (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, Ore., 1977), Part 1, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., XXXIII, pp. 111–155. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• [Chenevier and Lannes 14] G. Chenevier and J. Lannes. “Formes automorphes et voisins de Kneser des réseaux de Niemeier.” Preprint, arXiv:1409.7616, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• [Cohen et al. 98] A. M. Cohen, G. Nebe, and W. Plesken. “Maximal Integral Forms of the Algebraic Group G2 Defined by Finite Subgroups.” J. Number Theory 72:2 (1998), 282–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Cohen and Resnikoff 78] D. M. Cohen and H. L. Resnikoff. “Hermitian Quadratic Forms and Hermitian Modular Forms.” Pac. J. Math. 76:2 (1978), 329–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Diamond 91] F. Diamond. “Congruence Primes for Cusp Forms of Weight k≥2.” Astérisque 196–197:6 (1991), 205–213. Courbes modulaires et courbes de Shimura (Orsay, 1987/1988).
   Google Scholar
• [Dummigan 07] N. Dummigan. “Eisenstein Primes, Critical Values and Global Torsion.” Pac. J. Math. 233:2 (2007), 291–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Dummigan 13] N. Dummigan. “A Simple Trace Formula for Algebraic Modular Forms.” Exp. Math. 22:2 (2013), 123–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Dummigan 15] N. Dummigan. “Eisenstein Congruences for Unitary Groups.” Preprint, http://neil-dummigan.staff.shef.ac.uk/unitarycong5.pdf, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• [Dummigan and Fretwell 14] N. Dummigan and D. Fretwell. “Ramanujan-Style Congruences of Local Origin.” J. Number Theory 143 (2014), 248–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Feit 78] W. Feit. “Some Lattices over Q(−3).” J. Algebra 52:1 (1978), 248–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Gaba and Popa 18] R. Gaba and A. A. Popa. “A Generalization of Ramanujan’s Congruence to Modular Forms of Prime Level.” J. Number Theory 193 (2018), 48–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Greenberg and Voight 14] M. Greenberg and J. Voight. “Lattice Methods for Algebraic Modular Forms on Classical Groups.” In Computations with Modular Forms, pp.147–179. Cham: Springer, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• [Gross 98] B. H. Gross. “On the Satake Isomorphism.” In Galois Representations in Arithmetic Algebraic Geometry (Durham, 1996), London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., 254, pp. 223–237 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• [Gross 99] B. H. Gross. “Algebraic Modular Forms.” Isr. J. Math. 113:1 (1999), 61–93.
   Google Scholar
• [Harder 08] G. Harder. “A Congruence Between a Siegel and an Elliptic Modular Form.” In The 1-2-3 of Modular Forms, Universitext, pp. 247–262. Berlin: Springer, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• [Harder 13] G. Harder. “Secondary Operations in the Cohomology of Harish-Chandra Modules.” Preprint, http://www.math.uni-bonn.de/people/harder/Manuscripts/Eisenstein/SecOPs.pdf, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• [Hentschel et al. 10] M. Hentschel, A. Krieg, and G. Nebe. “On the Classification of Lattices over Q(−3), Which Are Even Unimodular Z-Lattices.” Abh. Math. Semin. Univ. Hambg. 80:2 (2010), 183–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Hentschel and Nebe 09] M. Hentschel and G. Nebe. “Hermitian Modular Forms Congruent to 1 Modulo p.” Arch. Math. 92:3 (2009), 251–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Hida 00] H. Hida. Geometric Modular Forms and Elliptic Curves. River Edge, NJ: World Scientific Publishing Co., Inc., 2000.
   Google Scholar
• [Hoffmann 91] D. W. Hoffmann. “On Positive Definite Hermitian Forms.” Manuscr. Math. 71:1 (1991), 399–429.
   Google Scholar
• [Ikeda 06] T. Ikeda. “Pullback of the Lifting of Elliptic Cusp Forms and Miyawaki’s Conjecture.” Duke Math. J. 131:3 (2006), 469–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Ikeda 08] T. Ikeda. “On the Lifting of Hermitian Modular Forms.” Compos. Math. 144:5 (2008), 1107–1154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Iyanaga 69] K. Iyanaga. “Class Numbers of Definite Hermitian Forms.” J. Math. Soc. Jpn. 21:3 (1969), 359–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Kaletha et al. 14] T. Kaletha, A. Minguez, S. W. Shin, and P.-J. White. “Endoscopic Classification of Representations: Inner Forms of Unitary Groups.” Preprint, arXiv:1409.3731, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• [Klosin 09] K. Klosin. “Congruences Among Modular Forms on U(2,2) and the Bloch-Kato Conjecture.” Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 59:1 (2009), 81–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Kneser 57] M. Kneser. “Klassenzahlen definiter quadratischer Formen.” Arch. Math. 8:4 (1957), 241–250.
   Google Scholar
• [Mégarbané 18] T. Mégarbané. “Calcul des opérateurs de Hecke sur les classes d’isomorphisme de réseaux pairs de déterminant 2 en dimension 23 et 25.” J. Number Theory 186 (2018), 370–416.
   Google Scholar
• [Mok 15] C. P. Mok. “Endoscopic Classification of Representations of Quasi-Split Unitary Groups.” Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 235:1108 (2015), vi + 248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Nebe and Venkov 01] G. Nebe and B. Venkov. “On Siegel Modular Forms of Weight 12.” J. Reine Angew. Math. 531 (2001), 49–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Plesken and Souvignier 97] W. Plesken and B. Souvignier. “Computing Isometries of Lattices.” J Symb. Comput. 24:3–4 (1997), 327–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Ribet 84] K. A. Ribet. “Congruence Relations Between Modular Forms.” In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Vol. 1, 2 (Warsaw, 1983), pp. 503–514. Warsaw: PWN, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• [Scharlau et al. 99] R. Scharlau, A. Schiemann, and R. Schulze-Pillot. “Theta Series of Modular, Extremal, and Hermitian Lattices.” In Integral Quadratic Forms and Lattices (Seoul, 1998), Contemp. Math., vol. 249, pp. 221–233. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• [Schiemann 98] A. Schiemann. “Classification of Hermitian Forms with the Neighbour Method.” J. Symb. Comput. 26:4 (1998), 487–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Schönnenbeck 18] S. Schönnenbeck. “Simultaneous Computation of Hecke Operators.” J. Algebra 501:1 (2018), 571–597.
   Google Scholar
• [Tamagawa 63] T. Tamagawa. “On the ζ-Functions of a Division Algebra.” Ann. Math. (2). 77:2 (1963), 387–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar